How the head of RUSNANO went to "war" with Minister Siluanov

"All situational allies - Vaino and Mishustin - turned away from Kulikov”



On March 24, investigators from the Investigative Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs seized documents from the Russian Ministry of Finance, which unpleasantly surprised the head of the ministry, Siluanov. The seizure was related to a criminal case initiated against former top managers of RUSNANO, which was first reported by the VChK-OGPU Telegram channel. The investigators were in a hurry, because on March 27, the court was scheduled to consider the investigator's petition to extend the arrest of Chubais's ex-deputies.



As Rucriminal.info found out, on April 1, 2025, the Russian Ministry of Finance was not just surprised, but shocked by the fact that RUSNANO allowed a technical default on bonds issued by RUSNANO and secured by state guarantees. Considering that Rusnano had the funds to pay, the default was a demonstrative jab at the Ministry of Finance by Rusnano CEO Kulikov. And it caused a storm of indignation among Minister Siluanov. This is not just a default on Rusnano loans, the situation is such that a default on Rusnano loans puts the entire borrowing market under Russian government guarantees, the total amount of which exceeds 1 trillion rubles, at risk. In the Russian economy, the provision of government guarantees is a form of government support used to support systemically important borrowers. The prerogative of making a decision on supporting certain issuers belongs exclusively to the President of the Russian Federation. It is noteworthy that the conflict between Rusnano and the Ministry of Finance arose back in 2021, when the Chairman of the Management Board of Rusnano, having secured the support of the head of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation Anton Vaino, demanded that Rusnano's old debts in the amount of 202 billion rubles be closed, including those loans that were not secured by government guarantees. Having received a refusal and an order to go to work, Kulikov essentially issued an ultimatum to the Russian Ministry of Finance, issuing a series of reports about the possible bankruptcy of Rusnano and threatening to default on the company's loans. The threat worked and the state provided Rusnano with support in the amount of up to 45 billion rubles, but the relationship between Rusnano and the Ministry of Finance was finally spoiled.

According to the VChK-OGPU, the response to Rusnano arrived very quickly: documents about a 12-day vacation on a 54-meter yacht of Kulikov and Vaino suddenly surfaced on the Internet. According to the published documents, the vacation took place in 2012 and cost about 300 thousand dollars.

The criminal case initiated in 2025, in which Boris Podolsky, Artur Galstyan and Marina Kasenkova were the defendants, was initiated with the aim of also attacking the Russian Ministry of Finance, which had approved the financial reporting restructuring scheme.

Despite the fact that Siluanov has plenty of opponents, nevertheless, the direct attack on the country's financial system forced all of his situational allies, primarily Vaino and Mishustin, to distance themselves from Kulikov's actions. And apparently, having thought about what happened, Rusnano will independently close the issue with payments and refer to some technical difficulties.



A source of the VChK-OGPU explained why there were problems with initiating a case against the former management of RUSNANO, the damage to which exceeds 45 billion rubles. And the problem was not in Anatoly Chubais, but in another person.

According to the source, the main intrigue and struggle around the case was due to the status of Arkady Dvorkovich, who during the period of the events under investigation was the Deputy Prime Minister and headed the Board of Directors of Rusnano. It was Dvorkovich who helped Chubais push through changes to the Rules for the Provision of State Guarantees, approved by a government decree of 2010. Thanks to these changes, Rusnano began to falsify reporting, introducing the company's debts to banks and bondholders, secured by state guarantees, not debts at all, but part of the company's capital.

The reporting drawn up in this way made it possible to receive new loans (which the Russian Federation will pay off), as well as issue 6 bond issues, for a total of more than 40 billion rubles.

The source said that after the battles "at the top", the investigation made a decision: the case materials say that Dvorkovich was misled by the management of RUSNANO, which provided him with incorrect information.

As for Chubais, according to the source, only one person can make a decision on him and without his go-ahead, the former head of RUSNANO will forever be only a "defendant" in cases without status.

Initially, the case was opened on January 28 by the Investigative Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation based on the materials of the FSB Directorate for Internal Affairs. On the same day, operatives and investigators came to dozens of addresses with searches, interrogations were conducted. However, in the midst of the events, the command "stand down" was given. It turned out that the decision to initiate the case was canceled. Moreover, according to the source, the go-ahead came from "a very high place".



As a result, law enforcement officers left apartments and houses without completing the search, all those being interrogated were released. There were still big questions about how to formalize everything.

But the next day, January 29, the go-ahead came from "even higher up", the case was reopened and they started searching and interrogating again.

Sources to the VChK-OGPU on the essence of the charges in the new Rusnano case with damages of 45 billion rubles:

"At first, the financial policy of Rusnano was quite balanced: the company's activities were based on long-term business plans and multi-year forecasts of cash flows, receipts from project exits were taken into account and discounted.

Such a policy forced investments to be extremely cautious and set strict requirements for the investment block, which Chubais did not like.

Chubais very systematically defeated the "financial opposition", having first transferred the financial block from under the management of Yakov Urinson to another of his deputy, and made Urinson himself an adviser. Within a year, both the chief accountant Makshakov and his deputy Kovshenkov were fired from the company. And Boris Podolsky, who came from STS, became the new curator of the financial block. How he came to RUSNANO deserves special attention.

Chubais's wife Avdotya Smirnova met Boris on the channel STS, where he was the CEO. Boris took her to the jury of the project "STS lights a superstar".

Chubais was looking for partners for the privatization of OOO UK Rusnano and then his wife suggested Borya to him. And Chubais agreed.

It was Podolsky who built a completely new financial block on a completely new personnel basis. A new financial director, Artur Galstyan, came and Artur brought with him Marina Kasenkova, who was essentially responsible for the company's accounting and reporting.

Now Chubais's ideas were given the green light and the machinations with the debt began. The machinations allowed to hide the real financial results of the company and attract new funds by issuing bond loans and credits.

The scale of the financial catastrophe became obvious already at the beginning of 2014, when RUSNANO was on the verge of a long-term default. Default was extremely undesirable, because the privatization of the company managing RUSNANO (OOO UK RUSNANO) was at stake, and besides, the “demonstration of unprecedented nano-successes” was supposed to open the way to new state money.

It was at this moment that Chubais, together with the Minister of Economic Development Ulyukaev A.V., Deputy Prime Minister Dvorkovich A.V. (and simultaneously the Chairman of the Board of Directors of RUSNANO) changed the Rules for the Provision of State Guarantees, approved by the RF Government Resolution of 10.09.2010 N 709.

The new rules radically change the borrowing architecture: now newly attracted loans and bond loans can be used to repay previously received loans and bond loans! This is how the construction of the nano-pyramid begins.

According to a letter addressed to the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation Igor Krasnov, “based on the results of a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness” of the previous management of RUSNANO, “In 2016, the amount of liabilities of JSC RUSNANO exceeded the value of the company's assets on the balance sheet, as a result of which the property insufficiency of JSC RUSNANO became obvious, and signs of bankruptcy appeared. “Starting in 2017, JSC RUSNANO, in agreement with the shareholder, changed its accounting policy and, as a result, financial statements: the amount of the company's liabilities was formally reduced by assigning part of them to the balance sheet section “Additional capital”.

The author of this idea was the company's financial director Artur Galstyan.

The essence of the idea was to consider the company's long-term debts to banks and bondholders, secured by state guarantees, not debts at all, but part of the company's capital! Thus, the value of the net assets of JSC increased sharply.

The level of "frostbite" of RUSNANO managers is striking, who not only seized on this idea, but also actively discussed it at weekly operational meetings in the presence of more than 50 people! The implementation of the idea was entrusted to corporate director Andrey Trapeznikov, who literally pushed through the necessary changes.

The fabricated reporting allowed not only to "use state guarantees" and attract new loans, which the Russian Federation will now pay off. Financial engineering allowed an additional 6 unsecured bond issues worth more than 40 billion rubles."



Timofey Grishin

To be continued

Source: www.rucriminal.info

RUSNANO began to be taken away “on the cheap”

Sergei Kulikov wants to blame his scams on Chubais



As the telegram channel of the VChK OGPU warned, Rusnano, on the eve of bankruptcy, is beginning to enter into rather strange deals. As Rucriminal.info found out, by the end of the year, a 30.76% stake in Novomet, owned by Rusnano, will be sold for an amount slightly exceeding 5 billion rubles. At the same time, Rusnano invested 3.968 billion rubles in the company in 2011.

Novomet is one of the flagships of the domestic mechanical engineering industry, the company's main products are electric centrifugal submersible pumping units - one of the best on the world market in terms of reliability and energy consumption, especially when extracting oil from complex fields and offshore. The company has good dynamics in both sales and profit (at the end of 2022 + 18%), with about half of the revenue coming from the foreign market, the company has more than 20 production bases in the near and far abroad.



