Corruption networks of the Kuban Themis

At the center of the web are the "gray cardinal" Kislyak and the chairman Shipilov

The situation in the Krasnodar Regional Court remains tense and alarming, causing a wide resonance in society; for a considerable time, this institution has been faced with serious accusations of corruption and abuse, which undermines citizens' trust in the judicial system. One of the key players in this dramatic story is the chairman of the court, Alexey Shipilov, who was supposed to become a symbol of change, but instead found himself at the center of scandals.

Alexey Shipilov: chairman or corrupt official?

Alexey Shipilov was appointed to the post of chairman of the Krasnodar Regional Court with the hope of improving the judicial system of the region. But he found himself in the clutches of corruption schemes.

However, according to observers, the reality turned out to be far from the initial expectations. The deterioration in the quality of case processing, the increase in complaints against judges, and the growth of corrupt practices all indicate that Alexey Shipilov does not seem to be coping with his duties. Moreover, in the shadow of his leadership stands the figure of Vladimir Kislyak, who held the position of head of the civil cases panel and has significant influence on Shipilov and the processes within the court. Kislyak is known not only for his closeness to Shipilov, but also for the fact that, according to sources on the VChK-OGPU Telegram channel, he has actively used and is using his powers to resolve “issues” for money.

Kislyak organizes hidden financial schemes, which leads to annual corruption receipts in the billions of rubles. According to Kislyak himself, he gives most of his income to Shipilov. Kislyak is indignant that Shipilov has lost touch with reality and demands fabulous, unrealistic sums for resolving issues, which confirms the scale of corruption in the Krasnodar Regional Court. While Shipilov, according to sources, is carried away by alcoholic excesses, Kislyak uses this situation to his advantage, manipulating court decisions. Forced to leave the court, Kislyak put his trusted judge Yapolskaya in office, who clearly carried out and carries out his instructions to control the issuance of illegal acts and the distribution of commands to judges.

And so that the corruption scheme built by Kislyak works without a hitch.



Unfortunately, complaints filed to Shipilov by judges about abuses remain without due attention. Which creates a vicious circle of impunity and corruption.

The Judicial Council, as stated, is also under strict control, which makes any attempts to reform or improve the situation inside the court impossible. The Krasnodar Regional Court, which should be a stronghold of justice, finds itself at the center of a corruption network, where key figures such as Alexey Shipilov and Vladimir Kislyak play key roles in maintaining the old order. Questions about whether the court will be able to restore the lost positions of trust remain open, as the context of corruption continues to deepen.

With Kislyak's temporary resignation into the shadows, nothing will change. The Shipilov-Kislyak corruption tandem will continue to work, due to the fact that Shipilov is completely dependent on and controlled by Kislyak.

Arseny Dronov

To be continued

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Коррупционные сети Кубанской Фемиды

В центре паутины «серый кардинал» Кисляк и председатель Шипилов

Ситуация в Краснодарском краевом суде остается напряженной и настораживающей, вызывая широкий резонанс в обществе, на протяжении значительного времени это учреждение сталкивается с серьезными обвинениями в коррупции и злоупотреблениях, что подрывает доверие граждан к судебной системе. Одним из ключевых действующих лиц в этой драматической истории является председатель суда Алексей Шипилов, который должен был стать символом перемен, но вместо этого оказался в центре скандалов.



Алексей Шипилов: председатель или коррупционер?

Алексей Шипилов был назначен на пост председателя Краснодарского краевого суда с надеждой на оздоровление судебной системы региона. Но оказался в тисках коррупционных схем.

Однако, по словам наблюдателей, реальность оказалась далека от первоначальных ожиданий. Ухудшение качества рассмотрения дел, увеличение числа жалоб на судей и рост коррупционных практик — все это указывает на то, что Алексей Шипилов, похоже, не справляется со своими обязанностями.

Более того, в тени его руководства стоит фигура Владимира Кисляка, который занимал должность руководителя коллегии по гражданским делам и обладает значительным влиянием на Шипилова и процессы внутри суда. Кисляк известен не только своей близостью к Шипилову, но и тем, что, по утверждениям источников телеграм-канала ВЧК-ОГПУ, активно использовал и использует свои полномочия для решения «вопросов» за деньги.

Кисляк организует скрытые финансовые схемы, что приводит к ежегодным коррупционным поступлениям в миллиарды рублей. По утверждениям самого Кисляка, большую часть доходов он отдает Шипилову. Кисляк негодует, что Шипилов потерял связь с реальностью и требует за решение вопросов баснословные, нереальные суммы , что подтверждает масштабы коррупции в Краснодарском краевом суде. В то время, как Шипилов, по сообщениям источников, увлечен алкогольными эксцессами, Кисляк использует эту ситуацию в своих интересах, манипулируя судебными решениями. Вынужденно уходя из суда, Кисляк усадил на должность свою доверенную судью Япольскую, которая четко выполняла и выполняет его поручения по контролю за вынесением противозаконных актов и раздачу команд судьям.

