“I received an order from the chairman of the ASGM Novikov N.A. on the withdrawal of 26 billion from the Russian Federation”

Moscow judges and a contract on confidential cooperation with the FSB of the Russian Federation for a period of 10 years

The Moscow prosecutor's office approved the indictment in the case of former ASGM judge Elena Kondrat. The case will be sent for consideration to the Nikulinsky District Court. Kondrat is accused of mediating the transfer of a bribe to his former student, who also became a judge of ASGM Makhalkina. Kondrat herself speaks of a provocation. Rucriminal.info continues to publish Kondrat's appeals from the pre-trial detention center to the leaders of the law enforcement unit, in which she reveals many secrets.

“I am Kondrat Elena Nikolaevna, a federal judge since 2008. until 2022, was forced to retire early. The reason for my forced resignation was my refusal to comply with the criminal order of the Chairman of the Arbitration Court of the mountains. Moscow Novikova N.A. about the illegal withdrawal from Russia of more than 26 billion budget funds. In response to this, Novikov N.A. demanded my dismissal. In the event of my refusal to resign of my own free will, I received threats to create serious problems for my son. Two months later, unprecedented illegal persecution of me and my son by the law enforcement agencies of the mountains began. Moscow and the Moscow Region .... The arguments of the statements were based on the fact that on October 18, 2020, an ORM was carried out against me, a federal judge, a provocation of an “operational experiment” without the permission of the Judicial Collegium of the RF Armed Forces.

The threshold of judicial immunity, in violation of the constitutional guarantee of the independence of judges, was overcome by a resolution of the head of the FSB for the mountains. Moscow and MO Dorofeeva A.N. on the decision to conduct an ORM “operational experiment” dated 10/13/2020, drawn up by o/u Ushakov A.A.

In the said Resolution, in substantiating the legality of the ORM in relation to the federal judge Kondrat E.N. contains a reference to the Definitions of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation No. 137, 138-rs dated 07/02/2020. At the same time, the reason for conducting an ORM, in accordance with the decree of 10/13/2020. is the statement of Judge Makhalkina E.A. from 13.10.2020 to law enforcement agencies ... ORM "operational experiment" dated 10/13/2020. carried out against me illegally, in excess of authority and is a provocation committed with the aim of removing me from office due to my failure to comply with the illegal instructions of the Chairman of the ASGM Novikov N.A. on the withdrawal of more than 26 billion budget funds from the Russian Federation.

ORM "operational experiment" - a provocation from 10/18/2020. carried out against federal judge Kondrat E.N. without the permission of the Judicial Collegium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. .. From June 2020 Judge ASGM Makhalkina E.A. is in the field of view of law enforcement agencies, in connection with her involvement in the commission of a crime against Goloshumova A.The. in the bankruptcy case of Unipol LLC.

In connection with the illegal activities of Judge E.A. criminal case No. 12002450048000108 was initiated, in which she was a defendant. However, Makhalkina E.A. escaped criminal liability by concluding, in violation of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the Federal Law “On the Status of Judges in the Russian Federation”, the Federal Law “On Operative-Investigative Activities”, a contract with the operational service on confidential cooperation for a period of 10 years. The above is confirmed by an expert study of the audio recording of the conversation with Makhalkina E.A. from 27.04.2021

From June 2020 Judge Makhalkina E.A. is under pressure from evidence in criminal case No. 12002450048000108 and has been systematically participating in provocations and ORM since the specified period at the direction of the operational service during working hours to the detriment of the main activities for the administration of justice. This is confirmed by the above criminal case, an expert study of an audio conversation with Makhalkina E.A. dated April 27, 2021, protocol of interrogation about / at the FSB in the mountains. Moscow and MO Ushakova A.A. from 19.10.2022

During the ORM - provocations against me on 10/18/2020. Judge Makhalkina E.A. explained that she was receiving money from me as a loan for the purchase of an apartment, which she acquired a few months after the provocation.

Being under the pressure of evidence in criminal case No. 12002450048000108, Judge E.A. Makhalkina, 6 (six) months after the provocation against me, took part in the falsification of evidence in the criminal case.

She agreed to P.A. Kondratiev, invented by the investigator. version about the "legendary" story with the apartment, although the apartment was purchased by her.

The "legend" with the purchase of the apartment was not recorded in operational documents. Makhalkina E.A. was not instructed to prevent provocation, as evidenced by the absence in the case of the Instruction Act on the inadmissibility of provocation.

Moreover, during the confrontation of 23.08.2022. between me and Makhalkina E.A., the latter reported that the version about the legend of the story with the apartment was formulated by law enforcement officers after conducting an ORM and receiving E.A. Makhalkina from me. money in debt (pp. 19, 20 of the Minutes of the confrontation). During the ORM "operational experiment" Makhalkina E.A. did not expose me in any illegal actions, reporting borrowing money to buy an apartment. The above indicates a provocation against me and falsification of evidence in a criminal case ...

During this period, money was extorted from me for not persecuting me and my family members, which I reported to the prosecutor's office of the mountains. Moscow.

I also reported to the prosecutor's office of the mountains. Moscow that I have audio recordings of conversations that confirm my arguments and other material objects.

The funds were assigned to the leadership of the FSB in the mountains. Moscow and MO.

If I did not have the required amount of money, I was offered to transfer the property.

I ask the prosecutor's office of the mountains to check the indicated facts within a year. Moscow. During the year, I asked to take measures of the prosecutor's response.

The prosecutor's office of the city of Moscow in their answers, which do not have a procedural title, concluded that there was sufficient evidence confirming my guilt and involvement in a falsified criminal case.

The above indicates the absence of prosecutorial supervision over the investigation of criminal case No.







To be continued

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

“The chairman of the ASGM “ordered” me to the head of the FSB of Moscow”

The judge spoke about corruption among the FSB and servants of Themis



The Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation has completed an investigation into a criminal case against Elena Kondrat, a judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court. She is accused of committing a crime under Part 4 of Art. 291.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (mediation in bribery).

At the disposal of the telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU was a recording of a conversation between two judges of the Moscow Arbitration Court - Elena Makhalkina and Elena Kondrat.

According to the ICR, Kondrat handed over $50,000 to her student, and now Judge Makhalkina, for making the decision the businessmen needed. Kondrat insists that she was the victim of a provocation.

Back in 2020, Makhalkina herself was caught taking a bribe from the manager Goloshumova. However, the officers of the FSB of Moscow who carried out the operation did not release the materials, preferring instead to make Makhalkina their agent. She undertook to transfer compromising information to other judges, solvers, etc. for 10 years. If one of them is of interest to counterintelligence officers, then Makhalkina should participate in an operational experiment to detain him. Previously, she took part in the operation to detain the fixer Ullubiy Medzhidov, who, among other things, decided in the interests of billionaire Gavriil Yushvaev in the case of a shootout in Moscow City. Then Makhalkina became a participant in the operation against her mentor Kondrat.



Shortly after the event, they met in the dining room of the court and Makhalkina tried to justify herself by telling everything that is described above. Kondrat secretly recorded the conversation. During it, Makhalkina admits that the FSB's practice of recruiting and removing judges through operational experiments flourishes in the ASGM. Thus, the judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court Fateeva H.The. , which the chairman Novikov appointed as the chairman of the banknote staff, was also caught red-handed when receiving a bribe by the FSB officers. However, at the request of Novikov, for Fateeva, everything ended only with a swift dismissal.

