Bloody Vendetta in Mantle

FSB believes that mafia showdowns in the judiciary



Rucriminal.info became aware of the simply fantastic development of the story with the investigation against the judge of the Arbitration Court of Moscow (ASGM) Elena Kondrat and her son Nikolai Kondrat (his father is ex-Deputy Prosecutor General Ivan Kondrat). Elena Kondrat herself is suspected of bribing her former assistant, and now the LRA judge Elena Makhlkina. Nikolay, in turn, is in custody on charges that he "ordered" the murder of his driver Kirill Igitkhanyan.



Sources said that the investigation and the operatives are not going to stop only on this accusation. Currently, the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Ministry of Defense of the Moscow region has received materials on another potential episode that may be incriminated to Nikolai. Allegedly, he was preparing for the attempted murder of Judge Makhalkina, who turned out to be an agent of the FSB of the Russian Federation and was a participant in an operational experiment in relation to his mother Elena Kondrat. According to the FSB, it turns out that morals in the spirit of the Sicilian mafia reign in the judiciary, only that "Colombian ties" and "cement shoes" Themis' servants do not do each other, and that is not a fact.

According to the interlocutor of Rucriminal.info, in order for Nikolai Kondrat himself to become compliant and begin to admit guilt, the investigation prepared a "surprise" for him. Unexpectedly, a meeting with a woman much older than the 20-year-old student of Moscow State University Nicolas was allowed, with whom he had only met for 1.5 months and did not feel any special feelings. And this despite the fact that for 8 months the investigation has denied the young man a meeting with his parents. Suspecting something was wrong, Nikolai refused the "surprise".

Recall, according to the data of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Moscow Region, on October 2, 2020, Nikolai Kondrat's Toyota Camry car was stopped by traffic police officers on Kutuzovsky Prospekt. His driver Kirill Igitkhanyan was driving. He showed the police an investigator's identity card and a special “non-check” coupon, allowing the holder of such a document to avoid checks on the roads.

The identity card and the coupon raised doubts among the police about the authenticity, on this basis Kirill Igitkhanyan was detained and taken to the Dorogomilovskiy OVD.

Nikolay Kondrat was disturbed by the detention of the driver with a "fake" certificate. To prevent the driver from telling his parents about this, the guy decided to get rid of him, says a source of Izvestia in law enforcement agencies. He instructed the iconic Nikita Matsnev to carry out his plans, promising a "generous" fee - 80 thousand rubles.

According to the investigation, Nikolai Kondrat passed a hunting knife to Nikita Matsnev through a taxi driver and wrote a message to Kirill, making an appointment in a remote place - in a ravine in the Lukhovitsky district of the Moscow region - supposedly to discuss what had happened. Nikita Matsnev attracted his friend Gennady Voskresensky to the case. Together, they met the unsuspecting driver at the designated location the day after the arrest incident, October 3. During the meeting, a fight broke out, the man received several knife wounds, from which he died.

On December 21, 2020, Nikolai Kondrat was arrested on suspicion of organizing the murder of Kirill Igitkhanyan.

Sources of Rucriminal.info, close to the Kondrat family, note that the evidence base on Nikolai is based on the testimony of N.A. Matsnev, who entered into a pre-trial agreement with the investigation on February 17, 2021. According to the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, when concluding a pre-trial agreement, a case against a person who has entered into such an agreement is separated into a separate proceeding and considered in a simplified manner with a verdict. Those. when considering a case in which Matsnev N.A. concluded a pre-trial agreement with the investigation, the court will not consider and delve into the details of the crime committed by NA Matsnev.

At the same time, this verdict will be of a prejudicial nature for the persons against whom Matsnev N.A. gave evidence - Kondrat N.I. and Voskresensky G.D.

During the interrogation of Voskresensky G.D. he explained that Matsnev N.A. forced him to hide the body of Igitkhanyan K.A. threatening, if you do not help, you will be 14 (corpse). Voskresensky G.D. and Matsnev N.A. for a long time they were in the same auto club, participated in night races, there are rumors in the auto club that Matsnev N.A. there are other corpses. Knowing the explosive nature of Matsnev N.A. and information about previously committed murders by Matsnev N.A., Voskresensky G.D. got scared of him and helped to hide the corpse.

“There is information that operational officers have information about the commission of Matsnev N.A. over the course of several years, a number of murders on the territory of Russia. According to the lawyer who represented the interests of one of the suspects, one of the witnesses to the murders previously committed by N.A. Matsnev. is currently hiding on the territory of Ukraine, her name and surname, according to the lawyer, is known to the operatives, - the interlocutor of Rucriminal.info expressed the opinion, - But, fulfilling someone's order, they force Matsnev N.A. to testify against Kondrat N.AND. and blackmail Matsnev N.A. the fact that if he does not stipulate

NI Kondrat, they will send him for the murders he had committed earlier, as well as car theft, etc. ”.

According to the source, after the conclusion of the deal with the investigation (February 17, 2021), Matsnev N.A. already in March 2021, he personally wrote a statement to the investigator and to the Internal Security Directorate of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Ministry of Defense about his (Matsneva N.A.) beating and torture. In the statement, he described in detail how he was beaten, an electric current was passed through him and asked to be checked upon his appeal. But the investigator not only did not conduct a check, but did not even attach the statements of N.A. Matsnev. in the investigation. Probably having “forgotten” about these statements in any verification materials, which he concealed from the prosecutor and intends to conceal from the court.