И что бы коррупционная схема Выстроенная Кисляком работала без сбоя.


К сожалению, жалобы, поданные Шипилову судьями на злоупотребления, остаются без должного внимания. Что создает порочный круг безнаказанности и коррупции.

Судейский совет, как утверждается, также находится под строгим контролем, что делает невозможным любые попытки реформирования или улучшения ситуации внутри суда.

Краснодарский краевой суд, который должен быть оплотом правосудия, оказывается в центре коррупционной сети, где главные фигуры, такие как Алексей Шипилов и Владимир Кисляк, играют ключевые роли в поддержании старых порядков. Вопросы о том, сможет ли суд восстановить утраченные позиции доверия, остаются открытыми, так пока контекст коррупции продолжает углубляться.

С уводом Кисляка в тень виде временной отставки ничего не поменяется. Коррупционный тандем Шипилов-Кисляк продолжит работу, в связи с тем что Шипилов полностью зависим и подконтролен Кисляку.

Арсений Дронов

Продолжение следует

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

A prank in the format of "arrest while accepting a bribe"

How General Travnikov got his cadet nephew off a guaranteed “imprisonment"



St. Petersburg continues to amaze with police news. This time, a whole police lieutenant general was placed in the "monkey house" of the department in the Central District of the city, and in handcuffs.



Telegram channel Lisa Basilio reported on the afternoon of April 7 about the arrest of the former head of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Alexander Travnikov for petty hooliganism. According to Lisa, the general got drunk and insulted the police squad that arrived at the scene, waving his ID (probably not handed in at his previous place of work), after which he was detained and then sat in the department for more than 12 hours. Later, the media reported details - the general and his family were relaxing in a restaurant on Sinopskaya Embankment, drank heavily, made a drunken scandal with his relatives, got to the point of assault, and was handed over to the police by his own relatives. It would be sad if it weren't quite common. It is known that General Travnikov has been a heavy drinker for a long time (to the point of binge drinking), but he doesn't forget about his own pocket. Appointed to the post of head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs University in 2018, he created a real kingdom of corruption there. And Travnikov got away with everything until the criminal case of the "three generals" broke out in St. Petersburg. Among them was Travnikov's main partner in corruption - the chief of the rear of the police headquarters Ivan Abakumov. After the arrest of the top brass of the St. Petersburg police, Travnikov held on to his post for several more months, using all his connections. A piquant detail - we have already reported that just before the general's resignation at the end of November 2022, Ilya Traber himself urgently flew to Moscow to defend him (if anyone doesn't know, type "authority Antiquarian" on the Internet). It was after returning from this apparently unsuccessful voyage (Traber's authority was not enough to keep Travnikov's position, but probably saved the latter from a criminal case) that Ilya Ilyich became the character of a tragicomic story - he was beaten by his seatmate on the Moscow-Petersburg plane.

And the VChK-OGPU telegram channel and Rucriminal.info had another story related to General Travkin. How he got his nephew off the hook from a criminal case.



"The parents of a 4th-year cadet of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after V. Ya. Kikot, Kharkovsky Ilya Viktorovich, who was illegally dismissed from the internal affairs agencies and expelled from the university, are asking you to restore justice.

We are pensioners, disabled persons of the second group (Ilya's father received a disability during his service in the police, where he worked for 30 years), we do not have any patrons in the authorities and we have no one else to turn to.

Kharkovskiy I.V. was dismissed under paragraph 9 of part 3 of article 82 of the Federal Law "On Service in the Internal Affairs Bodies of the Russian Federation" in connection with the commission of an offense that disgraces the honor of an employee of the internal affairs bodies. The reason for the dismissal of Kharkovskiy I.V. was his part-time job in his free time from school in a company that conducts pranks in the "Mask Show" format for a cash reward, where events are ordered with imitation of the actions of police officers.

02.11.2024 Kharkovskiy I.V. with his acquaintances, among whom was a 4th-year cadet V.A. Travnikov, were hired to perform a prank in the format of "caught red-handed while receiving a bribe", it later turned out that after the "detention", when the hired actors left, the organizer of the prank began to extort money from the person being played, for which he was detained by police officers.

Neither Kharkovskiy I.V. nor the other actors knew anything about the extortion of money, and initially the investigation had no claims against them, they were interrogated as witnesses, did not hide anything from the investigator. The management of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia was informed of the incident immediately after the initiation of the criminal case, it had no claims against the cadets.

