Показаны сообщения с ярлыком Mikhail Mikhailov. Показать все сообщения
Показаны сообщения с ярлыком Mikhail Mikhailov. Показать все сообщения

суббота, 13 мая 2023 г.

Pet of the TFR from the gang "Don't wake up"

The gray-haired was given a ticket with a security guarantee







The Telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU and Rucriminal.info continues to tell sad details about the activities of the Ne Budi gang (Lyubertsy authority Mikhail Mikhailov) and his associates. However, it is becoming more and more obvious that not only the crimes committed by gang members are sad, but also the methods of work of law enforcement agencies that are investigating the affairs of the gang.

Earlier, we talked a lot about the super-witness Mikhail Sadovsky (nicknamed Sedoy), whose obvious involvement in the commission of especially grave crimes, “accidentally” has not been noticed for many, many years.



Now it becomes obvious that Sadovsky received a ticket with a LIFETIME security guarantee. Integrated security with this warranty card is provided by the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee for the Moscow Region, the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation, the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for the Moscow Region.

In earlier posts, we told in detail that the “exploits” of the Ne Budi gang are contained in the materials of several separate criminal cases. Some have already been sentenced, while others are under investigation.

The long break after the last publication is primarily due to the expectation of an objective, INDEPENDENT, comprehensive investigation of ALL crimes committed by ALL members of the Ne Budi gang. However, expectations far exceeded the sad reality.

In 2022, the preliminary investigation on UD No. 9941 initiated on February 10, 2007 was resumed. on the fact of the murder of Senichkin V.V. True, it was resumed not because of the competent and professional work of the competent authorities, but because of the writing of a confession by Ne Budi himself. That is, Ne Budi did all the work of the operational services himself. UD No. 9941 after the resumption was in the production of the GSU SK in the Moscow Region. The "investigation" on him was carried out subtly and selectively. Sadovsky, respectively, is a witness, this is a matter of course. Despite the presence of direct witnesses and evidence indicating his direct participation in the murder of Senichkin V.V., committed for hire. Sadovsky is so valued, cherished and respected by the operatives that they themselves paid for his travel to Moscow from the Chelyabinsk region, accommodation and meals in Moscow. What Sadovsky later proudly boasted about with criminal acquaintances (an audio recording of the story is at the disposal of the Cheka-OGPU).

The “investigation” under UD No. 9941 was planned to be completed at the end of 2022. However, after a series of scandalous publications by the Cheka-OGPU, by a decree of the First Deputy Chairman of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, Colonel General of Justice Kaburneev E.V. dated December 28, 2022, UD No. 9941 was transferred for further investigation to the Central Office of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation (hereinafter GSU IC). In the Main Investigative Department of the Investigative Committee, the case is being processed by investigator Dmitry Viktorovich Linkov. Despite the solidity of the unit, bias towards the right people and circumstances has been preserved.

Also, UD No. 42202007703001731 is in the production of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Russia. Within the framework of this UD with the accused Gumnikov A.S. and Mikhailov M.V. various investigative and procedural actions are being carried out. In the course of these actions Gumnikov A.S., Mikhailov M.V. and a number of other persons informed the investigation about the murder of a native of the Chechen Republic committed by Mikhail Sadovsky in 1995 on the territory of the city of Lyubertsy. The members of the investigative-operational group (hereinafter SOG) are aware of the direct involvement of Mikhail Sadovsky in the murder of a Chechen. So in the course of one of the intimate conversations, Deputy. Pavel Nikolaevich Kulakov, head of the department for solving contract killings of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Moscow Region, complained about the lack of need to bring Mikhail Sadovsky to criminal liability for the murder of a Chechen. They say the affairs of the past years, Sadovsky Mikhail has a little daughter, if he (Sadovsky M.) is arrested, then the daughter will end up in an orphanage. And in another conversation Kulakov P.N. said that “negotiations” are now underway with the judge (without specifying which court) whether the court will arrest Mikhail Sadovsky for the murder of a Chechen. Well, what can I say ... The true goal of Kulakov P.N. in these "friendly" conversations, it was an operative way (tactical methods, psychological tricks) to find out as much information as possible, incl. what else could "witness" Mikhail Sadovsky be involved in. Well, of course, not to carry out an ORM complex aimed at collecting evidence of the guilt of the "witness" Mikhail Sadovsky, but in order to take comprehensive measures to prevent any possible legal problems with the "witness" Mikhail Sadovsky. That is, in reality, Kulakov P.N. and other members of the SOG are doing everything possible so that the "witness" Mikhail Sadovsky remains a witness forever. We have to give credit to the guys, while they are doing great. In addition, as part of the investigation of the UD on the crimes of the Ne Budi gang, members of the SOG (including investigators for the Internal Affairs Directorate of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Russia and the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee for the Moscow Region) became aware of the involvement of Mikhail Sadovsky in a series of robbery attacks committed in the past years. But, as you probably guessed, Misha Sadovsky is again “out of business.” Oh"! This is in view of the fact that we are talking about at least two robbery attacks.

And the participants of the SOG know that Gumnikov A.S. and Mikhailov M.V. convicted of a crime they did not commit. Earlier, in one of the posts, we talked in detail about the killers of the gang of Dmitry Makarenko (convicted by the verdict of the Moscow City Court) and the crimes they committed. So, one of the murders committed by members of this gang is the murder of Dmitry Vakulin. Only Gumnikov A.S. was convicted for this. and Mikhailov M.V. In "heartfelt" conversations with Gumnikov A.S. investigator Ablaev S.B. and operative Kulakov P.N. express "firm" intentions to restore social justice and understand the monstrous mistake. But this is only in conversations! So that and to whom they would not tell Ablaev S.B., Kulakov P.N. their colleagues and management, in fact, the story of the condemnation of Gumnikov A.S. for someone else's murder, they are trying to hush it up as carefully as possible! Naturally, without changing anything! Solidarity! Professional! By the way, Ablaev S.B. and Kulakov P.N. personally saw the testimony of G.S. Shevchenko (a killer from the Makarenko gang), in which the latter tells in detail the details of the murder of Dmitry Vakulin committed by him and his accomplices.