“And the“ curators ”of the investigator Babushkin A.The. for his such compliance, he was promoted to the post - transferred from the Investigation Department in Kolomna immediately to the Central Asia TFR of Russia, though to the personnel department, "- said the interlocutor of Rucriminal.info. He connects the events that happened with Nikolay, with the position of his mother, Judge Elena Kondrat, in a number of cases and unwillingness to voluntarily resign, as the chairman of the LRA Novikova N.A. demanded from her, who enjoys the unlimited support and trust of V.M. Lebedev.

“I would like to believe that the first deputy head of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation, S.V. Kirienko. after all, he will sort out Novikov and stop defending and shielding him in every possible way, ”the source says.

Recall that the VKKS on July 12 considered the submission of the head of the TFR Alexander Bastyrkin and agreed to initiate a criminal case against the judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court Elena Kondrat on the grounds of a crime provided for in part 4 of Article 291.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation ("Mediation in bribery on an especially large scale") ... According to the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation and the FSB in Moscow and the region, Kondrat transferred $ 50,000 to her former assistant, and now also the judge of the LRA, Elena Makhlkina, for making the decision of the necessary businessman. According to the operatives, Kondrat transferred money to Makhalkina for making a decision not to bring to subsidiary liability a number of individuals and legal entities, namely: United Standard LLC, its founders SI Soloveichik. and Shendrik V.G., accountant and financial director of LLC "USTS" Kostash O.A. and Pankova A.V., LLC "TransStroyMekhanizatsiya", as well as on bringing to subsidiary liability the former directors of LLC "USTS" Vershinin A.N., Seoev A.M., Laptev A.I., Pleskonos S.A. and Sakuna B.V.

Kondrat herself insists that she transferred money to the former assistant Makhalkina at her own request, since she did not have enough to buy an apartment and became a victim of a provocation. At the same time, Kondrat cited a recording of her conversation with Makhalkina, in which she admits that in 2020 the cattle were detained by the FSB while receiving money from the manager A.V. Goloshumova. ... In a personal conversation with Kondrat E.N. 04/27/2021 (recordings of the conversation are available), E.A. Makhalkina. said that she was caught red-handed, there are her fingerprints and for 10 years she must cooperate.

Already continuing to be under the control of the FSB, Makhalkina E.A. became a participant in an operational experiment in the case of the fixer Ullubiy Medzhidov. In December 2020, Majidov was detained.



To be continued

Arseny Dronov

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Кровавая вендетта в мантии

ФСБ считает, что в судейском корпусе мафиозные разборки



Rucriminal.info стало известно о просто фантастическом развитии истории с расследованием в отношении судьи Арбитражного суда Москвы (АСГМ) Елены Кондрат и ее сына Николая Кондрата (его отец экс-заместитель генпрокурора Иван Кондрат). Саму Елену Кондрат подозревают в даче взятки своей бывшей помощнице, а теперь судьи АСГМ Елене Махлкиной. Николай, в свою очередь, находится под стражей по обвинению в том, что «заказал» убийство своего водителя Кирилл Игитханяна.

Иван Кондрат


Источники рассказали, что только на этом обвинение следствие и оперативники останавливаться не собираются. В настоящее время в ГСУ СКР по МО из УФСБ по Москве поступили материалы еще по одному потенциальному эпизоду, который может быть инкриминирован Николаю. Якобы он занимался приготовлением к покушению на убийство судьи Махалкиной, которая оказалось агентом ФСБ РФ и была участником оперативного эксперимента в отношении его матери Елены Кондрат. По версии УФСБ выходит, что в судейском корпусе царят нравы в духе сицилийской мафии, только, что «колумбийские галстуки» и «цементные ботинки» Служители Фемиды друг другу не делают, и то не факт.

По словам собеседника Rucriminal.info, для того, чтобы сам Николай Кондрат стал сговорчивым и начал признавать вину, следствие ему приготовило «сюрприз». Неожиданно было разрешено свидание с женщиной гораздо старше 20-летнего студент МГУ Николя, с которой он встречался всего 1,5 месяца и особых чувств не испытывает. И это при том, что на протяжении 8 месяцев следствие отказывает молодому человеку в свидание с родителями. Заподозрив неладное, Николай от «сюрприза» отказался.

Напомним, согласно данным ГСУ СКР по МО, 2 октября 2020 года автомобиль «Тойота Камри» Николая Кондрата остановили на Кутузовском проспекте сотрудники ДПС. За рулем был его водитель Кирилл Игитханян. Он предъявил полицейским удостоверение следователя и специальный талон-«непроверяшку», позволяющий владельцу такого документа избегать проверок на дорогах.

Удостоверение и талон вызвали у полицейских сомнения в подлинности, на этом основании Кирилла Игитханяна задержали и доставили в Дорогомиловский ОВД.

Николая Кондрата задержание водителя с «липовым» удостоверением обеспокоило. Чтобы водитель не рассказал об этом родителям, парень решил от него избавиться, утверждает источник «Известий» в правоохранительных органах. Исполнить задуманное он поручил знакому Никите Мацневу, пообещав «щедрый» гонорар — 80 тыс. рублей.