In 2017, Rusnano put up its stake for auction for 7.5 billion rubles. Later, other shareholders joined the competition. The winner of the competition, the American company Haliburton, put out an offer to acquire 100% of the company for 45 billion rubles. Unfortunately for the shareholders, the deal with the Americans was blocked by the Russian Federal Antimonopoly Service.

Later, RDIF tried to buy out Rusnano’s stake in Novomet in a consortium with Saudi Aramco, Lukoil, TMK (ChTPZ), GE, and the company’s management. In all cases, trading began at 7.5 billion rubles; Rusnano also planned to receive a bonus if a strategic investor entered Novomet (with a share of more than 50%) or the company entered an IPO within five years after the transaction. The bonus amount is half the difference between the sale price of shares now and in the future.

In 2022, Sergei Kulikov (the current head of Rusnano) already tried to sell a stake in Novomet to the structures of the Orthodox oligarch Malofeev, but the owner of Tsargrad was not ready to pay the market value, and Kulikov could not find grounds for selling for next to nothing.

Now - a second attempt with an ironclad justification: “Rusnano urgently needs money and Chubais is to blame for this.”

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Chubais: “I will be outside the Russian Federation”

The ex-head of RUSNANO continues to rule the court and investigation from abroad



Rucriminal.info returns to one episode of legal lawlessness lasting more than 7 years on the part of the so-called preliminary investigation and legal proceedings in criminal case No. 123632:

Let us remember that from 2010 to 2013. on the initiative of Anatoly Chubais, the Swiss company JSC SFO Concept AG, in which he (Anatoly Chubais) was the only and 100% shareholder, borrowed funds in total from Boris Mints’s Company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOCA LIMITED) in Cyprus complexity is about 20,000,000 US dollars. It was on the initiative of Anatoly Chubais that the so-called borrowed funds were sent to Russia for the construction of a real estate property located in the village of Peredelki, Odintsovo district, Moscow region, (hereinafter referred to as the “Peredelki Residential Complex”).

In 2013, as it later turned out, the shareholder of the unprofitable Swiss company SFO Concept AG JSC, under the promise of Anatoly Chubais to buy the property at market value, in order to repay the loans he (Anatoly Chubais) had previously taken for the above company, the shares of the Swiss company were sold by Anatoly Chubais Ilya Suchkov.

In 2015, the property was put into operation and, as Anatoly Chubais planned, the ownership that arose over it was registered on his (Anatoly Chubais’s) instructions by his “adjutant” Sergei Krychenko to the Swiss company JSC SFO Concept AG.

As soon as possible after registering the ownership rights of the Cyprus company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED) - Boris Mints and Anatoly Chubais, proposals were sent to purchase "ZhK Peredelki" at market value for 33,000,000 US dollars. The cost was determined according to 3 independent estimates from specialized companies, including one judicial and one English.

During this period, Ilya Suchkov was “strongly invited” by Dmitry Mints to sell the house, with an estimated cost of about 47,000,000 US dollars at an extremely reduced cost for 7,000,000 - 8,000,000 US dollars, that is, in essence, to wash the money, the nature of which is in the accounts The Cyprus company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED) is extremely doubtful.

Since Anatoly Chubais did not try and is not trying to give borrowed funds to Boris Mints, there is reason to believe that this is part of the pension funds of Russians, including the share of Anatoly Chubais, and that loan agreements concluded before 2013 are sham.

Events with the direct participation of Anatoly Chubais, which developed later, characterize his statements in the intention of creating a rule of law state as extremely cynical and deceitful.

Since October 2016, despite the absence of any crime in Ilya Suchkov’s actions, according to statements by the so-called representatives of the Cyprus company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED) Kuksa R.V., Mosin D.V. and Anatoly Chubais, criminal case No. 123632 was initiated, provided for in Art. 159 part 4 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and later paragraph “b” part 4 of Art. 158 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

The absurdity of the charges brought against Ilya Suchkov is obvious.



- Anatoly Chubais 3 (Three times) the amount of damage allegedly caused to him was determined.

- The property that was located in the Peredelki residential complex and was determined by the investigation as allegedly stolen from Anatoly Chubais, in fact belonged by right of ownership to the Swiss company JSC SFO Concept AG and not to Anatoly Chubais.

- The real estate property “ZhK Peredelki”, on the day of the charged crime, was the property of a Swiss company and therefore there was no penetration into the home and could not have been as falsely stated in the indictment.

- The loans charged to Ilya Suchkov have nothing to do with him, since they were received and spent on the initiative of Anatoly Chubais by his “adjutant” Sergei Krychenko. Ilya Suchkov bought shares of the company only on May 16, 2013. Therefore, he could not physically have the intent to seize and appropriate funds.

- Being a shareholder of the Swiss company JSC SFO Concept AG, Ilya Suchkov transferred for partial, early repayment of the debt to the Cyprus company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED), for loans previously taken by Anatoly Chubais “allegedly” from the Cyprus company Boris Mints, 900 000 US dollars. Which indisputably confirms that Ilya Suchkov has no intent to commit fraud. This amount of 900,000 US dollars, despite numerous petitions from Ilya Suchkov’s defense and the presence of a full package of financial documents in the case materials, is not included in the indictment. This fact was completely ignored by the preliminary investigation and the Khamovnichesky District Court of Moscow and continues to be ignored, and the court refuses to satisfy the defense’s motions on this issue.



It has been 8 (eighth) years now since they have been trying to convict Ilya Suchkov.

Criminal case No. 123632 has been in the courts for more than 4 (Four) years. Case 2 (Twice) returned to before investigation, 2 (twice) sent to different courts of jurisdiction.

At the moment, the criminal case has been returned to the Khamovnichesky District Court of Moscow for the 3rd (third) time and is being considered by Judge A.V. Lutov.

The procedure for considering the case is such that, involuntarily, it gives reason to believe that Anatoly Chubais has “long arms.”

The interest of the judges of the Khamovnichesky District Court of Moscow is visible to the naked eye. One gets the strong impression that judges Filchenko M.S. and Lutov A.V. together with the chairman of the court Pokhilko K.A. are closely related to the wishes of Anatoly Chubais for the desired result (verdict) in criminal case No. 123632 (Court case No. 01-0204/2023).



- the court refuses to call key witnesses for the defense;

- the court does not familiarize the defendants and their defense attorneys with the case materials;

- the court continues to consider the case in the absence of part of the case materials specified in the indictment;

- the court ignores the fact that the investigation did not recognize an individual as a representative of the victim;

- the court is considering a case where the amount of damage has not been established by the investigation to the Cyprus company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED) and Anatoly Chubais;

- the court attaches to the case materials a certain piece of paper allegedly signed by Anatoly Chubais, stating the impossibility of his appearance in court for objective reasons known only to him. At the same time, there is every reason to believe that this application was signed not by Anatoly Chubais himself, but by a third party, without certification by a notary or consul and without an apostille;

- the court attaches to the case materials the power of attorney of Anatoly Chubais for the lawyers representing

his interests in the court of Vasiltsov V.F. and Kozyrev O.Yu., issued more than 6 (Six) months before the ruling by the judge of the Khamovnichesky District Court of Moscow Filchenko M.S. On February 21, 2023, a resolution to send criminal case No. 123632 with jurisdiction to the Zamoskvoretsky District Court of Moscow and indicating in it the criminal case number that does not correspond to reality;

- the judge persistently ignores all motions of the defense of the accused that are important for the case.





To be continued

Yuri Prokov

Source: www.rucriminal.info

“The Case of Baikal” and Dvorkovich, Chubais, Trapeznikov

“Redirect the huge flow of budget funds in the right direction”

 


Information has appeared about the bankruptcy of the manufacturer of Russian processors, Baikal Electronics.

As Rucriminal.info found out, this is not entirely true; one of the shareholders of Baikal Electronics, the T-Platforms company, known to specialists since the beginning of 2000 as a developer of supercomputers and a supplier of solutions for high-performance computing, was in the process of bankruptcy.

Until recently, the fate of this company was connected with Vsevolod Opanasenko, who was sentenced in May 2023 to a prison term of 2 years. Also, the most important role in the life of the company was played by RUSNANO OJSC, the Warton group and a number of well-known characters, such as Arkady Dvorkovich, Anatoly Chubais, member of the RUSNANO Board Andrey Trapeznikov, founder of the Warton group Denis Frolov, and many others.



The history of the T-Platforms company is an exception to the rule when the security forces are behind the redistribution of property. Here, the redistribution of property was initiated by people who position themselves as staunch systemic liberals and innovators, employees of state development institutions.

The development of Baikal Electronics processors took place with the support of RUSNANO, or rather the Fund for Infrastructure and Educational Programs formed by RUSNANO, or as it is abbreviated as FIOP. It was with the money from FIOP, allocated through the project company T-Nano LLC, that funding for the development of Baikal processors began.