In addition, as part of the investigation of the UD on the crimes of the Ne Budi gang, members of the SOG (including investigators for the Internal Affairs Directorate of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation and the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee for the Moscow Region) became aware of the involvement of Mikhail Sadovsky in a series of robbery attacks committed in the past years. But, as you probably guessed, Misha Sadovsky is again "out of business"! This is in view of the fact that we are talking about at least two robbery attacks.

Earlier, we talked in detail about another active member of the gang - Andrei Drozdov, nicknamed Drozd. The latter was on the federal wanted list for a long time, was detained and taken into custody on 04/26/2022. Where they turn - there it went. Initially, Drozdov denied everything. Subsequently, he fully admitted his guilt and gave detailed, but extremely selective testimony. He talks in great detail about some episodes, but "neatly" leads others into the shadows. Why is he (they) doing this? By the way, Andrei Drozdov not only confirmed the murder of a Chechen committed by Mikhail Sadovsky, but also told a number of important details necessary for proof.

It is worth paying attention to the fact that Gumnikov A.S. wishes to tell the preliminary investigation authorities in detail about additional, previously unknown episodes of criminal activity. However, to date, Gumnikov A.S. did not take a confession.

At present, there is all the data confirming that a certain circle of people deliberately misleads the first persons of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation.







To be continued

Arseny Dronov

Source: www.rucriminal.info

четверг, 16 февраля 2023 г.

Politkovskaya's killer spoke

Rustam Makhmudov spoke about the murders that the TFR does not want to investigate



The Telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU and Rucriminal.info continue to talk about the uniquely phantasmagoric events related to the investigation of crimes committed by the gang of Mikhail Mikhailov, as well as a number of mystical "coincidences" in the investigation of the criminal case of the Makarenko D.S. gang.

At our disposal was a lawyer's questioning of Makhmudov Rustam Ruslanovich (perpetrator of the murder of journalist Anna Politkovskaya, sentenced to life). Makhmudov R.R. for a long time he was kept in the same cell with D.S. Makarenko. Makhmudov R.R. told the lawyer in detail about how Makarenko D.S. he spoke in detail about the murders he had committed, incl. about the commission by him (Makarenko D.S.) of the murder of Vakulin D.S. Makarenko D.S. he assured his cellmate that everything had already been decided and he (Makarenko D.S.) would not receive a life sentence for committing 5 (five) murders.

As Rucriminal.info wrote earlier, our editors have at their disposal a video of D.Kh. Zaripov’s confessions. Zaripov D.Kh. was a direct witness to the murder of Vakulin D.S. Zaripov D.Kh. was interrogated as a witness. within the framework of the UD of the gang Mikhailova M.V., Zaripov D.Kh. claims that the face of the man who shot Vakulin D.S. remembered very well. Zaripov D.Kh. tells in detail how the “identification” of A.S. Gumnikov took place. in the conditions of the pre-trial detention center, as well as how he (Zaripov D.Kh.) “identified” Gumnikov A.S. in the Moscow Regional Court. During the "identification" of Gumnikov A.S. 06/11/2009 in SIZO - 7 (Yegoryevsk), Zaripov D.Kh. first, they showed the identifiable person through the door slot, and then the “identification” procedure took place directly. Zaripov D.Kh. says that, at the time of the identification, he was directly in the same office with the person he identified. This is despite the fact that from the materials of UD No. 79191 (the gang of Mikhailov M.V.) it follows that the identification of Gumnikov A.S. was carried out under conditions precluding visual observation by the identifiable person. It follows from the response to the request in PKU SIZO-7 that there was no room for conducting identification under conditions that excluded visual contact between the identifying person and the person being identified on June 11, 2009 in PKU SIZO-7.

Witness Zaripov D.Kh. told that he (Zaripov D.Kh.) was threatened with a knife by a man who introduced himself as an employee of the FSB of the Russian Federation. Zaripov D.Kh. said that he had repeatedly informed the investigator Pavel Igorevich Filipchuk about the threats from a man who introduced himself as an employee of the FSB of the Russian Federation (the case of the gang of Mikhailov M.V. was in his proceedings). However, no checks were made on this fact. Zaripov D.Kh. He said that he saw a man who introduced himself as an employee of the FSB of the Russian Federation on the dock in the Moscow Regional Court, where on December 1, 2014 he was summoned for questioning as a witness, in the case of Mikhailov's gang M.V.

By the way, investigator Filipchuk P.I. A lot of things became known during the investigation of this UD. However, this much is still lurking in the depths of UD No. 79191. In the following publications, Rucriminal.info will talk about this in detail.

Zaripov D.Kh. said that in the Moscow Regional Court, before the “identification”, he was taken to the office for secret witnesses, where investigator Filipchuk P.I. and one more person. In this office, Zaripov D.Kh. investigator Filipchuk P.I. photographs of a person who needed to be "identified" were shown. Zaripov D.Kh. clearly says that the person whom he “identified” under pressure in the Moscow Regional Court, i.e. Gumnikova A.S. and the man who shot Vakulin D.S. these are different people.

And even that's not all!