Many of the secrets that lie behind her arrest were told by Kondrat herself in her last appeal to the head of the ICR, Alexander Bastrykin. Rucriminal.info publishes this appeal with abbreviations:

November 23, 2021 The Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation initiated a criminal case against judge ASGM Kondrat E.N. on the basis of submitted to the Chairman of the RF IC by the investigation mountains. Moscow falsified evidence and results of the operational-search activity and misleading the Chairman of the RF Investigative Committee regarding the existence of a crime event.

The plot of the Submission to the Chairman of the RF IC contains conclusions that on 09/01/2020. in the restaurant "Swallow" I suggested Makhalkina E.A. receive a bribe for making the necessary decision in the case of USTS LLC.

According to investigators, 10/14/2020. on the same day, Makhalkina E.A., after the issuance of a judicial act, acting within the framework of the ORM “Operative Experiment”, informed me about the decision.

October 18, 2020 an ORM “Operative experiment” was carried out against me on the basis of the Determinations of the Judicial Collegium of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation No. 137, 138 - rs dated 07/02/2020, allegedly issued to verify the application of Makhalkina E.A. to law enforcement agencies, filed by her on 10/13/2020.

At the same time, ORM "Operative experiment" allegedly took place in the presence of witnesses.

The text of the submission contains the conclusion that I avoided appearing before the investigator, and therefore it is not possible to establish my whereabouts, although I was at work every day and considered hundreds of cases.

Dear Alexander Ivanovich, I ask you to take personal control over the verification of my application and, if it is justified, instruct to initiate a criminal case against the persons who prepared the draft Submission for you and presented falsified evidence of my guilt and involvement in the crime .... So, 09/01/2020. at the Lastochka restaurant, I was not the initiator of conversations related to work or consideration of arbitration cases. My arguments are confirmed by volume 4 of the criminal case. In the course of our communication with Makhalkina E.A. on personal topics, the latter proactively told me about the problems associated with her consideration of cases received by her in the summer of 2019.

Whereas from the plot of the accusation it follows that I allegedly turned to her in the case of USTS LLC, which came into the proceedings of Makhalkina E.A. February 2020

The audio recording of our conversation dated 09/01/2020, contained in volume 4 of the criminal case, refutes the fictitious conclusions of the investigation ... During the period of the pre-investigation check from February to May 2021. I administered justice in ASGM. Conducted more than 2,000 court hearings during the specified period. I was not notified about the pre-investigation check against me, I believe that due to the fact that the investigation of the mountains. Moscow was aware of the "order" by Novikov N.A. me to the department of Dorofeev A.N. in connection with the exercise of my judicial powers.

The reason for removing me as an objectionable judge was my failure to comply with the illegal instructions of N.A. Novikov, chairman of the ASGM. in the case of OOO IK Reporto, connected with the withdrawal from Russia of more than 26 billion in public funds.

Evidence of the intervention of the Chairman Novikov N.A. in the activities of the judge related to the administration of justice, are fixed on material objects and will be presented to the investigation.

November 18, 2020 an ORM was carried out against me - a provocation on the basis of a decision to conduct an ORM, approved by the head of the FSB for the city. Moscow and MO Dorofeev A.N.

In the resolution approved by A.N. Dorofeev, there is a reference to the Ruling of the Judicial Collegium of the RF Armed Forces No. 137, 138 - rs dated 07/02/2020, authorizing the conduct of an ORM in relation to judges.

I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the Ruling of the Judicial Collegium of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation No. 137, 138 - rs dated 07/02/2020, in violation of departmental instructions on the procedure for submitting the results of the ORM to the investigation and to the court, the operational service of the FSB did not provide any rulings authorizing the ORM in relation to the judges or the investigation of the mountains. Moscow, neither in the VKKS of the Russian Federation, nor in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

At the same time, the materials of the pre-investigation check in relation to the judge of ASGM Kondrat E.N. without Determinations of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation No. 137, 138 - rs dated 07/02/2020, only in the presence of which the threshold of judicial immunity is overcome.

Judge Makhalkina E.A. applied to law enforcement agencies on 10/13/2020, and permission to conduct an ORM in relation to judges was given by the RF Armed Forces on 07/02/2020.

Definitions of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation No. 137, 138 - rs dated 07/02/2020. not related to the statement Makhalkinoy E.A. from 13.10.2020

Concerning the judge ASGM Kondrat E.N. the Supreme Court did not give permission for the ORM. Determination No. 137 - rs dated 02.07.2020. authorizes ORM against another judge, not Kondrat E.N.

Determination of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation No. 137, 138 - rs dated 07/02/2020. investigated neither by the investigation, nor by the VKKS of the Russian Federation, nor by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

These Definitions were not submitted to the Chairman of the RF IC.

Permits of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation No. 137, 138 - rs dated 07/02/2020. given on the fact of the appeal Goloshumova A.V. with a statement to law enforcement agencies about extortion of a bribe from her by Judge Makhalkina E.A.

According to this fact, criminal case No. 12002450048000108 was initiated, where Judge E.A. Makhalkina acted as a defendant.

As part of the investigation of this criminal case, it was established that on 06/22/2020. Judge Makhalkina E.A. met at the Danilovsky market with Medzhidov US. and asked him to assist in the interests of Goloshumova A.The. in the higher courts.

According to the materials of the criminal case No. 12002450048000108 Makhalkina E.A. and Majidov U.S. in the period from 22.06.2020 to 05.11.2020 repeatedly met in restaurants and discussed the details of receiving a bribe from Goloshumova A.V. and transfer it to the staff of the higher court.

The initiator of all the conversations was E.A. Makhalkina, who intended to transfer $130,000 in the interests of A.V. Goloshumova, and split $70,000 between them.

specified Makhalkina E.A. testified in her testimony in a criminal case. These facts were confirmed in her testimony in the case of A.V. Goloshumova. and Majidov U.S.

June 2020 upon receipt of funds from Goloshumova A.V., Makhalkina E.A. was detained by officers.

Since the specified period, she has been operating under the pressure of evidence in order to mitigate her own fate.

The crime committed by the judge of ASGM E.A. Makhalkina was concealed from the Chairman of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation.

Makhalkina E.A. escaped criminal liability, however, from the indicated period, being on a forced contractual cooperation with operational services, she systematically acts in the ORM and provocations according to a well-established scheme, falsifying evidence as part of a group of people: an investigator of the Main Investigative Directorate of the RF IC for the mountains. Moscow Kondratiev P.A., operational officers - Ushakov A.A., Kalchuk G.V., with the participation of staff witnesses - Gogua A.Z., Opzoeva Ya.M., participating in all criminal cases.

My arguments are supported by the materials of the criminal case No. 12002450048000108.

Statement by Makhalkina E.A. I wrote to law enforcement agencies not on 10/13/2020, but at the end of November 2020, which is confirmed by messages on my phone’s WhatsApp.