Like many RUSNANO companies, the developers of Baikal processors very soon ran into a lack of demand for Russian developments and were in a state of permanent crisis. Lack of demand meant lack of revenue - there was not enough money not only for product development, but also for maintaining operating activities.

At the same time, the state allocated billions of rubles in subsidies for the development of the electronics industry through the Russian Ministry of Industry and Trade, and the RUSNANO company sought every possible access to this money. Responsible for interaction with government agencies, including the Ministry of Industry and Trade, was Andrei Trapeznikov, a member of the board, corporate director of RUSNANO, one of the oldest (since 1995) associates of Anatoly Chubais, who went with him through the government, the presidential administration and RAO UES.

Not only RUSNANO, but also the Warton group were looking closely at the money of the Ministry of Industry and Trade. The head of the group, Denis Frolov, was a person closely associated with Arkady Dvorkovich, the former Deputy Prime Minister of the Government of the Russian Federation and Chairman of the Board of Directors of OJSC RUSNANO. Having significant support from the office of the Deputy Prime Minister and owning a private company, the Warton group could easily receive and redirect in the right direction a huge flow of budget funds allocated for a variety of topics.

In 2014, in Dvorkovich’s reception room, Trapeznikov met Denis Frolov for the first time, their interests intersected, and their personal capital increased.

Warton is a small company, and to receive big money from the Ministry of Industry and Trade, a name and scale of activity were needed, primarily in terms of the variety of topics. It was officially easy for RUSNANO companies to receive subsidies from the Ministry of Industry and Trade; any government official will confirm that the allocation of money to state corporations is supported and does not raise any suspicion. But any official will also confirm that allocating money to state corporations that are under the close control of security forces and regulated by internal procedures is not at all interesting, because the management of such companies is well aware of the personal risks when withdrawing and cashing out funds.

Trapeznikov and Frolov came up with a brilliant plan: to collect state assets under the management of the Warton group and then, taking advantage of all the privileges inherent in state-owned companies, to receive huge budget money.

The list of companies that, according to Trapeznikov and Frolov’s plan, were to come under the control of the Warton group included: Mikron, Optogan, Crocus Nanoelectronics, ESTO Vacuum, Elvis Neo Tech, Plastic Logic, T-nano, Profotex, Optical fiber.

Trapeznikov quite easily received approval from Chubais, to whom Frolov was introduced as a major industrialist with the support of Dvorkovich. Dvorkovich also received corresponding explanations. An official explanation has also been formed - RUSNANO companies receive both financing and a private owner, which is fully consistent with RUSNANO's strategy.

The boss nodded and we could get to work.

Negotiations began and the first problems began: neither internal procedures nor the position of the project managers allowed the assets to be transferred to Warton’s control just like that, for next to nothing, and the financial capabilities of the Warton group were extremely limited. There were attempts to allocate subsidies to RUSNANO projects, but the efficiency of such activities was minimal: no more than 20-30% of the subsidy amount was converted into cash.

Trapeznikov, by agreement with Frolov, begins a long siege of assets. The departments subordinate to Trapeznikov and the auditors of RUSNANO are preparing certificates containing information comprehensive information on both companies and project managers.





To be continued

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucrminal.info

The best monument to Chubais

RUSNANO investment director is actively cooperating with the investigation

In May 2023, a photograph was published on the VChK-OGPU telegram channel, in which the former head of the presidential administration, former first deputy prime minister of the Russian government, former head of RAO UES, former head of Rosnano and former adviser to the President of Russia receives a temporary Israeli passport.

It is obvious that the great privatizer decided to finally retire and start arranging his own life outside the Russian Federation.



Such a turn of events only at a superficial glance looks like a spontaneous decision, a deeper dive into the topic shows that Anatoly Borisovich began to prepare alternate airfields a long time ago.

Rucriminal.info will start with Rusnano Israel Ltd, a subsidiary of Rosnano OJSC.

The idea of ​​creating a company arose back in 2009, it was then that Arkady Milman was appointed to the position of adviser to the Russian state corporation Rosnano, whose biography speaks for itself. Judge for yourself A. Milman: in 1989-1990, deputy head of the Israeli diplomatic mission in the USSR; in 1992 - Chargé d'Affaires of the Israeli Embassy in Kazakhstan; in 2003-2005 - Israeli Ambassador to Russia.

No one in Rusnano can say anything about what Rusnano Israel Ltd did, however, such “investments” in Israel were given in 2023, when A.B. Chubais urgently needed an Israeli passport.

The second airfield is Rusnano USA (a subsidiary of Rosnano JSC in the USA), headed by ex-employee of RAO UES, former head of the Federal Energy Agency Dmitry Akhanov. Through Rusnano USA, millions of US dollars have been invested in American companies. Today, the United States has become a refuge for Yu. Udaltsov, the author of the RAO UES reform and Anatoly Borisovich's most loyal ally.



The Cheka of the OGPU wrote a lot about Irina Markovna Rappoport, the former head of the Swiss company Rusnano Capital AG, now happily living in sunny Italy. At the stage of the creation of Rusnano Capital AG, its target volume was planned at the level of $1 billion, with such investments Rusnano Capital AG could become the main outpost of Rosnano in Europe. She could, but she didn't. Irina Markovna and her curator at RUSNANO Oleg Kiselev turned out to be good crooks and bad managers. In 2018, the company was liquidated, and RUSNANO wrote off more than 7 billion rubles as a loss.



What did Chubais have left in Russia?



Almost nothing. According to a Rucriminal.info source, the team broke up, and RUSNANO and its projects are in the process of closing.

The brightest member of the Chubais team, the author of wind energy development projects, Alisher Kalanov, has worked at RUSNANO for the longest time.

After Chubais left, he not only retained, but even strengthened his position in the company. Under the new leadership of S. Kulikov, Kalanov was transferred to the management of the block "Legacy - projects". The legacy aroused complex feelings: and, in the end, it was Alisher who initiated the initiation of a number of criminal cases on the old projects of Chubais. Not everything was successful, but the collected materials made it possible in September 2022 to initiate a criminal case on the facts of embezzlement of funds in the project company ELVIS-NeoTech JSC. This company has been the subject of a number of publications on our channel. In September 2022, the investment director of RUSNANO, Nail Gubaev, was arrested in connection with the case.

Dmitry Pimkin, another member of the Board and the hero of our publications, was the direct curator of N. Gubaev and, according to the investigation, carried out the strategic management of criminal schemes. In 2021, D. Pimkin did his best to resist the initiation of a case on episodes related to ELVIS-NeoTech JSC: he courted Kalanov, together with the lawyer of Asnis and Partners R. Kozhura tried to cover his tracks and hide the facts, appealed to O. Kiselev and A. Chubais, but he could not do anything - the case was initiated, and Pimkin himself was seriously worried about his future.

Andrey Trapeznikov is also a former member of the Management Board and press secretary of A.B. Chubais. In winter, a number of high-ranking officials of the executive branch of the Russian Federation received a presentation of the Fund for the Reconstruction of Ukraine under the code name "First Ukrainian". The idea of the fund is simple and not intricate - a management company, under the guidance of trusted specialists, creates a management company that will manage the assets seized from Russia and restore the infrastructure of Ukraine. Getting 2% of $200 billion in assets is much cooler than being involved in the development of nanotechnology in Russia. It is not known who was the first author of the idea, but A. Dvorkovich (former Deputy Prime Minister and Chairman of the Board of Directors of RUSNANO) and A. Trapeznikov (former press secretary of Chubais and member of the board of RUSNANO) acted as its popularizer. Chubais himself is not listed in any form in the presentation; moreover, he reacted without any interest to the idea of creating a fund.

Well, the main brainchild of Chubais - ROS Corporation NANO, as expected, left the news agenda: old, still Chubais investments have no prospects, and there are no new ideas, just as there is no money and no projects. The young director Kulikov of RUSNANO, alas, did not save the company, but on the contrary, by inept management decisions, accelerated the degradation of RUSNANO. Today, the uselessness of RUSNANO as a development institution is obvious to decision makers, and even the most difficult situation in the country will not save it from closing, which is expected by the end of the year.

RUSNANO, liquidated as useless, will become the best monument to Chubais.





To be continued

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

“Money is credited to the virtual account of the “boss” (Chubais)”

Money laundering through sham deals for the former head of RUSNANO



The source of the telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU said that Anatoly Chubais, moving around the countries, decided on the end point of his journey - he decided to settle in England. A place to stay has already been chosen. This is one of the most expensive and prestigious private villages of St. George's Hill in Surrey. There, a huge mansion belongs to Boris Mints, who in fact is the holder and custodian of the Chubais family office and assets for gigantic sums. Mintz bought a mansion next door and undertook expensive renovations, telling people it was for his son.

However, it has now become clear that Mintz's neighbor will not be a relative, but Anatoly Chubais, and it is he who is destined for the mansion in St. George's Hill.