However, on 04.12.2024 Kharkovskiy I.V., Travnikov V.A. and other participants in the prank, including operative officers of the Department of Internal Affairs for the Otradnoye district of Moscow Voropaev Ya.A. and Kolomnikov A.N., were detained by the Internal Security Department officers and taken to the Presnensky Interdistrict Investigative Department of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the city of Moscow for investigative actions, where they remained until nightfall, and were then arrested on charges of kidnapping a person (this is how the investigation assessed their actions during the prank), except for Travnikov V.A., who magically remained a witness in the case.

We explain why this happened: from the words of Travnikov V.A. we know that his relative, Lieutenant General of Police Travnikov V.A., former head of the University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in St. Petersburg, and grandfather, Colonel General of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, honorary citizen of St. Petersburg, “put in a good word” for him, who turned to the First Deputy Minister of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Gorovoy A.V. and the head of the Investigative Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Lebedev S.N., who solved all the problems of the unlucky cadet.

P Having received orders from above, the investigators turned a blind eye to the fact that the participants in the prank, including V.A. Travnikov, acted with a single intent, pursuing a common goal - to prank the victim for money, which included simulating the use of violence against him and deprivation of freedom of movement, that Travnikov received money on his bank card for participating in the prank, and did not bring charges against him.

After this, I.V. Kharkovsky was expelled from the university in connection with the commission of an offense that discredited the honor of an employee of the internal affairs bodies, and cadet V.A. Travnikov, who committed exactly the same actions as our son, continued his studies as if nothing had happened, enjoying the patronage of high-ranking relatives. The university management not only failed to help their cadet who found himself in a difficult situation, but, on the contrary, hastened to fire him without waiting for a verdict in the criminal case, spitting on the presumption of innocence, and sent the investigator a negative characterization of the cadet, against whom there had never been any complaints before, and who had not been brought to disciplinary responsibility.

Even the head of the Main Directorate of Internal Affairs of the city of Moscow vouched for the operational police officers Voropaev Ya.A. and Kolomnikov A.N., as a result of which a preventive measure in the form of house arrest was chosen for them, and the illegally fired and abandoned without any support Kharkovskiy I.V. is currently the only participant in the prank held in custody. We believe that everyone should be held accountable before the law, regardless of whether they have relatives who are generals, and if two cadets have committed similar acts, either they should both be dismissed for committing an offense that discredits the honor of an employee of the internal affairs bodies, or both should continue their service and studies.

I ask the management of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after V. Ya. Kikot to consider the issue of reinstating cadet Kharkovskiy I.V. at the university with the provision in the future of the opportunity to resign from the internal affairs bodies at his own request, or expelled cadet Travnikov V.A. on the same grounds as our son. We also ask you to provide us with an objective characterization of my son for submission to the investigator.

I ask the other addressees to verify the arguments set out in the appeal, take measures for an objective investigation of criminal case No. 12401450012000541, including clarifying the actual role of Travnikov V.V. in what happened, and also to consider the issue of changing the preventive measure for Kharkov I.V.".

Arseniy Dronov

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Розыгрыш в формате «задержание при получении взятки»

Как генерал Травников отмазал племянника-курсанта от гарантированной «посадки»

Петербург продолжает поражать полицейскими новостями. На этот раз в «обезьянник» отдела в Центральном районе города поместили целого генерал-лейтенанта полиции, причем в наручниках.



Телеграм канал Лиса Basilio днём 7 апреля сообщил о задержании за мелкое хулиганство бывшего начальника Санкт-Петербургского университета МВД Александра Травникова. По данным Лисы, генерал устроил пьяный дебош и оскорблял прибывший на место наряд полиции, размахивая корочкой (вероятно не сданной на прошлом месте работы), после чего был задержан и далее просидел в отделе более 12 часов. Уже потом в СМИ появились подробности - генерал с семьей отдыхал в ресторане на Синопской набережной, крепко выпил, устроил пьяный скандал с родней, дошел до рукоприкладства, и был сдан полиции собственными близкими. Печально, если бы не было вполне привычно. Известно, что генерал Травников давно и крепко злоупотребляет алкоголем (вплоть до запоев), но совсем не забывает о собственном кармане. Назначенный на должность руководителя университета МВД в 2018 году, он устроил в нем настоящее царство коррупции. И все сходило Травникову с рук, пока в СПб не грянуло уголовное дело «трех генералов». Среди них оказался и главный компаньон Травникова по коррупции - начальник тыла полицейского Главка Иван Абакумов. После ареста верхушки петербургской полиции, Травников продержался в должности еще несколько месяцев, используя все свои связи. Пикантная деталь - мы уже рассказывали, что перед самой отставкой генерала в конце ноября 2022 года отстаивать его в Москву экстренно вылетел сам Илья Трабер (если кто-то не знает, наберите в сети «авторитет Антиквар»). Именно возвращение после этого, видимо неудачного вояжа (авторитета Трабера не хватило на сохранение должности Травникова, но, вероятно, уберегло последнего от уголовного дела), Илья Ильич оказался персонажем трагикомичной истории - он получил побои от соседа по креслу в самолете Москва-Петербург.