The messages contain information about the need for me to fulfill the conditions put forward by the leadership of the department Dorofeev A.N.

Their conditions were unacceptable to me and impossible to fulfill.

The information was broadcast by the head of one of the courts of the mountains. Moscow, which is included in the closest circle of friends of Dorofeev A.N. The material carrier on which the information is recorded will be issued to the investigation.

October 18, 2020 during ORM - provocation, Makhalkina E.A. informed the operational staff that she was taking money from me to buy an apartment, and also taking a mortgage loan.

Explanations of Makhalkina E.A. found their confirmation, credit Makhalkin E.A. took, bought an apartment.

The fact of communication with Makhalkina E.A. 18.10.2020 The attesting witnesses did not see, they cannot certify, since they were brought to the place much later than our meeting and communication.

This is confirmed by the video recording of the ORM - provocation and the testimony of attesting witnesses.

5. May 2022 after my arrest on falsified evidence, under my husband's car was an explosive device was planted, which was found at a tire shop near the house. On this fact, a crime report was filed, however, law enforcement agencies also did not initiate a criminal case.”



To be continued

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

"Alexander Ivanovich, we will all become the former"

The judge and the ex-Deputy Prosecutor General reported to the head of the TFR about corruption...



Dear Alexander Ivanovich, I am a judge of the Arbitration Court of the mountains. Moscow Kondrat E.N. I appeal to you with a plea for help, namely: instruct an experienced and competent employee of the Investigative Committee of Russia to study the materials of the pre-investigation check No. 203 / 1-42pr-21 of the GSU in the mountains. Moscow in relation to me - Judge Kondrat E.N. and the criminal case against my son - Kondrat N.I. No. 12002460010000104, which is in the production of the investigator of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine V.Yu. Vinny. in order to establish the truth !!!



And also, I ask you, Dear Alexander Ivanovich, to bring to criminal responsibility persons who intentionally falsify criminal cases against me - Judge Kondrat E.N. and my son - Kondrat N.I. out of selfish or other interest. ….

These ... actions against me were committed by EA Makhalkina. - a judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court, together with a senior operational officer of the FSB of Russia for Moscow and the Moscow region - A.A. Ushakov, as well as other officers of the FSB of Russia for Moscow and the Moscow region, who committed illegal actions against me, in for the purpose of deliberately creating conditions for unreasonable involvement of me - Kondrat E.N. to criminal responsibility under Part 4 of Art. 291.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and are directly related to my official activities and position held in one of the cases that are in my proceedings.

I also inform you, dear Alexander Ivanovich, that the judge of the Arbitration Court of the mountains. Moscow Makhalkina E.A., participating in the provocation of a bribe against me - judge of the LRA Kondrat E.N. On October 18, 2020, earlier in June 2020, she was detained by officers of the FSB in Moscow and the Moscow Region while receiving a bribe from the arbitration manager AV Goloshumova, and was also used to participate in the transfer of a bribe in November 2020. "Fixer" Majidov U.



However, to date, criminal cases against Makhalkina E.A. not instituted, judge Makhalkina E.A. she has not been removed from her post and continues to consider arbitration cases. Dear Alexander Ivanovich, judge of the LRA Makhalkina E.A. is regularly detained by law enforcement officers when receiving and giving bribes. You were probably not informed about the crimes committed by Judge E.A. Makhalkina. crimes.



I believe that Judge Kondrat E.N. is a provocation against me. involved the Chairman of the Arbitration Court of the mountains. Moscow Novikov N.A., the provocation was carefully planned and the main purpose of the provocation, according to the operative officer A.A. Ushakov, was the departure of Kondrat E.N. from the position of a judge, most likely with the aim of transferring cases pending by the judge to a judge “under the control” of the court leadership.

During the provocation on 18.10. an employee of the FSB for Moscow and the Moscow region, Roman, in the presence of all the other employees, expressed threats to create problems for my son, a 19-year-old student of Moscow State University. Lomonosov, if I do not resign. They are officers of the UFSB in Moscow and the Moscow Region, and they implemented these threats by accusing their son Kondrat E.N. - 19 year old student, excellent student, winner of the All-Russian Olympiad in law in organizing the murder of his driver.

I would like to draw your attention, dear Alexander Ivanovich, that from the first day of the criminal prosecution of my son - Kondrat N.I. the investigative group was attended by officers of the FSB department for Moscow and the Moscow region. In a murder case !!!

I would also like to draw your attention to the fact that judge E.N. an application was submitted to the CSS of the FSB of Russia, to the Director of the FSB of Russia A.V. Bortnikov. on the facts of a possible conspiracy of the officer of the FSB for Moscow and the Moscow region, S.V. Natarov, who occupies one of the leading positions in this department and the Chairman of the Moscow Arbitration Court, N.A. Novikova. and their falsification of the materials of the criminal case. An employee of the FSB for Moscow and the Moscow Region may be dependent on the Chairman of the LRA Novikov N.A., since the wife of S.V. Natarov. - Zhdanova Yu.A. is a judge of the LRA, the leadership of the court provides her with unreasonable preferences, which is a direct conflict of interest.

Currently, according to my statements, a check is being carried out, during which I gave explanations warning me about criminal liability for giving deliberately false testimony, about the sources of my awareness of illegal actions - "ordering" me and my son by the FSB officers in Moscow and the Moscow region and represented proof.

I earnestly ask you, dear Alexander Ivanovich, to receive me or my spouse, I.N. Kondrat, at a personal reception, the Deputy Prosecutor General (retired) or entrust us with a responsible, competent employee who can personally study the materials of the pre-investigation check No. 203 / 1-42pr-21 GSO in Moscow in relation to me - Judge Kondrat E.N. and the criminal case against my son - Kondrat N.I. No. 12002460010000104, which is in the production of the investigator of the Main Investigative GSU SKR po MO Vinnov V.Yu.

On the fact of the illegal persecution of my son - Kondrat N.I. I want to explain to you, dear Alexander Ivanovich, the following.

The accusation is based only on the testimony of the suspect and the accused Matsnev N.A., who repeatedly changed his testimony, admitted that he was forced to incriminate my son under the influence of torture and beating of operational officers. 12/29/2020 during the confrontation between Matsnev N.A. and Kondrat N.I., Matsnev N.A. retracted his testimony and admitted that he was forced to incriminate N.I. Kondrat. operational officers, using electric shocks and beatings on him.

Lawyer Matsneva N.A. during the confrontation on December 29, 2020. filed a petition to the investigator for a forensic medical examination.

In February 2021, more than 1.5 months after the statement to the investigator about the examination, the forensic medical examination Matsnev N.A. was carried out, the experts recorded traces of torture and beatings !!!

February 17, 2021 suspect Matsnev N.A. concluded a pre-trial cooperation agreement, and a month later - on March 17, 2021. Matsnev N.A. turned to the Internal Affairs Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia and to the investigator with a statement about beating and torturing him by operational officers with the aim of slandering N.I. Kondrat.

For unknown reasons, the investigator Vinnov V.Yu. did not check this statement and, moreover, did not even include these statements in the materials of the criminal case. Probably in order to mislead you, dear Alexander Ivanovich!