As VChK-OGPU reported, initially Chubais planned to settle in Italy, where Oleg Kiselev, another holder of Chubais's assets, Oleg Kiselev (aka Gedalia Vakser), had previously acquired a mansion for him. But after the story of the poisoning in Italy, Chubais decided that it would be safer in England.

Over the past 2 (Two) years, publications about various financial "scams" in relation to or with the participation of Anatoly Chubais have systematically appeared in the Russian media.

Assessing the activities of Anatoly Chubais more carefully, it should be noted that in the vast majority of financial "scams" he continues to remain in the shadows.



"Planting material" are most of his deputies, friends, acquaintances, but not him.

In continuation of the publications on the website rucriminal.info dated August 07, 2022 “It is much tastier than paying a million” and dated August 29, 2022 “We are poor people, don’t give us all the profit”, another audio recording was at the disposal of the source of information revealing the source of the declared profitability and financing of the life of Anatoly Chubais on the territory of the Russian Federation.



The participants of this meeting, already known from previous publications, are:



1. Ilya Gulin - financial director of Mintsev companies;

2. Sergey Krychenko - Founder and General Director of the Russian Family Office of Anatoly Chubais;

3. Olga Butkova - financial director of the Russian family office of Anatoly Chubais,



At this meeting, the participants discussed and resolved the following issues:



- systematic provision of Anatoly Chubais with cash and non-cash funds using documents signed as part of "sham transactions" and ensuring the annual declared profitability;

- determination of the extremely low cost of the "purchase" by Anatoly Chubais of ZhK Peredelki in the region of 8,000,000 US dollars or 520,000,000 rubles.

Recall that the estimated cost of "ZhK Peredelki" amounted to around 47,000,000 US dollars, and the market, according to 3 (three) independent assessments, including the judicial one, amounted to: from 34,000,000 to 36,500,000 US dollars.

It should be assumed that in 2019, Anatoly Chubais purchased the property ZhK Peredelki from the Cypriot company of Boris Mints for the above amount, which was determined by the Chubais team in the annual budget.

Rosreestr does not provide any information on this issue.

- in view of the existing common interest between associate and business partner Boris Mints and Anatoly Chubais, it should be assumed that there is constant, direct financing, with a high degree of probability, illegally obtained, undeclared by Anatoly Chubais of his own funds through the offshore structures of Mints.



From numerous publications in the media in 2018-2022. it follows that Boris Mints is directly involved in the fraud of the Otkritie FC bank and the misappropriation of pension funds from Russian citizens by offshore companies (O1 Trust, O1 Properties, Crizna Holdings LTD, Denian LTD, Rafinha Holdings LTD, etc.) by incoming or affiliated with the financial corporation O1 Group owned by Boris Mints.

Some of the companies mentioned above were at the same time the so-called creditors of Anatoly Chubais.

Therefore, with a high degree of probability, it should be assumed that Anatoly Chubais used his share in the “illegally appropriated” Mintsy as borrowed money.



Under such circumstances, the position of the Khamovnichesky District Court of Moscow on the criminal case No. 123632 (No. nevertheless continuing to be considered by the judge Filchenko M.C.

Firstly: the criminal case was absolutely unreasonably sent for consideration by the Khamovnichesky District Court of Moscow, which has nothing to do with the jurisdiction of this court;

Secondly, for almost a year the case has not been considered on its merits, but has been postponed for various reasons;

Thirdly: in the presence of a lot of evidence available in the materials of case No. 123632 of gross violations of the law (UPTo and the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), substitution, forgery and falsification of the materials of the case with a distortion of its actual circumstances, solely for the sole purpose of accusing Ilya Suchkov of serious crimes that he did not commit.

The court ignores the need to check, in particular, the nature of the origin of the so-called borrowed money, the “feigned nature” of loan agreements, which should be assumed to be concluded at the direction of Anatoly Chubais; the legitimacy of the evaluation of "ZhK Alterations" and bidding; the amount of the purchase by Anatoly Chubais of ZhK Peredelki and the reasons, the cost of subsequent sales of the above property to third parties.

During the consideration of case No. 01-0104/2022, in our opinion, it became clear that this judge is extremely interested in the outcome of the case, as evidenced by the current legislation of the Russian Federation cynically, grossly violated by the above-mentioned judge, namely:

- for almost a year now, the court has not considered it necessary to acquaint the defendants and their lawyers with the case materials;

- the court continues to consider criminal case No. 01-0104/2022 in the absence of part of the case materials indicated in the indictment;

- the court completely ignores and considers superficially the petitions of the defendants;

- the court refuses to issue refusals to challenge a judge and minutes of court sessions;

- the court refuses to call defense witnesses;

- the court ignores the absence in the case file of a decision recognizing Mosin D.The. the representative of the victim - the Cypriot company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED);

- the court illegally admits to participation in court sessions, improper representatives of the injured Cyprus company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED) - beneficiary Boris Mints) - Mosina D.V. and lawyer Goryaynov I.Yu.;

- the court illegally continues to consider criminal No. 01-0104/2022 with the amount of alleged damage caused to the Cypriot company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED) not established by the investigation;

- the court continues to unlawfully consider criminal case No. 01-0104 / 2022 in the absence of the beneficiaries of the Cypriot company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED) Mr. Mintsev arrested in absentia by the Basmanny District Court of Moscow, put on the wanted list and hiding from law enforcement agencies of the Russian Federation in London, despite the obvious, significant discrepancies in their testimony, the testimony of Anatoly Chubais, the testimony of the so-called representatives of the victim of the above-mentioned Cyprus company - Kuksa R.V., Mosin D.V. and the materials of the case;

- the court continues to unlawfully consider criminal case No. 01-0104/2022 in the absence of the victim Chubais A.B. despite the obvious, significant discrepancies in the amount allegedly inflicted on Chubais by A.B. damage, i.e. on the circumstances underlying the indictment.



allowed by the judge Filchenko M.C. Numerous violations of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation in the consideration of criminal case No. 01-0104 / 2022 are possible due to the absence of any response from the Judicial Collegium for Criminal Cases of the Moscow City Court to numerous complaints filed by the defendants' defense, pointing to obvious illegal actions committed by the above-mentioned judge of the Khamovnichesky District Court Moscow.

In this connection, it becomes obvious that the Judicial Board has completely withdrawn itself in terms of judicial control over the court of first instance.

Unfortunately, as one would expect, this whole story of Mintsev and Anatoly Chubais ends more than successfully for them.

After all the "heavy hardships" Anatoly Chubais finally found, thanks to a friend, his haven in London - or rather, the "purse" found his master.



(Ilya Gulina (CFO Mintsev) with Sergey Krychenko (Adjutant Anatoly Chubais) and Olga Butkova (CFO of Anatoly Chubais Russian Family Office headed by Sergey Krychenko)



Sergei Krychenko: We said that you are ready to fulfill 12 (million rubles is meant), and we told you at the last meeting that we can even meet 10 (meaning million rubles). We are talking about this without having received a final verdict from the leader (Anatoly Chubais) who is waiting for me tomorrow

Olga Butkova: well, suddenly something will be added, from what we do not know

Sergey Krychenko: Yes, it is quite possible that the first half of the year will change, in which direction I do not know, hardly less. January (it means 2016) we completely closed, thank God everything is fine with us. And now let's go, get a piece of paper with your questions, we will now make ends meet. Now we have a connection between the requests for “grandmothers” and the ownership structure (meaning “ZhK Peredelki”). Now I am explaining that we are structuring our property (“LCD Alterations”) correctly. We give, we take for debts, we buy, right?

Ilya Gulin: yes

Sergey Krychenko: and all this should be accompanied by even some financial transactions, there is some connection here, so we want to establish this connection and understand at what point what we, with as much as needed.

Olga Butkova: now I turn on. In fact, before we talked, the cost of these Alterations (“LCD Alterations”) was estimated at around 8,000,000 US dollars, now this is a different rate, I considered the budget to be 520,000,000 rubles, respectively, we have “non-cash” money until they are gone. It is supposed that this will be “non-cash” money that you will return as part of the loan and then the same money will be returned somehow in cash, I don’t understand how it is. Dima (Dmitry Mints) will receive 520 (520,000,000 rubles under the contract for the sale of ZhK Peredelki concluded between him and Anatoly Chubais).

Ilya Gulin: what do I assume by default. The amount of money is returned to the “non-cash” account (by Anatoly Chubais) for the loan, of this money the part that you evaluate (assuming the assessment of ZhK Peredelok) goes to Dima (Dmitry Mints), at this moment we default to that this money is credited to a certain virtual account of the "boss" (Anatoly Chubais), that is, they return to him (Anatoly Chubais) in a non-cash form

Olga Butkova: but in non-cash, not in cash? This is important.

Ilya Gulin: we believe that a certain account with the “main” (Anatoly Chubais) with us (Mintsev) has increased by this amount, then from where the money is debited every time you need something. Then look, for example, you say we need to get this money, in fact, the money that originally belonged to him, his “white” money, “ok”, then we confirm this there and give it away in some range, because in any case, the equipment there will need to be discussed.