По версии следствия, через водителя такси Николай Кондрат передал Никите Мацневу охотничий нож и написал Кириллу сообщение, назначив встречу в глухом месте — в овраге в Луховицком районе Московской области — якобы с целью обсудить произошедшее. Никита Мацнев привлек к делу своего знакомого Геннадия Воскресенского. Вдвоем они встретили ничего не подозревавшего водителя в назначенном месте на следующий день после инцидента с задержанием, 3 октября. В ходе встречи завязалась драка, мужчина получил несколько ножевых ранений, от которых умер.

21 декабря 2020 года Николай Кондрат был задержан по подозрению в организации убийства Кирилла Игитханяна.

Источники Rucriminal.info, близкие к семье Кондрат, отмечают, что доказательная база на Николая строиться на показаниях Мацнева Н.А., который заключил досудебное соглашение со следствием 17 февраля 2021г. Согласно УПК РФ, при заключении досудебного соглашения дело в отношении лица, заключившего такое соглашение, выделяется в отдельное производство и рассматривается в упрощенном порядке с вынесением приговора. Т.е. при рассмотрения дела, по которому Мацнев Н.А. заключил досудебное соглашение со следствием суд не будет рассматривать и вникать в подробности совершенного Мацневым Н. А. преступления.

Вместе с тем, этот приговор будет преюдициальный характер для лиц, на которых Мацнев Н. А. дал показания - Кондрата Н.И. и Воскресенского Г.Д.

В ходе допроса Воскресенского Г.Д. он пояснил, что Мацнев Н.А. вынудил его прятать труп Игитханяна К.А. пригрозив, если не поможешь будешь 14 (трупом). Воскресенский Г.Д. и Мацнев Н.А. длительное время состояли в одном автоклубе, участвовали в ночных гонках, в автоклубе ходят слухи и том, что на счету Мацнева Н.А. есть другие трупы. Зная взрывной характер Мацнева Н.А. и информацию о ранее совершенных убийствах Мацневым Н.А., Воскресенский Г.Д. испугался его и помог прятать труп.

« Есть информация о том, что оперативные сотрудники располагают сведениями о совершении Мацневым Н.А. на протяжении нескольких лет целого ряда убийств на территории России. Со слов адвоката, представлявшего интересы одного из подозреваемых, одна из свидетелей убийств, ранее совершенных Мацневым Н.А. в настоящее время прячется на территории Украины, ее имя и фамилия, со слов адвоката, оперативникам известна, - высказал мнение собеседник Rucriminal.info, - Но, исполняя чей-то заказ, они вынуждают Мацнева Н.А. давать показания на Кондрата Н.И. и шантажируют Мацнева Н.А. тем, что если он не оговорит Кондрата Н.И., они отправят его за ранее совершенные им убийства, а также угон автомобилей и т.д.».

По словам источника, после заключения сделки со следствием (17 февраля 2021г.), Мацнев Н.А. уже в марте 2021 года собственноручно написал заявления следователю и в УСБ ГУ МВД России по МО о его (Мацнева Н.А.) избиении и применении к нему пыток. В заявлении он подробно описал, как его били, пропускали через него электрический ток и просил провести проверку по его обращению. Но следователь не только не провел проверку, но даже и не приобщил заявления Мацнева Н.А. в следственное дело. Вероятно «забыв» про эти заявления в каких-либо проверочных материалах, которые утаил от прокурора и намеревается утаить и от суда.

«И «кураторы» следователя Бабушкина А.В. за его такую сговорчивость его повысили в должности – перевели из Следственного отдела в Коломне сразу же в ЦА СКР России, правда в отдел кадров», - отметил собеседник Rucriminal.info. Он связывает события, произошедшие с Николаем, с позицией его матери судьи Елены Кондрат по ряду дел и нежеланием добровольно уходит в отставку, как требовал от нее председатель АСГМ Новикова Н.А., пользующегося безграничной поддержкой и доверием Лебедева В.М.

«Хочется верить в то, что первый заместитель руководителя Администрации Президента РФ – Кириенко С.В. все-таки разберется в Новикове и перестанет его всячески защищать и выгораживать», - говорит источник.

Напомним, что ВККС 12 июля рассмотрела представление главы СКР Александра Бастыркин и дала согласия на возбуждение уголовного дела в отношении судьи Арбитражного суда города Москвы Елены Кондрат по признакам преступления, предусмотренного частью 4 статьи 291.1 УК РФ ("Посредничество во взяточничестве в особо крупном размере"). По версии СКР и УФСБ по Москве и области, Кондрат передала 50 тыс долл своей бывшей помощнице, а сейчас тоже судье АСГМ Елене Махлкиной за принятие решения нужного бизнесмена. По версии оперативников, Кондрат передавала деньги Махалкиной за принятия решения о непривлечении к субсидиарной ответственности ряда физических и юридических лиц, а именно: ООО «Единый Стандарт», ее учредителей Соловейчика С.И. и Шендрика В.Г., бухгалтера и финансового директора ООО «УСТС» Косташ О.А. и Панкова А.В., ООО «ТрансСтройМеханизация», а также о привлечении к субсидиарной ответственности бывших директоров ООО «УСТС» Вершинина А.Н., Сеоева А.М., Лаптева А.И., Плесконоса С.А. и Сакуна Б.В.

