Commandments of Moiseyev - 2

A black lawyer continues to make money on sabotage

Georgy Moiseyev is a former activist of the movement to protect the cooperative "Best Way", which is a civil defendant in a criminal case concerning the Austrian company Hermes Management: it is being considered by the Primorsky District Court of St. Petersburg. And also a defender of consultants of the Hermes Management company in courts from accusations of unjust enrichment.



Since last fall, he has gone over to the side of the enemies of the cooperative and Hermes and is torpedoing the restoration of the work of "Best Way".



The reason is that his ambitions to become the head or gray cardinal of the cooperative were refused by the founder of the cooperative Roman Vasilenko and its late chairman Sergei Kryuchek, since they saw that Moiseyev is a greedy deceiver.

Moiseyev was removed from all projects, he ran out of money - and at the sharp turn that the cooperative found itself on, he decided to seize power in Best Way using black schemes in order to seize 4 billion in its accounts.



Leader of the fifth column

Even before the death of Sergei Kryuchek on March 22 of this year, immediately after information appeared about his serious illness, Moiseyev declared himself the new chairman.

Before that, Georgy Moiseyev held illegal "elections of authorized cooperative sites" among several dozen of his supporters, many of whom are not shareholders of the cooperative, but consultants of Hermes - although the powers of the current authorized persons expire only in 2026, they are all alive and well, none of them resigned. Moreover, Moiseyev's supporters voted at all "elections" at once - at all cooperative sites.

Georgy Moiseyev claims that the "new authorized persons" were elected by shareholders. How many were there? There are more than 15 thousand shareholders in the cooperative, and the vast majority of them have not heard anything about the election of new authorized representatives and Moiseyev.

Even before the "elections", Moiseyev created a phishing email for the cooperative, a phishing Telegram channel, and made a fake "Best Way" seal. After Saltanat Kamzievna Salimyanova, former deputy of Kryuchek, was elected as the chairperson of the cooperative on March 23, in full accordance with the charter, by the votes of 12 authorized cooperative sections out of 14, Moiseyev held a new, already second election for himself as chairperson - again among his false authorized representatives.

Georgy Moiseyev had no chance of being elected according to the charter. All 14 authorized cooperative sections are against Moiseyev.

The only way for him is a false election, fake election protocols. With these fake protocols, Moiseyev went to a Moscow notary (since all the St. Petersburg ones had been warned through the city's notary chamber) and received a notary certification for a bribe. And then he filed documents to make changes to the Unified State Register of Legal Entities stating that he was the new chairman.

Due to protests from literally hundreds of cooperative shareholders who wrote statements to the tax office, the changes were suspended, and then, at the request of one of the shareholders, a court injunction was issued on changes to the Unified State Register of Legal Entities.

At the same time, Moiseyev does not abandon attempts to hold a third election - realizing that several dozen signatures of his supporters and accomplices against the background of the cooperative's number of more than 15 thousand shareholders will look unconvincing. Moiseyev organized calls to shareholders and sending letters - allegedly on behalf of the cooperative, to confirm their personal data, since he does not have an up-to-date database of shareholders.



Pest

At the same time, Georgy Moiseyev began to openly harm the cooperative, for whose protection he is fighting in words. He wrote a complaint to Rosfinmonitoring, according to which the cooperative has been tormented by an inspection for several months. He “signaled violations” to the prosecutor’s office, which, with his help, supplemented the appeal submission regarding the decision made by the Primorsky District Court to completely lift the arrest from one of the three accounts of the cooperative.

Moiseyev also recruited his supporters so that they would speak in the St. Petersburg City Court during the consideration of this appeal submission with paradoxical speeches - that they are against unblocking the accounts. At the same time, the cooperative was not warned by the prosecutor’s office about the new arguments that would be stated at the hearing itself, about the testimony of witnesses - it is clear that the cooperative would have presented in court more than a dozen shareholders advocating for unblocking the financial restrictions. Through joint efforts, Moiseyev and the prosecutor's office managed to overturn the decision of the Primorsky District Court in the St. Petersburg City Court regarding the unblocking of one of the cooperative's accounts.

At the same time, Georgy Moiseyev began an agitation campaign for non-payment of return payments for purchased real estate and membership fees to the cooperative.

