Witness in the corruption case in the Ministry of Industry and Trade did not live to see the trial

A friend of Denis Manturov, a member of the executive committee of the ROC Vlasenko, promised a short term for silence



As it became known to the VChK-OGPU telegram channel and Rucriminal.info, the ICR completed the investigation of the criminal case against the deputy head of the department of the Ministry of Industry and Trade Olga Pokidysheva, ex-head of the department Olga Kolotilova, a member of the executive committee of the Russian Olympic Committee, president of the Synchronized Swimming, Water Polo and Jumping Federations water of Aleksey Vlasenko and a number of businessmen. They are already getting acquainted with the materials of the case. In total, they are accused of embezzling budget money in the supply of drugs.



The criminal case was initiated by the TFR back in October 2020. The FSB of the Russian Federation conducts operational support on it. According to the investigation, the Zubkov family, which controlled a number of pharmaceutical companies, through intermediaries managed to agree that the Ministry of Industry and Trade would conclude several government contracts with the structures controlled by the brothers for the purchase of medicines. During the execution of government contracts, more than 500 million rubles were stolen. In reality, no medicines were supplied for such an amount. In November 2020, there was Vladimir Zubkov, his wife, V.V. Novakovsky, A.A. Vashurov.

At first, Zubkov denied his guilt, but then he began to cooperate with the investigation. He said that government contracts were obtained as a result of corrupt actions of senior officials of the Ministry of Industry and Trade. We managed to obtain the state control orders with the help of intermediaries who had connections in the department. The main mediator was Alexey Vlasenko, who had a lot of acquaintances in the Ministry of Industry and Trade. In March, Vlasenko was arrested. And in May, it was the turn of the executors from the Ministry of Industry and Trade, those who organized government contracts for the Zubkovs' structures. Pokidysheva and Kolotilova went into custody.

In the summer of 2021, Zubkov, who made a deal with the investigation, died in a pre-trial detention center. His wife was not allowed to attend the funeral.

The first that the arrests of the deputy head of the department of the Ministry of Industry and Trade Olga Pokidysheva, the ex-head of the department Olga Kolotilova and the president of the Russian Federation of the Water Floor Alexei Vlasenko, a close friend of Minister Denis Manturov, are connected and are episodes of one high-profile case leading to the minister, - said the Cheka-OGPU ...



The most interesting figure in this group is undoubtedly Vlasenko. “Chief fixer of the Ministry of Industry and Trade; chief pimp under the government; a close friend and "decided" under Manturov and Mazepin, "- this is how Rucriminal.info sources characterize him. Actually, they took Vlasenko because the paths from him led directly to Denis Manturov's office. “The employees of the SEB FSB RF have a full invoice, including all the correspondence, how much went to the very top for the decision on drugs. How much to the rest, ”the source said. Vlasenko himself refused to cooperate and give evidence against Mayeturov's friend. According to sources, he has guarantees from high-ranking friends that he will not stay in prison for too long.

Then, with Zubkov, who was also aware of who was paid and how much, they began to actively work in the pre-trial detention center. He concluded a pre-trial agreement, but for the time being he was silent about the recipients of the money. And when he was "ripe", he suddenly died in a pre-trial detention center.

It is worth noting that Zubkov's wife, who is in custody, is an Israeli citizen, which gives the investigation reason to put forward a version of her possible leaving the country if she were free.

The woman's lawyers insist that she was not involved in the crime and was the nominal owner of the company (involved with schemes for the supply of drugs for the funds of the Ministry of Industry and Trade, which was registered with her at the insistence of her husband. She had no intention of committing a crime, she only signed documents, which her husband gave her, while she trusted the latter and did not doubt the legality of his actions.

Zubkov's partner Vladimir Novakovsky has fully admitted guilt, gives confessions, a pre-trial cooperation agreement has been concluded with him. Despite this, he continues to remain in custody. The ICR explains this by the fact that Novakovsky actively involved other persons in criminal activities, taking measures to conceal facts and evidence, and, being at large, he can hide from the investigation and the court, put pressure on the participants in criminal proceedings, get in touch with unidentified accomplices , destroy evidence, hide property obtained as a result of a crime, otherwise interfere with the proceedings.



To be continued

Timofey Grishin

Свидетель по делу о коррупции в Минпромторге до суда не дожил

Другу Дениса Мантурова, член исполкома ОКР Власенко за молчание обещан маленький срок



Как стало известно телеграм-каналу ВЧК-ОГПУ и Rucriminal.info, СКР завершил расследование уголовного дела в отношении замглавы департамента Минпромторга Ольги Покидышевой, экс-начальника департамента Ольги Колотиловой, члена исполкома Олимпийского комитета России, президента Федераций синхронного плавания, водного поло и прыжков в воду Алексея Власенко и ряда бизнесменов. Они уже знакомятся с материалами дела. Всего они обвиняются в хищениях бюджетных денег при поставках лекарств.

Алексей Власенко




Уголовное дело было возбуждено СКР еще в октябре 2020 года. Оперативное сопровождение по нему ведет ФСБ РФ. По версии следствия, семья Зубковых, контролировавшая ряд фармацевтических компаний, через посредников сумели договориться, что Минпромторг заключит несколько госконтрактов с подконтрольными братьям структурам на закупку медикаментов. При исполнении госконтрактов было похищено более 500 млн рублей. На такую сумму в реальности медикаменты не были поставлены. В ноябре 2020 года был Владимир Зубков, его супруга, Новаковский В.В., Вашуров А.А.

Сначала Зубков отрицал вину, но потом стал сотрудничать со следствием. Он рассказал, что госконтракты были получены в результате коррупционных действий руководящих сотрудников Минпромторга. Госконтркты удалось получить при помощи посредников, имеющих связи в ведомстве. Основным посредником выступал Алексей Власенко, имеющих массу знакомых в Минпромторге. В марте Власенко был арестован. А в мае дошла очередь до исполнителей из Минпромторга, тех, кто организовал госконтракты для структур Зубковых. Под стражу отправились Покидышева и Колотилова.

Летом 2021 года Зубков, заключивший сделку со следствием, умер в СИЗО. Его жену на похороны не отпустили.

Первым о том, что аресты замглавы департамента Минпромторга Ольги Покидышевой, экс-начальника департамента Ольги Колотиловой и президент Федерации водного пола РФ Алексей Власенко-близкого друга министра Дениса Мантурова- связаны и являются эпизодами одного громкого делу, ведущего к министру, - рассказал ВЧК-ОГПУ.

Денис Мантуров




Самой интересной фигурой в этой группе, безусловно, является Власенко. «Главный решальщик Минпромторга; главный сутенер при правительстве; близкий друг и «решала» при Мантурове и Мазепина», - так его характеризуют источники Rucriminal.info. Собственно, и взяли Власенко потому что пути от него прямо вели в кабинет Дениса Мантурова. «У сотрудников СЭБ ФСБ РФ есть полная фактура, включая всю переписку, сколько ушло на самый верх за решение по лекарствам. Сколько остальным», - отмечает собеседник издания. Сам Власенко сотрудничать и даватть показания на друга Маетурова отказался. По информации источников, у него есть гарантии от высокопоставленных друзей, что слишком долго он в заключении не задержится.

Тогда с Зубковым, который тоже был в курсе, кому и сколько платилось, в СИЗО начали проводить активную работу. Он заключил досудебное соглашение, но про получателей денег до поры молчал. А когда «созрел», то неожиданно умер в СИЗО.

Стоит отметить, что находящаяся под стражей супруга Зубкова является гражданкой Израиля, что дает повод следствию выдвигать версию о ее возможном уезде из страны, окажись она на свободе.

Адвокаты женщины настаивают, что она не причастна к совершению преступления и являлась номинальным владельцем фирмы (задействованы с схемах по поставке лекарств на средства Минпромторга , которая была на нее оформлена по настоянию супруга. Умысла на совершение преступления у нее не было, она только подписывала документы, которые ей давал муж, при этом доверяла последнему и не сомневалась в законности его действий.

Партнер Зубкова Владимир Новаковский полностью признал вину, дает признательные показания, с ним заключено досудебное соглашение о сотрудничестве. Несмотря на это он продолжает оставаться под стражей. СКР объясняет это тем, что Новаковский активно вовлекал иных лиц в преступную деятельность, принимая меры к сокрытию фактов и доказательств, а, находясь на свободе, он может скрыться от следствия и суда, оказать давление на участников уголовного судопроизводства, войти в контакт с неустановленными соучастниками, уничтожить доказательства, сокрыть имущество, полученное в результате совершения преступления, иным путем воспрепятствовать производству по делу.



Продолжение следует

Тимофей Гришин

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

"Will be the main evidence in the big" Rusnano case "

We publish the full list of "partners of Anatoly Borisovich Chubais"



The Telegram channel VChK-OGPU and Rucriminal.info have already written about the greatest and failed scam associated with the privatization of Rusnano Management Company LLC. Today we will supplement everything that has been said previously with important details.

Earlier, the role of Nathan Shklyar, a partner of the American company "Bain" in Moscow, a representative of Bain's international practice in working with private equity funds, was unjustly kept silent. In vain, after all, it was Nathan's ideas to create a fund, collected "for Chubais" from public and private money, but managed by a private company, where Anatoly Borisovich himself is the key shareholder that charmed Chubais.