Сама Кондрат настаивает, что передавала деньги бывшей помощнице Махалкиной по ее же просьбе, поскольку ей не хватало для покупки квартиры и стала жертвой провокации. При этом Кондрат привела запись своего разговора с Махалкиной, в которой та признется, что в 2020 года быдла задержана ФСБ при получении денег от управляющей Голошумовой А.В. . В личной беседе с Кондрат Е.Н. 27.04.2021г. (записи разговора имеется), Махалкина Е.А. сообщила, что ее взяли с поличным, есть ее отпечатки пальцев и в течение 10 лет она должна сотрудничать.

Уже продолжая находиться под контролем ФСБ, Махалкина Е.А. стала участницей оперативного эксперимента по делу решальщика Уллубия Меджидова. В декабре 2020 года Меджидов был задержан.



Продолжение следует

Арсений Дронов

Sea urchin as a bribe

FSB is interested in judicial cuisine



Judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court Elena Kondrat appealed to the Supreme Court against the decision of the VKKS, which gave consent to initiate a criminal case against Kondrat on the grounds of a crime under part 4 of Article 291.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation ("Mediation in bribery on an especially large scale"). According to the ICR and the FSB department for Moscow and the region, Kondrat transferred $ 50,000 to her former assistant, and now also the judge of the LRA, Elena Makhlkina, for making a decision that the businessmen needed. The meeting on the redneck Kondrat is scheduled for September 28.



The Rucriminal.info correspondent learned what documents were submitted to the VKKS for making a decision on consent to initiate a case against a judge. These are 3 volumes: two of them - Kondrat's track record and one volume - the report of the FSB officers, Makhalkina's statement and voice transcripts of the conversation between Kondrat and Makhalkina. At the same time, the textual decoding itself is incomplete, the phrases are taken out of context and the investigator points out in many places that the text has been lost.

For example, the investigation believes that on September 1, Kondrat and Makhalkina, while in the Swallow restaurant, ordered sea urchins, and ordering sea urchins means an offer to receive a bribe. Further, there is a "space" in the text transcript. Let's fill it in. At that moment, the waiter came, brought sea urchins, explained that they need to be eaten with quail eggs, etc. Kondrat told Makhalkina that in Herosima and Nagasaki, after the nuclear bombardment, the Japanese ate sea urchins to remove radionucleides. Makhalkina was surprised that there was such a fact, said that she did not know history at all and thought that Herosima was the song of the singer Sandra. But there is nothing about the "bribe" in the conversation.

It is worth noting that, contrary to the information that appeared the other day, Kondrat never cooperated with the investigation, moreover, she had no communication with representatives of the operational-investigative group at all. Investigator Kondratyev refuses to question Kondrat. He motivates it like this. If VKKS, on the basis of the submitted materials, agreed to initiate a case, it means that the materials were collected in full and did not need interviews. And after the approval of the VKKS, the materials can no longer be supplemented.





At the same time, one of the arguments of the investigation was that it was not possible to get an explanation from the judge, since it was also not possible to establish her whereabouts. While, until May 24, 2020, Kondrat was considering cases. From May 25, 2020, she was on sick leave for 10 days, the VKKS sent her a notification 5 days before the meeting, and the apartment was not indicated in the notification, i.e. "to grandfather's village". Throughout June 2021, Kondrat considered cases.

The VKKS submission was considered on May 31, 2020. Kondrat reported an improper notification and the question was postponed until July 12, 2021. On July 12, Kondrat also did not appear and was on sick leave for 9 days due to contact with a relative who had a coronavirus.

“Judge Kondrat E.N. no one has ever questioned, moreover, the investigator avoids communicating with her. She sent him four letters and he sent her a formal reply (the text is published by Rucriminal.info) that since the verification materials have been formed, there is no need to interrogate Kondrat, ”said a source close to the Kondrat family.

According to him, Kondrat also filed an application to initiate a criminal case against Makhalkina and the FSB officer A.A. Ushakov, who was preparing materials for the VKKS.

As Rucriminal.info told, according to operatives, Kondrat transferred money to Makhalkina for making a decision not to bring a number of individuals and legal entities to subsidiary liability, namely: United Standard LLC, its founders S.I. Soloveychik. and Shendrik V.G., accountant and financial director of LLC "USTS" Kostash O.A. and Pankova A.V., LLC "TransStroyMekhanizatsiya", as well as on bringing to subsidiary liability the former directors of LLC "USTS" Vershinin A.N., Seoev A.M., Laptev A.I., Pleskonos S.A. and Sakuna B.V.

Kondrat herself insists that she transferred money to the former assistant Makhalkina at her own request, since she did not have enough to buy an apartment and became a victim of a provocation. At the same time, Kondrat cited a recording of her conversation with Makhalkina, in which she admits that in 2020 the cattle were detained by the FSB while receiving money from the manager A.V. Goloshumova. ... In a personal conversation with Kondrat E.N. 04/27/2021 (recordings of the conversation are available), E.A. Makhalkina. said that she was caught red-handed, there are her fingerprints and for 10 years she must cooperate.

Already continuing to be under the control of the FSB, Makhalkina E.A. became a participant in an operational experiment in the case of the fixer Ullubiy Medzhidov. In December 2020, Majidov was detained.