At the scene of the murder of Vakulin D.S. A Kalashnikov assault rifle was discovered. Experts found biological traces (DNA of a man) on this machine. Within the framework of UD No. 79191 (Mikhailov's gang), a molecular genetic examination was carried out on the biological traces found on the machine. From the conclusion of this examination, it follows that, found on weapons from the scene of the murder of Vakulin D.S. biological traces definitely DO NOT BELONG to Gumnikov A.S. and Mikhailov M.V. According to the current legislation (clause 2, part 1, article 7 of the Federal Law No. 242 of December 3, 2008), biological material of unidentified persons, which was seized during the course of investigative actions, is subject to mandatory genomic registration in the FBDGI (federal database of genomic information) . Information about the registration and, as a result, the verification of the genomic passport of an “unknown” man, whose DNA was found on the AK-74 machine No. It didn't happen by accident!

In the case of a check by FBDGI, a match of the genomic passport of D.S. Makarenko would have been revealed. with DNA traces of an "unknown" man left at the scene of the murder of Vakulin D.S.

Accordingly, this was clear to the best investigator (according to the results of 2013) Vasilovsky Sergey Vladimirovich, in whose production was UD No. 376610 (Gang Makarenko D.S.). Knew, understood and was silent about this and the investigator for the Department of Internal Affairs Filipchuk Pavel Igorevich, who investigated the case of Mikhailov's gang M.V. I wonder what the synchronous "forgetfulness" of two officers of the investigative department is connected with?!....

Ancient Latin wisdom says: if you want to understand who did it, understand who benefits from it.

In the materials of the criminal cases of the gang of Mikhailov M.V. (Don't wake) and Makarenko D.S. repeatedly there are 2 (two) names - Mullashaekhov M.A. and Grishchenko Artur Alexandrovich (nicknamed Uzbek). In early publications, we said that Mullashaekhov M.A. was killed by members of the gang Don't wake up. As established by the investigation and the court Mullashaekhov M.A. was killed by order of Vakulin D.S. But Grishchenko A.A. in both UD appears as a close person and chief Mullashaehova M.A., as well as an extremely wealthy person with connections in law enforcement agencies. From the materials of the UD gang Makarenko D.S. it is seen that Grishchenko A.A. with impunity he beat Kuksenko Yury Arkadyevich, who on 12/21/2005 was killed by members of the Makarenko D.S. gang, incl. for hire. An interesting coincidence, Kuksenko Yu.A. and Grishchenko A.A. there was a joint business - LLC "Grand Pri Stroy". 26% of the authorized capital belonged to Kuksenko Yu.A., and 76% belonged respectively to Grishchenko A.A. After the death of Kuksenko Yu.A. the share of the latter promptly passed to Grishchenko A.A. A number of witnesses in the case of the Makarenko D.S. gang point to the direct involvement of A.A. Grishchenko. to the death of Kuksenko Yu.A.

My friend's enemy is my enemy.

Grishchenko A.A. there was a firm - LLC PRESS-MOTIV (TIN 5027066262). And the general director in this company was ...... voila - Mullashaekhov M.A. And before Mullashaekhov M.A. Vakulin D.S. was the general director. From the testimonies of a number of witnesses and materials of UD No. 79191 (Ne wake up the gang), it follows that Vakulin D.S. ceased to be the CEO of the illegal, as a result of forgery of title documents. On this fact, the Department of Internal Affairs of the city of Lyubertsy initiated a criminal case under Part 4 of Article 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. After that, a month later Mullashaekhov M.A. was killed, and after 2 (two) months Vakulin D.S. was killed.

It is worth noting that despite the testimony of a number of witnesses (more than 10 people), in the cases of both gangs, about the involvement of Grishchenko A.A. to the commission of especially serious crimes, no measures against Grishchenko A.A. was not carried out.

Maybe the witnesses (on the cases of both gangs) told the truth that Grishchenko A.A. a very rich man and has huge connections in law enforcement?!

Here is such a "non-intersecting" parallel in the affairs of two independent gangs.

In recent years, official representatives of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation regularly receive statements that one of the most important activities of the department is the disclosure of crimes of past years. The forensic investigators of the IC have at their disposal a huge amount of forensic technology and modern methods of expert research, the possibilities of which, a simple layman cannot even imagine. One of the key innovations in forensic science is olfactory examination - the examination of odor traces. According to highly qualified employees of the Central Administration of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, it is possible even 30 years after the crime was committed.

By the way, on the basis of this examination, a number of guilty verdicts have recently been issued. Incl. and criminal cases from the distant past.

But I wonder if it will be possible to conduct an olfactory study on the fact of the murder of Vakulin D.S.?! And to conduct the named examination on the facts of the violent death of Senichkin V.V., Ostrovsky V.Yu., Akinshina S.V. it would be just great. We talked about the named victims in detail earlier.

Yes, by the way, on January 11, 2023, to Mikhailov M.V. and Gumnikov A.S. operatives came to talk. They were very interested in the circumstances of the murders of Senichkin V.V. And for some reason they said that Sergey Anatolyevich Savelyev (nicknamed Bald), who was an intermediary in ordering the murder of Senichkin V.V., died. And he lives and rejoices. Maybe this is a tactical move, the purpose of which is the lack of evidence against Savelyev S.A. about his direct involvement in the murder of Senichkin V.V.?! And on the other hand Savelyev S.A. can give detailed testimony about the murder of VV Senichkin, about all the persons involved in its commission and the specific role of everyone who took part in the murder. Does the investigation really need this??!



It should be noted that until now - 16.02.2023 in respect of Mikhailov M.V. and Gumnikova A.S. no measure of restraint has been chosen. They are kept in a pre-trial detention center for more than 3 months on the basis of an investigator's decision issued in accordance with Art. 77.1 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation. This is in view of the fact that they were charged with murder! With their participation, a number of investigative and procedural actions were carried out. But it cannot be ruled out that the investigation intends to “bury” UD No. 9941 on the fact of the murder of Senichkin V.V. And by sending materials for choosing a preventive measure to the court, additional traces will remain. Probably the investigation leaves itself room for maneuver. Insured so to speak ....