In addition, there is reason to believe that Matsnev N.A. involved in the commission of a number of other crimes and operational officers can blackmail him with this, forcing him to slander Kondrat N.I.

The investigation and the operatives mock the innocent victim - my son NI Kondrat: while he is on investigative actions, the operatives rip open the mattress and the pillow, allegedly conducting searches in the cell and naturally do not find anything; foodstuffs are taken away from my son Nikolai, which are brought to him on Fridays by his father - Kondrat I.N., Colonel General, Deputy Prosecutor General of Russia (retired). Even the fascists did not do that!

Dear Alexander Ivanovich, someday we will all become "former" !!! God grant that this chaos will end soon!

At present, the families of high-ranking officials of the prosecutor's office, the children of generals are becoming a special object of mockery on the part of law enforcement agencies and a victim of violation of laws and human values.

It is better to die at work while in office than to watch helplessly as "werewolves in uniform" and "new aristocrats" destroy a child and a family.

In order to prevent this, a professional approach is needed: just study the criminal case / inspection materials and take response measures - to stop the outlaws. After all, this chaos will affect everyone !!!

On the fact of unlawful persecution of me - Judge Kondrat E.N. I want to explain to you, dear Alexander Ivanovich, the following.

The prosecution of a judge is connected with my exercise of judicial powers, namely, failure to comply with the instructions of the court leadership in the framework of case No. A40-239027 / 16-70-310 on the bankruptcy of LLC IC RE-Porto and associated with the return to Russia of more than 25 billion rubles illegally withdrawn in 2014 -2016 in offshore jurisdictions under questionable schemes.

Since December 2019 me - Judge Kondrat E.N. there were demands from the court management to take judicial decisions in favor of offshore companies, but such decisions are illegal and Judge Kondrat E.N. refused to comply, as reported to the chairman of the judicial composition Pakhomov E.A., t.to. all instructions from the leadership of the court are broadcast through the chairman of the composition.

At the same time, I made the last decision to return more than 20 billion rubles on June 18, 2021, despite the fact that you, dear Alexander Ivanovich, had already initiated a submission against me about giving consent to initiate a criminal case against me and the meeting of the VKKS RF was supposed to take place on July 12, 2021.

I have at my disposal an audio recording of a conversation with the chairman of the 12th court composition, E.A. Pakhomov. in another arbitration case А40-275728 / 18-70-334, related to the invalidation of a transaction in the amount of RUB 340 million. and according to which Pakhomov E.A. also broadcast on behalf of the President of the Court Novikov N.A. instructions on the case. The recording of the conversation testifies to the pressure on the judge by the Chairman of the Arbitration Court of the mountains. Moscow Novikov N.A. The specified audio recording passed the examination of authenticity in the Ministry of Justice, and its text transcript was also made there.

Starting from summer-autumn 2021, Judge Kondrat E.N. began to receive demands from the Chairman of the Arbitration Court of the mountains. Moscow Novikova N.A. about her resignation, which the judge rejected.

Request for resignation on behalf of N.A. Novikov and the staff of the CSS in Moscow and Moscow Region were also broadcast to me by my good friend - the Chairman of the 10th Arbitration Court of Appeal Vorobyova I.O.

She told me more than once that I should resign because I was talkative, and Kolya (as she calls N.A. Novikov) is bloodthirsty, he will destroy you anyway. Demands for my resignation on behalf of N.A. Novikov and the guys from the FSB in Moscow and the Moscow Region, broadcast by I.O. saved on my phone when texting via Whatsapp.

Subsequently, on 18.10. me - Judge Kondrat E.N., who was on sick leave, was provoked by the FSB officers in Moscow and the Moscow Region and the judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court Makhalkina E.A., who was detained while receiving a bribe in June 2020. from the arbitration manager Goloshumova AV, as well as participating in the transfer of a bribe in November 2020. "Fixer" Majidov U.

I was provoked in connection with the transfer of funds to judge EA Makhalkina. Makhalkina E.A. intended to purchase an apartment in October 2020. Some of the money was loaned to her by other judges. Makhalkina E.A., starting from June 2020. demonstrated from the working computer in the arbitration court the apartment that she wants to acquire, and from the working computer she repeatedly demonstrated the preliminary sale and purchase agreement of the apartment intended for the acquisition. Do not trust Makhalkina E.A. I had no intention of buying an apartment. I helped her in choosing an apartment, including providing the realtor's phone number, which takes a small commission, which is recorded by the operational staff.

Dear Alexander Ivanovich, does the investigation really believe that I, a judge with 13 years of experience, who is on sick leave with Covid, will take out into the courtyard of the house of my former subordinate, who made coffee for me for 10 years and carried pies from the dining room, a bribe! This is completely absurd!

I gave her the money only because E.A. Makhalkina it was necessary to urgently close the deal with the apartment and have time to repair it before the New Year !!!



Analyzing the materials of the pre-investigation check, which served as the basis for the direction by you, dear Alexander Ivanovich, Judges Kondrat E.N. from 05/19/2021 No. 224 / 1-694-21, as well as other information about the judge Makhalkina E.A., her corrupt activities, and considering that on the basis of the decisions of the judicial collegium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 02.07. regarding Makhalkina E.A. it was allowed to conduct operational - search activities, I believe that there are sufficient grounds indicating the illegality of the criminal prosecution against me - Judge Kondrat E.N., as well as about the provocation in relation to me by the officers of the FSB of Russia in Moscow and Moscow region, conducted with the participation of E.A. Makhalkina, for the purpose of my illegal criminal prosecution.

Makhalkina E.A. she was the direct person in respect of whom the operational-search measures were carried out, in connection with the commission of a corruption crime, and therefore at any time Makhalkina E.A. could be held criminally liable, which she could reasonably have feared and wanted to avoid.







To be continued

Arseny Dronov

Solvers, Servants of Themis and Counterintelligence

How the judge agreed to the FSB experiment



Elena Kondrat, a judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court, filed a statement with the chairman of the ICR, Alexander Bastrykin. She demands to initiate a case against the investigator of the Main Investigative Directorate of the TFR in Moscow, Kondratyev, who, according to the Servant of Themis, fabricated materials against her, which served as the basis for Bastrykin's appeal to VKKS and the VKKS decision to allow the initiation of criminal prosecution of Kondrat.



Recall that they are trying to accuse Kondrat of transferring money to her once good friend, another judge of the AU of Moscow Makhalkina, who operated under the control of the FSB in Moscow. However, Kondrat prudently recorded her conversations with Makhalkina and she kept a recording of the conversation dated April 27, 2021. On this record, Makhalkina admits to her friend that when receiving a bribe from the bankruptcy administrator she was taken red-handed by the FSB officers and, for not being prosecuted, she undertakes work for the FSB for 10 years, participate in operational combinations. Makhalkina says that the arbitration manager Goloshumova herself came to her and offered her money, and since Makhalkina was going to buy an apartment, she accepted the offer. During the transfer of money, Makhalkin was detained. Makhalkina also informs Kondrat in a conversation that her officers of the FSB in Moscow and the Moscow Region were forced to provoke the fixer Medzhidov to receive money for resolving the issue. Makhalkina collaborated with Majidov and he trusted her. As a result, Majidov was detained. She also said during the conversation that the judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court Fateeva N.The. , who was appointed by the chairman Novikov as the chairman of the banknote representative, was also caught red-handed while receiving a bribe by the FSB officers. However, at the request of Novikov, for Fateeva, everything ended only in a swift dismissal.