Olga Butkova: why am I asking this question, because when we discussed it with him (Anatoly Chubais), he says I don’t care about this topic because this is a technical amount (it means an amount of 520,000,000 rubles). I explain to him (Anatoly Chubais) that this technical amount should go from your personal account and, accordingly, this amount will be less on a non-cash account

Ilya Gulin: Yes, this is true, and we need to agree on what to do with this (meaning this money) as a reserve for personal future plans. This is the subject of some discussion. This is his (Anatoly Chubais) part of the "white" money transformed into income.

Sergey Krychenko: fix the question for tomorrow, what to do with these “grandmothers” (assumed with 520,000,000 rubles)



Olga Butkova: I have another question about non-cash money

Sergey Krychenko: on loan repayment?

Olga Butkova: yes. I don’t even have how much to repay the loan to Boris Iosifovich (Mints) how much to repay the loan to Ruben Karlenovich (Vardanyan), the balance remained there

Sergey Krychenko: well, let's go through these loans now

Ilya Gulin: what is the rest?

Olga Butkova: well, 210 (assuming million rubles) You gave us at the end of the year (meaning 2015), and we took 480 (meaning million rubles)

Ilya Gulin: oh, I don’t know about that

Olga Butkova: how do you not know? You know perfectly well that we paid for the PAI (meaning the PAI of the Closed-End Mutual Fund "Perspective Companies"), but we took a loan

Ilya Gulin: I returned the money to them (implied to Ruben Vardanyan)

Olga Butkova: You give them yes, but we do that? You returned the money to them, of course, definitely

Ilya Gulin: that is, you don’t actually owe them, you owe them only according to documents

Olga Butkova: according to the documents, this money should still be debited from a non-cash account, here

Sergey Krychenko: should I ask Ruben (Vardanyan) about the request of the client (Anatoly Chubais)?

Olga Butkova: why am I using “non-cash” money, because the term for repaying the loan to him (Ruben Vardanyan) is July (it means 2016)

Sergey Krychenko: when we removed the issue of returning the loan that we gave to Boris Iosifovich (Mints)

Ilya Gulin: when all this was happening, the most important ones told me that they agreed, Mints agreed with AB (Anatoly Borisovich Chubais) that it would be 3-4 months, I tell you directly verbatim. I now live in this logic

Olga Butkova: well, yes, we did the loan agreement until October 01 (assuming 2016)

Sergey Krychenko: You said 3-4 months is excellent, you don't have any technical failures or indications, do we live by the same logic?

Ilya Gulin: I haven't had any other information yet

Sergey Krychenko: wonderful, for three, four months we report January, February, March, well, the end of April, the beginning of May.

Ilya Gulin: Well, apparently yes

Sergey Krychenko: that means the end of April, the beginning of May, the forecast, while we think so. Now they are there "boss" (Anatoly Chubais) will think

Ilya Gulin: for me, too, so that you understand, this will be a certain point of departure on which I do not influence in any way, as soon as it happens, so that not only I have a headache on this topic. I'm just going to provide further equipment here, who, as it looms on the horizon

Sergey Krychenko: Dima (Dmitry Mints) correctly heard that the figure we mentioned was 12-10 (meaning million rubles), how we fit because of the exchange rate, this is just our figure, this is not his (Anatoly Chubais) figure, but he (Dmitry Mints ) jumped right at me Ilya Gulin: Dima (Dmitry Mints) attacked me in the same way, I told him that it was you who originally voiced it. Sergei (Sergey Krychenko) made his own calculations and said that so far, according to their calculations, this is so much, but with a reservation for a possible change in the amount. That's exactly what I said

Sergey Krychenko: I didn’t insure my “liver” with this very reservation, but it actually was because when we last discussed the budget for the year, drew approximately the expenses that await us, then he (Anatoly Chubais) already there I sketched a correction of such not weak ones from where we got it and appeared in February at 356 (thousands of US dollars are meant). Yes?

Olga Butkova: it's not February, it's April

Sergei Krychenko: 356

Olga Butkova: what 356?

Sergey Krychenko: Dollars, thousand

Olga Butkova: What are you talking about now?

Sergey Krychenko: about February "cash"

Olga Butkova: What are you talking about now?

Sergey Krychenko: about "cash"

Olga Butkova: “cash” is in general for us February of these 30 and March 60 (thousands of US dollars are implied). We do not have such amounts in crazy dollars

Sergey Krychenko: we don't have such a huge amount in February, do we?

Olga Butkova: No, we don't have a huge amount. Why do you think so?

Ilya Gulin: the task is to understand the budget and say, comment on what we can in this regard. The number has two parts. I'm just summarizing. The first part, you and I there, plus, minus "shot down" found an understanding, sort of like your vision with our capabilities, sort of. There is a second part that we do not know, respectively, as soon as it is clear, we will think of something about it. Therefore, as of today, we have a consensus.

Olga Butkova: and, accordingly, there is a "non-cash" part that we also understand that while we are in this ..., and also that we do not understand

Ilya Gulin: in continuation of the dialogue on numbers, please, in the near future, it’s not clear today, formulate a request for February so that I also clear the “cache”

Olga Butkova: I have formulated it, I can just tell you the amount for today

Ilya Gulin: let's

Olga Butkova: I have 26 million

Ilya Gulin: rubles?

Olga Butkova: yes

Ilya Gulin: is it somehow split up within a month?

Sergey Krychenko: as you prefer

Olga Butkova: whatever is more convenient for you, we will adjust. We will distribute when we receive

Ilya Gulin: if you do not have a binding, I will think

Sergey Krychenko: we try so that all our expenses, namely ours that we plan, “suck”, think over, vary in the range between the 25th and 30th of each month. There is a force majeure, an SMS message with an order to give tomorrow

Ilya Gulin: force majeure is understandable. Another clarifying question, since we are now interacting with you only on this part, here is the conditional budget that was previously there, those amounts that we are now talking about, they are also part of this budget

Sergey Krychenko: Yes, of course. We are only talking about "nanal" and this

Ilya Gulin: and this is it. This is relatively speaking the February need

Sergey Krychenko: yes

Olga Butkova: yes. The whole common part and this is the budget, I share it non-cash / cash

Sergey Krychenko: it means that now, in order to simply understand the logic in which we live, we minimize those expenses (non-cash expenses are implied), so the load on the “cash” part has increased greatly and significantly, very much in order to save money ... This is the logic simply

Ilya Gulin: this is clear



To be continued

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucrimianl.info

“At the last meeting with V.V.P., I told him the whole picture”

Wiretapping with Chubais, who "twists" scams, hiding behind Putin

At the disposal of Rucriminal.info and the telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU was a record of a meeting in June 2016 between Anatoly Chubais and Ilya Suchkov, an entrepreneur who helped build Chubais's palace in the Moscow region ..

At this meeting, Ilya Suchkov turned to Anatoly Chubais in order to reach an agreement on the sale of ZhK Peredelka in accordance with the current legislation of the Russian Federation and Switzerland. The option of purchase and sale of ZhK Peredelka proposed by Ilya Suchkov was based on the estimated and estimated cost of ZhK Peredelka in the amount of 33,000,000 US dollars, and was also dictated by the need to fulfill obligations under the numerous loans taken by Anatoly Chubais in 2010 and 2012 for a Swiss company JSC "SFO Concept AG" from the Cyprus company of his friend, colleague and business partner Boris Mints. At least at that time, Anatoly Chubais declared the above loans in words as real transactions, involving their execution.

As indicated in previous publications, the estimated cost of "ZhK Alterations" was about 47,000,000 US dollars, and the market value was determined according to 3 (Three) independent assessments, including a judicial one in the amount of 34,000,000 to 36,500,000 US dollars.

However, the conversation initiated by Anatoly Chubais took place in a different vein than expected. Anatoly Chubais said that allegedly the ZhK Peredelki real estate object was no longer of interest to him, the Mintsy became interested in it as a collateral object for paying off debts. Therefore, Ilya Suchkov must come to an agreement with the Mintsy. Based on the results of the negotiations, in the event of a favorable outcome, Anatoly Chubais to Ilya Suchkov “maybe” will be compensated for the personal funds invested by the latter in the construction of the Residential Complex Peredelok. It should be assumed that in order to show his complete impunity and the senselessness of opposing him, Anatoly Chubais explained that the President of the Russian Federation was supposedly aware of this situation.



Later it became obvious that Anatoly Chubais thus intended to buy this property for a symbolic price through the offshore company of his associate Boris Mints. We believe that the motive is clear - the concealment of the passage of such large sums through the accounts of the Cypriot company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED in the form of loans and the legalization of own funds dubiously received from Boris Mints. At the same time, while executing this scheme for the purchase of ZhK Peredelok at an extremely low cost, Anatoly Chubais removed all questions from the tax authorities of the Russian Federation.