Well, our old acquaintance, "witness" Misha Sadovsky, was duly notified that his no one will ever stop. He smokes a plan every day, threatens with physical harm to citizens of the Russian Federation, regularly receives money from renting the premises for which Valery Ostrovsky was killed. In general, a person enjoys life. He has a lifetime warranty card from the Investigative Committee and the Ministry of Internal Affairs, guaranteeing a free and carefree life.



In the near future we will publish a whole series of audio and video recordings. From the content of which, dear readers, it will become clear to you how “correctly” the investigation of a whole series of interrelated especially serious crimes was carried out.











To be continued

Arseny Dronov

Source: www.rucriminal.info

пятница, 28 октября 2022 г.

"Authority" Sedoy lived on the passport of the murdered victim

How a deal with the investigation made an innocent "sheep" out of a killer



Rucriminal.info continues the epic about the gang of the once one of the most sinister Lyubertsy "authorities" Mikhail Mikhailov, nicknamed Don't wake up. He got it for the corresponding tattoo made right on the eyelids. In the third part of the investigation, we will talk about the private owner of the gang, who entered into a pre-trial agreement and testified against other bandits. Very handy readings.

Separately, in such a complex and terrible story, it is necessary to note Sadovsky Mikhail Alekseevich. He is a truly unique person. That's it with a capital letter.

For it is simply impossible to call it “luck” in another way.

This is exactly the case when, with an acute lack of evidence, the investigation and the court are ready to turn a blind eye to everything. The main thing is to “finish” the investigation, send the case to court and get a “fair” verdict.

As we said earlier, the main members of the gang were detained on March 18, 2009. Immediately after the arrest, Sadovsky (aka Sedoy) began to actively cooperate with the investigation. By concluding a pre-trial cooperation agreement in the future. But this cooperation was very filigree. Bypassing sharp and dangerous corners with jeweler's precision. Sharp and dangerous for Sedoy.

So, during the interrogation, Sedoy "accidentally" did not indicate that he lived for more than 3 years on the passport of the murdered Akinshin S.V., pasting his photograph into it. Yes, not just lived, but got married, changed his surname to Kazakov, received a residence permit. It is worth noting that at the time of Sedym's testimony, the investigation knew for certain that for a long time he lived under the passport of S.V. Akinshina, both during the latter's lifetime and after his death. Well, how could the investigation be interested in such “trifles”?! Investigator P.I. Filippchuk was not interested in the fact, using what documents Sedoy drove the car at the moment when, from his (Sedoy) testimony, Akinshin S.V. was killed. And from the testimony of Sedoy it follows that at the time of the murder of Akinshin S.V., there were three of them: Sedoy, Mikhailov M.V. and Akinshin S.V. Gray-haired was driving, and Mikhailov M.V. and Akinshin S.V. was driving behind. Moreover, one of the main tasks of the investigation is to establish the motive for the committed crime, especially such as murder. As you know, the motive is suddenly arisen and pre-planned. In this particular case, the investigation considered that the motive for the murder of Akinshina S.V. for Mikhailov M.V. it turned out that he (Akinshin S.V.) insulted him as an authority. It is worth noting that the prosecution Mikhailov M.The. in the murder of Akinshina S.V., built ONLY!!!!!! on the testimony of Sadovsky M.A. There is no other evidence in the case. Neither direct nor indirect. And this despite the fact that Akinshin S.V. was the brother of Mikhailov's wife M.V., Elena. mother of his only child. But the fact that Sedoy lived according to the documents of Akinshin S.V. and the latter demanded that Sedoy stop this and return his documents to him, the investigation "did not establish."

Stability is a sign of excellence. And in the case of Sadovsky M.A. This proverb is 100% true.

Earlier, Rucriminal.info said that one of the episodes of the criminal activity of Misha’s “Don’t wake up” gang was the murder of Ostrovsky V.Yu., committed on 08/31/2004. take over office space. This motive was established, after giving Sadovsky M.A. "confessional" testimony. In which he described in detail, “honestly”, consistently how Mikhailov M.V. decided to kill V.Yu. Ostrovsky in order to take over the office. Well, he (Sadovsky M.A.) just told about it as a close friend. No, no, Mikhail Alekseevich was a law-abiding citizen, and did not participate in anything illegal, especially in murders. This is how one of his (Sedoy's) interrogations begins. Now, let's raise the curtain a little. As it follows from the official extract from the Unified State Register of Real Estate Registers, on November 30, 2007, the share owners of a part of the office premises simultaneously became: Gumnikov A.S., Mikhailov M.V., Sadovskaya O.V. (wife of Sadovsky M.A.) and Drozdov A.M. Currently, Sadovskaya O.V. surname Semenikhin, but more on that later. And what a misfortune… Gumnikov, Mikhailov and Drozdov are charged with the murder of Ostrovsky V.Yu. in order to take possession of a share in that very office, but Sadovsky did not. Mystic! And this despite the fact that the episode with the murder of Ostrovsky V.Yu. directly based on the "true" testimony of Sadovsky M.A. There is no other real evidence obtained in accordance with the requirements of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation regarding the episode with the murder of V.Yu. Ostrovsky. That is, the investigation, the court of first instance and the court of appeal agreed that 3 people were killed, and the object of the criminal encroachment was registered for 4. Well, just for being the fourth good friend. Indeed, why not. Everything is simple. But as if not quite ... .. In one of the recent evening video conversations, Sadovsky M.A. Marchuk N.A. tells in detail. (ex-wife of Mikhailov M.V.), that the office was “messed up” he (Sedoy) and Mikhailov M.V. TOGETHER!!!! And no one else has anything to do with him. And only Sedoy and Mikhailov M.V. should also receive a share of the rent. Joke??? Joke!!! And there is also a video conversation between Marchuk N.A. and the founder of Gulag.net Vladimir Osechkin, during which Marchuk N.K. reports that he regularly transfers money to Sedom for his share in that same office space. Do you think that's all?! It wasn't there...