А в распоряжении телеграм-канала ВЧК-ОГПУ и Rucriminal.info оказалась другая история, связанная с генералом Травкиным. Как он отмазал своего племянника от уголовного дела.

«С просьбой о восстановлении справедливости к вам обращаются родители курсанта 4-го курса Московского университета МВД России им. В.Я. Кикотя, Харьковского Ильи Викторовича, незаконно уволенного из органов внутренних дел и отчисленного из университета.

Мы являемся пенсионерами, инвалидами второй группы (отец Ильи инвалидность получил во время службы в органах милиции, где проработал 30 лет), у нас нет каких-то покровителей в органах власти и нам не к кому больше обратиться.

Харьковский И.В. был уволен по п. 9 части 3 ст. 82 Федерального закона "О службе в органах внутренних дел Российской Федерации" в связи с совершением проступка, порочащего честь сотрудника органов внутренних дел. Причиной увольнения Харьковского И.В. послужила его подработка в свободное от учебы время в компании, проводящей за денежное вознаграждение розыгрыши в формате «Маски-шоу», где заказываются мероприятия с имитацией действий сотрудников полиции.

02.11.2024 Харьковского И.В. с его знакомыми, среди которых был и курсант 4-го курса Травников В.А., наняли для розыгрыша в формате «задержание с поличным при получении взятки», впоследствии выяснилось, что после «задержания», когда нанятые актеры ушли, организатор розыгрыша начал вымогать у разыгрываемого лица денежные средства, за что и был задержан сотрудниками полиции.

Ни Харьковсий И.В., ни другие актеры ничего не знали о вымогательстве денег, и первоначально у следствия не имелось к ним никаких претензий, они были допрошены в качестве свидетелей, ничего от следователя не скрывали. Руководство Московского университета МВД России было поставлено о случившемся в известность сразу после возбуждения уголовного дела, никаких претензий к курсантам у него не возникло.

Однако 04.12.2024 Харьковский И.В., Травников В.А. и другие участники розыгрыша, в том числе оперуполномоченные ОВД по району «Отрадное» г. Москвы Воропаев Я.А. и Коломников А.Н., были задержаны сотрудниками УСБ и доставлены в Пресненский межрайонный следственный отдел ГСУ СК РФ по г. Москве для проведения следственных действий, где оставались до ночи, а потом были арестованы по обвинению в похищении человека (так следствие расценило их действия в ходе розыгрыша) кроме Травникова В.А., который волшебным образом остался свидетелем по делу.

Поясняем, почему так произошло: со слов Травникова В.А. нам известно, что за него «замолвили словечко» его родственник – генерал-лейтенант полиции Травников В.А., бывший начальник университета МВД России в Санкт-Петербурге и дедушка, генерал-полковник МВД, почетный гражданин г. Санкт-Петербурга, которые обратились за помощью к первому заместителю министра МВД России Горовому А.В. и начальнику Следственного Департамента МВД России Лебедеву С.Н., решившим все проблемы незадачливого курсанта.

Получив указание сверху, следователи закрыли глаза на тот факт, что участники розыгрыша, включая Травникова В.А., действовали с единым умыслом, преследуя общую цель – розыгрыш потерпевшего за деньги, который включал имитацию применения к нему насилия и лишения свободы передвижения, что Травников получил на свою банковскую карту деньги за участие в розыгрыше, и не стали предъявлять ему обвинение.

После этого Харьковский И.В. был отчислен из университета в связи с совершением проступка, порочащего честь сотрудника органов внутренних дел, а курсант Травников В.А., совершивший точно такие же действия, как и наш сын, продолжил обучение как ни в чем не бывало, пользуясь покровительством высокопоставленных родственников.

Руководство университета не только ничем не помогло своему курсанту, попавшему в сложную ситуацию, но, напротив, поспешило уволить его, не дождавшись приговора по уголовному делу, наплевав на презумпцию невиновности, и направило следователю отрицательную характеристику на курсанта, к которому ранее никогда не было претензий, и который не привлекался к дисциплинарной ответственности.