The above property, after a month of ownership by the Mints, in February 2019, we believe that for 7-8 million US dollars, or maybe free of charge for the debt obligations artificially created between Anatoly Chubais and the offshore company of Boris Mints, was simply re-registered for Anatoly Chubais. Rosreestr does not give any information on the above transaction!

Also, at the above meeting, Ilya Suchkov was unequivocally warned by Anatoly Chubais that in the event of "sudden movements" and no agreement was reached between him and the Mintsy, the latter, this circumstance would be perceived as an ordinary "business case" with the subsequent possible initiation of criminal prosecution in regarding Ilya Suchkov.

The warning of Anatoly Chubais turned out to be prophetic in relation to Ilya Suchkov, in connection with his refusal to participate, together with Anatoly Chubais and the Mintsy, in the events of money laundering and tax evasion, in 2016, on far-fetched grounds, criminal case No. 123632 was initiated.



These criminal cases, as Anatoly Chubais promised to Ilya Suchkov at the meeting, as it should be assumed, were initiated in 2016-2017. on the initiative of Mintsev on the false statements of representatives (Kuksa R.V. and Mosin D.V.) of the Cypriot company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (beneficiary Boris Mints) and the false statement of Anatoly Chubais about the alleged theft of his property with their subsequent merger into one.

Based on the materials of the criminal case No. 123632, its ordered nature is obvious. Over the course of 6 (six) years of the so-called investigation by the investigators of the SU UMVD of Russia for the Odintsovo urban district, Egorova Zh.A. and Mogileyvskaya A.G. in criminal case No. 123632, the law (the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) was grossly violated, substitution, forgery and falsification of the materials of the case were carried out and its actual circumstances were distorted, solely for the sole purpose of accusing Suchkov AND.The. in serious crimes that he did not commit.

Recall that due to the failure of the criminal case No. 123632 itself and the grossest violations of the rights of the accused, the courts of Moscow and the Moscow Region twice in 2020 and in 2021 returned the case for further investigation.

From February 2022 to the present, criminal case No. 123632 (No. 01-0104 / 2022) has been returned for consideration to the Khamovnichesky district for the 3rd (Third) time. th Court of Moscow (Judge Filchenko M.S.).

This period of the trial in the case should be told in more detail.

Without going into details about the fact that criminal case No. 123632 was sent to the Khamovnichesky District Court of Moscow absolutely on far-fetched grounds, and as it now becomes obvious, it is not by chance that Judge Filchenko M.S. During the consideration of case No. 01-0104/2022, in our opinion, it became clear that this judge was extremely interested in the outcome of the case.



There is every reason for such an assumption, since the Khamovnichesky District Court cynically, grossly violates the current legislation of the Russian Federation, namely:



- the court does not consider it necessary to acquaint the defendants and their lawyers with the materials of the case;

- the court continues to consider criminal case No. 01-0104/2022 in the absence of part of the case materials indicated in the indictment;

- the court completely ignores and does not consider the petitions of the defendants;

- the court refuses to issue minutes of court sessions;

- the court refuses to call defense witnesses;

- the court illegally admits to participation in court sessions, improper representatives of the injured Cyprus company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED) - beneficiary Boris Mints) - Mosina D.V. and lawyer Goryaynov I.Yu.;

- the court ignores the absence from 2016 in the case file of a decision to recognize Mosin D.V. the representative of the victim - the Cypriot company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED);

- the court illegally continues to consider criminal No. 01-0104/2022 with the amount of alleged damage caused to Chubais A.B. not established by the investigation. and Cyprus Company O1 TRUST SERVICES LIMITED (TILSOKA LIMITED);

- the court continues to unlawfully consider criminal case No. 01-0104/2022 in the absence of the victim Chubais A.B. despite the obvious, significant discrepancies in the amount allegedly inflicted on Chubais by A.B. damage, i.e. on the circumstances underlying the indictment.

Due to the fact that numerous complaints sent by the defendants' lawyers to the Judicial Collegium for Criminal Cases of the Moscow City Court about the illegal actions committed by the above-mentioned judge of the Khamovnichesky District Court of Moscow in criminal case No. 01-0104/2022 are completely ignored, it becomes obvious that the Judicial Collegium completely withdrew itself in terms of judicial control over the court of first instance.



With a high degree of probability, it should be assumed that the lawlessness outlined above is carried out at the “request” of Anatoly Chubais through extremely influential officials in law enforcement agencies in order to stop all extremely dubious events with his participation from a legal point of view.



meetings in 2016



(Anatoly Chubais - Ilya Suchkov)



Anatoly Chubais: our picture has changed radically. The essence of changing the picture. This whole object (meaning "LCD Alterations") was built according to the plan, as you understand for me. The picture has changed completely, he ("ZhK Alterations") turned out to be needed by the Mints themselves. If the Mintsy say that they need this object, this means that I will definitely not argue with them, due to the history of relations, due to the state of today. If so, then so be it. What's there. Well, they have a rental business there, which is not developing very well now, as you know, either as a collateral asset, or otherwise, I don’t even dive into it. I proceed from the fact that if the question is posed in this way, then the picture is unfolded completely. This is how you understand a completely different way of life, a different picture, and so on ... I repeat once again, I don’t even go into details. If they say so, then so be it. For me, this topic is closed for today. I don’t know, maybe when, at some point I will return to it, but unfortunately, for today it is closed for me. What does this mean in terms of consequences? According to the consequences, this means that the object must be returned to the Mints. For this, well, they are business guys. In general, sit down and negotiate with them on an acceptable scheme. Even now I am not ready to dive into them, not before that, “boil” with Melamed. So discuss options, find a solution. No major sudden movements are necessary. Because once again they are business guys.

Ilya Suchkov: I understand.

Anatoly Chubais: accordingly, his own version, their version, a compromise version. So I’ll meet him specifically (meaning Dmitry Mints) in order to be in time, because I’m leaving tomorrow morning. So what does this mean in life, in life it means that I will return to Moscow on the 20th, and of course it would be right if you agreed by the 20th (it means June 2016).

So you said you have your expenses?

Ilya Suchkov: yes.

Anatoly Chubais: so the logic will be as follows. Step number 1: you agreed with them (meaning with the Mints), the Mints said everything is ok, you said everything is ok, closed the issue. Step number 2: we sit down with you, lay out the costs for me, evaluate the costs.

I'll honestly tell you how for two, at the last meeting with V.V. (implied at a meeting with Vladimir Vladimirovich) I told him all the same the whole picture (meaning about the house in Peredelki) there were raids, publications. Listen, we, well, firstly, we already know everything very well, this is the most not to be puzzled, and secondly, we will deal with publications, do not worry. That is, we will definitely analyze this picture and in general it is so truly not disturbing. It means that it is much more important for me that you agree with the Mints, here it is. So, do it before the 20th (it means June 2016). Movement in the opposite direction will mean that the Mints perceive this as a classic business case and let's go. If everything is clear then act!



To be continued

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Why is Chubais' foreign money-box inviolable?

Fonds Rusnano Capital S.A. and lovely neighbors in Italy

The news about the initiation of a criminal case against one of the members of the board of directors of the Nanoenergo fund (a subsidiary of one of the Rosnano structures - Fonds Rusnano Capital S.A.) caused only one reaction from the majority of experts familiar with the situation in Rosnano - and why only now, why only for the Nanoenergo fund, and not for Fonds Rusnano Capital S.A. (or RNA for short) in general? Rucriminal.info answers these questions.

Indeed, why did the criminal case appear only now, and not in 2011-2012, not after the audit of the activities of Rosnano in 2013 (by the auditor Agaptsov S.A.), not after the audit of the Accounts Chamber in 2016 (by the auditor Manuylova T.N.) , not after the annual inspections of Rosnano's activities by Rosfinanadzor, and not after an inspection in 2020 by the Federal Treasury of the Ministry of Finance of Russia, after all, in the reports on the results of the above inspections of the activities of RNC, entire sections were devoted to describing in detail the schemes for pseudo-investment of funds and their beneficiaries?



The history of RNC began in 2009, when Oleg Vladimirovich Kiselev (former deputy chairman of the board of Rosnano, now living in Italy and the UK) convinced Anatoly Chubais to create a "Fund of Funds" in a foreign jurisdiction. Irina Markovna Rapoport, who now lives in Italy, next to her former boss, was invited to the position of the head of the fund.

RNC was very different from other RUSNANO projects - it was such a lagoon in which the rules and procedures that were mandatory for other RUSNANO projects did not apply: the company was located in a separate beautiful office, had its own back office, including financiers, accounting and lawyers, its own control procedures; fund employees received solid (even by the standards of Rosnano) salaries and rewards, used luxury cars, were unlimited in representation and travel expenses. In addition to the salary, you can “work” with legal services, consulting, appraisers, etc. (200-250 million rubles a year).

