Corrupt officials and law enforcers agreed in a war of two bottles of wine

“Submissive, narrow-minded, but his Dan suddenly showed a grin and pounced on because of a couple of cheap missing bottles”



Today, the telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU and Rucriminal.info will introduce readers to a unique document - a court decision, which describes the beginning of the "war" of two members of the once powerful corruption clan, overgrown with assets (withdrawn from the budget for hundreds of millions of dollars). They quarreled in the literal sense because of the "trifle". The banker, now former Deputy Minister of Economic Development Petr Zaselsky, built schemes according to which state funds received through Rosatom and Rostec were successfully “sawed”. Alla Laletina, a top manager of Rostec, was also a participant in these schemes. The "holder" of the common fund from the stolen funds was the brother of Zaselsky's wife, Denis Mikhailov. He invested hundreds of millions of dollars in real estate in the USA, Monaco, Russia, in the purchase of antiques at Sotheby's, etc. In 2017, Laletina was tired of hiding her real wealth behind Mikhailov’s back (at that time, many officials stopped being shy and afraid and began to come out of the shadows) and asked to sign a cottage on Rublyovka for her. Only on "paper" its cost was 6.2 million dollars. The house was registered in the name of Tatiana Zaselskaya (wife of Pyotr Zaselsky and sister of Denis Mikhailov). And then, unexpectedly, something came to Mikhailov. What found, in principle, is clear. By that time he lived like an Arab sheikh. The socialite Nadezhda Obolentseva managed to visit his wives, he spent most of his time in Monaco in the company of millionaires, rode yachts, bathed in luxury. He considered himself no longer a nominal figure, but one of the leaders of this corrupt group, on an equal footing with everyone else. And now he arranges a real and ugly scandal with Laletina because of several bottles of wine. “Humble, narrow-minded, but his Dan unexpectedly showed a grin and attacked Laletina because of a couple of cheap missing bottles of wine in a house on Rublyovka re-registered for Laletin,” a source familiar with the situation told Rucriminal.info.

Mikhailov claimed that several bottles of his wine were kept in this house and demanded that they be returned. Laletina sent him. But the parties did not calm down on this. Mikhailov accused Laletina of selling the wine for $50,000. Pyotr Zaselsky got away from this situation, as he found himself between two fires. He did it in vain. Angry, Laletina announced her withdrawal from the obshchak and demanded that her assets be transferred to proxies. At this, Mikhailov announced that these were all his assets in general and sent it already. Laletina set the security forces on Mikhailov, and criminal cases appeared. Zaselsky sided with the obshchak keeper and also began to attack Laletina through the security forces. Including because of this, she ended up sitting down.

Rucriminal.info publishes an excerpt from the court decision about the “fight” between Mikhailov and Laletina over wine.



“The court found that between Laletnaya A.S. and Semenov N.S., on the one hand (buyers), and Zaselskaya T.L., on the other hand (seller), concluded a contract for the sale of real estate dated January 10, 2017, according to which the seller undertakes to transfer ownership to the buyer , and the buyer - to accept and pay for the real estate specified in clause 1.2 of the agreement, with a total area of ​​​​1417.4 sq.m., a land plot with a total area of ​​​​4686 sq.m., hereinafter referred to as the "object", as well as movable property located inside the object, hereinafter referred to as "property".

The object includes: - a residential building with a total area of ​​1049 sq.m. located at: ***, cadastral (conditional) number: ***; - security house, purpose: non-residential, with a total area of ​​217.5 sq.m. located at: ***, cadastral (conditional) number: ***; - utility block, purpose: non-residential, building area 150.9 sq.m., located at: ***, cadastral (conditional) number: ***; - land plot, land category: lands of settlements, permitted use: for individual housing construction, with an area of ​​4686 sq.m., located at the address: ***, cadastral (conditional) number: ***.

According to the terms of the contract, the buyer's right of ownership to the object arises from the moment of state registration of the transfer of ownership of the object in the body that carries out state registration of rights to real estate and transactions with it.

The court has established and is not disputed by the parties that at the time of filing the statement of claim with the court, the defendant is the owner of the object.

Also, between the buyer and the seller, an act of acceptance and transfer of real estate dated January 10, 2017 was signed, according to clause 3 of which the seller guarantees that at the time of the conclusion of the contract and the signing of the act, the object and property do not belong to anyone else, are not pledged, in trust management, are not leased, as a contribution to the authorized capital of legal entities, are not in dispute, including judicial, under arrest and prohibition and are free from the rights of third parties.

In accordance with paragraph 8 of the act of acceptance and transfer, the price of the transferred object, together with the property, is determined by agreement of the parties and amounts to 6,200,000 US dollars. The parties agreed that the price of the object together with the property is final and not subject to change, except in cases of early fulfillment by the buyer of the obligations provided for in clauses 3.3 and 3.4 of the agreement.