To be continued

Arseny Dronov

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Морской еж как взятка

ФСБ заинтересовалась судейской кухней



Судья Арбитражного суд Москвы Елена Кондрат обжаловала в Верховном суде решение ВККС, которым было дано согласия на возбуждение уголовного дела в отношении Кондрат по признакам преступления, предусмотренного частью 4 статьи 291.1 УК РФ ("Посредничество во взяточничестве в особо крупном размере"). По версии СКР и УФСБ по Москве и области, Кондрат передала 50 тыс долл своей бывшей помощнице, а сейчас тоже судье АСГМ Елене Махлкиной за принятие решения нужного бизнесменам. Заседание по жлобе Кондрат назначено на 28 сентября.

Елена Кондрат


Корреспонденту Rucriminal.info стало известно, какие документы были представлены в ВККС для принятия решения о согласии на возбуждение дела на судью. Это 3 тома: два из них - послужной список Кондрат и один том - рапорта сотрудников УФСБ, заявление Махалкиной и голосовые расшифровки разговора между Кондрат и Махалкиной. При этом сама текстовая расшифровка неполная, фразы вырваны из контекста и следователь указывает во многих местах, что текст утрачен.

Например, следствие считает, первого сентября Кондрат с Махалкиной , находясь в ресторане Ласточка, заказали морских ежей и заказ морских ежей означает является предложением получить взятку. Далее, в текстовой расшифровке присутствует «пробел». Заполним его. В этот момент пришел официант, принес морских ежей, объяснил, что их нужно есть с перепелиными яйцами и т.д. Кондрат рассказала Махалкиной, что в Херосиме и Нагасаки после ядерной бомбардировки японцы ели морских ежей, чтобы вывести радионуклеиды. Махалкина удивилась, что такой факт был, сказала, что она совсем не знает историю и думала, что Херосима - это песня певицы Сандры. А вот о «взятке» в беседе ничего нет.

Стоит отметить, что вопреки появившейся на днях информации, Кондрат никогда не сотрудничала со следствием, более того общения с представителями оперативно-следственной группы у нее вовсе пока не было. Следователь Кондратьев отказывается опрашивать Кондрат. Он мотивирует это так. Коли ВККС на основании представленных материалов дала согласие на возбуждение дела, значит материалы были собраны в полном объеме и в опросах не нуждались. А после одобрения ВККС материалы дополнять уже нельзя.


При этом одним из доводов следствия было то, что получить объяснения от судьи не представилось возможным, так как установить ее местонахождения также не представилось возможным. В то время, как до 24 мая 2020 год Кондрат рассматривала дела. С 25 мая 2020 года она находилась на больничном 10 дней, ВККС отправила ей уведомление за 5 дней до заседания, причем в уведомлении не была указана квартира, т.е. "на деревню дедушке". Весь июнь 2021 года Кондрат рассматривала дела.

Представление ВККС рассматривалось 31 мая 2020г. , Кондрат сообщила о ненадлежащем уведомлении и вопрос отложили на 12 июля 2021 года 12 июля Кондрат тоже не явилась и находилась на больничном 9 дней по контакту с больной коронавирусом родственницей.

«Судью Кондрат Е.Н. никогда никто не опрашивал, более того, следователь избегает общения с ней. Она отправила ему четыре обращения и он прислал ей отписку (текст публикует Rucriminal.info) , что поскольку материалы проверки сформированы, опрашивать Кондрат нет необходимости», - заявил источник, близкий к семье Кондрат.

По его словам, также Кондрат подала заявление о возбуждении уголовного дела в отношении Махалкиной и сотрудника УФСБ Ушакова А.А., который готовил материалы для ВККС.

Как рассказывал Rucriminal.info , по версии оперативников, Кондрат передавала деньги Махалкиной за принятия решения о непривлечении к субсидиарной ответственности ряда физических и юридических лиц, а именно: ООО «Единый Стандарт», ее учредителей Соловейчика С.И. и Шендрика В.Г., бухгалтера и финансового директора ООО «УСТС» Косташ О.А. и Панкова А.В., ООО «ТрансСтройМеханизация», а также о привлечении к субсидиарной ответственности бывших директоров ООО «УСТС» Вершинина А.Н., Сеоева А.М., Лаптева А.И., Плесконоса С.А. и Сакуна Б.В.

Сама Кондрат настаивает, что передавала деньги бывшей помощнице Махалкиной по ее же просьбе, поскольку ей не хватало для покупки квартиры и стала жертвой провокации. При этом Кондрат привела запись своего разговора с Махалкиной, в которой та признется, что в 2020 года быдла задержана ФСБ при получении денег от управляющей Голошумовой А.В. . В личной беседе с Кондрат Е.Н. 27.04.2021г. (записи разговора имеется), Махалкина Е.А. сообщила, что ее взяли с поличным, есть ее отпечатки пальцев и в течение 10 лет она должна сотрудничать.

Уже продолжая находиться под контролем ФСБ, Махалкина Е.А. стала участницей оперативного эксперимента по делу решальщика Уллубия Меджидова. В декабре 2020 года Меджидов был задержан.



Продолжение следует

Арсений Дронов

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

"I asked the person who was the deputy in the Administrative Department of the President"

In St. Petersburg, they divide money for the overhaul of the city



Last week, a competition was held in St. Petersburg for the position of General Director of the Overhaul Fund. The place is strategically important for someone who is used to regular receipts of budget money in his pocket. Since August 2020, the position has been held by Petr Pogrebnyak, a man who, as Rucriminal.info found out, as a general contractor, carried out state contracts of the Administrative Department of the President of the Russian Federation in the 2000s. He is also trying to remain the CEO so as not to lose his place at the trough. He needs it not only for himself.