Nathan not only proposed the idea of ​​partnership, but at one of his personal meetings presented Chubais with a draft of the Partnership agreement, which includes the subject of the agreement, goals, objectives and even a mechanism for resolving disagreements between Partners through an arbitrator. The final version of the agreement was prepared by Rusnano's lawyers, Ruben Karlenovich Vardanyan was asked to act as the arbiter of the agreement. The document was prepared in the strictest confidentiality - so the draft agreement was not sent by mail, but passed from reception to reception in a sealed envelope.

However, Rucriminal.info sources know its content. According to them, the idea of ​​a written agreement did not make the Partners happy, but only the deputy chairman of the board of Rusnano Vladimir Avetisyan could refuse the boss, the rest accepted the rules of the game, although some with reservations: the deputy chairman of the board of RUSNANO Boris Podolsky was very proud of the trust and was ready sign an agreement in any edition. The cautious Oleg Kiselev thought for a long time: he consulted with the lawyer Asnis, carefully punctured the mood of other partners and timidly tried to put the brakes on the venture with partnership. But Chubais's assertiveness was always stronger than Kiselev's caution, and the agreement was signed, and A.B. Chubais, O. V. Kiselev, Yu.A. Udaltsov and B.G. Podolsky became Partners. Later, A.V. Trapeznikov, A.B. Kalanov and D.A. Pimkin.



The partnership agreement signed by members of the Management Board of Rusnano and A. Chubais may become an important evidence of the prosecution in a large criminal case against Rusnano.

But the strange choice of Partners is striking and there is a desire to figure out why A.B. Chubais, surrounded by strong business partners in RAO UES of Russia, remained in such a not presentable company by the end of 2014?

Where did the RAO UES team go and why did the old energy partners not help Chubais develop nanotechnology?

V.G. Zavadnikov. In the summer of 1998, Valentin Georgievich Zavadnikov (Valya) was appointed Deputy Chairman of RAO UES of Russia, which came as a real shock to the venerable industrial generals from the power industry and left an indelible mark on the history of RAO UES.



Firstly, it was Valya who introduced the practice of so-called “homework assignments, or in abbreviated form - DZ” - this is when the general director of an energy company is given a specific task to contribute cash to the corporate black box office. DZ transformed into a kickback system and by 2000 each contractor understood that from 10 to 30% of what was received under the contract would have to be returned. Probably, corruption to one degree or another has always been present in the energy sector: there were gifts from contractors and the appointment of the right people, but it was Valya who made it manageable from the very top. It was RAO UES of Russia that became the first company in Russia to completely take control of financial flows.

Secondly, the team. It was Valya who formed a block of managers responsible for reform and corporate governance: O. Oksuzyan, V. Sinyugin, Yu. Udaltsov, and others.

Third, the concept of the market and reform. Some will say that the concepts of the energy sector reform in 2000 and 2008 are very different. Don't go into trifles - the concept of the RAO UES reform was laid by Zavadnikov!

In September 2001, Valya left RAO UES for the Federation Council, but at the same time remained a member of the working group of the Presidium of the State Council of the Russian Federation on reforming the electric power industry.

Valya too quickly and swiftly went to the higher floors, and after that the scale of RAO UES, and even more so the scale of Rusnano, ceased to correspond to it.

M.A. Abyzov. In 2014 Abyzov M.A. He is also the Minister of the Open Government of Russia, he is always ready to support A. Chubais, and Chubais has always reciprocated him, but the partnership between Rusnano is far from the ambitions of the young minister.



Melamed L.B., Urinson Ya.M., Rappoport A.N., Avetisyan are old and proven leaders who have worked a lot as deputies of Chubais A.B. in RAO "UES of Russia". All four took part in the work of Rusnano in one way or another.

Melamed L.B. was the first general director of the State Corporation "Rosnanotech" and after A. Chubais came to Rusnano, he could probably remain Chubais's first deputy if he wanted to. But he didn’t want to: at first, ambition and the erroneous bet on the fact that it was possible to control the flows of the corporation without being in its governing bodies. By 2012, I probably would have already returned, but a new team has formed in Rusnano with its own ideology of an “eternal fund”, which is different from the worldviews of L.B. Melamed. Chubais did not want to open a new dispute, and Melamed did not enter the partnership.

In 2014, Melamed L.B. supervised one of Rusnano's projects - the company HC Composite JSC and tried to find satisfaction in this.

Urinson Ya.M. Until the end of 2008, he carried out a special assignment from A. Chubais - in the status of the head of the Project Center, he "closed" RAO "UES of Russia" back office of the company. An absolutely loyal and trusted person, Urinson. nevertheless, he ceased to fit into Chubais's new, progressive ideas about the methods of company management and his functional responsibilities were gradually reduced: in 2010, first the financial unit was removed from his subordination, then the personnel management unit.

For family reasons, in 2011, J. Urinson moved to an advisor with very narrow and specific powers.

Rappoport A.N. he was not just a deputy chairman at RAO UES, but also a chairman of the board at the Federal Grid Company. Moreover, as the head of FGC UES, he held out the longest in the post-reform energy sector.

In 2012-2013, Andrei Natanovich managed to work as First Deputy Chairman of the Management Board of OJSC Rusnano, in charge of investment activities (in this position, he replaced Andrei Malyshev, who left the company due to disagreements with A. Chubais).

The arrival of A. Rappoport coincided with problems at the largest projects of Rusnano, such as: Usolye-Siberian Silicone, Plastic Logic, Liotech, Optogan, Mikron, etc. Personal Risks and Company Prospects A. Rappoport returned to the Skolkovo Moscow School, where he still works.

Avetisyan V.E. - Samara businessman, drafted by V.G. Zavadnikov, first to manage the energy sector of the Samara region, and then the entire Volga region. In 2004, V.E. Avetisyan moves to Moscow and becomes one of the key leaders of RAO UES, he heads Business Unit No. 2, and at the same time creates the Quartz group of companies on the fragments of repair subsidiaries spun off from regional energy companies. After the reorganization of RAO UES of Russia, Avetisyan V.E. works in the Russian Technologies State Corporation, where he oversees energy conservation and energy efficiency projects. Obviously, the arrival of V. Avetisyan in Rusnano was a matter of time, and such a arrival took place at the end of 2013 .. It took experienced Avetisyan 2 months to assess the state of affairs: “There is no money, there are no prospects, too, there is nothing to catch here.”

The disappointment was mutual: Chubais sincerely did not understand why his old comrades-in-arms, accustomed to and capable of solving complex managerial problems, after working from 2 months to a year, fled from Rusnano at breakneck speed. Chubais was already forming a new team in a state of "time pressure", and it was not an easy task: the power engineers disappointed, seasoned investment managers bypassed the state-owned company - they knew too well the principles of Rusnano's investment in the market and adequately predicted the future of the corporation, young and ambitious investment directors received their first experience and fearing to lose their reputation, they tried to go “into the market”.

However, A. Chubais created his own team. I worked. Where to attach bonds now?

Timofey Grishin

To be continued

Source: www.rucriminal.info

«Станет главным доказательством в большом «деле Роснано»

Публикуем полный список «партнеров Анатолия Борисовича Чубайса»



Телеграм-канал ВЧК-ОГПУ и Rucriminal.info уже писали о величайшей и несостоявшейся афере, связанной с приватизацией ООО «УК «Роснано». Сегодня дополним все ранее сказанное важными деталями.

Ранее несправедливо умолчали о роли Натана Шкляра - партнера американской компании "Bain" в Москве, представителя международной практики Bain по работе с фондами прямых инвестиций. Зря, ведь именно идеи Натана о создании фонда, собранного «под Чубайса» из государственных и частных денег, но находящегося под управлением частной компании, где ключевым акционером выступает сам Анатолий Борисович очаровали Чубайса.

Натан Шкляр




Натан не только предложил идею партнерства, но и на одной из личных встреч представил Чубайсу черновик соглашения Партнеров, включающий в себя предмет соглашения, цели, задачи и даже механизм разрешения разногласий между Партнерами через арбитра. Окончательную редакцию соглашения подготовили юристы Роснано, арбитром по соглашению попросили выступить Рубена Карленовича Варданяна. Документ готовился в режиме строжайшей конфиденциальности - так проект соглашения не пересылался по почте, а передавался из приемной в приемную в запечатанном конверте.

Однако, источники Rucriminal.info знают его содержание. По их словам, идея письменного соглашения Партнеров не порадовала, но отказать начальнику смог только заместитель председателя правления «Роснано» Владимир Аветисян, остальные приняли правила игры, правда некоторые - с оговорками: заместитель председателя правления РОСНАНО Борис Подольский был очень горд оказанным доверием и готов был подписать соглашение в любой редакции. Осторожный Олег Киселев думал долго: консультировался с адвокатом Аснисом, аккуратно пробивал настроение других партнеров и робко пытался затею с партнерством спустить на тормозах. Но напористость Чубайса всегда была сильнее осторожности Киселева и соглашение было подписано, а А.Б. Чубайс, О.В. Киселев, Ю.А. Удальцов и Б.Г. Подольский стали Партнерами. В дальнейшем статус младших партнеров получили А.В. Трапезников, А.Б. Каланов и Д.А. Пимкин.

