The GSU of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Moscow and the prosecutor’s office “plugged them into a socket”

The trial of the defenders of the Police Ombudsman began



Defender of the Police Ombudsman Vasily Fedorov especially for the Cheka-OGPU

“You all know that the three of us are in prison for solving the crime, the details of which were outlined in the video “Save the Police Ombudsman.”

Sitting in a pre-trial detention center and periodically seeing the proud and confident face of our investigator Yegor, who came for interrogations, portraying the investigation of the case of the century. I still could not believe that he was so narrow-minded that he believes in the success of his falsification only on the basis that his superiors promised full support. I could not believe that Yegor did not understand that the powers of his superiors would end at the stage of the court, where their hands simply could not reach, and if not the district court, then the Moscow Court, Cassation or the Supreme would definitely turn this nonsense in the opposite direction. There must have been something else that instilled confidence in Egor and allowed him to wear a complex expression, and now, after almost a year in the pre-trial detention center, my accomplice Yevgeny Moiseev seems to have found the answer: in 2022, before a criminal case was opened against us, Khoroshevsky the district court of Moscow, gave a year of probation for part 3 of article 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (the same as ours) to citizen Khamitova, who wrote a statement to the police that someone stole her car. According to her statement, the duty officer sent an investigative task force (SOG). They arrived, took a picture of the place where the car was supposedly stolen from, drew up a protocol for the inspection of the scene (OMP), asked Khamitova to sign it, later it turned out that Khamitova wrote a deliberately false statement, but in fact no one stole the car and she knew. The goal of Khamitova was most likely a classic - getting insurance, but what does part 3 have to do with it ???

After all, this part involves the artificial creation of evidence of a crime, that is, its staging. If Khamitova had painted on the spot where her car was allegedly stolen from, traces of men's boots; I would have thrown a screwdriver / ruler into place, with which they allegedly opened the car; I would have planted instructions for stealing a car. Which the hijackers allegedly could have dropped, and after that would have filed an application for theft, then it would be the purest part 3 of article 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and without all of the above, her application only draws on part 1 of article 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. But apparently the Khoroshevsky police department needed a stick specifically for a serious crime, and the investigation, as an artificially created evidence of car theft, sewed on Khamitova that she signed the WMD protocol! That is, the structure of the accusation is exactly the same as ours: Ira allegedly voluntarily wrote a statement about the crime to the police from the CSS of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, who, for some reason, ended up at her house 500 kilometers from the service area, although she did not call them, and after initiating a criminal case, according to her statement, signed the protocols of interrogations and confrontations, which, according to investigator Yegor, artificially created evidence of Vova's accusation of extortion.

It is obvious that the senior investigator for especially important cases of the 12th department of the SC of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Moscow, Yegor Fedorov, when we were put in a pre-trial detention center, was inspired by the Khamitova case, because, according to Evgeny Moiseev, some speech turns and phrases were simply copied from her sentence and inserted into our accusation. And everything is “herringbone” with Yegor and the authorities pat on the head, but there was a surprise that Yegor may not be aware of until now: Khamitova, disagreeing with the decision of the Khoroshevsky court that, with her signature in the WMD protocol, she artificially created evidence for the prosecution, filed an appeal with the Moscow City Court, which on December 8, 2022 determined (No. 10-23014/2022) that Khamitova did not create any evidence by signing in the WMD protocol. In addition, this action of hers was already carried out during the verification of a false report (statement) by Khamitova, and according to the meaning of the law, the crime under 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is completed from the moment the addressee perceives knowingly false information. On the basis of all this, the Moscow City Court canceled Khamitova's condition, reclassified her, 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation from part 3 to part 1 (with a serious one to a slight one), soldered 50 thousand rubles a fine and released her with God.

On July 28, 2023, the judge of the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow, Belyakov, began consideration of our case, which is identical in structure to the Khamitova case. True, the methods of investigation are radically different, as are its circumstances:

1) No one mocked Khamitova. During the investigation, she was under house arrest, while all three of us, including a widow with two children and a mortgage, have been sitting in a pre-trial detention center for a year without the slightest specific and factual grounds for which Art. 108 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation obliges the judge to refer when making a decision on the length of service.