The whole process of holding a competition for the position of Director of the Fund is one continuous fiction and dramatization. After the failure of the short-term plan last year, certain people tasked the chairman of the Housing Committee of St. Petersburg, Viktor Borshchev, to terminate the contract with Pogrebnyak. Prosecutorial inspections poured into the Overhaul Fund, the prosecutor's office had claims personally against Pogrebnyak because of the debts of his construction company Logos, in general, pressure was exerted so that the Housing Committee announced a competition and looked for a new director.



On May 12, the competition was announced with stupid reservations in the press that initially Pogrebnyak came only for a year, and all other directors would now come only for a year. But this is not true. According to the results of last year's competition, a three-year contract was concluded and on June 14, despite the fact that the procedure was violated in this way, the term of the employment contract with the candidate was changed in the notice on the website - from one year to three.

Realizing that with the departure of Pogrebnyak there would be no access to the Fund's money, Borshchev brought in heavy artillery. We know that Pogrebnyak was asked for by a man who had held the post of deputy in the Presidential Property Management Department for many years.

The decision on who will be the new general director of the Overhaul Fund was not made a week after the competition. Although the contract should have been concluded according to the conditions stated in the notice, on August 2. However, this notice has been spat on for the second time - in June, the contract with the new director was corrected from a year to three, and now they do not consider it necessary to conclude this contract in time.

The current director of the Foundation, Petr Pogrebnyak, scored the highest number of points based on the results of three rounds of the competition, but taking into account his back ground, it is scary to conclude a contract with such a friend.

Rucriminal.info lists his "achievements": outstanding work in 2020 for a record amount of 2.4 billion rubles; the presence of a bankrupt construction company, with claims from third parties for half a billion rubles; and as a cherry on the cake - the requirement of the prosecutor's office to conduct a check on its compliance with the position of the director of the Fund (this requirement, by the way, has not been fulfilled by the housing block since May).

"Achievements" continue to this day. This season, 378 roofs are being repaired, of which 72 roofs in the Admiralteisky, Vasileostrovsky, Kolpinsky, Kalininsky, Krasnoselsky and Moskovsky districts have been completed by less than 10%. The roof is not even half done. Recall that by September 1, the housing block must report that residential buildings are ready for winter. I wonder what they will say.

Last year, the Fund for Overhaul "mothballed" 43 roofs for the winter - in fact, there is a simple fact behind this term - and stopped growing moldy. This year we expect this to be the case with 72 houses. Residents are already signaling to journalists about leaks.



To be continued

Timofey Zabiyakin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

«Попросил человек, являвшейся замом в Управделами Президента»

В Питере делят деньги на капремонт города



На минувшей неделе в Петербурге провели конкурс на должность генерального директора Фонда капремонта. Место стратегически важное для того, кто привык к регулярным поступлениям бюджетных денег в свой карман. С августа 2020 года должность занимает Петр Погребняк, человек, который, как выяснил Rucriminal.info, в качестве генерального подрядчика выполнял в «нулевых» госконтракты Управления делами Президента РФ. Он же и пытается остаться генеральным директором, чтобы не потерять место у кормушки. Оно ему нужно не только для себя.

Весь процесс проведения конкурса на должность директора Фонда – это одна сплошная фикция и инсценировка. После провала краткосрочного плана в прошлом году, определенными людьми была поставлена задача председателю Жилищного комитета Санкт-Петербурга Виктору Борщеву расторгнуть контракт с Погребняком. В Фонд капремонта посыпались прокурорские проверки, у прокуратуры возникли претензии лично к Погребняку из-за долгов его строительной компании «Логос», в общем, давление оказывалось для того, чтобы Жилищный комитет объявил конкурс и искал нового директора.

Петр Погребняк


12 мая конкурс был объявлен с глупыми оговорками в прессе, что изначально Погребняк пришел всего на год, и все остальные директора будут теперь приходить только на год. Но это неправда. По итогам прошлогоднего конкурса был заключен трехлетний контракт и 14 июня, несмотря на то, что таким образом нарушили процедуру, в извещении на сайте поменяли срок трудового договора с кандидатом – с года на три.

Понимая, что с уходом Погребняка не будет доступа к деньгам Фонда, Борщев привлек тяжелую артиллерию. Нам известно, что за Погребняка просил человек, много лет занимавший должность заместителя в Управлении делами Президента.

Решение о том, кто же будет новым генеральным директором Фонда капремонта за неделю после конкурса так и не приняли. Хотя контракт должны были заключить по условиям, заявленным в извещении, 2 августа. Впрочем, на это извещение плюют уже второй раз – в июне исправили срок контракта с новым директором с года на три, а теперь вот не считают нужным во время этот контракт заключить.

Наибольшее количество баллов по итогам трех туров конкурса набрал действующий директор Фонда Петр Погребняк, но учитывая его бэк-граунд, заключать контракт с таким товарищем страшно.

Rucriminal.info перечисляет его «достижения»: невыполненные работы в 2020 году на рекордную сумму 2,4 млрд. рублей; наличие строительной компании-банкрота, с претензиями от третьих лиц на полмиллиарда рублей; и в качестве вишенки на торте - требование прокуратуры о проведении проверки на его соответствие должности директора Фонда (это требование, кстати, жилищный блок не выполнил с мая).