The RNC fund itself was a kind of foreign moneybox, a stash for the future (in total, more than 15 billion rubles were transferred to the RNC). The funds were withdrawn outside the Russian Federation, placed on accounts in foreign banks and waited for the appearance of a beautiful scheme ... The unwritten mandate of the fund was the unhurried "digestion" of large budget money.

Rights and obligations of Rusnano in relation to Fonds Rusnano Capital S.A. were limited to the timely transfer of funds. The duties of the RNC were to prepare beautiful presentations dismantling the powerful pipeline of projects and the gigantic returns from them in the distant future. By the way, the fund’s reports made even Rusnano managers, accustomed to fraud, be sincerely surprised: thus, according to the RNA report for 2015, the expected income of RNA in 2017 should have been more than 60 billion rubles! At the end of 2017, no income was received, but a new, less optimistic forecast appears - more than 40 billion rubles in 2019. At the end of 2019, income amounted to only 2.1 million rubles (0.00035% of the original plan)!

Such is the mandate, cynical, but very harmless for the organizers and performers - after all, they don’t put people in jail for a beautiful life! Well, there is no corpus delicti here! No, even though none of Fonds Rusnano Capital S.A. did not bring a single ruble of income, that as of today all the projects of the fund have either been liquidated or are at the final stage of liquidation.

Everything would have been fine for Kiselev and Rapoport if not for the Nanoenergo Fund, one of the projects of Fonds Rusnano Capital S.A., which was managed by a subsidiary of Sberinvest Management Company CJSC.

Partner managers from Sberinvest Management Company CJSC did not share the strategy of slow digestion of money, having a desire to cut the funds received as soon as possible. The conflict came to light very quickly. Here Irina Rapoport needed to immerse herself in the activities of Nanoenergo, to use all sorts of corporate and other control mechanisms, but neither Irina Markovna (Rapoport) nor Oleg Vladimirovich (Kiselev) simply did not want to and did not know how to do this. It soon became clear that all the funds were quickly “invested” in shops allegedly engaged in the development of clean energy (Hydropower Technologies LLC, Coal Innovative Technologies LLC, etc.), where they were successfully cashed out. No, the managers of Sberinvest Management Company CJSC acted quite decently, sharing both the money and almost closing the scheme. But then the bank "Peresvet" collapsed, in which the Nanoenergo Fund kept funds and part of the money of the Nanoenergo Fund was lost. After that, the problems of the Nanoenergo Foundation began to come out and require a solution.



The decision came very quickly: Irina Markovna and Oleg Vladimirovich decided to imitate a variety of actions (including those aimed at initiating a criminal case) to return the money. Of course, no one planned to initiate a criminal case, it was a form of protection for his own burning asses. And it became a strategic mistake. Very soon, the circle of participants involved in solving the problem became excessively large and the situation began to develop by itself. Of course, Asnisy and Partners did everything to keep the money back process from getting out of control, but after the dismissal of Chubais, Kiselyov and Rapoport, it became simply impossible to keep the situation.

What else is important. By the end of 2020, the entire invoice for RNC projects, including the Nanoenergo fund, was on the table with the leadership of Rusnano, but it took almost 2 years for Kulikov and Co. to initiate this criminal case. And now it depends on the investigating authorities what the scope of the investigation will be: whether only the activities of the Nanoenergo fund or the activities of Fonds Rusnano Capital S.A. will be the subject of study. and the decision makers in it.





To be continued

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

“Hiding behind the letters of A. Chubais and A. Dvorkovich”

How a modest investment director of RUSNANO got access to billions



Arrested for embezzlement of RUSNANO funds, Nail Gubaev had a very low position in the Rosnan hierarchy - just an investment director, below him only analysts, above him - managing directors, senior managing directors, members of the board and Chubais. For more than ten years, he oversaw only two, but very large projects: ELVIS-NeoTech JSC and Termointekh LLC, which are now under the close attention of the security forces.

Why did the criminal case against such a completely ordinary swindler cause such a powerful response?

The Telegram channel of the Cheka of the OGPU and Rucriminal.info are trying to evaluate the labor achievements of Nail Gubaev.

Money makes money if it is properly shared - this principle, inherited from a relative of Nail's wife - R. Arashukov, Nail learned very well. The first test of it in practice showed that the scheme works very successfully.

The Cheka of the OGPU described in detail the scheme for the purchase of "non-existent" licenses from the Sensor Design Association (SDA) in the amount of 932 million rubles. for 2011-2017

Having received his share (about 500 million rubles), Nail thought for a long time - how to divide this money? As a result of much thought, he came up with a rule: half should be given to patrons. Nail also compiled a list of his patrons, it included member of the Board Pimkin D. (and through him Kiselev O. and Chubais A), Member of the Board Trapeznikov A. (hereinafter - again Chubais A.), lawyers, auditors and someone else on trifles.



The result of the distribution of money exceeded all expectations: the green light was opened for the financing of Nail's projects! Very soon, the amount of funding provided by RUSNANO to the project of ELVIS-NeoTech JSC increased from 1.0 to 2.0 billion rubles. More than 600 million funds were additionally allocated to Termointekh LLC. Needless to say, the money was again withdrawn, cashed out and distributed to the right people.



According to a Rucriminal.info source, Nail signed himself up as a mega effective manager, which guaranteed him support at the highest level. Chubais A. himself is already helping with the search for clients and formats for financing projects: the project of Termointekh LLC is presented to the head of GAZPROM PJSC, at the highest level Chubais discusses the issues of concluding and paying for contracts between JSC ELVIS-NeoTech and Lukoil. The Board easily and freely decides on the provision of additional funds to Nail's projects.

The withdrawal of a huge amount of money could not but alert the leadership of Rusnano, but the money does its job and very soon the bosses of Nail simply stopped delving into the schemes for withdrawing money. "The less you know the better you sleep". Nail became the full owner of the projects and little was required of him: regularly bring money and competently justify his requests for funding. In return, he received unlimited power in design companies with the right to dismiss and appoint any employees (from ordinary engineers to the general director), approve and coordinate any transactions, and submit any changes to projects for approval by RUSNANO management bodies.



Very soon, Rosnano's ability to finance additional projects will run out, and Nail will make great friends with Andrey Trapeznikov, who was responsible for GR and PR on the Corporation's Board. Unrealistic greed and the desire for big money united Nail and Andrey. As a result, ELVIS-NeoTech JSC gained access to subsidies from the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation and large government contracts.

In 2017, Nail, through the relatives of his wife, met V. Brovko, director of special projects at ROSTEKH and husband T. Kandelaki. The acquaintance was superficial and it is unlikely that Vasily Yuryevich (Brovko) himself remembered the young middle manager from RUSNANO, but Nail tried to squeeze the maximum out of the fact of his acquaintance.

Nail Gubaev and Andrey Trapeznikov, under the banner of cooperation between the two state corporations, flaunting their connections and opportunities, tried to gain access to government contracts of RUSNANO project companies. Interested in huge kickbacks, A. Trapeznikov went ahead, hiding behind the letters of A. Chubais and A. Dvorkovich, various government instructions and protocols.

Nail's problems began after Chubais, Pimkin, Kiselev and Trapeznikov left RUSNANO. Very serious problems



Nail began after the senior managing director M. Kuzyuk, who previously worked at ROSTEKH as the head of one of the holdings, joined RUSNANO.

The information was conveyed to the Director General of RUSNANO S. Kulikov and Nail was promptly fired from RUSNANO.

But Nail did not give up, he persuaded S. Kulikov to appoint himself the head of ELVIS-NeoTech JSC.

Once at JSC ELVIS-NeoTech, Nail continued his adventures, but the situation changed: the patrons left, it became simply impossible to steal on a large scale and without looking back. It would seem that Nail needed to soberly assess the situation, stop, but greed often outweighs the sense of self-preservation! Nail begins an active struggle for his right to steal and share with impunity. The effect turned out to be the opposite - long-buried schemes and closed contracts began to crawl out like mushrooms after rain. But now no one is trying to cover for Nail, and the security service is asking more and more questions.

In the summer of 2021, a scheme for theft was revealed during the supply of equipment from Lukoil (Middle East) in 2012-2014. The Cheka of the OGPU wrote in detail about this deal, as a result of which Nail received about 140 million rubles in cash. Nail falls into hysterics and tries to get protection from Chubais. But Anatoly Borisovich is not interested in Nail's problems, Asnis and Partners is given the task to assess the personal risks of the members of the Management Board.

To discuss the situation, Pimkin D. repeatedly flies to Italy, where O. Kiselev currently lives. As a result, A. Asnis receives a task: to stop a big case, leaving one episode in it - a deal with Lukoil and one accused - Nail Gubaev!

In September 2021, Nail leaves ELVIS-NeoTech JSC, a year later, in September 2022, the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation initiates a criminal case on the facts of embezzlement of funds from ELVIS-NeoTech JSC, Nail Gubaev is detained and arrested. But has justice prevailed? We will learn this only by evaluating the full composition of the episodes and the defendants in the case.