2) Khamitova's article, although it was reclassified as less serious, but hot. She nevertheless received some kind of sentence, which means that the investigation and the prosecutor's office worked at least somewhat effectively, even though the stick would be under part 1 (small severity), and not under part 3 (severe). In our case, retraining in part 1 neither the prosecutor, nor even Egor with his leader no matter how it suits, because the statute of limitations under part 1 of article 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation expired even before the initiation of a criminal case against us, and this is a rehabilitating ground, unlike the situation, if during an investigation or trial. Those. requalification in part 1 in our case automatically means that the case against us was initiated illegally, which in turn makes it illegal to pick at relatives' underpants with the seizure of their phones and laptops and, in general, all procedural and investigative actions, which in in turn gives them the status of abuse of power. Well, our detention, in an illegally initiated case, is the cherry on the cake of all this lawlessness.

Judge Anatoly Anatolyevich Belyakov is now facing a very interesting choice:

1) Pass a guilty verdict, knowing that it will be canceled by Mos. Gor. The court, based on its own practice, and get a ticket to the disciplinary commission;

2) To justify, than to undermine warm relations with the Main Investigative Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Prosecutor's Office, frankly "plugging them into the socket";

3) Return the case to Yegor through the prosecutor, with the resolution “here one hundred percent justification is writhing and either you yourself stop this rotten thing as you like, or if you stick it in me again, you won’t like my decision”;

4) Convince the prosecutor to drop support for the prosecution.

In the meantime, we are waiting for everyone to attend court hearings in room 355 of the Tverskoy District Court.





THANK YOU TO ALL LAWYERS WHO RESPONDED TO DEFEND US, YOU WILL BE DEDICATED TO A SEPARATE POST.

SPECIAL THANKS TO THE GUYS FROM THE VChK-OGPU TELEGRAM CHANNEL WHO ARE FOLLOWING OUR SITUATION.

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

"APPOSITE CELL"

The case of the defender of the “Police Ombudsman” was made up of porn



The Telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU and Rucriminal.info continue to publish letters from the defenders of the Police Ombudsman and the authors of the film about the grossest violations and falsifications committed by operatives and investigators in the case of Vladimir Vorontsov. As a result, it was because of this film that the defenders themselves were sent to prison on a perfect invented case. We publish a new letter from Vasily Fedorov.



"Especially for the Cheka-OGPU

Hi all! This is the creator of the film "Save the Police Ombudsman": Vasily Fedorov. The three of us are still in jail (almost 9 months).

There will be a bit of a slow start.

A couple of years ago I came home to Kent and we moved out to hang out. On the way to the elevator, he reached into the mailbox to check for the bill. Instead, he found a smartphone there. He pressed the "ON" button, but the phone showed the initial splash screen and went out. Kent asked if I needed it, and I threw it into my bag. A week later, I felt it in my bag, passing by the workshop next to the house, brought it in and left it with the words, fix it or keep it. They fixed it. Then I understood why he was thrown out. It turned out to be an ancient "Explay". After some time, I stumbled upon it in a box with wires and I don’t remember why I decided to introduce it into use. I installed a cart on it, logged into my account and began to install WhatsApp. It didn’t work out, the vatsap said “I won’t ride this dinosaur, I’m not your cart.” Explay went to the box with wires again.

After the release of our video, paranoia covered me and I remembered that a phone with an accessible account from telegrams was lying in the wires. I removed the cart and returned the phone to the box. On July 28, 2022, we are received with special forces (where would we be without it) and during a house search they seize this Explay, as well as my wife’s iPhone 13 and her sister’s (Natashka’s) iPhone12 (yes, we live together). A smart watch was also removed from Natasha, it was obvious to the investigator that it could contain evidence of a crime committed by me. They seized everything that could move, from a school certificate to a studio microphone. Well, they acted according to a clumsy scheme, "withdraw everything that has memory, then we'll figure it out." Under the threat of "give us the passwords to your phones or we will crack them," the girls gave out passwords, since the word "crack" sounded especially scary in relation to gadgets with a total value of more than 270 K, some of which are on credit.