Rucriminal.info, with small abbreviations, quotes Elena Kondrat's appeal to Alexander Bastrykin:

“In the proceedings of the investigator for especially important cases of the first investigation department of the second department for the investigation of especially important cases (on crimes against state power and in the economic sphere) of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Russia in the mountains. Moscow, Major of Justice Kondratyev P.A. there is a material of a pre-investigation check KRSoP 203 / 1-42pr-21 in relation to the judge of the ASGM Kondrat E.N.

During the procedural check, the investigator Kondartyev P.A. In violation of the requirements of Articles 144,145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, he did not question the judge on materials falsified by the FSB officers in Moscow and the Ministry of Defense, which, in the process of conducting operational-search measures and an operational experiment, in violation of the requirements of the Federal Law "On Operational-Investigative Activities", Judge Kondrat E. N. also not interviewed.

May 19, 2021 ref. 224 / 1-694-21 You have submitted a Submission to the Higher Qualification Collegium of Judges of the Russian Federation to give consent to initiate a criminal case against the judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court Elena Nikolaevna Kondrat on the grounds of a crime under Part 4 of Art. 291.1. Of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on the basis of the materials of the pre-investigation check of KRSoP 203 / 1-42pr-21 of the GSU in Moscow (a copy is attached).

In your Submission, you indicated false information that: “In the course of the audit, receive explanations from Ye.N. Kondrat. it was not possible, since she avoided appearing before the investigator, her whereabouts have not been established ”.

This is falsification! You were misled by the investigator of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Russia in the mountains. Moscow, Major of Justice PA Kondratyev….

The notion of excitement against Kondrat E.N. of the criminal case is due to my principled position taken in the exercise of judicial powers. So, I am judge Kondrat E.N. I ignored the demands of the court leadership in adopting illegal judicial acts, which made it possible not to return the funds illegally withdrawn from Russia in the amount of more than 25 billion rubles, which I stated in my complaints to the President of the Russian Federation and to the FSB of Russia.

Investigator for especially important cases of the first investigation department of the second department for the investigation of especially important cases (about crimes against state power and in the sphere of economics) of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Russia in Moscow, Major of Justice Kondratyev P.A. during the pre-investigation procedural check, in violation of the requirements of Articles 144-145 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, he did not even try to interrogate me. In the materials of the check submitted to the VKKS RF there is no information indicating that the investigator tried to interrogate me, there is no evidence that I was summoned to the investigator. Thus it is investigator Kondratyev P.A. misled you and the members of the VKKS RF about the impossibility of interrogating me, actually exceeded his official powers, falsified the materials of the check ...

Until 06 July 2021 I was at work in the LRA building, held court hearings, I did not receive any calls or calls.

The explanations given by the investigator at the meeting of the VKKS RF are completely unreliable. Investigator Kondratie in P.A. misled the members of the VKKS RF, without questioning me, without finding out from me the information that I was being persecuted in connection with my position taken by me in the exercise of judicial powers, depriving me in fact of the opportunity to protect my constitutional rights and freedoms, as well as additional guarantees independence of judges in accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the Federal Law “On the Status of Judges in the Russian Federation”.

... The investigative experiment was carried out by the FSB officers for Moscow and the Moscow region on 18.10.2020, and the statement of the judge of the AGSM Makhalkina E.A. about illegal actions Kondrat E.N., as follows from your submission, was filed with the FSB of Russia on 13.10.2020, after which the judge of the AGSM Makhalkina E.A. gave her voluntary consent to participate in operational-search activities.

Consequently, the statement about the commission by the judge Kondrat E.N. of any crime, in the materials of the pre-investigation check No. 203 / 1-42pr-21 of the Main Investigation Department for the city of Moscow, there are no.

In your submission there is no information about when to the investigator Kondratyev P.A. a message was received about the committed by the judge of the AGSM Kondrat E.N. crime, during what period this message was checked and what procedural decisions were made on it for more than 7 (seven) months from 13.10. until 19.05.2021

I believe that the deadlines for considering a crime report provided for by Article 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation have been grossly violated.

In accordance with part 2 of article 140 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the basis for initiating a criminal case is the availability of sufficient data indicating signs of a crime. In accordance with Part 1 of Article 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, the investigator has the right to receive explanations and perform other procedural actions aimed at establishing data indicating signs of a crime.

However, the investigator Kondratyev P.A. deliberately did not try to get an explanation from me on the circumstances reported by Makhalkina E.A. and officers of the FSB for Moscow and the Moscow Region. What kind of legality and validity of the procedural check can we talk about?

Conclusion of the investigator Kondratyev P.A. about the presence of corpus delicti in my actions made only on the basis of the statement and explanation of Makhalkina E.A., the explanation (report) of the FSB officer for Moscow and the Moscow region A.A. Ushakov, the explanations of public figures S.Yu. Ponamarev. and Moshkova R.N. (probably freelance officers of the FSB), who arrived at the site on 18.10. more than 40 minutes later, after the operational experiment, there were no witnesses to the transfer of money.

On my repeated appeals to the investigator Kondratyev P.A. from 30.06.2021, 14.06.2021, 15.06.2021, 16.06.2021 with a proposal to receive from me explanations on the materials of the inspection of KRSoP 203 / 1-42pr-21, three letters were received from the investigator from 07.19. and two from 07/27/2021. of a similar content: “Due to the fact that when submitting a submission to give consent to initiate a criminal case, the inspection materials were actually collected in full and after obtaining the consent of the Higher Qualification Collegium of Judges of the Russian Federation, they cannot be supplemented, since the volume of collected materials cannot be changed prior to the entry into force of the received decision.

Thus, there are currently no legal grounds and opportunities for obtaining explanations from you ”(copies of letters are attached).

What completeness of the collected materials can we talk about if the investigator did not even question me, submitting false information about me to the VKKS, despite the fact that it was a question of initiating a criminal case against the judge. During the meeting of the VKKS, the investigator stated false information that he had notified me properly and that I had ignored the summons to summon the investigative authorities. This is utter absurdity, I did not receive any summons, because the investigator did not send them to me. Letters that investigator Kondratyev P.A. sent I received.

Is the investigator of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee for Moscow, Major of Justice P.A. does not know how to get an explanation from the acting judge? ….

I ask you to check the legality of the findings of the investigator P.A. Kondratyev. about the presence in my actions of signs of corpus delicti.

Moreover, the investigator Kondratyev P.A. the circumstances of the detention of judge of the LRA Makhalkina E.A. have not been investigated. red-handed when receiving a bribe in May-June 2020. from the bankruptcy manager Goloshumova A.The. and during the transfer by the judge of the LRA Makhalkina E.A. bribes to U. Majidov in autumn 2020….

As follows from the Submission about giving consent to initiate a criminal case against Kondrat E.N. from 05/19/2021 No. 224 / 1-694-21, 18.10.2020 from about 18 h. 30 min. until 19:00 Kondrat E.N. handed over to Makhalkina E.A., acting under the control of law enforcement officers, cash in the amount of 50 thousand US dollars, after which she was detained by law enforcement officers at the scene of the crime.