«Достижения» продолжаются и сейчас. В этом сезоне ремонтируется 378 крыш, из них 72 крыши в Адмиралтейском, Василеостровском, Колпинском, Калининском, Красносельском и Московском районах работы выполнены менее чем на 10%. 251 крыша не сделана даже наполовину. Напомним, к 1 сентября жилищный блок должен отчитаться о том, что жилые дома готовы к зиме. Интересно, что скажут.

В прошлом году Фонд капремонта «законсервировал» на зиму 43 крыши – по сути, за этим термином кроется простая данность – не сделал и бросил плесневеть. В этом году мы ожидаем, что так будет с 72 домами. О протечках жители уже сигналят журналистам.



Продолжение следует

Тимофей Забиякин

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

SKR came for a VIP pedophile

Basmanny court to decide on the arrest of "FSB agent" in a red Ferrari



The Basmanny Court of Moscow received a petition for the arrest of the former adviser to the chairman of the board of Russtroybank, the owner of a large number of real estate near Moscow, Alexander Sytin, who introduces himself as an agent of the "K" Department of the FSB of Russia and the son of a retired lieutenant general of the KGB. This is not the first attempt to imprison this figure. In 2020, he was arrested on charges of pedophilia, but the Moscow City Court released Alexander Sytin right in the hall. Details are in the Rucriminal.info investigation.



Our sources believe that such loyalty to Sytin is due to the fact that he is a well-known character in the circles of various high-ranking officials and representatives of power structures near Moscow. Still would. He owns a huge number of real estate objects, has a reputation as an influential "decision maker" in matters with the same real estate (he presented himself as an agent of the "K" Department of the FSB of Russia), plus an excellent reputation of his father, Boris Pavlovich Sytin, who posed as a retired lieutenant general in the Serpukhov region KGB. In reality, Sytin is a senior criminal who served a sentence for murder in 1982-1993! And Alexander Sytin is also known for dozens of rumored cases of manifestations of love for underage girls and boys, whom he lured with his red Ferrari cabrio.

He was caught on one of these crimes. The essence of Sytin's accusations lies in acts of a sexual nature against a thirteen-year-old girl. Places Sytin chose not the most glamorous - a forest near Moscow near the village of Romashkovo, and apartments on Kutuzovsky Prospekt.



The victim's testimony was confirmed by a polygraph. Interestingly, the investigation did not offer Sytin himself to undergo a polygraph: he did not appear at any investigative action or at forensic medical examinations, which can refute his most likely fake diagnoses of a blood disease and a certificate of disability.

In general, Sytin is chronically lucky in the courts: both for the early episodes related to the theft of land owned by the state and under the article for pedophilia - the court does not question key witnesses. And why, and so everything is clear: the person is ill, he must take pity and let him go.



Sytin's wife, Anastasia Vyacheslavovna Sytina, an accomplice in giving a bribe to an official from the Serpukhov region, who personally informed whom to come to and how much money should be brought, has not even been interrogated to date and has no status in the criminal case. The audio recordings of the negotiations have been at the disposal of law enforcement agencies for almost two years, while the rest of the not so financially wealthy persons involved in the bribe case have already pleaded guilty.

We have restored the chronicle of how Sytin had previously evaded responsibility.

2011-2015. Capital accumulation.



According to the interlocutors of Rucriminal.info, until in 2015 the Central Bank revoked the license from Russtroybank, from 2012 to 2015. Sytin helped the bank to obtain ownership of a building in Moscow and the region for a penny. The company that owned the building was artificially bankrupt by him, then Sytin went to the officials he knew and changed the parameters of the nondivzhka, reducing its cost several times. After this, the buildings were transferred to the bank. The appetites of Sytin and the bank managers grew. When the Central Bank suspected something was wrong with the bank, Sytin, through one-day firms, helps the bank's management to withdraw depositors' funds. According to the bank's employees, the average size of the transfer then amounted to 100 million rubles. The bank was closed, the management successfully fled to the United States, and for 2020 the claims of the DIA are around 10 billion rubles.

Despite the fact that back in 2017, the investigation proved Sytin's guilt in a number of episodes, the investigation against him was suddenly terminated.



2016-2019.



Being at large, Sytin is building a number of objects in the Moscow region with the proceeds. Without approvals, without obtaining permits - why, if there is a criminal scheme worked out over the years to legalize land plots and real estate through his contacts in MosoblBTI and other departments for a bribe. Since the fraud is sewn with white thread, Sytin runs in panic to a rally in support of Ivan Golunov and from the stage says that he is illegally accused of “stealing spoons”. A month later, Kommersant checks the information - Sytin is guilty of bribery and is being investigated.

Significant witnesses in the case are not interrogated, Sytin provides fake health certificates and remains at large.



2020. Pedophilia.

Sytin is being sued by a victim of his harassment, who at the time of the “friendship” was only 13 years old. According to a Rucriminal.info source, Sytin was often seen in companies with minors. He came to them in a Ferrari convertible. The victim is tested on a polygraph - it's all true. Sytin is not being tested. According to the information provided and probably fake, "for health reasons" the court is becoming more and more lenient towards him, ignoring the circus in the form of leaving the court in an ambulance. Already in early June, hired by a lawyer for a fabulous fee Sytin from the Padva & Partners office brags about his release on his Instagram: the court releases him under house arrest for 2 months. A few weeks later, while still under arrest, Sytin is seen in the office of Valery Ivarlac, the second person in the Moscow Region IC, whom the media accused of having Moldovan citizenship. The loudest scandal of Valery Ivarlak is the death in the Matrosskaya Tishina pre-trial detention center of an elderly entrepreneur Vera Trifonova, who suffered from diabetes mellitus and during her imprisonment, her kidneys almost failed and her eyesight disappeared. The measure of restraint was not changed for her then, and four months later Trifonova died of complications. After this scandal, Ivarlak and his subordinates were fired from the UK, and then suddenly reinstated back.