Another of the episodes of the murders, for which members of the Mikhailov M.V. brigade were convicted, is the murder of V.M. Danilin. committed on August 30, 2007. And everything is according to the old scheme. The "frank" testimony of Sedoy formed the basis of the guilty verdict. And he (Gray), as in previous cases, did not participate in anything. It's just that he, white and fluffy, was initiated into his affairs by his killer friends. But he is not, an honest man. But here again there is a nuance. All in the same confidential video conversation that was filmed on video by one of the parties. Sadovsky M.A. claims: that Gumnikov A.S. had nothing to do with the “case”, and received a share of $ 25,000 because he was a friend. And there is also an audio recording on which Marchuk N.A. claims that she personally shared the money for the sold apartment of Danilin V.M. and handed them out to the participants. And one of these participants was Sadovsky M.A. In his "sincere" testimony, about receiving money for the sold apartment Danilina V.M. Gray-haired naturally did not report. Lucky fellow, do not say anything. Under the noise of this wave, the investigators lost interest in the information obtained during the ORM that the murder of Danilin V.M. involved c. Kryuchkov A.A. Probably the investigation came to the conclusion that if the "witness" Sadovsky M.A. about Kryuchkov A.A. did not report anything, so the results of the ORM do not correspond to reality.

But on the episode of the murder of Vakulin D.S. our "hero" did not bother with a detailed narrative about the terrible crimes that "accidentally" became known to him. He simply answered the question of the investigator what he knew about the murder of Vakulin D.S., he answered: during a telephone conversation with Mikhailov M.V. from the latter, it became known to me that Vakulina D.S. shot from a machine gun. Everything! No comment.

Recall: previously repeatedly convicted of grave and especially grave crimes, with a conviction that has not been expunged and not extinguished, for committing a murder for hire by a group of people, participating in a gang, robbery with a weapon, using violence dangerous to life and health, illegal possession of weapons, received 5 (five) years in prison.



One of the operatives leading the operational support of the criminal case of the Mikhailov gang was Semenikhin A.V. When conducting a search in the apartment of Sadovsky M.A. one of the o / s was Semenikhin A.V. Who had a lightning-fast romance with the already ex-wife of Sadovsky M.A., Oksana. Relations Semenikhina A.V. and Sadovskaya Oksana developed rapidly, which resulted in the registration of marriage between Semenikhin A.V. and Oksana (already Semenikhina). But the very savor of this happy marriage is that, after the release of Sadovsky M.A. from the colony (in 2014), the newlyweds urged the latter to confirm all the “true” testimony given at the preliminary investigation, but already in court. And in return for him (Sadovsky M.A.), the Semenikhins promised a life sentence for Mikhailov M.V. and receiving half of the property of Mikhailov M.V. to Sedym, to which Sedy agreed. Having come to court with his own feet, as a witness for the prosecution, Sedoy simply refused to answer any questions. Referring to the provisions of Art. 51 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. But here's the problem again. The right to use the norm of Art. 51 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, witnesses in criminal proceedings are not endowed. Moreover, art. 308 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation provides for the responsibility of a witness for refusing to testify. However, neither the prosecutor Karapetyan D.Oh., nor the presiding judge Vyunov A.The. did not respond in any way to the fundamental violation of the Law, witness Sadovsky M.A. As soon as the Semenikhins found out that Sedoy had not retracted his earlier testimony, he was sent away for a long time. With a brief reminder that in case of bad behavior, he (Sedoy) will be promptly returned to places of detention. Since everyone knows how “honestly” he fulfilled the conditions of the pre-trial cooperation agreement concluded with him.

This is how the testimony of one “sincere” person becomes an iron-concrete basis for a sentence with 2 life terms.



But these are all things of the past. And there is what is called at the top. As we wrote earlier, Mikhailov M.V. is currently in jail, in connection with the investigation of a criminal case. In this criminal case Mikhailov M.The. is the accused. The latter fully admits his guilt, cooperates with the investigation, he has written a confession. Also with Mikhailov M.V. on-site verification was carried out. In the course of investigative actions, from the beginning of August 2022, Mikhailov M.V. informed the investigation about the persons involved in the commission of this crime and their role in the commission of this crime. However, to date, none of those indicated by Mikhailov M.V. persons were not detained and not interrogated. In the decision to attract as the accused, only one surname of the accomplice, now deceased, appears. The rest are unidentified persons. Although Mikhailov M.V. given clear, consistent evidence that is logical and consistent with other materials of the case. Or maybe it is again beneficial for the preliminary investigation bodies not to notice something?







To be continued

Arseny Dronov

Source: www.rucriminal.info




воскресенье, 18 сентября 2022 г.

“Unable to bear the pain, he named the passwords”

How they took the gang Don't wake



Rucriminal.info continues the epic about the gang of the once one of the most sinister Lyubertsy "authorities" Mikhail Mikhailov, nicknamed Don't wake up. He got it for the corresponding tattoo made right on the eyelids. In the second part, we will tell you how the gang members got caught.



As almost always happens, the guys got burned on stupidity. And if it is absolutely accurate, then on greed.