Владимир Аветисян




Партнерское соглашение, подписанное членами Правления Роснано и А. Чубайсом, может стать важным свидетельством обвинения в большом уголовном деле Роснано.

Но бросается в глаза странный выбор Партнеров и возникает желание разобраться почему А.Б. Чубайс, окруженный в РАО «ЕЭС России» крепкими бизнес-партнерами, к концу 2014 года остался в столь не презентабельной компании?

Куда делась команда РАО ЕЭС и почему старые партнеры-энергетики не помогли Чубайсу развить нанотехнологии?

В.Г. Завадников. Летом 1998 года зампредом РАО «ЕЭС России» был назначен Валентин Георгиевич Завадников (Валя), что стало настоящим шоком для почтенных промышленных генералов от энергетики и оставило неизгладимый след в истории РАО ЕЭС.

Валентин Завадников




Во первых, именно Валя ввел практику так называемых «домашних заданий или сокращенно - ДЗ» - это когда генеральному директору энергокомпании ставится конкретное задание по взносу наличных денег в корпоративную черную кассу. ДЗ трансформировались в систему откатов и уже к 2000 году каждый подрядчик понимал, что от 10 до 30% полученного по контракту придется вернуть. Наверное, коррупция в той или иной степени всегда присутствовала в энергетике: были подарки от подрядчиков и назначение нужных людей, но именно Валя сделал ее управляемой с самого верха. Именно РАО «ЕЭС России» стала первой компанией в России полностью взявшей под контроль финансовые потоки.

Во вторых, команда. Именно Валя сформировал блок управленцев, отвечающих за реформу и корпоративное управление: О. Оксузьян, В. Синюгин, Ю. Удальцов и др.

В третьих, концепция рынка и реформы. Кто-то скажет, что концепции реформы энергоотрасли 2000 года и 2008 года сильно отличаются. Не уходите в мелочи – концепцию реформы РАО ЕЭС заложил Завадников!

В сентябре 2001 года Валя ушел из РАО ЕЭС в Совет Федерации, но при этом оставался членом рабочей группы президиума Государственного совета Российской Федерации по вопросам реформирования электроэнергетики.

Валя слишком быстро и стремительно ушел на высшие этажи, и после этого и масштабы РАО ЕЭС, и тем более масштабы Роснано перестали ему соответствовать.

М.А. Абызов. В 2014 году Абызов М.А. еще Министр Открытого Правительства России, он всегда готов поддержать А. Чубайса, да и Чубайс всегда отвечал ему взаимностью, но партнерство Роснано сильно не дотягивает до амбиций молодого министра.

Михаил Абызов




Меламед Л.Б., Уринсон Я.М., Раппопорт А.Н., Аветисян – старые и проверенные руководители, много поработавшие заместителями Чубайса А.Б. в РАО «ЕЭС России». Все четверо так или иначе поучаствовали в работе Роснано.

Меламед Л.Б. был первым генеральным директором ГК «Роснанотех» и после прихода А. Чубайса в Роснано, наверное, смог бы остаться первым заместителем Чубайса если бы захотел. Но не захотел: сначала сыграли амбиции и ошибочная ставка на то, что можно контролировать потоки корпорации, не находясь в органах ее управления. К 2012 году, наверное, уже бы и вернулся, но в Роснано сформировалась новая команда со своей идеологией «вечного фонда», отличной от мировоззрений Л.Б. Меламеда. Чубайс не захотел открывать новый спор, а Меламед не вошел в партнерство.

В 2014 году Меламед Л.Б. руководил одним из проектов Роснано – компанией АО «ХК Композит» и пытался найти в этом удовлетворение.

Уринсон Я.М. до конца 2008 года выполнял особое поручение А.Чубайса – в статусе руководителя Проектного центра он «закрывал» РАО «ЕЭС России» и только к началу нового 2009 года смог выйти на работу в ГК «Роснанотех» в должности заместителя генерального директора, курирующего финансы и бэк-офис компании. Будучи абсолютно преданным и доверенным человеком, Уринсон. тем не менее, перестал вписываться в новые, прогрессивные представления Чубайса о методах управления компанией и его функциональные обязанности постепенно сокращались: в 2010 году из его подчинения вывели сначала финансовый блок, затем блок управления персоналом.

По семейным обстоятельствам в 2011 году Я. Уринсон перешел в советники с весьма узкими и специфическими полномочиями.

Раппопорт А.Н. был не просто зампредом в РАО ЕЭС, но и председателем Правления в Федеральной сетевой компании. Причем как руководитель ФСК ЕЭС он дольше всех продержался в постреформенной энергетике.

В 2012-2013 году Андрей Натанович успел поработать первым заместителем председателя Правления ОАО «Роснано», курирующим инвестиционную деятельность (на этой должности он сменил Андрея Малышева, покинувшего компанию из-за разногласий с А. Чубайсом).

Приход А. Раппопорта совпал с проблемами на крупнейших проектах Роснано, таких как: «Усолье-Сибирский силикон», «Пластик Лоджик», «Лиотех», «Оптоган», «Микрон» и др. Получив вызов на допрос в Следственный комитет, оценив личные риски и перспективы компании А. Раппопорт вернулся в Московскую школу Сколково, где работает по настоящее время.

Аветисян В.Е. – самарский бизнесмен, призванный В.Г. Завадниковым сначала для руководства энергетикой Самарской области, а затем и всего Поволжья. В 2004 году Аветисян В.Е. переезжает в Москву и становится одним из ключевых руководителей РАО ЕЭС, он возглавляет Бизнес-единицу №2, параллельно на осколках ремонтных дочек, выделенных из региональных энергокомпаний, создает группу компаний «Кварц». После реорганизации РАО ЕЭС России Аветисян В.Е. работает в ГК «Ростехнологии», где курирует проекты энергосбережения и энергоэффективности. Очевидно, что приход В. Аветисяна в Роснано был делом времени и такой приход состоялся в конце 2013 года.. Опытному Аветисяну хватило 2 месяца, чтобы оценить состояние дел: «Денег нет, перспектив – тоже, ловить тут – нечего».

Разочарование было взаимным: Чубайс искренне не понимал почему его старые соратники, привыкшие и способные решать сложные управленческие задачи поработав от 2 месяцев до года бежали из Роснано сломя голову. Новую команду Чубайс формировал уже в состоянии «цейтнота», а это была непростая задача: энергетики - разочаровали, матерые инвестиционщики обходили госкомпанию стороной – на рынке слишком хорошо знали принципы инвестирования Роснано и адекватно прогнозировали будущее корпорации, молодые и амбициозные инвестиционные директора получив первый опыт и боясь потерять репутацию стремились уйти «в рынок».

Впрочем, А. Чубайс команду свою создал. Поработал. Куда бы теперь пристроить облигации?

Тимофей Гришин

Продолжение следует

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

FSB reached Sergo Ordzhonikidze

University leaders got hold of dead souls





The FSB has completed a criminal investigation into a particularly large-scale fraud at the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA). His key defendant is the director of the Institute of Civil Service and Management of the RANEPA Igor Bartsits, as well as his alleged accomplices - the dean of the faculty of public administration of the economy Svetlana Larina and the wanted native of Abkhazia Aslan Feyzba. The investigation accuses them of "theft of funds by systematically receiving them from subordinates for unjustified accrual of additional wages." According to some information, the damage in the case amounts to several million rubles, which the accused Bartsits, fully admitting his guilt, extinguished.



Sources of the VChK-OGPU telegram channel and Rucriminal.info said that the theft of funds with the help of "dead souls" in Russian Universities occurs everywhere. We acquaint our readers with already existing similar criminal cases.

I. FSBEI HE "Russian State Geological Prospecting University named after Sergo Ordzhonikidze" (hereinafter - MGRI).



1. The criminal case was initiated on February 12, 2020 under Part 4 of Art. 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (fraud on an especially large scale with the use of official position) according to the report of the detective of the department of the South-Western Administrative District of the Federal Security Service of Russia for the city of Moscow and the Moscow region (seconded officer in MGRI).

The investigation of the criminal case was carried out by the Investigative Service of the FSB of Russia for the city of Moscow and the Moscow region, since the crime was revealed by the FSB officers.

2. Initially, the media suggested that the criminal case against the rector V.A. instituted for real estate fraud.





3. The real "basis" for initiating a criminal case was the fictitious employment of employees in various positions in the MGRI.

If initially a criminal case was initiated against 1 fictitiously employed employee, then by the end of the investigation, the investigation revealed 13 “dead souls”. The period of fictitious labor activity of "dead souls" is from 2016 to 2020.

An official of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation acted as a co-executor of the rector in two episodes of criminal activity (2 dead souls). Also, one of the employees of the MGRI is a co-executor of the crime in the case.

In addition, 2 persons who, according to the investigation, have found and brought to MGRI for fictitious employment of workers, are involved as accomplices in the commission of a crime.

Persons who were directly fictitiously employed are not brought to criminal responsibility as ignorant of criminal intentions.

The total amount of damage in the criminal case is 29,317,348.64 rubles.

4.On March 09, 2021, the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation as the founder of MGRI was recognized as a victim in the criminal case. The victim's representative gets acquainted with all the materials of the criminal case.