The law separates from the provocation of a bribe "instigating actions of law enforcement officers", which are "committed in violation of the requirements of Article 5 of the Federal Law of August 12 1995 N 144-FZ "On operational search activities" and consist in the transfer of a bribe or the subject of commercial bribery with the consent or at the suggestion of an official or a person performing managerial functions in a commercial or other organization, when such consent or proposal was obtained as a result persuading these persons to receive valuables under circumstances indicating that without the intervention of law enforcement officials, the intent to obtain them would not have arisen and the crime would not have been committed ”.

Thus, I believe that in relation to me, judge of the LRA Kondrat E.N. a provocation was committed by officers of the FSB Directorate for Moscow and the Moscow Region with the participation of the judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court Makhalkina E.A. A. criminal case.

The unlawful persecution of me, Judge Kondrat E.N., began in connection with the disregard of the demand of the court leadership in adopting illegal judicial acts that allowed not to return the funds illegally withdrawn from Russia in the amount of more than 25 billion rubles, as well as the demand for resignation received judge Kondrat E.N. from the officers of the FSB in Moscow and the Moscow region participating in the operational experiment on 10/18/2020, otherwise they stated that they would create problems for my son, Kondrat N.I., about which I sent a complaint to the President of the Russian Federation and filed a complaint with the FSB of Russia.

The transcripts of conversations between me and Makhalkina E.A., available in the materials of the procedural check, testify to the fact of a long personal communication, a trusting relationship that has developed between us.

Thus, I believe that these actions by judge of the LRA Makhalkina E.A. in the form of a provocation, bribes against me were committed by her solely under pressure from the FSB officers for Moscow and the Moscow region and in order not to bring her herself to criminal responsibility.

This information Makhalkina E.A. 04/27/2021 she confirmed to me during lunch in the canteen of the LRA, and also told me that she was detained when receiving a bribe by the FSB officers in Moscow and the Moscow Region, her fingerprints were on the money, the bribe was recorded by the officers and she was offered to cooperate with the FSB officers in order to avoid criminal prosecution in Moscow and Moscow region. On this conversation, an expert study was carried out No. 2308 / 16-6-21 of 06/07/2021. in the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation and a transcript of the conversation (a copy of the expert study is attached).

You, dear Alexander Ivanovich, and the members of the VKKS of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation were misled by the investigator PA Kondratyev, who personally transcribed the audio recordings of the conversations of Kondrat E.N. and Makhalkina E.A. without the involvement of specialists in the field of phonoscopy and linguistics ”.





To be continued

Arseny Dronov

Bloody Vendetta in Mantle

FSB believes that mafia showdowns in the judiciary



Rucriminal.info became aware of the simply fantastic development of the story with the investigation against the judge of the Arbitration Court of Moscow (ASGM) Elena Kondrat and her son Nikolai Kondrat (his father is ex-Deputy Prosecutor General Ivan Kondrat). Elena Kondrat herself is suspected of bribing her former assistant, and now the LRA judge Elena Makhlkina. Nikolay, in turn, is in custody on charges that he "ordered" the murder of his driver Kirill Igitkhanyan.



Sources said that the investigation and the operatives are not going to stop only on this accusation. Currently, the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Ministry of Defense of the Moscow region has received materials on another potential episode that may be incriminated to Nikolai. Allegedly, he was preparing for the attempted murder of Judge Makhalkina, who turned out to be an agent of the FSB of the Russian Federation and was a participant in an operational experiment in relation to his mother Elena Kondrat. According to the FSB, it turns out that morals in the spirit of the Sicilian mafia reign in the judiciary, only that "Colombian ties" and "cement shoes" Themis' servants do not do each other, and that is not a fact.

According to the interlocutor of Rucriminal.info, in order for Nikolai Kondrat himself to become compliant and begin to admit guilt, the investigation prepared a "surprise" for him. Unexpectedly, a meeting with a woman much older than the 20-year-old student of Moscow State University Nicolas was allowed, with whom he had only met for 1.5 months and did not feel any special feelings. And this despite the fact that for 8 months the investigation has denied the young man a meeting with his parents. Suspecting something was wrong, Nikolai refused the "surprise".

Recall, according to the data of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Moscow Region, on October 2, 2020, Nikolai Kondrat's Toyota Camry car was stopped by traffic police officers on Kutuzovsky Prospekt. His driver Kirill Igitkhanyan was driving. He showed the police an investigator's identity card and a special “non-check” coupon, allowing the holder of such a document to avoid checks on the roads.

The identity card and the coupon raised doubts among the police about the authenticity, on this basis Kirill Igitkhanyan was detained and taken to the Dorogomilovskiy OVD.

Nikolay Kondrat was disturbed by the detention of the driver with a "fake" certificate. To prevent the driver from telling his parents about this, the guy decided to get rid of him, says a source of Izvestia in law enforcement agencies. He instructed the iconic Nikita Matsnev to carry out his plans, promising a "generous" fee - 80 thousand rubles.

According to the investigation, Nikolai Kondrat passed a hunting knife to Nikita Matsnev through a taxi driver and wrote a message to Kirill, making an appointment in a remote place - in a ravine in the Lukhovitsky district of the Moscow region - supposedly to discuss what had happened. Nikita Matsnev attracted his friend Gennady Voskresensky to the case. Together, they met the unsuspecting driver at the designated location the day after the arrest incident, October 3. During the meeting, a fight broke out, the man received several knife wounds, from which he died.

On December 21, 2020, Nikolai Kondrat was arrested on suspicion of organizing the murder of Kirill Igitkhanyan.

Sources of Rucriminal.info, close to the Kondrat family, note that the evidence base on Nikolai is based on the testimony of N.A. Matsnev, who entered into a pre-trial agreement with the investigation on February 17, 2021. According to the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, when concluding a pre-trial agreement, a case against a person who has entered into such an agreement is separated into a separate proceeding and considered in a simplified manner with a verdict. Those. when considering a case in which Matsnev N.A. concluded a pre-trial agreement with the investigation, the court will not consider and delve into the details of the crime committed by NA Matsnev.

At the same time, this verdict will be of a prejudicial nature for the persons against whom Matsnev N.A. gave evidence - Kondrat N.I. and Voskresensky G.D.

During the interrogation of Voskresensky G.D. he explained that Matsnev N.A. forced him to hide the body of Igitkhanyan K.A. threatening, if you do not help, you will be 14 (corpse). Voskresensky G.D. and Matsnev N.A. for a long time they were in the same auto club, participated in night races, there are rumors in the auto club that Matsnev N.A. there are other corpses. Knowing the explosive nature of Matsnev N.A. and information about previously committed murders by Matsnev N.A., Voskresensky G.D. got scared of him and helped to hide the corpse.