Now the RF IC is asking to arrest Sytin for episodes related to the activities of Russtroybank. Rucriminal.info has at its disposal a certificate of embezzlement from Russtroybank:

Joint Stock Company RUSSIAN STROITELNY BANK (PSRN 1027739327880, TIN 7744001514 KPP 770901001, address: 109004, Moscow, Drovyanoy B. lane, 7 / 9-1) was established in 2002.

On 15.10.2015, the Bank of Russia revoked the banking license from Russtroybank. The reason for the revocation of the license was the bank's failure to fulfill its obligations to creditors and its involvement in dubious transactions, such as money laundering, legalization and cashing through anonymous "fly-by-night firms" of funds.

As of 2014, the Chairman of the Board of the bank was Andrey Petrovich Strukov, whose business partner in joint projects was Alexander Borisovich Sytin.

According to available information, A.P. Strukov and Sytin A.B. were involved in the following illegal transactions with bank assets:

1) According to the data received from the former top management of the bank at the time of the acquisition by the bank of the asset of LLC "Sports and Recreation Complex Vostok" (INN: 7709660480) at a reduced price (about 500 thousand dollars), it turned out that the real estate objects located on the territory of the complex were not privatized and not registered, which became clear after the acquisition transaction. Sytin A.B. offered Strukov A.P. a way out of this situation by forging a privatization list with the participation of a friend of Sytin A.B. notary. Strukov A.P. agreed to this deal. Further, the notary made a notarized copy of the privatization sheet with the included real estate objects worth about 300 million rubles, after which this document was submitted for registration with the Federal Register, which entailed an increase in the value of the object by the amount indicated above.

Subsequently (2016-2017), the SEBiPK of the Internal Affairs Directorate of the Odintsovo District of the Moscow Region, according to the above episode, an attempt was made to involve A.B. Sytin. to criminal liability under Art. 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (fraud). In spite of operational measures, in particular, the identity of the notary, to whom the testimony was given, was established, but the case was closed “on a call from Moscow”.

2) According to reliable information, before the revocation of the license from JSC RUSSTROYBANK, the bank's management represented by A.P. Strukov. operations were actively carried out to withdraw funds of depositors, in particular Sytin A.B. through various one-day companies he actively cashed out large sums of money, in the amount of more than 100 million rubles.

There is evidence from a group of top managers of the Bank, testifying to the illegal operations of Sytin A.B.

3) Sytin A.B. in the period 2012-2014 the funds of JSC RUSSTROYBANK were used to organize the development of residential real estate located at the address: Moscow, st. 50 years

October, 2, bldg. 1. During the sales process, 2 criminal schemes were implemented:

Ø one building was assigned two cadastral numbers, which made it possible to legally sell the same premises twice to individuals.

Ø Sytin A.B. reconstructed part of the common areas, converting them into residential apartments, grossly violating urban planning regulations.

Until 2017, real estate buyers were in court with A.B. Sytin. on the subject of legalizing the real estate they purchased.

Testimony on the fact of numerous violations is ready to give the chairman of TSN Eliseev I.P.

4) CJSC "Disk", founder and general director - Sytin A.B.

The company owns a large office and retail building located at the address Reutov, Highway Moscow-Nizhniy Novgorod, 1, which is operated, contrary to the law, without commissioning.

In the course of its operating activities in 2011, Disk CJSC had a debt to Russtroybank JSC in the amount of 16,999,101.27 rubles. After the revocation of the Bank's license in December 2015, there was a threat of bankruptcy of the company at the suit of the Bank's successor - ASV Group of Companies and the sale of the building at auction to satisfy claims for debt.

In this regard, presumably, the director and owner of 40% of the shares of the company - Sytin A.B. there was an intention to form fictitious - "controlled" debt to establish control over the company, initiate bankruptcy proceedings and transfer the building to another subcontract roll face.

To implement this plan, appraisers were involved, in the process of preparing the appraisal report, they restructured the cost of the object - while maintaining the total cost of about 185 million rubles. Most of the value as a result of the appraisal was allocated to land (150 million), and the building was valued at 35 million, so that in the future, in the process of bankruptcy, under control of the bidding procedure, to redeem it at a low cost Sytin A.B. to an affiliated person.

The total amount of debts controlled by Sytin A.B. presumably, based on the claims filed with the court, is estimated at 50 million rubles. - enough to determine the site for the bidding of the building, the procedure for its sale and to receive from the bankruptcy commissioner insider information about the bidders for the purchase. The bankruptcy trustee introduced by the Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service challenged the bankruptcy estate introduced into the bankruptcy estate by A.B. Sytin. requirements, is currently trying to prove Sytin's guilt under part 4 of article 159 (fraud by deliberate bankruptcy) in a criminal case "



Yuri Prokov

To be continued

Source: www.rucriminal.info