5. At present, the requirements of Art. 217-219 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, that is, familiarization of the accused with the materials of the criminal case.

II. "Fresh" criminal cases at the Universities that have been identified or are being investigated by the FSB.

1.February 17, 2021: Moscow Polytechnic University

The Investigative Department of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation in Moscow opened a criminal case on large-scale fraud (part 4 of article 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) against employees of the Moscow Polytechnic University. They, according to the investigation, received 3.6 million rubles from the budget. for teaching people of pre-retirement age, but did not conduct classes.

The case was initiated on the basis of materials from an audit of one of the departments of the FSB administration in Moscow and the Moscow region.

2.16 February 2021: Institute of Civil Service and Management of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation (RANEPA)

The Investigative Department of the FSB of Russia opened a criminal case for fraud against the Director of the said institute of RANEPA Igor Bartsits.

The scheme of embezzlement is the systematic receipt of money from subordinates for unjustified accrual of additional salaries to them. The investigation is over, the accused are starting to familiarize themselves.

To be continued

Denis Zhirnov

Source: www.rucriminal.info

ФСБ добралось до Серго Орджоникидзе

Руководители ВУЗов разжились мертвыми душами





ФСБ завершила расследование уголовного дела об особо крупном мошенничестве в Российской академии народного хозяйства и государственной службы при президенте РФ (РАНХиГС). Его ключевым фигурантом является директор Института госслужбы и управления РАНХиГС Игорь Барциц, а также его предполагаемые сообщники — декан факультета госуправления экономикой Светлана Ларина и объявленный в розыск уроженец Абхазии Аслан Фейзба. Следствие инкриминирует им «хищения денежных средств путем их систематического получения от подчиненных за необоснованное начисление дополнительной заработной платы». По некоторым данным, ущерб по делу составляет несколько миллионов рублей, который обвиняемый Барциц, полностью признав вину, погасил.

Игорь Барциц




Источники телеграм-канала ВЧК-ОГПУ и Rucriminal.info рассказали, что хищение средств при помощи «мертвых душ» в российских Университетах происходит повсеместно. Знакомим читателей с уже существующими аналогичными уголовным делами.

I. ФГБОУ ВО «Российский государственный геологоразведочный университет имени Серго Орджоникидзе» (далее – МГРИ).



1. Уголовное дело возбуждено 12 февраля 2020 года по ч. 4 ст. 159 УК РФ (мошенничество в особо крупном размере с использованием служебного положения) по рапорту оперуполномоченного отдела ЮЗАО УФСБ России по городу Москве и Московской области (прикомандированный сотрудник в МГРИ).

Расследованием уголовного дела занималась Следственная служба УФСБ России по городу Москве и Московской области, так как преступление выявили сотрудники ФСБ.

2. Первоначально в СМИ выдвигались предположения, что уголовное дело против ректора Косьянова В.А. возбуждено за махинации с недвижимостью.

Косьянова В.А. (слева)




3. Действительным «основанием» для возбуждения уголовного дела послужило фиктивное трудоустройство сотрудников на различные должности в МГРИ.

Если первоначально уголовное дело было возбуждено по 1 фиктивно трудоустроенному сотруднику, то к окончанию расследования следствием было выявлено 13 «мертвых душ». Период фиктивной трудовой деятельности «мертвых душ» – с 2016 по 2020 годы.

В качестве соисполнителя ректора по двум эпизодам преступной деятельности (2 мертвым душам) выступало должностное лицо Министерство науки и высшего образования РФ. Также соисполнителем преступления по делу проходит одна из сотрудниц МГРИ.

Кроме того, 2 лица, которые, по версии следствия, подыскали и привели в МГРИ для фиктивного трудоустройства работников, привлекаются в качестве пособников совершения преступления.

Лица, которые были непосредственно фиктивно трудоустроены, к уголовной ответственности не привлекаются как неосведомленные о преступных намерениях.

Общая сумма ущерба по уголовному делу составляет 29 317 348, 64 руб.

4. 09 марта 2021 года потерпевшим по уголовному делу признано Министерство науки и высшего образования РФ как учредитель МГРИ. Представитель потерпевшего знакомится со всеми материалами уголовного дела.

5. В настоящее время по уголовному делу идет выполнение требований ст. 217-219 УПК РФ, то есть ознакомление обвиняемых с материалами уголовного дела.

II. «Свежие» уголовные дела в Университетах, которые выявлены или расследуются ФСБ.

1. 17 февраля 2021: Московский политехнический университет

Следственное управление СКР по Москве возбудило уголовное дело о мошенничестве в особо крупном размере (ч. 4 ст. 159 УК РФ) в отношении сотрудников Московского политехнического университета. Они, по версии следствия, получили из бюджета 3,6 млн руб. за обучение людей предпенсионного возраста, но не проводили занятия.

Дело возбудили на основании материалов проверки одного из отделов управления ФСБ по Москве и Подмосковью.

2. 16 февраля 2021: Институт госслужбы и управления Российской академии народного хозяйства и государственной службы при президенте РФ (РАНХиГС)

Следственным управлением ФСБ России возбуждено уголовное дело по мошенничеству против Директора указанного института РАНХиГС Игоря Барцица.

Схему хищения - систематическое получение от подчиненных денежных средств за необоснованное начисление им дополнительной зарплаты. Расследование завершено, обвиняемые приступают к ознакомлению.

Продолжение следует

Денис Жирнов

"Chef was flunked"

How Kostya Bolshoi killed the man Yuri Chaika and was covered from punishment





There are a lot of gaps in the materials of the case of the leader of the killer gang, Konstantin Piskarev (Kostya Bolshoi). From the volumes of the investigation, they directly cut out references to his connections with the special services about the behind-the-scenes of many crimes. Rucriminal.info and the VChK-OGPU telegram channel will fill these gaps. Thus, Konstantin Piskarev owned the Shchit and Sword restaurant, located directly opposite the FSB Directorate for Moscow and the region. It was in this restaurant that evenings, banquets, birthdays, etc. were held. Chekists of the Moscow region and not only. Many officials and businessmen knew Piskarev himself as an employee of the FSB.

Piskarev's senior friend and partner was Mikhail Ruzin (owner of Krylovsky bank and Capital Holding), who was closely associated with the FSB in Moscow and the Moscow region. In fact, he represented the interests of individual characters from this department in various projects. For example, Ruzin, who is listed in the databases of the RUOP of Moscow as an active member of the Solntsevo organized criminal group and a “close relationship” of one of the “authorities” of this organized criminal group, Alexei Molchanov, was the owner of Sergiev Posad.

Local officials and security officials danced to his tune. His "right hand" was Pisakrev. They got whatever they wanted. When the question arose about the allocation of a couple of regular plots of land for building, the head of the urban settlement Goncharov directly told his subordinates (this is in the case file): "these are not the people who can be refused." Mayor Maslov was at all their protege and business partner. And then Yevgeny Dushko appeared, who first dismissed Maslov, and after becoming mayor himself began to refuse Piskarev and Ruzin. In particular, he refused permission to build on those very plots of land. This couple threatened Dushko, pressed on him, but it was useless. Then Kostya Bolshoi came and shot Dushko. Piskarev is sitting, but Ruzin is not. Why? And this man is completely untouchable. He has long established close relations with representatives of the FSB in Moscow and the Moscow region. Moreover, his partners in dark deeds die one after another. Ruzin did business with the banker Oleg Zhukovsky. In December 2007, the banker's body was found on the territory of his cottage in the elite village of Lesnaya edge of the Odintsovo district. The housekeeper noticed Zhukovsky's corpse at the bottom of the pool, tied up and dressed in a tracksuit. Law enforcement officials ruled his death as an unusual suicide.

In 2009, the RF IC took up the story of embezzlement of budgetary funds in the Pushkin region, to which Ruzin was involved, and his partner in the theft of 554 million rubles perished. Ruzin's friend allegedly took his own life.

At one time, the deputy chairman of the MOO FSO "Dynamo" Alexander Rusanov attracted his friend Ruzin to the project for the reconstruction of the shooting club of the same name. It was planned to build residential houses on its territory. However, as a result of a series of sham deals using shell firms, the shooting club went bankrupt. The Dynamo lands began to be sold cheaply to the firms controlled by Ruzin. Rusanov realized that behind his back, a friend had carried out a grandiose scam. Rusanov began litigation. Shortly thereafter, the body of the deputy chairman of the MOO FSO "Dynamo" was found in the courtyard of his house. According to the official version, he threw himself out of the window of his apartment.

In this publication, Rucriminal.info returns to the topic of the murder of Marat Gazizov, director of the Scientific Center for Legal Information under the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation (NTSPI). He was personally shot by Kostya Bolshoi. The case file only mentions that Gazizov, on certain topics, communicated directly to the employees of the M Department of the FSB of the Russian Federation. And in the Ministry of Justice, all the state structures associated with him, Gazizov's orders were perceived as "orders of the leadership of the Ministry of Justice." However, why this was left out of the brackets of the case. Our sources have made it clear what's what. Marat Gazizov was a good friend of Yuri Chaika, who at the time of the events headed the Ministry of Justice. And the Scientific Center for Legal Information under the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation (NTSLI), headed by him, was a structure de facto controlled by the young Artyom Chaykes, the son of Yuri Chaika. And everyone knew Marat Gazizov as a person of the Chaika family. However, the family, having entered the business of selling the confiscated property, did not expect that they would find themselves in the very midst of the "90s".