To be continued

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

FSB vs FSB

How was the war for the "case of Chubais"



The TFR was detained and then arrested by the Basmanny Court, an ex-employee of RUSNANO, investment director Elvis NeoTek Nail Gubaev. The telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU was the first to report this. The events were held as part of a case initiated on the fact of the theft of RUSNANO funds at a time when Anatoly Chubais was in charge of the company. We are talking about the activities of the joint venture of JSC RUSNANO and SPC ELVIS - Elvis NeoTek.

A source of the Cheka-OGPU and Rucriminal.info spoke about the episodes of the criminal case of Nail Gubaev. He was detained as part of an investigation into embezzlement at RUSNANO during the time of Chubais

1) Fictitious purchases of "non-existent" licenses from the Sensor Design Association (SDA) in the amount of 932 million rubles. for 2011-2017

Licenses were purchased for the development of VIP1 and ELISE chips, for which the company spent more than 2 billion rubles. The chips themselves turned out to be fiction and are currently written off the balance sheet.

2) Theft during the supply of Lukoil equipment (Middle East) in 2012-2014.

The delivery was carried out through a network of intermediaries, while the selling price of ELVIS-NeoTech JSC and the cost of equipment supplied to Lukoil differed significantly.

The difference settled on intermediaries.

Gubaev N.I. with the support of his leaders (Deputy Chairman of the Board D.A. Pimkin and O.V. Kiselev), he ensured the cancellation of intermediary debts to ELVIS-NeoTech JSC, personally gained control over the intermediary company Kingfield and embezzled about $ 2 million.

3) supply of equipment with a total value of 577.0 million rubles to Sozvezdie Concern JSC, conclusion of a contract with Sertal LLC in the amount of 458 million rubles as part of the implementation of the Ministry of Education 2019 project.

Conclusion of fictitious contracts with LenSpetsStroy Construction Company LLC, Techleader LLC, FKU UPRDOR Chernomorye, AI-D-Consulting LLC, MONETA LLC for the amount of about 500 million rubles.



4) Fictitious employment of his mistress - Salpagarova Amina Khuseinovna, born in 1988, with the payment of her salary in the amount of about 9 million rubles.

5) Finally, the main episode, the defendants of which will be members of the board and A. Chubais: theft of public funds allocated for the implementation of the project to create a "Cluster center for the design of VLSI with nanometer design standards and the production of high-tech products based on them" with a total funding of 2.8 billion rubles. In various years, the project was supervised by the members of the Board Malyshev A.B., Rappoport A.N., Kiselev O.V., Pimkin D.A.

In 2021 Gubaev N.I. was dismissed from RUSNANO and employed at Elvis Neo Tek JSC as the 1st Deputy General Director in order to conceal the crimes committed. As an aid to Gubaev N.I. the resources of the law office No. 31 “Asnis and Partners” were provided, which in every possible way prevented the initiation of a criminal case against Gubaev N.I., Pimkin D.A., Kiseleva O.V. and Chubais A.B.

Nevertheless, after a year of preparatory work, including thanks to the publications of the Cheka of the OGPU, the case was initiated.

However, before that, a war of special services unfolded around Nail Gubaev.

One should not think that Chubais is a soft-bodied liberal. He also has people who can involve the security forces in solving problems. In our situation, the Internal Security Service of the Federal Security Service of the Federal Security Service for Moscow and the Moscow Region, represented by the head of the Service Krasilnikov and detective Kharitonov, was involved in solving the “Gubaev problem”.

What is the best way to protect a person from imminent arrest and interrogation? Make him a witness in a high-profile case, take him under state protection and hide him away. And so they began to do so.

Through the main "desk of orders" of the law enforcement block - the Main Investigative Directorate of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for Moscow - cases began to be initiated one after another, in which Gubaev was listed as a victim. At the same time, the GSU began to actively summon deputy ministers, heads of federal departments, etc. for interrogation as witnesses. For example, here is a document with an attempt to bring the head of Rosreestr Skufinsky and the Deputy Minister of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation Shpak for questioning.



In turn, the FSB began stamping out certificates of possible involvement in the “crimes” against Gubaev of high-ranking security officials, including employees of the Central Administration of the FSB of the Russian Federation. Thus, the scale of the investigation, the level of Gubaev's "enemies" were caught up, and the full effect was created that this extremely valuable victim should be under state protection and should not be touched.



For example, Kharitonov, during interrogation, tells a story about the alleged abduction of Gubaev by "FSB officers", planting drugs on him and extorting money.

Then it turned out that all this is fiction.

When it became known that it was impossible to save Gubaev from detention, and there were huge questions for the FSB Security Service officer, Kharitonov immediately asked to send him away. To the war zone, as employees who are under attack now do.

Also, a case was initiated that Gubaev, through high-ranking FSB officers, transferred money for obtaining the FSB certificate to Elvis-NEOTECH, as well as for closing the subsidy of the Ministry of Industry and Trade rga.

It is clear that such a case should be investigated by the TFR. However, this department was just going to initiate a case on NeoTeku. As a result, the FSB in the “pocket” GSU of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for Moscow opened a case on these facts, but under the article fraud. Like, they took money from Gubaev, but did nothing. As part of the fraud case, the GSU began to summon high-ranking federal officials for interrogation, in particular the Deputy Minister of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation Shpak.

Also, materials were prepared that Gubaev paid a large amount of money to an employee of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation seconded to Rosreestr, Dmitry Dashkov and the head of Rosreestr Oleg Skufinsky, in order to give access to state secrets and hire Nail's wife Susanna Gubaeva (Arashchakova) to Rosreestr - a close relative of ex-senator Rauf Arashukov. Again, everything was investigated as fraud, but Dashkov was interrogated, and Skufinsky was summoned for interrogation.

To be continued

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Grave for Rosnano to be prepared by October

Chubais's legacy buried the state corporation



How long have you heard the news about Rosnano? New technologies, projects, clearing the balance from the heavy legacy of Chubais, new criminal cases against Chubais and his members of the Board? None of this, unfortunately, is and never will be. Why? Details in the article Rucriminal.info.

According to our sources, the new leader turned out to be just a dummy, without ideas, without a team, without experience and hardware weight. The old board members left the Chubais team, new ones come in, work for a maximum of six months and leave. The company is shrinking, leaving competencies behind its perimeter.

At the same time, already in October 2022, RUSNANO bondholders will be in for a small shock: on October 13, 2022, the redemption of the RUSNANO-6 issue in the amount of 9 billion rubles should take place, then on October 16, 2022 - the redemption of the RUSNANO-7 issue in the amount of 9 billion rubles, on October 20. 2022 - redemption of RUSNANO-BO-002R-03 issue in the amount of 12 billion rubles. A total of 30 billion rubles, which the company does not have. It should be noted that the nominal values ​​of the bonds of the RUSNANO-6 and RUSNANO-7 issues are backed by state guarantees, which only means the loss of the coupon for the issue holders. The owners of the bonds on the issue of RUSNANO-BO-002R-03 most likely will not receive anything.

The current situation greatly irritates the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, which is strenuously trying to find a way out of their current situation.

As the telegram channel of the VChK OGPU wrote earlier at the end of last year, two decisions were at stake:

First. The state will additionally capitalize Rosnano by 230-250 billion rubles, creditors receive their investments and interest; Rosnano managers continue to receive their insane salaries, another 10-15 projects will be invested, which will end in losses, write-offs and arguments about the lack of demand for innovations.

Another way: The state will pay exactly as much as it should pay (about 120 billion rubles), and creditors will have to receive the remaining money through bankruptcy proceedings.



Then, in December 2021, no decision was made, the state decided to wait, especially since there were still 10 months left until the next default.

Today, the situation has cleared up: the absence of any results, the extremely unconvincing report of S. Kulikov to the head of state, the general economic situation make it almost impossible to implement decisions on the first option. It became obvious that no money would save Rusnano, and the state had neither the desire nor the opportunity to start new experiments.

When implementing the second option, details are important and they began to appear. It seems that the responsibility for restoring the functionality of the development institution will be entrusted to one of the largest creditors of Rosnano - Promsvyazbank.

This option allows the state to get rid of several headaches at once: not only the problem of management and current projects is automatically solved, but also Rosnano's debts to the defense bank. It is very important that in the implementation of this scenario, the problem of Rosnano moves from the state level to the corporate one: the responsibility of the state is limited to obligations under the state guarantees provided, and the sanatorium (PSB) receives all the powers necessary to solve the problems of Rosnano. It is assumed that, based on the results of the financial recovery, PSB will independently decide on the future fate of Rusnano: either classic bankruptcy, or restoration of solvency and further development of the company.

Looking forward to October? Not long left.

Timofey Grishin

To be continued

Source: www.rucriminal.info