Даже за оперативных сотрудников полиции Воропаева Я.А. и Коломникова А.Н. поручился начальник ГУВД города Москвы, вследствие чего им была избрана мера пресечения в виде домашнего ареста, а незаконно уволенный и брошенный без всякой поддержки Харьковский И.В. в настоящее время является единственным участником розыгрыша, содержащимся под стражей.

Мы считаем, что каждый должен нести ответственность перед законом вне зависимости от наличия у него родственников – генералов, и, если два курсанта совершили аналогичные действия, либо они оба должны быть уволены за совершение проступка, порочащего честь сотрудника органов внутренних дел, либо оба должны продолжать службу и учебу.

Руководство Московского университета МВД России им. В.Я. Кикотя прошу рассмотреть вопрос о восстановлении курсанта Харьковского И.В. в университете с предоставлением в будущем возможности уволиться из органов внутренних дел по собственному желанию, либо отчислись курсанта Травникова В.А. по тем же основаниям, что и нашего сына. Также просим выдать нам объективную характеристику на сына для представления следователю.

Остальных адресатов прошу провести проверку изложенных в обращении доводов, принять меры к объективному расследованию уголовного дела № 12401450012000541, в том числе к выяснению действительной роли Травникова В.В. в произошедшем, а также рассмотреть вопрос об изменении Харьковскому И.В. меры пресечения».

Арсений Дронов

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

How Telegram deleted the VChK-OGPU

Lies, hatred and an offer you can't refuse




Of course, the main news of Monday was the deletion of our VChK-OGPU channel by Telegram (Pavel Durov). Today we will reveal new circumstances about how Telegram fulfilled the long-standing dream of the Russian special services and how ineptly it tried to hide it.

The VChK-OGPU channel was deleted by Telegram on Friday night without any warnings or notifications. Access to Telegram was also blocked from the phone number to which the channel was registered. The VChK-OGPU editorial team sent requests to all Telegram forms of communication, but no responses have been received to date - more than a day has passed. Access to Telegram is still blocked, only Telegram itself can do this.



Already in the morning, a major media scandal began to mount around the deletion of a channel with 1.2 million subscribers (which was recognized as a foreign agent, hung with criminal cases, and is being persecuted by the authorities), which quickly went beyond Telegram. It was clear that Durov had deleted the VChK-OGPU and a dozen more channels at the request of the Russian authorities. And then Kristina Potupchik came to Durov's aid, who stated in her channel "Nebozhena" that "it looks like the channel was deleted by its owner." This happened at 11:40. And at 1:55 p.m. the Agency published an official comment from the Telegram press service, which repeated Potupchik's information - "the channel was deleted by its owner." This version is very stupid and unfounded. But more on that later. Now about the interesting nuances.



Potupchik's partner is Pavel Durov's former press secretary Georgy Lobushkin. Together they even founded the K2 agency. It would be a stretch to call Lobushkin a former press secretary. The VChK-OGPU states with all responsibility that when Durov was arrested in France, it was Lobushkin who was organizing positive coverage of this situation for Pavel in large Telegram channels. Yes, in general, as sources say, Durov sometimes turns to Loboshkin (Potupchik) for anti-crisis PR. It can be added that another partner of Potupchik was former FSB employee Mikhail Polyakov (Uncle Misha FSB), who was responsible for the prosecution and deanonymization of Telegram channels that were undesirable to the Russian authorities. Potupchik and Polyakov were supervised by the deputy head of the Internal Policy Department of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation Timur Prokopenko. When Polyakov was arrested (Potupchik's home and office were searched as part of this case), he quickly answered the investigator's questions about this or that channel by the SIM card of which country the channel was registered and added that more detailed information with the number was in his dossier on this channel. Where Uncle Misha received such information about SIM cards, he did not say during interrogation.

The version of Telegram and Potupchik that the VChK-OGPU "deleted the owner" is very funny and stupid. Firstly, the phone and SIM card, to which the channel was registered, were not used at all. Only the owner and, accordingly, Telegram knew the number. There are no traces of "hacking" anywhere near. Well, and the main thing. Telegram is designed in such a way that the owner himself cannot delete a channel with over 1 thousand subscribers. You need to send a request to Telegram, and Telegram itself, having studied for security purposes whether everything is OK with the request, will delete (or not delete) the channel in 3-5 days. The VChK-OGPU channel disappeared in a matter of minutes and the owner simply could not do this. But the Telegram administration could delete the channel

Well, and the version of Telegram and Potupchik about self-deletion was finally destroyed by Roskomnadzor. On Monday evening, RKN announced that it was very successfully cooperating with Telegram; Durov's brainchild deleted "over 373 thousand channels and publications" at the request of Russian censorship. RKN directly stated that they demanded that Telegram delete VChK-OGPU, which is what eventually happened. A Rucriminal.info source from Durov's entourage stated that the "chief" (Durov-Ed.) was "in the know about the situation (with the VChK-OGPU-ED.) from beginning to end." However, it is hard to believe that Pavel Durov will salute only at the request of RKN. Some higher-up petitioner is needed here, to whom Durov cannot say "no."