The business was as follows. The property was valued at an underestimated value. It was sold at market value and the appraisal was necessarily paid to the budget. And the "top" was divided between the bailiffs, the RFBR and the company accredited with RFBR. In the jargon, such a pilezh was called "Mercedes" (as in 3 parts, like a Mercedes sign). Under Yuri Chaika, bailiffs (subordinate to the Ministry of Justice) began to take half, 25% went to the RFBR, and another 25% to an accredited company. Such a cut began to be called BMW.

When it became clear that the apartments of the head of Golden ADA Andrei Kozlenok (seven gigantic, exclusive apartments in the center of Moscow) would be put up for sale, a struggle began among the companies involved in the sale. However, the crayons and average players instantly went off topic. They were told that the main contenders are the "Chaika structure" (NTSPI) and the "solcevskih with the Chekists "(GKS). Trying to "butt" with one of them is suicide. Most of the market participants relied on the Chaika family.

When Chaika Gazizov's man was killed, everyone simply “opened their mouths” and waited for the development of events. But they did not happen. According to a Rucriminal.info source, the Chaek family felt that you couldn't earn all the money, but only one life. And they simply refused to earn money by selling the confiscated property. And they did the right thing. After that, many more players were killed, including officials. As for the murder of Gazizov, although everyone knew who was behind the crime, it remained unsolved for a very long time. And then at one point Kostya More ceased to be comfortable and necessary and was "closed".

As for the events that led to the murder of Gazizov, they developed as follows.



In 2004, GKS (Piskarev and Co) and perepala real "gold mine" - the seized property of the founder of the company Golden ADA Andrey Kozlenok. The latter was a participant in a mega-scam. With the permission of the head of Roskomdragmet Yevgeny Bychkov, the company Golden ADA was created in the United States, to which valuables from Goharn were transferred for 180 million dollars (gold coins, old silverware, jewelry with precious stones). Officially, the cost of the cargo was estimated at $ 180 million, but the operatives suspected that their real price exceeded $ 1 billion. The valuables were sold, but the money never arrived in Russia. All officials were taken out of the criminal case, and the court sentenced Kozlenok to six and a half years in prison.



In addition, the servants of Themis satisfied the claim to recover 54 million rubles from Andrei Kozlenok. As a result of this claim, seven elite apartments in Moscow that belonged to Kozlenok were seized. Kostya Bolshoi and a member of his organized crime group Sergey Bezrukov agreed that the property would go through the Global Computer Service (GKS). But then the director of the Scientific Center for Legal Information under the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation (NTSPI) Marat Gazizov intervened. He began to demand that the property go through the NCPI. During the meeting, he shared information about the machinations with an employee of the "M" Department of the FSB of the Russian Federation, who supervised the Ministry of Justice. After that, Piskarev decided to deal with him. He dressed in tattered black clothes. Pretended to be a vagabond and lay down at the entrance of Gazizov. When a service car arrived for that, Kostya Bolshoi shot him with a pistol.

After the murder of Gazizov, the GKS was re-registered the drinker Aleksey Poshkus, the apartments were sold for $ 4.7 million. Of these, 300 thousand went to the intermediary, 600 thousand were appropriated by Bezrukov, and the rest went to Kostya Bolshoi. The budget received only 24 thousand rubles.

Rucriminal.info acquaints readers with previously unpublished testimonies of the accused and witnesses in the Kostya Bolshoi case.

The testimony of the witness LV Belenko, according to which on the day of the murder of MF Gazizov, 20.05.2004, the witness was engaged in street trading near the station of the Moscow metro “Prospekt Miraradialnaya”. At about 9 hours 15 minutes 9 hours 30 minutes Belenko went to the garbage containers located in the courtyard of house 49 on Mira Avenue. There Belenko saw a man standing next to a Volga car. Suddenly another man in dark clothes with a hood on his head and a mask on his face ran up to this man from the side. This man shot three times at a man standing next to the Volga, who fell on the asphalt after the shots. The man who was shooting ran away about 3 meters, then came back and fired one more time, after which he ran between the houses towards the street. Gilyarovsky.

Testimony of the witness P.V. Zonov, that on 20.05.2004, at about 10 o'clock, he smoked together with Guzikov Sergei and Kostrovy Sergei near the entrance to the store "Chip and Deep". At that time, they heard first one shot, and then at least three more shots from the side of houses on Prospekt Mira. After 20-30 seconds, a tall man of massive build, dressed in a black jacket, ran out from the side of the courtyards from where the shots were fired. His face was hidden. Another man ran after him. The fleeing man ran to the roadway on the street. Gilyarovsky and got into a VAZ 2109 car, which started abruptly and drove towards the Moscow region. The man who was pursuing him approached the witness and, when asked what had happened, said that they had “flunked the chief”.

The testimony of the witness Y. Bulgakov, according to which in 2003 the Moscow Finance Department received a letter from the Moscow City Court or the Ministry of Internal Affairs that there is confiscated property in the form of seven apartments, subject to turning into state revenue. Bulgakov sent a request to the Moscow City Court for a copy of the verdict, after which the deputy head of the RFBR contacted him, who introduced him to S.A. Bezrukov and said that he would deal with the sale of these apartments. In the course of communication, S.A. Bezrukov. presented to Bulgakov the charter of Global Computer Service LLC and accreditation with the RFBR. S.A. Bezrukov He introduced Bulgakov to a tall man, whom he introduced as an FSB officer who will assist in the sale of the apartment. Bulgakov and this dinner also met at the Shield and Sword restaurant, and the sale of apartments was discussed at the meeting. In May 2004, the bailiff Keldyushev or S.A. Bezrukov. brought him to sign the act on the transfer of property for safekeeping from Gogia to the Department of Finance. Bulgakov signed this act and put the seal of the Department of Finance on it, after which he gave the act to probably S.A. Bezrukov.

Testimony of D.A. Zemtsov as a suspect, according to which, according to K.Yu. he knows that on May 20, 2004, on Prospekt Mira, they killed "some Tatar" who was interfering with SA Bezrukov. in the field of activity of LLC "Global Computer Service" on the sale of seized and confiscated property. Piskarev said that he himself shot the man, Saryan brought him to the place of the murder, and Aleksandrov was "on the safe side." Zemtsov also explained that the activities of the "Global Computer Service" were first carried out by SA Bezrukov. and Fedoseev, who had their own man in the service of bailiffs (deputy chief bailiff of the city of Moscow, Konstantin Plekhov).





To be continued

Arseny Dronov

«Шефа завалили»

Как Костя Большой убил человека Юрия Чайки и его прикрыли от наказания





В материалах дела лидера банды киллеров Константин Пискарева (Костя Большой) очень много пробелов. Из томов расследования прямо вырезали упоминания про его связи со спецслужбами про закулисье многих преступлений. Rucriminal.info и телеграм-канал ВЧК-ОГПУ будут заполнять эти пробелы. Так, Константин Пискарев владел рестораном «Щит и Меч», расположенным прямо напротив УФСБ по Москве и области. Именно в этом ресторане проводили вечера, банкеты, дни рождения и т.д. чекисты московского региона и не только. Да и самого Пискарева многие чиновника и бизнесмены знали, как сотрудника УФСБ.


Старшим другом и партнером Пискарева являлся Михаил Рузин (владелец банка Крыловский и «Капитал Холдинг») , который был тесно связан с УФСБ по Москве и МО. Фактически он представлял интересы отдельных персонажей из этого ведомства в различных проектах. Например, Рузин, который в базах данных РУОП Москвы значится, как активный член солнцевской ОПГ и «близкая связь» одного из «авторитетов» этой ОПГ Алексея Молчанова, был хозяином Сергиева Посада.

Под его дудку плясали местные чиновники, и силовики. Его «правой рукой» был Писакрев. Они получали все, что хотели. Когда встал вопрос о выделении паре очередных участков земли под застройку, то глава городского поселения Гончаров прямо сказал подчиненным (это есть в материалах дела): «это не те люди, которым можно отказать». Мэр Маслов вовсе был их ставленником и деловым партнером. И тут появился Евгений Душко, который сначала сместил Маслова, а сам став мэром начал отказывать Пискареву и Рузину. В частности, отказывал в разрешении на застройку на тех самых участках земли. Эта пара угрожала Душко, давила на него, но было бесполезно. Тогда Костя Большой пришел и застрелил Душко. Пискарев сидит, а Рузин нет. Почему? А этот человек вовсе неприкасаемый. Он давно наладил тесные отношения с представителями УФСБ по Москве и МО. Более того, его партнеры по темным делам умирают один за другим. Рузин проворачивал дела с банкиром Олегом Жуковским. В декабре 2007 года тело банкира было обнаружено на территории его коттеджа в элитном поселке Лесная опушка Одинцовского района. Домработница заметила на дне бассейна труп Жуковского, связанного и одетого в тренировочный костюм. Правоохранительные органы признали его смерть необычным самоубийством.

В 2009 году СК РФ занялся историей с хищением бюджетных средств в Пушкинском районе, к которым имел отношение Рузин, и погиб его партнер по хищению 554 млн рублей. Приятель Рузина якобы сам свел счеты с жизнью.