Then the pre-trial detention center, investigation and familiarization with the case. Information was extracted from all the seized gadgets and recorded on disks. They were invested in the case, and the gadgets were returned, as they were not recognized as material evidence. Why then a bunch of disks with unnecessary information in the case, I don’t know, but everything seems to have a meaning.

Zhenya and I considered it necessary to familiarize ourselves with the contents of the disks and, by filing petitions, forced Yegorka to come to us in the pre-trial detention center with a laptop, disks and a disgruntled face. According to the protocol of Egorka's examination of that ancient Explay, there was some information on it, although I did not use it from the word "absolutely". I became interested in this fact and began to get acquainted with the disk first from him. There was a mountain of some memes, pictures and photos on the disk, which were allegedly copied from Explay, but I never saw them on it. Maybe because I didn’t climb in it, or maybe for some other reason. Scrolling alternately through this dump of chaotic images, I came across a photo of Vova Vorontsov with the inscription "Freedom to Vorontsov", at first I fell into a stupor in trying to understand where it could come from. In addition, it was clear that I did not do it, since it was made on the knee in the cheapest image editor and by hands that did it for the first time. I came to the conclusion that the cart itself saved this photo on the device while it was installed on this phone, since when installing telegrams on your phone, you must immediately turn off the autosave function of media files to your phone or the cart will save all media files from all chats and channels to which you are subscribed. And so with the image of Vova with a stretch, but figured it out. After all, I really could have been subscribed to a police-themed channel and this photo could have been published in it. I began to scroll further and scrolled down to exactly the same photo, the same bastard quality, with the same font of the inscription, but instead of Vova, Navalny was depicted there. But I have never been subscribed to his channels and it is unlikely that in a police public, they would have posted his photo with such a slogan. It is obvious that these pictures, either the phone itself or already on the disk, were simply thrown, and then this phone was shaken in the face of some boss, proving to him that we were APPOSITIONAL (this is how this word was written in the report of the head of the CSS Lyamzin) cell and we need to to keep in a pre-trial detention center under an article under which not a single previously convicted person received a real prison term, but only multi-episode repeat offenders received a condition for which the condition is simply not provided for by law. And I am still silent about whether we have committed p. 3 of Art. 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which they are pulling (and not pulling) to us, and even more so I am silent about who the real criminal is. Everyone already knows everything. Scrolling through the photo with Navalny and heaps her other game, I came across a few pictures with porn, this is rarely shown to you by an investigator in a pre-trial detention center. I don't subscribe to porn channels either. Porn is full of Internet without them, but after Navalny I was no longer surprised by anything. The disk with images from Explay was put aside and I began to inspect the disk with the files of my wife's phone. The result of medical tests, a few pictures in underwear, which she once sent me ... "In general, nothing like that," I thought. Then I moved on to studying the contents of Natasha's phone. And if my wife had nothing unusual in the phone, then Natasha also had nothing unusual, nothing unusual, for a girl free from relationships. Which would hardly of her own free will show me what I saw against her will, but at the behest of the senior investigator of the 12th SC GSU of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Moscow E. Fedorov. For 4 years of living together with my wife and her sister, I have never seen Natasha's boobs. And who would have thought that Fedorov would fill this gap by showing me their image in the pre-trial detention center. Well, and medical tests, of course, Natasha dreamed of sharing their results not only with me, but with the entire investigation team of 8 people. The acquaintance ended, the case was transferred to the Presnya court, and the agonizing wait for the trial began. And now, sitting in the cell, I think: "And why the devil will everyone be staring at my wife and her sister?" We met with Fedorov at the appeal and it turned out that he also saw all of the above and porn too. He also complained that during Fedorov's demonstration of pornographic photos, his morals were greatly affected, as a result of which he walked around the cell for several hours, frightening his cellmates with his high "mood". Looking into the criminal code, I saw that the demonstration of pornographic materials falls under Article 242 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. There is only up to two years in prison, which, of course, no one will deprive Yegorka of, but on the other hand, the dissemination of information constituting a personal or family secret using one's official position falls under Part 2 of Art. 137 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and is punishable by up to 4 years in prison, which, in contrast to Part 1 of Art. 242 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, is a crime of medium gravity. It is obvious that investigator Egorka committed a total of 4 episodes under Part 2 of Art. 137 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and 2 episodes under Art. 242 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and all this is documented by him, in our criminal case. This is exactly the case when, while pulling one crime to three innocent people, he himself committed six. And at the same time, absolutely strangers suffered, who spent 4 months without phones, which had nothing to do with them in a criminal case, as well as their intimate materials and materials constituting a medical secret, now they are watching everything from the hands of the investigator. The good news is that only part 1 of Art. 137 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is an article that is initiated only at the request of the victim, while Part 2 of Art. 137 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is initiated at anyone's request. It is good that there is plenty of time to think over all the details and competently draw up an application to the RF IC.