The golden autumn of 2008 was in the yard. Under unspecified circumstances, the heroes of our today's story became aware of a large amount of cash stored in one of the currency exchange offices in the Novogireevo metro area. In addition, they became aware of the employees working in this exchange office. Immediately after that, the kids decided to commit a robbery attack on the cash vault. But it was not just a robbery from the dashing 90s. There was ingenuity, cunning and even fiction here.

Having found out everything necessary, the guys moved on to action. In accordance with the developed plan, Balashov Gennady for several days followed the senior manager of the bank branch in order to establish the time of his arrival and departure to the workplace. Having collected all the necessary information, having held a rehearsal at the site of the future attack, we decided to go to work.

The operation has begun! On one of the first days of October 2008, at the end of the working day, the senior manager of the bank turned on all security systems, closed the exchange office and headed home. Having parked the car at the house, the manager went to the entrance. Directly near the entrance to the gate, on the territory of the house, there was a Gazelle, into which boxes were loaded. The Gazelle stood in such a way that it blocked the entrance to the gate. In this connection, the manager was forced to bypass the Gazelle in such a way that he was directly near its open side doors. Having caught up with the doors of the Gazelle, the manager felt that he was grabbed sharply and very strongly, and pushed into the Gazelle. It happened at lightning speed and the manager did not have time to call for help. Once in the back of the Gazelle, the manager was tied to a chair with tape. After that, they immediately began to beat him, demanding to give passwords to turn off the alarm at the exchange office. The manager claimed that without his personal presence it was impossible to get into the right room. However, blows to various parts of the manager's body continued. Unable to bear the pain, the manager named passwords for security systems and algorithms for their introduction. After that, everyone together went to the right address. Once there, the manager was left in the back of a Gazelle along with two accomplices, while the other defendants went to the exchange office. Having entered the premises of interest, the bandits began to put cash in large market bags. The theft of money itself took no more than 2 minutes. Returning to the car with the booty, they quickly retreated from the crime scene. On the way, the manager, along with the chair, to which the latter was securely attached with adhesive tape, was thrown into a ditch. The manager lay in the ditch for about 2 hours. All this time he was shouting: GO-GI-TE! The manager's screams were heard by passers-by. The latter released the manager, provided the necessary assistance and called the police.

The booty of the robbers was 26 million rubles. With the booty, the bandits went to the office, which belonged to the gang members (we will talk about this office in detail in the following parts). Where they began to divide the loot. 4 (four) people were directly involved in the robbery. Namely: Gumnikov A.S., Drozdov A.M., Schipantsev S.A., Gomygin M.V. The indirect participant was Balashov G.A., who monitored the manager before the attack. Who and how much received the money is not exactly established. But the share of one participant is known for sure ... ..

Everyone was satisfied with the outcome of the work done. Except Gena Balashov. The crocodile, which is exactly what Balashov was called by his colleagues, received only 10 thousand US dollars. That on the day of the commission of the described crime was approximately 270 thousand Russian rubles. Balashov, as he later wrote in his confession, did not even understand how and what to do with his "wealth". Gennady was afraid of other participants in the attack. In this connection, he could not decide to insistently ask for a decent share. The resentment and annoyance of the unfortunate robber knew no bounds. He could not put up with the handout thrown to him like a dog. And the Crocodile decides, as he thought at that moment, on a cunning step ... ..

Having learned the phone number of the manager, yes, yes, the very one who, against his will, was riding a chair in the Gazelle. Balashov Gena offered him to sell the data of those who robbed him for a certain amount of money. Not believing his luck, the manager even doubted the veracity of the potential seller. But, after a short dialogue about the details of that sad day for the manager, the latter realized that the seller was in possession of the declared information, and offered a meeting. And at the meeting, instead of the desired 100 thousand dollars, Gennady was expecting the “Warm welcome” tariff plan. Balashov was detained by officers of the CID of the UVD of the SEAD. In what key do you passThe conversation between the police officers and Balashov is unknown. Officially, no procedural or investigative actions were carried out with Balashov at that time. Balashov was released the same evening. And after a while Drozdov Andrey was detained. No measures were taken with Drozov aimed at confirming his involvement in the robbery. Moreover, on the same evening Andrey Gumnikov handed over 200,000 US dollars to officers of the Department of Internal Affairs of the SEAD of Moscow. After which Drozdov was released.

The next day, Balashov was invited by the staff of the CID of the UVD of the SEAD of Moscow for a conversation. During this conversation, police officers told Balashov that he had given them false information about Drozdov's involvement in the robbery. Adding at the same time that the victim did not identify Drozdov as the person who committed the crime against him. At the end of the conversation, the police officers advised Balashov to “get lost” for a while from the Moscow region. After that, they took Gennady to the Kuzminki metro station, where, after dropping him off, they left. Balashov, in turn, understood why Drozdov was "not involved", and decided, or, most likely, they decided to write a statement for him. Yes, not just write a statement, but compose: an autobiography - a statement - a confession on 27 pages. For some reason, he wrote a statement addressed to the head of the 23rd department of the Criminal Investigation Department of the Main Internal Affairs Directorate of Moscow, police colonel Sakharov S.V. Balashov did not submit this application to the duty unit and did not even send it by mail. Balashov left his information bomb in a storage room at the Leningradsky railway station, and he left in an unknown direction. In the future, he "accidentally" informed about his application and its location precisely about / at the 23rd department of the 7th ORCH of the GUVD of Moscow. By whom it was discovered and seized from the storage room of the Leningradsky railway station in Moscow. It is worth noting separately that Balashov's statement of February 26, 2009 is simply bound to appear in criminal law textbooks as an unprecedented and unparalleled case.