“There is information that operational officers have information about the commission of Matsnev N.A. over the course of several years, a number of murders on the territory of Russia. According to the lawyer who represented the interests of one of the suspects, one of the witnesses to the murders previously committed by N.A. Matsnev. is currently hiding on the territory of Ukraine, her name and surname, according to the lawyer, is known to the operatives, - the interlocutor of Rucriminal.info expressed the opinion, - But, fulfilling someone's order, they force Matsnev N.A. to testify against Kondrat N.AND. and blackmail Matsnev N.A. the fact that if he does not stipulate

NI Kondrat, they will send him for the murders he had committed earlier, as well as car theft, etc. ”.

According to the source, after the conclusion of the deal with the investigation (February 17, 2021), Matsnev N.A. already in March 2021, he personally wrote a statement to the investigator and to the Internal Security Directorate of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Ministry of Defense about his (Matsneva N.A.) beating and torture. In the statement, he described in detail how he was beaten, an electric current was passed through him and asked to be checked upon his appeal. But the investigator not only did not conduct a check, but did not even attach the statements of N.A. Matsnev. in the investigation. Probably having “forgotten” about these statements in any verification materials, which he concealed from the prosecutor and intends to conceal from the court.

“And the“ curators ”of the investigator Babushkin A.The. for his such compliance, he was promoted to the post - transferred from the Investigation Department in Kolomna immediately to the Central Asia TFR of Russia, though to the personnel department, "- said the interlocutor of Rucriminal.info. He connects the events that happened with Nikolay, with the position of his mother, Judge Elena Kondrat, in a number of cases and unwillingness to voluntarily resign, as the chairman of the LRA Novikova N.A. demanded from her, who enjoys the unlimited support and trust of V.M. Lebedev.

“I would like to believe that the first deputy head of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation, S.V. Kirienko. after all, he will sort out Novikov and stop defending and shielding him in every possible way, ”the source says.

Recall that the VKKS on July 12 considered the submission of the head of the TFR Alexander Bastyrkin and agreed to initiate a criminal case against the judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court Elena Kondrat on the grounds of a crime provided for in part 4 of Article 291.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation ("Mediation in bribery on an especially large scale") ... According to the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation and the FSB in Moscow and the region, Kondrat transferred $ 50,000 to her former assistant, and now also the judge of the LRA, Elena Makhlkina, for making the decision of the necessary businessman. According to the operatives, Kondrat transferred money to Makhalkina for making a decision not to bring to subsidiary liability a number of individuals and legal entities, namely: United Standard LLC, its founders SI Soloveichik. and Shendrik V.G., accountant and financial director of LLC "USTS" Kostash O.A. and Pankova A.V., LLC "TransStroyMekhanizatsiya", as well as on bringing to subsidiary liability the former directors of LLC "USTS" Vershinin A.N., Seoev A.M., Laptev A.I., Pleskonos S.A. and Sakuna B.V.

Kondrat herself insists that she transferred money to the former assistant Makhalkina at her own request, since she did not have enough to buy an apartment and became a victim of a provocation. At the same time, Kondrat cited a recording of her conversation with Makhalkina, in which she admits that in 2020 the cattle were detained by the FSB while receiving money from the manager A.V. Goloshumova. ... In a personal conversation with Kondrat E.N. 04/27/2021 (recordings of the conversation are available), E.A. Makhalkina. said that she was caught red-handed, there are her fingerprints and for 10 years she must cooperate.

Already continuing to be under the control of the FSB, Makhalkina E.A. became a participant in an operational experiment in the case of the fixer Ullubiy Medzhidov. In December 2020, Majidov was detained.



To be continued

Arseny Dronov

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Sea urchin as a bribe

FSB is interested in judicial cuisine



Judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court Elena Kondrat appealed to the Supreme Court against the decision of the VKKS, which gave consent to initiate a criminal case against Kondrat on the grounds of a crime under part 4 of Article 291.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation ("Mediation in bribery on an especially large scale"). According to the ICR and the FSB department for Moscow and the region, Kondrat transferred $ 50,000 to her former assistant, and now also the judge of the LRA, Elena Makhlkina, for making a decision that the businessmen needed. The meeting on the redneck Kondrat is scheduled for September 28.



The Rucriminal.info correspondent learned what documents were submitted to the VKKS for making a decision on consent to initiate a case against a judge. These are 3 volumes: two of them - Kondrat's track record and one volume - the report of the FSB officers, Makhalkina's statement and voice transcripts of the conversation between Kondrat and Makhalkina. At the same time, the textual decoding itself is incomplete, the phrases are taken out of context and the investigator points out in many places that the text has been lost.

For example, the investigation believes that on September 1, Kondrat and Makhalkina, while in the Swallow restaurant, ordered sea urchins, and ordering sea urchins means an offer to receive a bribe. Further, there is a "space" in the text transcript. Let's fill it in. At that moment, the waiter came, brought sea urchins, explained that they need to be eaten with quail eggs, etc. Kondrat told Makhalkina that in Herosima and Nagasaki, after the nuclear bombardment, the Japanese ate sea urchins to remove radionucleides. Makhalkina was surprised that there was such a fact, said that she did not know history at all and thought that Herosima was the song of the singer Sandra. But there is nothing about the "bribe" in the conversation.

It is worth noting that, contrary to the information that appeared the other day, Kondrat never cooperated with the investigation, moreover, she had no communication with representatives of the operational-investigative group at all. Investigator Kondratyev refuses to question Kondrat. He motivates it like this. If VKKS, on the basis of the submitted materials, agreed to initiate a case, it means that the materials were collected in full and did not need interviews. And after the approval of the VKKS, the materials can no longer be supplemented.





At the same time, one of the arguments of the investigation was that it was not possible to get an explanation from the judge, since it was also not possible to establish her whereabouts. While, until May 24, 2020, Kondrat was considering cases. From May 25, 2020, she was on sick leave for 10 days, the VKKS sent her a notification 5 days before the meeting, and the apartment was not indicated in the notification, i.e. "to grandfather's village". Throughout June 2021, Kondrat considered cases.

The VKKS submission was considered on May 31, 2020. Kondrat reported an improper notification and the question was postponed until July 12, 2021. On July 12, Kondrat also did not appear and was on sick leave for 9 days due to contact with a relative who had a coronavirus.

“Judge Kondrat E.N. no one has ever questioned, moreover, the investigator avoids communicating with her. She sent him four letters and he sent her a formal reply (the text is published by Rucriminal.info) that since the verification materials have been formed, there is no need to interrogate Kondrat, ”said a source close to the Kondrat family.

According to him, Kondrat also filed an application to initiate a criminal case against Makhalkina and the FSB officer A.A. Ushakov, who was preparing materials for the VKKS.

As Rucriminal.info told, according to operatives, Kondrat transferred money to Makhalkina for making a decision not to bring a number of individuals and legal entities to subsidiary liability, namely: United Standard LLC, its founders S.I. Soloveychik. and Shendrik V.G., accountant and financial director of LLC "USTS" Kostash O.A. and Pankova A.V., LLC "TransStroyMekhanizatsiya", as well as on bringing to subsidiary liability the former directors of LLC "USTS" Vershinin A.N., Seoev A.M., Laptev A.I., Pleskonos S.A. and Sakuna B.V.