The source names two such probable persons. And it is from them that the VChK-OGPU team has been receiving very unpleasant messages lately. The first is the first deputy director of the FSB of the Russian Federation Sergei Korolev. A native of the FSB of St. Petersburg, when he was the head of the FSB SEB, he said that he was able to obtain any necessary information from Vkontakte with the help of his former colleagues from St. Petersburg.



The second person is Alisher Usmanov. By the way, Korolev and Usmanov are closely connected through the fixer Valery Bitaev.

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Как Телеграм удалял ВЧК-ОГПУ

Ложь, ненависть и предложение, от которого нельзя отказаться

Безусловно, главной новостью понедельника стало удаление Телеграм (Павел Дуров) нашего канала ВЧК-ОГПУ. Сегодня мы откроем новые обстоятельства, как Телеграм осуществил давнею мечту российских спецслужб и как неумело это пытался скрыть.

Канал ВЧК-ОГПУ без всяких предупреждений и извещений был удален Телеграм в ночь на пятницу. Также был заблокирован доступ в Телеграм с телефонного номера, на который был оформлен канал. Редакция ВЧК-ОГПУ отправила по всем формам связи Телеграм запросы, но ответы не получены до сих-прошло уже больше суток. Доступ в телеграм по-прежнему заблокирован, сделать это может только сам Телеграм.



Уже утром вокруг удаления канала с 1,2 млн подписчиков (который признан иноагентом, обвешен уголовными делами, преследуется властями) начал нарастать большой медийный скандал, который быстро вышел за пределы Телеграм. Было ясно, что Дуров удалил ВЧК-ОГПУ и еще с десяток каналов по требованию российских властей. И тут на помощь Дурову пришла Кристина Потупчик, которая в свое канала «Небожена» заявила, что «похоже канал удалил сам владелец». Произошло это в 11.40. А в 13.55 Агентство публикует официальный комментарий пресс-службы Телеграм, который повторяет информацию Потупчик- «канал был удален его владельцем». Версия очень глупая и не состоятельная. Но об этом позже. Сейчас об интересных нюансах.



Партнером Потупчик является бывший пресс-секретарь Павла Дурова Георгий Лобушкин. Вместе они даже учредили агентство «К2». Лобушкина назвать бывшим пресс-секретарем можно с натяжкой. ВЧК-ОГПУ со всей ответственностью заявляет, что, когда Дурова арестовали во Франции, именно Лобушкин занимался организацией положительного для Павла освещения данной ситуации в крупных телеграм-каналах. Да, вообще, как говорят источники, Дуров обращается порой к Лобошкину (Потупчик) для антикризисного PR. Можно добавить, что другим партнером Потупчик был бывший сотрудник ФСБ РФ Михаил Поляков (Дядя Миша ФСБ), который отвечал за преследование и деанонимизацию неугодных российским властям телеграм-каналов. Потупчик и Поляков курировались замначальника Управления внутренней политики АП РФ Тимуром Прокопенко. Когда Поляков был арестован (у Потупчик дома и в офисе были обыски в рамках данного дела), он на вопросы следователя о том или ином канале, быстро отвечал на симку какой страны оформлен канал и дополнял, что более подробная информация с номером находится у него в досье на этот канал. Где Дядя Миша получал подобную информацию о симках, он на допросе не сказал.

Версия Телеграм и Потупчик, что ВЧК-ОГПУ «удалил владелец» очень смешная и глупая. Во-первых, телефон и симка, на которую был оформлен канал, вообще не использовались. Номер знал только владелец и соответственно Телеграм. Никаких следов «взлома» нет и близко. Ну и главное. Телеграм устроен так, что канал, где свыше 1 тыс подписчиков, сам владелец удалить не может. Надо отправить запрос в Телеграм, и сам Телеграм, изучив в целях безопасности, все ли нормально с запросом, через 3-5 дней удалит (или не удалит) канал. Канал ВЧК-ОГПУ исчез в считанные минуты и владелец просто этого сделать не мог. Зато вот администрация Телеграм .удалить канал могла

Ну, а окончательно версию Телеграм и Потупчик о самоудалении разрушил Роскомнадзор. Под вечер понедельника РКН заявил, что очень успешно сотрудничает с Телеграм, детище Дурова удалило по требованию российской цензуры «свыше 373 тыс каналов и публикаций». В РКН прямо заявили, что требовали от Телеграм удалить ВЧК-ОГПУ, что в итоге и произошло.