Three weeks after the discovery of Balashov's statement, a series of arrests began. And Balashov himself turned out to be in the status of ... .. drumroll - a witness. Yes, not simple, but "classified", under the pseudonym "Artyom Fedorovich". In connection with the fear for the life and health of a valuable witness, Artyom Fedorovich was settled to live somewhere, but at a special forces base. Artyom Fedorovich thought about relations with the preliminary investigation bodies - “we see each other less often - friendship is stronger”, and escaped from the special forces base. Here the investigator began to understand that Artyom Fedorovich, let's say, is not an entirely honest person. Artyom Fedorovich - Balashov - Crocodile was put on the federal wanted list.

It didn't take long to search for the grief of the "witness". He found himself. Yes, not just somehow, but with a twist, well, as we love. The manager never gave the money to Gennady for information about the robbers .... But he promised. Well, Balashov decided to remind himself. Like, the debt is red in payment. The poor victim (the same manager), taken aback by such impudence, promised to call Gennady back. And he, in turn, reported the “good man” to the operatives. After a short period of time, Balashov was detained in the city of Stavropol. After that, he was taken to Moscow and placed in a pre-trial detention center.





To be continued

Arseny Dronov

Source: www.rucriminal.info




суббота, 10 сентября 2022 г.

Bloody "Don't Wake" and his brigade

An eye-for-an-eye



Rucriminal.info begins an epic about a gang of once one of the most sinister Lyubertsy "authorities" Mikhail Mikhailov, nicknamed Don't Wake. He got it for the corresponding tattoo made right on the eyelids. In the first part, we will tell you about the gang itself. And in the following parts about the jury trial and subsequent events, accompanied by unprecedented scandals.



Part 1.

The band started in 2002. It was organized by Mikhailov Mikhail Viktorovich, nicknamed "Don't Wake" (he has a tattoo on his eyelids - Don't Wake They Sleep). Native resident of the city of Lyubertsy. Previously convicted multiple times.

The gang included:

- Sadovsky Mikhail Alekseevich, nickname "Gray". A native of the city of Norilsk, Krasnoyarsk Territory. Previously convicted multiple times. He met Mikhailov in the early 1990s, while serving sentences together in one of the colonies in the Tula region. Until 2008, he did not have a Russian passport, because he escaped from the colony and was on the federal wanted list for a long time. After his arrest and serving his sentence, he did not receive Russian citizenship. In his testimony about the loss of documents, he lied. The investigation was satisfied with this version, and no one checked anything. Constantly used herbal drugs. In early 2008, he began using hard drugs. Currently, he also constantly uses drugs of plant origin (marijuana, hashish). He concluded a dosudebku, gave "correct" testimony. For the crimes provided for: p.p. "g", "h" part 2 of article 105; part 3 of article 222; Part 2 Art. 209; p.p. "a", "b" part 4 of Art. 162 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, received 5 years of strict regime. The apartment in which he was registered at the time of his arrest and sentencing was received as a result of the murder of its owner. Later, by fraudulent means, Sadovsky's wife, Oksana Vladimirovna Sadovskaya, sold this apartment. He “forgot” about this during interrogations.

- Drozdov Andrey Sergeevich. A native of the city of Lyubertsy. Nickname "Drozd". Previously convicted on probation. On March 18, 2009, when the main members were detained, he managed to escape. Detained at the end of April 2022. Gives selective testimonies that are beneficial to him. He minimizes his participation in crimes or even transfers them to others. In many ways, he tries to blame everything on Mikhailov. Currently, he is kept in the FKU SIZO-2 of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia in the Moscow Region.

- Gumnikov Andrey Sergeevich. Native resident of the city of Lyubertsy. Previously convicted and serving sentences in MLS. Incl. and for the crime (murder) committed by Sadovsky M.A. Gumnikov took the blame, because. was a minor and could not be sentenced to capital punishment. While Sadovsky was previously repeatedly judged and he was threatened with a “tower”. He joined Bandu in 2004, after his release from MLS.

The rest of the participants were people who knew each other. Close relationships were not maintained. They became "participants" of the gang only from the testimony of Sadovsky.

According to the source of Rucriminal.info, the relations within the gang were friendly and trusting. On an eye-for-an-eye basis. Namely, between Mikhailov, Sadovsky, Gumnikov and Drozdov. Sadovsky, Gumnikov generally admired and tried to imitate him. When Gumnikov was detained in 1996, without hesitation, he took the blame for the murder committed by Sadovsky in 1995 (this fact is confirmed in conversations by all mutual acquaintances). Drozdov, until the end of 2007, was also respected among his own. And after that, a colder attitude towards him became, because of his cunning, stinginess and unscrupulousness. Even towards their own. Drozdov had an intimate relationship with Mikhailov's common-law wife. By the beginning of 2008, the opiate group also began to move away from Sadovsky, due to his addiction to hard drugs.

The murders committed by gang members had a different motive.

The murder of Sergei Vladimirovich Akinshin in 2002-2003. for which Mikhailov was convicted, was committed in order to hide the fact that Sadovsky used Akinshina's documents for a long time. It is worth noting that Sadovsky began to use Akinshina's documents when Mikhailov was still serving time in a colony. However, neither the investigation nor the court paid attention to this. Strictly taking as truth the testimony of Sadovsky, from which it followed that Akinshina killed Mikhailov, because he insulted Mikhailov. The fact that this happened in the presence of Sadovsky, and for the last 6 years he was silent about it, did not interest anyone.