FRIENDS THANK YOU TO THOSE WHO REMEMBER US AND SUPPORT US.

SPECIAL THANKS to the administration of the VChK-OGPU telegram channel.

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

How the case of the “Police Ombudsman” was fabricated

"Bad" application sent to the landfill

At the end of July 2022, the investigator of the 12th department of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for Moscow, E. A. Fedorov, opened a case under article 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (false denunciation) against three members of the team of Police Ombudsman Vladimir Vorontsov - Andina, Moiseev, Fedorov.



According to the telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU, investigator Fedorov E.A. did not take into account that the initial statement from Andina, which was registered in the CSS of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for Moscow in the KUSP under the number 249 of 05/13/2020, is in the dustbin, since there was not a word about extortion from Vorontsov.

In fact, in the criminal case there is a statement with an explanation from Andina, written to her later, namely on May 26, 2020, under threats from Maxim Krivoshein, the detective of the CSS in Moscow.

The statement received on May 26, 2020 from Andina with an explanation of extortion by the detective of the CSS of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for Moscow, Krivoshein, agreed with the head of the CSS of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for Moscow, Stroganov, and, contrary to the interests of the service, in order to increase the indicators for detecting and solving crimes, replaced it with an earlier written statement by Andina, by which he falsified evidence of the results of operational-search activities (Article 303, Part 4 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) and abused official powers (Article 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation).

We add that after the landing of Vladimir Vorontsov, the detective of the Internal Security Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for Moscow, was promoted to head of the drug control department at the Internal Affairs Directorate for the North-East Administrative District of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for Moscow, and was given a special rank - police colonel, and Stroganov to the head of the Internal Affairs Directorate for the North-Eastern Administrative District Moscow, with the assignment of a special rank - major general of the police.

In addition, the above employees were given out of turn payments for the purchase or construction of housing.

Dear readers of Rucriminal.info. While the team of the "Police Ombudsman" in the person of Moiseev, Fedorov and Andina is in a pre-trial detention center, we continue to publish the details of the criminal case initiated by the investigator of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for Moscow Fedorov E.A. in relation to the above under Art. 306 part 3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

We invite you to listen to the audio recording of the original application (the application is currently in a landfill), which Irina Andina submitted to the CSS of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for Moscow on May 13, 2020, while in the village of Atyurievo r. Mordovia to the arriving employees of the Internal Security Service of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Moscow.



Here is the text of the statement:

“In May 2020, I saw information on the Internet that Vladimir Vorontsov, who I knew earlier, was detained for extorting money from a police officer. Vorontsov extorted money from him for not disposing of intimate photos.

I want to inform you that at the beginning of 2020 (I don’t remember the exact date) I was in Saransk at the place of registration. Vorontsov called me on "What's App" and made it clear that he had my video of intimate content with my participation.

It was this “empty” statement that was brought and registered by the officers of the Internal Security Service of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for Moscow at Barrikadnaya on May 13, 2020. In the original version of the statement, there is not a word about the fact that Vorontsov extorted money from Andina.

Now compare it with the statement in the case. It has a completely different content.

To date, Fedorov, Andina and Moiseev at the place of residence, and Moiseev also at the working office by the employees of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in Moscow together with the employees of the CSS of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Moscow in order to legitimize the case initiated under Art. 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the seizure of compromising information, and audio recordings of themselves, searches were carried out.

We ask you to remove this criminal case from the proceedings of the Ministry of Internal Affairs with the subsequent transfer to an objective investigation in the Investigative Committee of Russia by territoriality.



Yaroslav Mukhtarov

To be continued