Thus, having evaluated the evidence presented in the case, the court concluded that the claims are subject to rejection, since the contract for the sale of real estate dated January 10, 2017 and the act of acceptance and transfer to it dated January 10, 2017 conditions on the presence in the object being sold collectible wine belonging to the plaintiff is not contained. The plaintiff claims that he purchased collection wine and kept it in the house of his sister T.L. Zaselskaya, however, evidence of the plaintiff's purchase of wine, its cost and quantity, as well as the storage of the plaintiff's wine in the house, is not presented in the case materials.

The plaintiff claims that his collection wine was sold without consent by the defendant on February 4, 2018 for 50,000 US dollars, therefore, he submits a claim to the court for the recovery of unjust enrichment in an amount equivalent in rubles according to the CBR of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation as of February 4, 2018 in the amount of 2,802,040 rubles, but the defendant denies this circumstance, evidence of the sale of wine for the specified amount of money by the plaintiff in the case file is not presented.

Due to the fact that the court refused to satisfy the plaintiff's claims for the recovery of unjust enrichment in the amount of 2,802,040 rubles, the court concluded that the claims for the recovery of court costs for payment of the state fee in the amount of 22,210 rubles are also not subject to satisfaction.

To be continued

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

American common fund of Russian officials under threat

It was recorded on the ex-husband of the "socialite" Nadezhda Obolentseva



The property of the VChK-OGPU telegram channel was simply a fantastic corruption story with all the documents and layouts. Its meaning is extremely simple. A number of high-ranking officials and representatives of state corporations created something like a common fund and invested funds stolen from the budget in the purchase of real estate in the USA, Monaco, London and antiques. In total, such assets were purchased in the amount of $ 200 million. Assets were recorded for the face value of Denis Mikhailov, relatives of the Deputy Minister of Economic Development Pyotr Zaselsky. However, at some point, the nominal figure decided that he was the real owner of these riches and should not share. This was superimposed on the fact that in the orderly ranks of corrupt officials there was a "split", which grew into a war with the involvement of the security forces. The intermediate result is as follows: the top manager of Rostec, Alla Laletina, was sent to a pre-trial detention center, the investigator of the ICR Gabdulin, who dealt with her case, resigned, and Deputy Minister Zaselsky lost his position.



At the disposal of Rucrminal.info was the full text of Denis Mikhailov's statement to the FSB of the Russian Federation and we will publish it at the end of the article. In the meantime, we will tell you the information we know about Mikhailov's difficult personal life. He is the brother of the wife of Peter Zaselsky, was married to a socialite Nadezhda Obolentseva. Then he left for Monaco, where he went all out. Pyotr Zaselsky, seeing how Mikhailov was "rolling downhill", decided to assign him a reliable person. So a very young Oksana Ivanova appeared in the life of Denis. Everything turned out even better than Zaselsky could have imagined, Oksana became the legal wife of Mikhailov and, in which case, would be his main heir.



In a statement addressed to the director of the FSB of the Russian Federation Mikhailov D.L. admits to being a very rich man. However, Mikhailov assures that with the help of pressure, in particular from the GUEBiPK and the 4th Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, they are trying to take away the assets that he himself lists (see photo). This is a set of properties around the world, worth over $200 million.



It follows from Mikhailov’s narrative that at first the top manager of Rostec, Alla Laletina, “pressed” and “wanted to squeeze out” the property. And when she was imprisoned, "the high-ranking mover" of the "will of Laletina A." in relation to me (my property) is her former leader, with whom she still has a “warm” relationship.



According to Mikhailov’s statement, his close relative, now former Deputy Minister of Economic Development Pyotr Zaselsky (resigned in March 2021), started the attack on the assets. “Zaselsky P.V. also demands that most of the property be re-registered to him, arguing that the financial condition that I earn is the quintessence of his (Zaselsky P.V.) efforts during my formation as a rich man while serving in the Rosatom structure.

Further, Mikhailov asks the director of the FSB of the Russian Federation to take measures to protect him from possible illegal actions, etc.

With great difficulty we managed to find who Mikhailov was. It turned out that until 2012 he held the post of commercial director of CJSC TVEL-INVEST (the “granddaughter” of Rosatom) and he is no longer remarkable for anything else. However, the VChK-OGPU spoke with several sources who told what lies behind this story.



Quite a long time ago, Peter Zaselsky, while still a banker, and not an official, began to build schemes to steal money from the treasury. This was facilitated by his long-standing and close relationship with the then First Vice-President of TVEL Vladimir Rozhdestvensky (now Advisor to the President of TVEL). The money was embezzled under the guise of imaginary contracts concluded by TVEL INVEST, allegedly in the interests of Rosatom. These schemes provided for an extremely reliable person in the management of TVEL-Invest and Zaselsky remembered his wife's brother Tatyana Denis Mikhailov. He was appointed commercial director of TVEL-Invest. The source characterizes Mikhailov as a narrow-minded, but very executive person. As a result, Zaselsky began to entrust him with the purchase of family assets. And not only their own. The schemes for the withdrawal of budgetary funds created by Zaselsky were expanding, and at one point a good friend Alla Laletina, who has been working in Rostec structures since 2010, became their participant. And then Zaselsky even became a deputy minister.