Источник Rucriminal.info из окружения Дурова заявил, что «главный» (Дуров-Ред) был «в курсе ситуации (с ВЧК-ОГПУ-РЕД.) от начала и до конца». Впрочем, не очень верится, что Павел Дуров возьмет под козырек только по требованию РКН. Тут нужен какой-то более высокий проситель, которому Дуров не может сказать «нет».

Источник называет две такие вероятные персоны. И как раз от них команде ВЧК-ОГПУ последнее время исходили очень неприятные посылы. Первая, - это первый замдиректора ФСБ РФ Сергей Королев. Выходец из УФСБ Санкт-Петербурга, на должности начальника СЭБ ФСБ РФ рассказывал, что способен с помощью бывших коллег из Питера получать любую нужную информацию из Вконтакте.



Вторая персона - это Алишер Усманов. Кстати, Королев и Усманов тесно связаны через решальщика Валерий Битаева.

Тимофей Гришин

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

Bloody harvest

A new victim in the "Best Way” case




The so-called criminal case "Life-is-Good" - "Hermes" - "Best Way" continues its bloody harvest - at the end of March, the chairman of the "Best Way" cooperative, deputy of the State Duma of the 7th convocation Sergei Ivanovich Kryuchek died of cancer, which quickly progressed due to constant stress. A year and a half ago, Sergei Kryuchek's wife died - her heart could not stand it after searches of their home and interrogations of her husband.



The trial leads nowhere

The investigation acted as harshly as possible. Hundreds of cooperative shareholders all over Russia suffered from the 2023 raids, and innocent technical employees found themselves in the dock - an assistant to the manager, one of the accountants, a website and conference manager, several individual entrepreneurs, as well as the 83-year-old father of the founder of the Best Way cooperative and former head of the Life-is-Good company Roman Vasilenko - pensioner Viktor Ivanovich Vasilenko. One of those interrogated - Shamil Fakhrullin, died after interrogation from a heart attack, in critical condition after a 12-hour interrogation was Zoya Semenova, who refuted her testimony given to the investigation in court (there are dozens of such refuters). Roman Vasilenko's mother, Larisa Aleksandrovna Vasilenko, faced real torture - having come to her at five in the morning, the operatives forced her to change clothes in front of them, stripping naked, and in the investigative department they sat her on a chair with a broken leg for several hours and did not give her anything to drink. She lost consciousness, and only after that she managed to leave the investigative department. There are many cases of abuse and torture.

At the same time, in the trial, which has been going on since the end of February 2024, the case is clearly falling apart - the recognized victims and witnesses have no evidence of their statements, they are caught lying one after another during cross-examinations. Fewer and fewer prosecution witnesses come to the latest trials - they refuse under various pretexts so as not to support the false version of the investigation.



Cooperative without the guilt of the guilty

Sergey Kryuchek headed the largest cooperative in Russia - 20 thousand shareholders in all regions of the country - in the spring of 2022, during an acute crisis, after the first search of the cooperative office had just taken place, during which all documentation, databases, servers, even personal belongings and work books of employees were seized (and nothing has been returned yet: all accounts had to be restored from scratch). He himself became a victim of searches in his house near Moscow - during which a collection of awards was seized and has not yet been returned. The cooperative ended up "in a criminal case" by a strange coincidence - it was declared by the investigation to be an organization affiliated with the foreign investment company Hermes, and therefore called upon to answer for its obligations - although the cooperative was in no way connected with Hermes either organizationally or financially: it only had a common system for selling products through the marketing firm Life-of-Good. Hermes had problems with payments to Russian clients after the hacking of the Russian segment of the payment system by system administrator Evgeny Naboychenko - the system stopped working in February 2022, and a picture appeared with an offer to contact law enforcement agencies. Only payments stopped not before Naboychenko's actions, but after them. At the same time, a situation arose with the SVO and Western sanctions, which made cross-border financial transactions extremely difficult. But the Best Way cooperative did not stop making any payments, it is registered in St. Petersburg, all its assets are in Russia. And even if we take into account the demands made on it by persons recognized as victims in the criminal case, there is no reason to block the work of the cooperative: the total damage in the indictment is 282 million rubles, given that there are more than 4 billion rubles in the cooperative's accounts. This amount is constantly increasing, and another 600 million is the accounts receivable of the members of the cooperative to date. 282 million rubles could have been blocked in the cooperative's account, which accumulates funds from membership fees intended for development - there was no reason to block all the activities of the cooperative! Nevertheless, this has been happening for a long time.