В свое время заместитель председателя МОО ФСО "Динамо" Александр Русанов привлек своего знакомого Рузина к проекту по реконструкции одноименно стрелкового клуба. На его территории планировалось возвести жилые дома. Однако, в результате ряда фиктивных сделок с использованием подставным фирм, стрелковый клуб был обанкрочен. Земли «Динамо» стали уходить по дешевке фирмам, подконтрольным Рузину. Русанов понял, что за его спиной приятель провернул грандиозную аферу. Русанов начал судебные тяжбы. Вскоре после этого, тело зампредседателя МОО ФСО «Динамо» нашли во дворе его дома. По официальной версии, он выбросился из окна своей квартиры.

В этой публикации Rucriminal.info возвращается к теме убийства директора Научного центра правовой информации при Минюсте РФ (НЦПИ) Марат Газизов. Его лично расстрелял Костя Большой. В материалах дела упоминается только, что Газизов по отдельным темам общался напрямую к сотрудникам Управления М ФСБ РФ. А в Минюсте, всех связанных с ним госструктура, распоряжения Газизова воспринимали, как «распоряжения руководства Минюста». Однако, почему это было, оставлено за скобками дела. Наши источники прояснили, что к чему. Марат Газизов был хорошим знакомым Юрия Чайки, который на момент событий возглавлял минюст. А руководимый им Научный центр правовой информации при Минюсте РФ (НЦПИ)- была структура дефакто подконтрольная молодому Артёму Чайке- сыну Юрия Чайки. И Марата Газизова все знали, как человека семьи Чайки. Однако, семья, зайдя в бизнес по реализации конфискованного имущества, и не предполагала, что окажется в самой гуще «90-х».

Артем Чайка




Бизнес был следующим. По заниженной стоимости имущество оценивалось. Продавалось по рыночной стоимости и оценка обязательно платилась в бюджет. А «верхушка» делилась между приставами, РФФИ и аккредитованной при РФФИ фирмой. На жаргоне такой пилеж назывался «Мерседес» (так как на 3 части, как знак Мерседеса). При Юрии Чайке судебные приставы (подчиняются Минюсту) стали забирать половину, 25 % шли РФФИ, а еще 25 % аккредитованной фирме. Такой распил стали называть БМВ.

Когда выяснилось, что на реализацию выставят квартиры главы Golden ADA Андрея Козленка (семь гигантских, эксклюзивных квартир в центре Москвы) за них началась борьба среди фирм, занимающихся реализацией. Однако, мелки и средние игроки моментально вышли из темы. Им объяснили, что главные претенденты «структура Чайки» (НЦПИ) и структура «солнцевских с чекистами» (ГКС). Пытаться «бодаться» с кем то из них- самоубийство. Большинство участников рынка делали ставку на семью Чайки.

Когда убили человек Чайки Газизова, все просто «открыли рты» и ждали развития событий. Но их не произошло. По словам источника Rucriminal.info, в семье Чаек сочли, что всех денег не заработаешь, а жизнь одна. И просто отказались от зарабатывания на реализации конфискованного имущества. И правильно сделали. После этого были убиты еще немало игроков, в том числе чиновников. Что касается убийства Газизова, хотя все знали, кто стоит за преступлением, оно очень долго оставалось не раскрытым. А потом в один момент Костя Больше перестал быть удобными и нужным и его «закрыли».

Что касается событий, которые привели у убийству Газизова, то развивались они следующим образом.

Константин Пискарев


В 2004 году ГКС (Пискарев и Ко) и перепала настоящая «золотая жила» — арестованное имущество создателя компании Golden ADA Андрея Козленка. Последний был участником мега-аферы. С разрешения главы Роскомдрагмета Евгения Бычкова, в США была создана фирма Golden ADA, которой передали ценности из Гохарна на 180 млн долл (золотые монеты, старинную серебряную посуду, ювелирные изделия с драгоценными камнями). Официально стоимость груза была оценена в $180 млн, но оперативники подозревали, что их реальная цена превышала $1 млрд. Ценности были проданы, а деньги в Россию так и не поступили. Всех чиновников вывели из уголовного дела, Козленка суд приговорил к шести с половиной годам колонии.

Место убийства Марата Газизова




Кроме того, служители Фемиды удовлетворили иск о взыскании с Андрея Козленка 54 млн рублей. В счет этого иска был наложен арест на семь элитных квартир в Москве, принадлежавших Козленку. Костя Большой и член его ОПГ Сергей Безруков договорились, что недвижимость уйдет через «Глобальный компьютерный сервис» (ГКС). Но тут вмешался директор Научного центра правовой информации при Минюсте РФ (НЦПИ) Марат Газизов. Он стал требовать, чтобы имущество ушло через НЦПИ. Во время встречи он поделился информацией о махинациях с сотрудником Управления «М» ФСБ РФ, который надзирал за Минюстом. После этого Пискарев и решил с ним расправиться. Он оделся в черную потрепанную одежду. Прикинулся бродягой и лег у подъезда Газизова. Когда за тем приехала служебная машина, Костя Большой расстрелял его из пистолета.

После убийства Газизова ГКС было переоформлено любителя выпить Алексея Пошкуса, квартиры были проданы за $4,7 млн. Из них 300 тыс. ушли посреднику, 600 тыс. Безруков присвоил, а остальное досталось Косте Большому. В бюджет поступило всего 24 тыс. рублей.

Rucriminal.info знакомит читателей с ранее не публиковавшимися показаниями обвиняемых и свидетелей по делу Кости Большого.

Показания свидетеля Беленко Л.В., согласно которым в день убийства Газизова М.Ф., 20.05.2004, свидетель занималась уличной торговлей рядом со станцией Московского метрополитена «Проспект Мира- радиальная». Примерно в 9 часом 15 минут 9 часов 30 минут Беленко пошла к мусорным контейнерам, расположенным во дворе дома N 49 на проспекте Мира. Там Беленко увидела мужчину, стоявшего рядом с автомобилем «Волга». Внезапно к этому мужчине сбоку подбежал другой мужчина в одежде темного цвета с капюшоном на голове и маской на лице. Этот мужчина выстрелил три раза в стоявшего рядом с «Волгой» мужчину, который после выстрелов упал на асфальт. Стрелявший мужчина отбежал примерно 3 метра, затем вернулся и выстрелил еще один раз, после чего побежал между домами в сторону ул. Гиляровского.

Показания свидетеля Зонова П.В., о том, что 20.05.2004, примерно в 10 часов, он курил вместе с Гузиковым Сергеем и Костровым Сергеем возле входе в магазин «Чип и Дип». В это время они услышали сначала один выстрел, а затем еще не менее трех выстрелов со стороны домов на проспекте Мира. Через 20-30 секунд со стороны дворов домов, откуда звучали выстрелы, выбежал мужчина высокого роста, массивного телосложения, одетый в куртку черного цвета, его лицо было скрыто. За ним следом бежал другой мужчина. Убегавший мужчина подбежал к проезжей части на ул. Гиляровского и сел в автомобиль ВАЗ 2109, который резко тронулся с места и поехал в сторону Московской области. Преследовавший его мужчина подошел к свидетелю и на вопрос, что случилось, сказал, что «завалили шефа».

Показания свидетеля Булгакова Ю.В., согласно которым в 2003 году в Департамент финансов Москвы пришло письмо из Мосгорсуда или МВД о том, что есть конфискованное имущество в виде семи квартир, подлежащее обращению в доход государства. Булгаков направил запрос в Мосгорсуд на копию приговора, после чего с ним связался заместитель руководителя РФФИ, который представил ему Безрукова С.А.. и сказал, что он будет заниматься реализацией этих квартир. В ходе общения Безруков С.А. представил Булгакову устав ООО «Глобальный компьютерный сервис» и аккредитацию при РФФИ. Безруков С.А. познакомил Булгакова с мужчиной высокого роста, которого представил как сотрудника ФСБ, который будет оказывать помощь в реализации квартиры. Булгаков и этот мужчина также встречались в ресторане «Щит и меч», и на встрече обсуждалась реализация квартир. В мае 2004 года судебный пристав Кельдюшев или Безруков С.А. принес ему на подпись акт о передаче имущества на ответственное хранение от Гогия в Департамент финансов. Булгаков подписал этот акт и поставил на нем печать Департамента финансов, после чего отдал акт вероятно Безрукову С.А.

Показания Земцова Д.А. в качестве подозреваемого, согласно которым со слов Пискарева К.Ю. ему известно, что 20.05.2004 на проспекте Мира убили «какого-то татарина», мешавшего Безрукову С.А. в сфере деятельности ООО «Глобальный компьютерный сервис» по реализации арестованного и конфискованного имущества. Пискарев рассказывал, что сам застрелил этого человека, к месту убийства его привез Сарьян, а Александров был «на подстраховке». Также Земцов пояснил, что деятельностью «Глобальный компьютерный сервис» сначала занимались Безруков С.А. и Федосеев, у которых в службе судебных приставов был свой человек (заместитель главного судебного пристава города Москвы Плехов Константин).





Продолжение следует

Арсений Дронов

Deadly brawl in the classified section of the Russian Embassy

"They concealed the statement so that Bastrykin A.I. did not find out about inaction."