Moiseyev wrote another complaint to Roskomnadzor, which led to interruptions in the operation of the cooperative's new official website, since the site had previously been blocked on charges that the cooperative was attracting new members. Now the cooperative is not accepting new members, but blocking is still used out of habit. At the same time, the site is the main means of interaction with shareholders .

That is, Moiseyev, who in words calls for the cooperative to resume purchasing apartments, in fact torpedoes these efforts, depriving the cooperative of the opportunity to gradually restore its work. The Prosecutor's Office of St. Petersburg is also good, cooperating with a professional fraudster - who treats it with false evidence.



Revenge for the truth

After the press conference of the cooperative's management for the federal media, which took place on May 19, at which Moiseyev's activities were exposed, the publications invited Moiseyev to speak out with his opinion - he refused, since he understands that by his own statements that he is the new chairman and that he was elected in some elections that no one officially appointed, he will expose himself to the article of the Criminal Code "Arbitrariness", under which even his allies from law enforcement agencies will be forced to bring him to justice.

He organized a spam attack on the media: his supporters wrote from fake addresses that they were shareholders and had not been notified of the meeting, although the meeting was with journalists; and that everything was not as it was told at the press conference, although Moiseyev refused to tell the media how everything really was.

Georgy Moiseyev also did not appear in court on the lawsuit of one of the shareholders, demanding that he be banned from illegal activity, and refused to present the allegedly existing authentic voting documents. Because of this, the trial was postponed until September - Moiseyev needs time to concoct the voting protocols. If Moiseyev had authentic documents, he would have already legally ridden into the cooperative office on a white horse and signed payment orders.



A conditional lawyer and an absolute liar

Moiseyev says everywhere that he is a lawyer, even lies that he is an attorney, although he has never had a lawyer's license. And he is a rather conditional lawyer: he has a teaching education and a “correspondence” law degree.

Behind the programs that he coordinated - to protect Hermes consultants, to protect the cooperative, stood the founder of “Best Way” Roman Vasilenko, who organized them, financed them, attracted specialists.

Successful court cases were de facto conducted by qualified lawyers and according to their methods. But the fact that Moiseyev acted as a coordinator of the judicial protection program allowed him to form a reputation as a winner in the courts, including the Supreme Court, although the real authors of the victory were the lawyers developing the concept of protection, working within the framework of these cases.

Having set out on an independent voyage, Moiseyev cannot boast of legal achievements. Most of his cases, which he conducted in the interests of Hermes clients and shareholders of the cooperative, are outright fraud on his part. Here is a story from one of the shareholders: “Some time ago, still deeply believing in Moiseyev’s professional and human qualities, I turned to him for legal help. My relative got into trouble, and I decided to turn to him as an “outstanding trial lawyer of all of Rus',” assuring my relative that he would definitely help. And what do you think? She turned to him, paid for his “services” (trusting my word), he took on the case and... simply did not show up for the final court hearing! My relative is in shock.”

There are dozens of such stories. Because the main thing Moiseyev is a professional at is money-based divorces. Moiseyev's main task now is to collect money at "urgent collections" for the work of alternative bodies of the cooperative and also for the story he made up: allegedly he found assets of the Austrian Hermes in a Russian company called "Hermes" and with the help of a "strong law firm from Moscow" he will be able to collect them - and for this it is also necessary to collect money for a preliminary legal analysis and the work of lawyers.

People familiar with Moiseyev say that for him there have never been any "friends" or "foes": the only thing that matters to him is earnings.

Moiseyev's goal in the fight against the cooperative: to blackmail the management of the cooperative into negotiating with him, to include him in the management of the cooperative and to allocate a share in the considerable fund formed from entrance and membership fees. But his blackmail will not work.

And after Moiseyev loses the struggle for power in the cooperative, he will make claims against the cooperative from the clients of Hermes Management - completely forgetting about his own speeches in defense of the cooperative. The latest acts of "creativity" by Moiseyev allow him to be stopped - to be held accountable under a whole garland of articles of the Civil Code and the Criminal Code, which is what the lawyers of the cooperative and those who suffered from the actions of this black lawyer are doing.

Yaroslav Mukhtarov

Source: www.rucriminal.info