Kondrat herself insists that she transferred money to the former assistant Makhalkina at her own request, since she did not have enough to buy an apartment and became a victim of a provocation. At the same time, Kondrat cited a recording of her conversation with Makhalkina, in which she admits that in 2020 the cattle were detained by the FSB while receiving money from the manager A.V. Goloshumova. ... In a personal conversation with Kondrat E.N. 04/27/2021 (recordings of the conversation are available), E.A. Makhalkina. said that she was caught red-handed, there are her fingerprints and for 10 years she must cooperate.

Already continuing to be under the control of the FSB, Makhalkina E.A. became a participant in an operational experiment in the case of the fixer Ullubiy Medzhidov. In December 2020, Majidov was detained.



To be continued

Arseny Dronov

Source: www.rucriminal.info

"If you don't help, you will be the 14th corpse"

Testimony about a serial killer appeared in the case of the judge's son and ex-deputy prosecutor...



The Rucriminal.info correspondent managed to find out the version of events accused of the murder of Nikolai Kondrat, the son of judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court Elena Kondrat and ex-Deputy Prosecutor General Ivan Kondrat. We give the version of the investigation, and then the position of the accused.



According to the data of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, on October 2, 2020, Nikolai Kondrat's Toyota Camry car was stopped by traffic police officers on Kutuzovsky Prospekt. His driver Kirill Igitkhanyan was driving. He showed the police officers an investigator's certificate and a special “non-check” coupon, allowing the holder of such a document to avoid checks on the roads.

The identity card and the coupon raised doubts among the police about the authenticity, on this basis Kirill Igitkhanyan was detained and taken to the Dorogomilovskiy OVD.



Nikolai Kondrat was worried about the detention of the driver with a "fake" certificate. So that the driver does not tell his parents about this, the guy decided to get rid of him, says a source of Izvestia in law enforcement agencies. He instructed the same Nikita Matsnev to carry out his plans, promising a "generous" fee - 80 thousand rubles.

According to the investigation, Nikolai Kondrat passed a hunting knife to Nikita Matsnev through a taxi driver and wrote a message to Kirill, making an appointment in a remote place - in a ravine in the Lukhovitsky district of the Moscow region - supposedly to discuss what had happened. Nikita Matsnev attracted his friend Gennady Voskresensky to the case. Together, they met the unsuspecting driver at the designated location the day after the arrest incident, October 3. During the meeting, a fight broke out, the man received several knife wounds from which he died.

On December 21, 2020, Nikolai Kondrat was arrested on suspicion of organizing the murder of Kirill Igitkhanyan.

Sources of Rucriminal.info, close to the Kondrat family, note that the evidence base on Nikolai is based on the testimony of N.A. Matsnev, who entered into a pre-trial agreement with the investigation on February 17, 2021. According to the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, when concluding a pre-trial agreement, a case against a person who has entered into such an agreement is separated into a separate proceeding and considered in a simplified manner with a verdict. Those. when considering a case in which Matsnev N.A. concluded a pre-trial agreement with the investigation, the court will not consider and delve into the details of the crime committed by NA Matsnev.

At the same time, this verdict will be of a prejudicial nature for the persons against whom Matsnev N.A. gave testimony - Kondrat N.I. and Voskresensky G.D.

During the interrogation of Voskresensky G.D. he explained that Matsnev N.A. forced him to hide the body of Igitkhanyan K.A. threatening, if you do not help, you will be 14 (corpse). Voskresensky G.D. and Matsnev N.A. for a long time they were in the same auto club, participated in night races, there are rumors in the auto club that Matsnev N.A. there are other corpses. Knowing the explosive nature of Matsnev N.A. and information about previously committed murders by Matsnev N.A., Voskresensky G.D. got scared of him and helped to hide the corpse.

“There is information that operational officers have information about the commission of Matsnev N.A. over the course of several years, a number of murders on the territory of Russia. According to the lawyer who represented the interests of one of the suspects, one of the witnesses to the murders previously committed by N.A. Matsnev. is currently hiding on the territory of Ukraine, her name and surname, according to the lawyer, is known to operatives, - the interlocutor of Rucriminal.info expressed the opinion, - But, fulfilling someone's order, they are forcing Matsnev N.A. to testify against Kondrat N.AND. and blackmail Matsnev N.A. the fact that if he does not slander Kondrat NI, they will send him for the murders he had committed earlier, as well as car theft, etc. ”.

According to the source, after the conclusion of the deal with the investigation (February 17, 2021), Matsnev N.A. already in March 2021, he personally wrote a statement to the investigator and to the Internal Security Directorate of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Ministry of Defense about his (Matsneva N.A.) beating and torture. In the statement, he described in detail how he was beaten, an electric current was passed through him and asked to be checked upon his appeal. But the investigator not only did not conduct a check, but did not even attach the statements of N.A. Matsnev. in the investigation. Probably having "forgotten" about these statements in any verification materials, which he concealed from the prosecutor and intends to conceal from the court.

“And the“ curators ”of the investigator Babushkin A.The. for his such pliability, he was promoted to the post - transferred from the Investigation Department in Kolomna immediately to the Central Asia TFR of Russia, though to the personnel department, "- said the interlocutor of Rucriminal.info. He connects the events that happened with Nikolay, with the position of his mother, Judge Elena Kondrat, in a number of cases and unwillingness to voluntarily resign, as the chairman of the LRA Novikova N.A. demanded from her, who enjoys the unlimited support and trust of V.M. Lebedev.

“I would like to believe that the first deputy head of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation, S.V. Kirienko. so he will understand Novikov and stop protecting and shielding him in every possible way,” the source says.

Recall that the VKKS on July 12 considered the submission of the head of the TFR Alexander Bastyrkin and agreed to initiate a criminal case against the judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court Elena Kondrat on the grounds of a crime provided for in part 4 of Article 291.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation ("Mediation in bribery on an especially large scale") ... According to the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation and the FSB in Moscow and the region, Kondrat transferred $ 50,000 to her former assistant, and now also the judge of the LRA, Elena Makhlkina, for making the decision of the necessary businessman. According to the operatives, Kondrat transferred money to Makhalkina for making a decision not to bring to subsidiary liability a number of individuals and legal entities, namely: United Standard LLC, its founders SI Soloveichik. and Shendrik V.G., accountant and financial director of LLC "USTS" Kostash O.A. and Pankova A.V., LLC "TransStroyMekhanizatsiya", as well as on bringing to subsidiary liability the former directors of LLC "USTS" Vershinin A.N., Seoev A.M., Laptev A.I., Pleskonos S.A. and Sakuna B.V.

Kondrat herself insists that she transferred money to the former assistant Makhalkina at her own request, since she did not have enough to buy an apartment and became a victim of a provocation. At the same time, Kondrat cited a recording of her conversation with Makhalkina, in which she admits that in 2020 the cattle were detained by the FSB while receiving money from the manager A.V. Goloshumova. ... In a personal conversation with Kondrat E.N. 04/27/2021 (recordings of the conversation are available), E.A. Makhalkina. said that she was caught red-handed, there are her fingerprints and for 10 years she must cooperate.

Already continuing to be under the control of the FSB, Makhalkina E.A. became a participant in an operational experiment in the case of the fixer Ullubiy Medzhidov. In December 2020, Majidov was detained.





To be continued

Arseny Dronov

Source: www.rucriminal.info