There was a huge scandal among the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation and partly the special services. Right in the building of the Russian Embassy in Egypt, the head of the department brutally beat his subordinate, but also tried to strangle him. But these are only flowers, and the fruit of this story lies in the fact that the department itself and all its employees are absolutely classified. So much so that even the name of the department cannot appear anywhere. The reason for the beating is also not trivial. The head of the department, Kuznetsov, demanded that Matveyev's subordinate destroy (burn) documents labeled "Special Importance" to which Matveyev simply did not have access. Having no legal truth even to touch these documents, Matveyev refused, which caused an unexplainable fit of rage in Kuznetsov. He began to demand that his order be fulfilled, regardless of whether it was legal or not. Fists were used as a persuasion, and then a strangulation by force. At the embassy, ​​everyone gave explanations that, of course, Matveyev was right in that story. The attack on him is generally inexplicable. However, instead of conducting an investigation into the incident, the embassy chose to "hush up" the scandal by sending Matveyev to Moscow. In Moscow, the Foreign Ministry decided to "hush up" the story. However, beaten for refusing to carry out an illegal order, the employee continued to fight for justice. Matveev, via the Internet, at the reception of the official website of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, reported the indicated crime (reference number 722930), to which he received a response from 20.07. Moscow, from where, as a result, this statement, without registration and carrying out any verification measures, was sent to the internal affairs bodies, namely to the Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Arbat district of Moscow, where the district representative A.A. Berestneva, without conducting any verification measures, indicating false information in procedural documents, issued a resolution refusing to initiate a criminal case.



Now the telegram channel VChK-OGPU and Rucriminal.info will tell this story in detail.

03/15/2020, in the period from 09 hours 30 minutes to 10 hours 30 minutes

chief specialist-expert of the department (whose name is classified and is information classified as a state secret) of the Russian Embassy in Egypt V.A. ., gave the latter, as an employee subordinate to him, an order to destroy official documents labeled "Of particular importance", which, according to his official regulations, as well as other regulations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia, he had to destroy on his own, excluding access to these documents by unauthorized persons , including Matveeva A.N. Understanding the illegality of the requirements of V.A. Kuznetsov, A.N. Matveev. responded to the latter with a refusal, referring to the regulations governing the procedure for the destruction of official documents with a stamp of "Special importance", thus indicating the justification for his refusal.

At the indicated moment, that is, at the time of the performance of organizational and administrative functions in a state body and in connection with their implementation, V.A. Kuznetsov, dissatisfied with the refusal of A.N. Matveev. to fulfill his requirements in the service, a criminal intent arose aimed at committing actions that no one under any circumstances has the right to commit, that is, actions clearly outside the scope of his authority, namely the use of violence against A.N. Matveev, for whom he was the boss in his official position.



Immediately realizing his criminal intent, 03/15/2020, in the time period from 09 hours 30 minutes to 10 hours 30 minutes (Coordinated Universal Time +2), the chief specialist-expert of the department (the name of which is classified and is information classified as state secrets) of the Embassy Russia in Egypt Kuznetsov V.A., being in the office of the department (the name of which is classified and is information classified as a state secret) of the Russian Embassy in Egypt, located at the address: Arab Republic of Egypt, mountains. Cairo, st. Giza, 95, acting out of the falsely understood interests of the service, in order to teach a lesson for disobedience to the expert-expert A.N. Matveev, to show his imaginary superiority over him and to subordinate him to his will, being in the performance of his official duties, realizing that he is performing actions, which no one under any circumstances has the right to commit, that is, actions that clearly go beyond the powers granted to him by law, realizing the social danger and unlawfulness of his actions, anticipating the onset of socially dangerous consequences, in the form of a violation of the rights and legitimate interests of A.N. , society and the state as a whole, and wanting their offensive, acting deliberately, approached Matveev A.N. and with forcefully grabbed the latter by the neck, thus restricting the access of oxygen to the lungs of A.N. Matveev, knocking down A.N. on the floor, which is why the latter, when falling, hit various parts of the body against objects of the surrounding environment and felt physical pain. Immediately after that, acting in the continuation of the implementation of his above-mentioned criminal intent, Kuznetsov V.A., acting out of the falsely understood interests of the service, in order to teach a lesson for disobedience to the specialist expert A.N. Matveev, to show his imaginary superiority over him and to subordinate him to his will, being in the performance of his official duties, realizing that he commits actions that no one under any circumstances has the right to perform, that is, actions that clearly go beyond the powers granted to him by law, realizing the social danger and illegality of his actions, anticipating the onset of social dangerous consequences, in the form of a violation of the rights and legitimate interests of A.N. Matveev, society and the state as a whole, and wanting their offensive, acting deliberately, holding the latter by the neck with force, thereby restricting the access of oxygen to the lungs of A.N. Matveev, with one hand let go of the neck of A.N.Matveev, who was actively resisting him, holding and squeezing the neck of the latter with the second hand, inflicted with the fist of his free hand at least four blows to the head of A.N. Matveev. Immediately after that, Kuznetsov V.A. acting in the continuation of his criminal intent, he again grabbed A.N. Matveev with his arms. behind the neck, which limited the access of oxygen to the lungs of A.N. Matveeva, while expressing threats of physical harm to the latter.

By his aforementioned unlawful actions, V.A. Kuznetsov. caused Matveev A.N. physical pain and injuries in the form of: swelling of soft tissues, several punctate abrasions with bruises, two linear abrasions in the frontal region on the right; swelling of soft tissues, two linear abrasions and small punctate bruises on the anterior surface in the region of the left shoulder joint; swelling of tissues, linear abrasion to the left of the midclavicular line in the region of the left clavicle; moderately pronounced swelling of soft tissues, abrasions on the right in the neck, along the back surface of the sternoclavicular muscle with a transition to the anterior surface of the neck on the right; multiple abrasions and swelling of soft tissues on the anterolateral surface of the neck on the left, in the submandibular region and at the level of the thyroid cartilage; area with soft tissue edema in the right half of the chest, in the projection of 6-7 ribs, along the antero-axillary line, which significantly violated the rights and legitimate interests of A.N. Matveev, in particular the constitutional right to the inviolability of the person and personal dignity, as well as Significantly undermined the authority of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, discrediting the authority of public authorities in the eyes of employees of the Russian Embassy in Egypt and the public, thereby violating the principle of legality in the activities of a state body of the Russian Federation, established by Article 15 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which entailed a significant violation of legally protected interests society and state.

Thus, the actions of Vladimir Aleksandrovich Kuznetsov can be regarded as falling under article of the Criminal Code 286, namely, the commission by an official of actions that clearly go beyond his powers and entail a significant violation of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens protected by law interests of society and the state, committed with the use of violence.



According to the documents that are at the disposal of Rucriminal.info, the above circumstances are confirmed by the explanation of A.N. Matveev, a certificate from a specialist doctor at the Embassy of Ataev I.R., who examined him immediately after the use of violence by V.A. Kuznetsov.

According to the specified certificate compiled by I.R. Ataev. according to the results of a medical examination of A.N. Matveev, the latter was diagnosed with bodily injuries, the nature and localization of which testify to the mechanism of their formation under the circumstances described by A.N. Matveev.

The fact that it was Kuznetsov V.A. caused Matveev A.N. These bodily injuries are confirmed by the explanations of the employee of the Embassy, ​​Sedov A.S., who directly indicates the absence of A.N. injuries before the start of the working day 03/15/2020, as well as their presence immediately after A.N. Matveev proceeded to the office of A.S. Sedov. after unlawful actions by V.A. Kuznetsov. in the period from 09:00 to 10:30 on 03/15/2020, where, in the presence of other employees of the embassy, ​​he asked for help and told about the above circumstances. The fact that it was Kuznetsov V.A. was the initiator of a conflict situation, during which he inflicted on Matveev A.N. the indicated bodily injuries, and Matveev A.N., did not initiate any violence against him, is confirmed by the absence of V.A. Kuznetsov. bodily injury, the mechanism of formation of which would indicate proactive and offensive use of violence against the latter by A.N. Matveev. In addition, V.A. Kuznetsov after the incident, he did not apply to the law enforcement agencies about the incident, which indicates the absence of reasons and grounds for such an appeal.

The fact that Kuznetsov V.A. is an official indicates that he holds the position of the head of a department in a state body - the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, performs organizational and administrative functions, the implementation of which, in relation to the provisions of Chapter 30 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, means, in particular, the management of a team, the organization of labor or the service of subordinates , maintaining discipline, applying incentive measures and imposing disciplinary sanctions, which are part of the official duties of V.A. Kuznetsov.