The murder of Ostrovsky V.Yu. On August 31, 2004, for which Mikhailov and Gumnikov were convicted, and now Drozdov has also been charged. It was committed in order to take over part of the office space. Which since then and to the present. is owned by Mikhailov (now registered to his wife, Marchuk Natalya Alexandrovna), Gumnikov, Sadovsky and Drozdov. From 2012 to present for Drozdov's share, Marchuk receives the rent, without Drozdov's consent to this. Sadovsky in his testimony indicated that they “bought” the part where they “bought” his share, and where the other part was, they killed Ostrovsky. At the same time, in the video where Marchuk speaks with Sadovsky at the beginning of 2022, the latter says that only Sadovsky and Mikhailov should receive a share for the office. Since it is they "us junk" office. It is worth noting that, according to information from the USRN, Drozdov was the first to become the owner of this office. Mikhailov, Gumnikov and Sadovsky after, but at the same time.

The murder of Danilin V.S. in the summer of 2007, for which Mikhailov was convicted, and now Drozdov has also been charged. It was committed in order to take possession of his apartment. Which is what was done. After that, this apartment was sold for $ 100,000 to Gumnikov's cohabitant. From the testimony of Sadovsky, on which alone the prosecution in this episode is based, it follows that he became aware of this from a friendly conversation with Mikhailov and Gumnikov. It has nothing to do with this episode. Didn't do anything illegal. At the same time, in a video conversation with Marchuk, he talks about the allegedly dishonest sharing of money for Danilin's apartment by Mikhailov. There is also an audio recording of a conversation with Marchuk, in which she says that she (Marchuk) personally divided 100,000 dollars at 25,000 at home into Mikhailov, Sadovsky, Gumnikov and Drozdov.

The murder of Sevryugina N.N. committed on May 22, 2008 in Lyubertsy. For which Mikhailov was convicted. Absolutely directly Balashov G.A. (the one who initially served as an impulse to expose the gang). The accusation is based on the testimony given as a “secret witness” by G.A. Balashov himself. From which it follows that it is made for hire. The order came from a n / a person, how much he paid, he does not know, for what he ordered, he also does not know.

Murder of Mullashaekhov M.A. committed on September 30, 2008 in Lyubertsy. The direct executor was Balashov. Sadovsky is imputed to this episode. However, the role is significantly minimized. From the "confessional" testimony of Sadovsky, it follows that Balashov was supposed to rob someone, and he took and killed. But Sadovsky found out about this "only the next day." After that, in a harsh form, he demanded an explanation from Mikhailov for what had happened. Naturally, Sadovsky "did not receive" any money for the murder. And he did not report the incident to law enforcement agencies, as he was mortally “afraid” of Mikhailov.

The murder of Vakulin D.S. committed on November 25, 2008 in the village of Tokarevo, Luberetskiy district. Mikhailov was convicted for this. In addition to the testimony of Sadovsky and the protocol of “identification” of Gumnikov, witness Zaripov D.Kh. in the case there is nothing from the word COMPLETELY. At the same time, Sadovsky's testimony contains 2 answers to the investigator's questions, namely: that Vakulin D.S. he is not familiar, and what he knows from a telephone conversation with Mikhailov, that Vakulina D.S. shot from a machine gun. There is an audio recording of a conversation between Retyunsky's lawyer Pavel Yemelyanovich and convict Dmitry Makarenko (a member of Andrei Safronov's gang), who says that he killed D.S. Vakulin. He says that he wrote a confession on this episode, that his wife Vakulin D.S. recognized him. when checking on site. And also the fact that the operatives told him that if he wants to save the pre-trial, then he should forget about the episode with D.S. Vakulin. Makarenko ends by saying that he will not repeat this anywhere, since he does not need problems. And the term of 17 years, received with a dosudebkoy, suits him. There is a video in which Osechkin calls Zaripov D.Kh., introducing himself as an employee of the Prosecutor General's Office. Where is Zaripov D.Kh. says that in the pre-trial detention center he identified another person, neither the one whom he saw in court (that is, not Gumnikov), but the opera, who were present in court, “convincingly” asked to identify Gumnikov in court. There are explanations of extras and witnesses who were present at the identification. Those who say that they did not see the very fact of identification. They were approached on the street by police officers and asked to participate in the event. Well, cherry on the cake…….. There are answers to inquiries in the pre-trial detention center, certified by a round seal and signature of the head of the pre-trial detention center, as well as a photo log of visits to the pre-trial detention center on the day of identification. From which it follows that they all entered the pre-trial detention center at the same time: the investigator, the identification officer (Zaripov D.Kh.), attesting witnesses and extras. Vakulin D.S. was quite a serious and authoritative businessman. Owned a number of premises. Maintained a close relationship with the "thief in law" nicknamed Almaz. The latter had serious disagreements with Mullashaekhov M.A. Who was killed by members of Mikhailov's gang by order of Vakulin D.S. And the purpose of the murder of Vakulin D.S. according to the investigation, the desire was to get rid of the customer as a possible witness.



The source of Rucriminal, info also draws attention to the wife (in the present already former) Mikhailov, Marchuk N.A. The latter, using the trust of Mikhailov, in a clever way, re-registered all the property for herself. Incl. and a share in that very office, and an apartment obtained by fraudulent means. There are a number of audio recordings on which Marchuk N.A. says that she deliberately overplayed so that everything became framed for her. Firstly, she helped them in many ways, I had the money, she kept all the records / expenses. And secondly, Mikhailov is on the PLS, why does he need all this ?! Currently, he is in a state of extreme stress. Due to the fact that Mikhailov began to testify on other episodes. On the audio recording dated 09/04/2022 Marchuk N.A. says that he is very worried. So to like her, at the beginning of 2009, she inherited an apartment in the city of Lyubertsy. Whose apartment this was, the circumstances of the death of the previous owner are unknown to her. She signed all the documents with her right hand (being left-handed), after completing all the documents, she announced the loss of her passport. She did not tell anyone about it and all this time she did not tell anyone.





To be continued

Arseny Dronov

Source: www.rucriminal.info