And Mikhailov's functions expanded, and he began to invest the stolen money not only for Zaselsky, but also for other participants in the schemes. And then Mikhailov had a conflict with Laletina. According to the source, it happened because of a trifle.

“Mikhailov began to “turn up his nose” and started a scandal with Laletina because of a couple of missing bottles of expensive wine in a house on Rublyovka, which was re-registered on Laletina. Laletina also caught on. And it began. A real war with the division of “assets” and the involvement of security forces,” said the interlocutor of the Cheka-OGPU.

As a result, Laletina sits. The Investigator of the TFR, Gabdulin, who led her case, preferred to resign. In forced retirement Zaselsky also curled up, aiming for the minister's chair.

“Zaselsky’s dreams associated with the state. the service collapsed, which led to a whole chain of various events and Zaselsky’s intention to transfer assets from Mikhailov to more adequate persons, to which the latter, naturally, began to resist believing that since the criminal money Zaselsky would not find ways to turn them in his favor, ”notes a source.

And now Rucriminal.info publishes the full text of Mikhailov's statement.

Director of the FSB of Russia A.V. Bortnikov from Mikhailov Denis Leonidovich ...

Statement I would like to inform you that I, Mikhailov D.L., am a Russian businessman and a major foreign investor. The main portfolio of assets is concentrated in the United States (luxury real estate, luxury and art, construction business, etc.). The total amount of my fortune, at the moment, exceeds 20 billion rubles.

So, since October 2021, a number of high-ranking officials from law enforcement and other central structures of the Russian Federation ((GUEBIPK, 4 Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Federal Tax Service, FSB, etc.) have united in order to seize assets belonging to me for the purpose of subsequent appeal to their address (controlled persons The indicated officials are trying to turn the following property or funds already received by me from its sale into their address:

house 8520 Skyline Drive, Los Ange Les, California, USA, worth $9 million

- house 1152 Calle Vista, Beverly Hills, California, USA, worth $13,500,000;

- house 1140 Calle Vista, Beverly Hills, California, USA, worth $10,550,000 million

- an apartment in Odeon Toweg, Monaco worth $21,000,000;

- Apartment 100 Knightsbridge, Apartment DQ2-03. One Hyde Park, London, United Kingdom, worth $30,000,000;

- an apartment at the address: Moscow, Vorontsovskie Prudy 3, 131, worth $3,000,000;

- a house in the Odintsovo district, Moscow region, worth $22 million

- a plot at Zelenaya Hollow, Settlement Gorskoye, Odintsovsky district, Moscow region, (1.87 hectares), worth $20,000,000 million

- commercial office building on Vasilisa Kozhina street, 7/1, Moscow, worth $40,000,000

- commercial office building Nauchny proezd, 19, Moscow, worth $2,000,000

- at a number of Sotheby's auctions (manager Nicol tel. +1-212-606-7150), I purchased various antiques and art objects with a total value of more than $ 15,000,000 (supporting documents are available);

- a number of other small objects.

I know that the “customer” and the main beneficiary of the illegal actions against me is the not unknown citizen Alla Laletina (located in the prison, the criminal case was investigated by the investigator of the RF Investigative Committee Gabdulin), with whom I had extremely conflicting relations, due to the fact that that I was the initiator of the dissemination of truthful information regarding Laletina A., which, subsequently, was the reason for a number of TRADs and criminal prosecutions in 2021. I also know that the high-ranking mover of the “will of Laletina A.” in relation to me (my property) is her former leader, with whom she has a “warm” relationship to date.

As a result of my “harassment” organized by Laletina A., in 2021, my sister’s husband, Deputy Minister of Economic Development of the Russian Federation P. Zaselsky, lost his position, who is currently forced to be content with work that does not correspond to his level of education, qualifications, personal and business qualities .

Zaselsky P.V. he also demands to re-register most of the property to him, arguing that the financial condition that I earn is the quintessence of his (Zaselsky P.V.) efforts during my formation as a rich man while serving in the Rosatom structure.

At the end of 2021, I repeatedly sent appeals of various content to the above-mentioned structures of the Russian Federation in order to clarify the situation around me and asked me not to allow manipulation of the state authorities. bodies of the Russian Federation in someone's personal, selfish interests. These Appeals only aggravated the situation and led to the fact that a number of checks were initiated against me and people close to me and connections, my Mikhailova D.L. began to be controlled. movement, personal and business contacts, telephone, Internet, lifestyle and leisure, etc.

In this Appeal, I also want to point out that the level of my financial well-being is solely the result of my legal labor activity at TVEL-Invest CJSC (a Rosatom structure) in the period up to 2012.

Based on the foregoing, I ask you to take measures and prevent the commission of illegal actions against me (Mikhailov D.L. and my relatives and connections) aimed at converting in my favor the funds and property belonging to me located on the territory of the Russian Federation, USA, Great Britain, Monaco and other countries in the amount of more than 20 billion rubles. February 15, 2022 Mikhailov D.L.













Timofey Grishin

To be continued

Source: www.rucriminal.info