Fears of the guards

What is behind the persecution of the Life-is-Good company, which successfully operated from 2014 to the beginning of 2022; the Hermes company, which fulfilled its obligations during this same period; cooperative "Best Way", against which there are no claims at all, except from those whom the investigation convinced that since the cooperative is illegal, they will be able to collect membership fees and also from people whom the cooperative, caring about liquidity, did not allow to buy a real estate property with redevelopment? What is behind the government's support of repressions against the cooperative?

First of all, the people who are trying to gain control over the billion-dollar assets of the cooperative and other organizations, as well as the security forces who have joined them. But it seems that the government is very worried about the political potential behind the cooperative - all these thousands of shareholders' meetings at stadiums. Meetings of people who do not need anything from the state - they are ready to solve their housing and other problems themselves, by chipping in. This scared some of the guards and became the reason for the green light for repressions against the cooperative by high-ranking security officials.



False experts and false accusations

The cooperative, like "Hermes", was accused of being a financial pyramid. The expert from St. Petersburg State University, Maevsky, invited by the investigation, demanded a closed meeting - so that no one could hear him floating around in the subject. He claims that the financing of the purchase of apartments for old shareholders occurred at the expense of new shareholders: he does not understand that the financing of the cooperative occurs not only at the expense of new receipts from shareholders, but also at the expense of return payments for real estate purchased with the cooperative's money. And since the fall of 2021, the time of inclusion in the Central Bank's warning list, almost exclusively due to return payments from shareholders who purchased an apartment. At the same time, the liquidity of the cooperative did not suffer in any way. The explanations from the lawyers were a revelation for this economist.

A significant part of the shareholders seek to speed up the repayment of the debt to the cooperative in order to quickly get the apartment into ownership - after all, an apartment with the help of the cooperative is purchased almost without overpayments. Overpayments are associated only with entrance and membership fees; taxes that are paid at the rates for a legal entity; payment for due diligence and independent real estate appraisal.



Since the spring of 2022, the cooperative stopped accepting new shareholders, but this did not affect its liquidity in any way: funds in the accounts continued to grow, despite the fact that many shareholders were afraid to pay into the arrested accounts and are making payments only now.



Savior



From spring 2022 to winter 2025, the cooperative's accounts were under arrest with short breaks - and even payments on writs of execution to shareholders who decided to leave the cooperative were prohibited; apartments belonging to the cooperative were also arrested, with breaks, for 12 billion rubles.



Under the leadership of Sergei Ivanovich Kryuchek, it was possible to achieve in the courts the lifting of the arrest from the apartments, and then a partial lifting of the arrest from the accounts, permission to pay from the arrested amounts on writs of execution to shareholders who achieved the return of funds through the court (the cooperative itself actively helped them in this), as well as taxes and wages of the cooperative's employees. Partial "release" of the accounts made it possible to make payments to shareholders who decided to leave the cooperative and return their funds.

There are about 2.5 thousand such shareholders, the total amount of payments to them is about 1.5 billion rubles, a significant part of them have already received their share funds - despite the enormous difficulties with the transfer of funds under 115-FZ: the fact is that another criminal case is being investigated - under Art. 174 of the Criminal Code (although the cooperative did not transfer any money abroad), a new case has also been opened based on the statements of victims from "Hermes", which were not included in the criminal case, which is currently being considered by the court. In addition, a civil trial is underway on the claim of the prosecutor's office, blocking the possibility of accepting new shareholders. And, despite these difficulties, the cooperative, headed until recently by Sergei Kryuchek, makes daily payments to shareholders leaving it and is successfully restoring its activities. Kryuchek's most important achievement is the creation of a mechanism whereby, with frozen accounts, shareholders who have already purchased real estate objects were given the opportunity to pay off their debt to the cooperative and re-register real estate into ownership at the expense of other shareholders who transfer their frozen share contributions to them, and in return receive cash from the happy purchasers of apartments into ownership. In this way, shareholders managed to pay off their debt to the cooperative and completely transfer real estate into ownership for dozens of real estate objects.

The cooperative, under the leadership of Sergei Kryuchek, worked to start purchasing apartments again for shareholders who are first in line to buy. Moreover, a number of apartments will be released by shareholders who refused to return money for them and were excluded from the cooperative with the return of share funds.

The cooperative, according to many shareholders, is alive thanks to the enormous work that Sergei Kryuchek did from the spring of 2022 to the spring of 2025, successfully resisting the arbitrariness of the law enforcement system. It is not without reason that one of the shareholders suggested naming the cooperative after Sergei Ivanovich.

Timofey Zabiyakin

Source: www.rucriminal.info