Embassy officials confirm that personal hostile relations between A.N. and Kuznetsov V.A. were not, in any relationship not related to the performance of official duties, they were not, communicated only about their work in the Embassy as a leader and subordinate. This circumstance confirms that Kuznetsov V.A. applied in relation to Matveev A.N. violence, both against an employee subordinate to him in connection with the performance of his official duties and for purposes related to the resolution of just official issues. This circumstance indicates that the violence of V.A. Kuznetsov applied to Matveev V.A. precisely in connection with the implementation of their official activities, and not on personal grounds. Kuznetsov V.A. demanded from Matveev A.N. performing actions due to service necessity, gave A.N. Matveev. instructions on the destruction of official documents, that is, he made demands solely on the basis of his official powers and in the interests of the civil service. These requirements Kuznetsov V.A. showed Matveev A.N. immediately before using violence to that. These circumstances indicate that V.A. Kuznetsov by his actions, he committed a crime against state power and the interests of the state service, namely, he exceeded his official powers in connection with the implementation of organizational and administrative functions in the department of the Russian Embassy in Egypt of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, which entails liability on the basis and within the limits provided for by criminal legislation ... At the same time, the object of a crime in cases of this kind, and in this case in particular, is the activity of the governing bodies in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation carried out in accordance with the legislation in order to solve the tasks determined by their purpose. From the foregoing it follows that in this case the criminal encroachment is carried out not only on the rights and interests of my personality, but also on another object, different from the person, protected by law in the form of normal, that is, the activity of a specific link of the state apparatus of power carried out in accordance with the legislation and management, and the victim directly acts only as an additional objective manifestation of this encroachment.

Thus, these illegal actions Kuznetsov V.A. cannot be qualified, under Art. 111-116 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as crimes against the person, and are subject to strict qualifications, as a crime against the order of government in a state body, that is, as a crime provided for in paragraph "a" of Part 3 of Art. 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, in connection with which a legal assessment of his actions should be given by employees of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation.

Taking into account the above circumstances, 04/29/2020 Matveev A.N. informed about the specified crime committed by V.A. Kuznetsov. by calling the hotline of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, Moscow metro station - 8 (495) 6902528. This message was not registered in accordance with the established procedure, the applicant did not receive any notification of its consideration.

In this regard, on 07/01/2020 Matveev A.N., through the form of electronic appeal via the Internet, the reception of the official website of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation reported the indicated crime (Application number 722930), to which he received a response from 07/20/2020, according to which this statement was redirected in the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Russia in the mountains. Moscow, from where, as a result, this statement, without registration and carrying out any verification measures, was sent to the internal affairs bodies, namely to the Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Arbat district of Moscow, where the district representative A.A. Berestneva, without conducting any verification measures, indicating false information in procedural documents, issued a resolution refusing to initiate a criminal case.

As a result, after the direction of A.N. 09/28/2020 statements about this crime to the Presnensky Interdistrict Investigation Department of the Investigative Department of the Central Administrative District of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the city of Moscow, this statement containing signs of a crime under clause "a" part 3 of Article 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, in violation of the provisions of Instrument n the organization of reception, registration and verification of reports of a crime in the investigative bodies (investigative units) of the system of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation (approved by order of the Investigative Committee of Russia dated 11.10.2012 No. 72), as well as Art. 151 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, was not registered in the register of reports on crimes of the said territorial investigative body of the TFR, but was sent on November 12, 2020 without registration and carrying out any verification measures to the Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Arbat district of Moscow.

In addition, on 07.12.2020, when Matveev A.N. at a personal meeting with the head of the Presnensky Interdistrict Investigation Department of the Directorate for the Central Administrative District of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the city of Moscow Idrisova Venera Rushanovna for explanations in this part (regarding the illegal refusal to register the indicated crime reports and the verification in accordance with Article 144-145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation), the latter, without studying the statement of A.N. Matveev, carrying out any verification measures, informed the latter that the prospects for initiating a criminal case under paragraph "a" of Part 3 of Art. 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, according to the application filed reflecting the real circumstances of the crime, she does not see, since she is more inclined to believe VA Kuznetsov, placing the latter in a privileged position for unknown reasons. This circumstance is confirmed by the available at the disposal of A.N. Matveev. audio recording.

At the same time, after the above appeal, Matveev A.N. for a personal appointment with the head of the Presnensky MRSO Idrisova V.R. So, 12/13/2020, through the postal service A.N. Matveev. received a notification from the Presnensky MRDO SU for the Central Administrative District of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Russia for the city of Moscow, according to which the above statement was registered in the register of reports of crimes of this investigative body, after which it was sent for verification to the Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Presnensky District of Moscow in accordance with the provisions of Art. ... 151 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. This notice is dated 11/27/2020, however, the calendar stamp (used to indicate on the postal item and other postal document the time of its receipt and sending to the addressee), the imprint of which was printed on the envelope by the employees of the Russian Post, indicates that this notice was actually drawn up and sent to A.N. Matveev. only on 11.12.2020, that is, after the last personal reception of the head of the Presnensky MRCO, Idrisova V.R., who by her actions clearly withdrew from the procedural check on this crime statement, which grossly violated the rights and legitimate interests of the applicant, guaranteed to me part 1 Art. 45 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

These circumstances directly indicate the fact that the execution of Idrisova V.R. and her subordinate employees of the official duties assigned to them by law, in terms of checking the message about what was committed against A.N. Matveev. a crime under paragraph. "a" h. 3 Article. 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, at the moment it is impossible due to a biased, subjective, not based on an objective verification in accordance with the law and the principle of justice, attitude towards the latter.

12/14/2020, on the basis of Part 1 of Art. 45 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, in accordance with which state protection of human and civil rights and freedoms in the Russian Federation is guaranteed, by A.N. Matveev, addressed to A.I. Bastrykin, Chairman of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation. a statement was sent with the necessary attachments confirming his arguments regarding the commission of the above crime against him, with a request to organize a full and comprehensive check by the forces of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation on the above circumstances in accordance with Art. 140-145 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, and involve V.A. Kuznetsov. for committing a crime under paragraph "a" of Part 3 of Art. 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation to criminal liability.

However, this statement was not registered in the accounting documents of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation in accordance with the procedure established by law, no verification was carried out on this statement, the location of this statement is currently not known.

This illegal inaction of the Chairman of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation was appealed against by A.N. Matveev. in the manner prescribed by Article 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation to the Khamovnichesky District Court of the city of Moscow. On July 7, 2021, a court hearing was held in this judicial body on this complaint, as a result of which the complaint was transferred by jurisdiction to the Basmanny District Court of the mountains. Moscow.

Despite the fact that Article 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation provides for the consideration of a complaint about illegal inaction of employees of the preliminary investigation bodies within three days, on July 20, 2021, at the court session this complaint was not considered by the court, since neither the employees of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, nor the employees of the prosecutor's office could not establish the actual the location of the aforementioned crime statement filed with the Chairman of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation. At the same time, under a formal pretext, consideration of the complaint was postponed due to the failure of the prosecutor to appear, which is not provided for by law.

08/05/2021, without establishing the actual location of the said statement of A.N. Matveev. about a crime filed in the name of the Chairman of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, without examining this application and the decision taken on it during the court session, which is confirmed by the materials of the court case on the consideration of the complaint, the Basmanny District Court refused to satisfy this complaint. At the same time, the court decision of any information about the examination of the application dated 12/14/2021, filed by A.N. Matveev. in the RF IC does not contain, the subject of the judicial appeal was actually changed by the judge. This circumstance clearly indicates that the statement of the crime was either lost by the employees of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation or deliberately destroyed by the employees of this law enforcement agency for unknown reasons.

08/06/2021, in order to appeal against an illegal court decision, A.N. Matveev submitted a petition to familiarize himself with the minutes of the court session and the material on the consideration of the complaint, with the aim of appealing an obviously illegal decision of the court of first instance. With repeated appearances, Matveeva A.N. in court, under various pretexts, he was denied access to these materials, and only after contacting the qualification collegium of judges of the mountains. Moscow, which recognized violations in the actions of employees of the Basmanny District Court, Matveev A.N. I was able to get acquainted with the specified materials on 10.11.2021. This happened under the following circumstances.

08/11/2021, taking into account the specified behavior of the employees of this judicial body, clearly illegally delaying the time for acquaintance with A.N. Matveev. with materials on the consideration of the complaint in order to suppress the appeal of the unlawful decision of the court by the latter, Matveev A.N. submitted through the system GAS "Justice" an appeal against the said decision of the Basmanny District Court. At the same time, for some unknown reason, this complaint was not registered and was ignored until the decision came into legal force, as a message appeared on the court's website.

08/31/2021 Matveev A.N. a complaint was filed with the VKKS about the refusal to register the appeal by the Basmanny District Court.

10/13/2021 Matveev A.N. received a response from the VKKS dated 10/7/2021, according to which the board confirmed the existence of violations and obliged the Basmanny Court to give an answer to the issues indicated in the complaint by 10/21/2021, namely to inform A.N. Matveev. with the materials of the case for the consideration of the complaint and register his appeal.

11/12/2021 Matveev A.N. from the Basmanny District Court received a notification dated 10.11.2021 signed by I.O. Chairman I.V. Vyryshyv, according to which measures were taken to eliminate the violations identified and the appeal Matveev A.N. registered, in fact, retroactively, namely on August 17, 2021. It was also stated in this notification that the complaint would be forwarded to the Moscow City Court, where it would be considered on 8.12.2021. After that, on the website of the Basmanny District Court, the decision on the complaint of Matveev A, N. changed from "effective" to "appealed".

From the above, it is not clear that the employees of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, for obvious reasons, concealed the indicated statement of the crime from registration, took illegal measures to conceal this fact in court, when considering the complaint, in order to conceal their illegal inaction from the Chairman of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation Bastrykin A. .AND.









Timofey Grishin

To be continued