How a deal with the investigation made an innocent "sheep" out of a killer
Rucriminal.info continues the epic about the gang of the once one of the most sinister Lyubertsy "authorities" Mikhail Mikhailov, nicknamed Don't wake up. He got it for the corresponding tattoo made right on the eyelids. In the third part of the investigation, we will talk about the private owner of the gang, who entered into a pre-trial agreement and testified against other bandits. Very handy readings.
Separately, in such a complex and terrible story, it is necessary to note Sadovsky Mikhail Alekseevich. He is a truly unique person. That's it with a capital letter.
For it is simply impossible to call it “luck” in another way.
This is exactly the case when, with an acute lack of evidence, the investigation and the court are ready to turn a blind eye to everything. The main thing is to “finish” the investigation, send the case to court and get a “fair” verdict.
As we said earlier, the main members of the gang were detained on March 18, 2009. Immediately after the arrest, Sadovsky (aka Sedoy) began to actively cooperate with the investigation. By concluding a pre-trial cooperation agreement in the future. But this cooperation was very filigree. Bypassing sharp and dangerous corners with jeweler's precision. Sharp and dangerous for Sedoy.
So, during the interrogation, Sedoy "accidentally" did not indicate that he lived for more than 3 years on the passport of the murdered Akinshin S.V., pasting his photograph into it. Yes, not just lived, but got married, changed his surname to Kazakov, received a residence permit. It is worth noting that at the time of Sedym's testimony, the investigation knew for certain that for a long time he lived under the passport of S.V. Akinshina, both during the latter's lifetime and after his death. Well, how could the investigation be interested in such “trifles”?! Investigator P.I. Filippchuk was not interested in the fact, using what documents Sedoy drove the car at the moment when, from his (Sedoy) testimony, Akinshin S.V. was killed. And from the testimony of Sedoy it follows that at the time of the murder of Akinshin S.V., there were three of them: Sedoy, Mikhailov M.V. and Akinshin S.V. Gray-haired was driving, and Mikhailov M.V. and Akinshin S.V. was driving behind. Moreover, one of the main tasks of the investigation is to establish the motive for the committed crime, especially such as murder. As you know, the motive is suddenly arisen and pre-planned. In this particular case, the investigation considered that the motive for the murder of Akinshina S.V. for Mikhailov M.V. it turned out that he (Akinshin S.V.) insulted him as an authority. It is worth noting that the prosecution Mikhailov M.The. in the murder of Akinshina S.V., built ONLY!!!!!! on the testimony of Sadovsky M.A. There is no other evidence in the case. Neither direct nor indirect. And this despite the fact that Akinshin S.V. was the brother of Mikhailov's wife M.V., Elena. mother of his only child. But the fact that Sedoy lived according to the documents of Akinshin S.V. and the latter demanded that Sedoy stop this and return his documents to him, the investigation "did not establish."
Stability is a sign of excellence. And in the case of Sadovsky M.A. This proverb is 100% true.
Earlier, Rucriminal.info said that one of the episodes of the criminal activity of Misha’s “Don’t wake up” gang was the murder of Ostrovsky V.Yu., committed on 08/31/2004. take over office space. This motive was established, after giving Sadovsky M.A. "confessional" testimony. In which he described in detail, “honestly”, consistently how Mikhailov M.V. decided to kill V.Yu. Ostrovsky in order to take over the office. Well, he (Sadovsky M.A.) just told about it as a close friend. No, no, Mikhail Alekseevich was a law-abiding citizen, and did not participate in anything illegal, especially in murders. This is how one of his (Sedoy's) interrogations begins. Now, let's raise the curtain a little. As it follows from the official extract from the Unified State Register of Real Estate Registers, on November 30, 2007, the share owners of a part of the office premises simultaneously became: Gumnikov A.S., Mikhailov M.V., Sadovskaya O.V. (wife of Sadovsky M.A.) and Drozdov A.M. Currently, Sadovskaya O.V. surname Semenikhin, but more on that later. And what a misfortune… Gumnikov, Mikhailov and Drozdov are charged with the murder of Ostrovsky V.Yu. in order to take possession of a share in that very office, but Sadovsky did not. Mystic! And this despite the fact that the episode with the murder of Ostrovsky V.Yu. directly based on the "true" testimony of Sadovsky M.A. There is no other real evidence obtained in accordance with the requirements of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation regarding the episode with the murder of V.Yu. Ostrovsky. That is, the investigation, the court of first instance and the court of appeal agreed that 3 people were killed, and the object of the criminal encroachment was registered for 4. Well, just for being the fourth good friend. Indeed, why not. Everything is simple. But as if not quite ... .. In one of the recent evening video conversations, Sadovsky M.A. Marchuk N.A. tells in detail. (ex-wife of Mikhailov M.V.), that the office was “messed up” he (Sedoy) and Mikhailov M.V. TOGETHER!!!! And no one else has anything to do with him. And only Sedoy and Mikhailov M.V. should also receive a share of the rent. Joke??? Joke!!! And there is also a video conversation between Marchuk N.A. and the founder of Gulag.net Vladimir Osechkin, during which Marchuk N.K. reports that he regularly transfers money to Sedom for his share in that same office space. Do you think that's all?! It wasn't there...
Another of the episodes of the murders, for which members of the Mikhailov M.V. brigade were convicted, is the murder of V.M. Danilin. committed on August 30, 2007. And everything is according to the old scheme. The "frank" testimony of Sedoy formed the basis of the guilty verdict. And he (Gray), as in previous cases, did not participate in anything. It's just that he, white and fluffy, was initiated into his affairs by his killer friends. But he is not, an honest man. But here again there is a nuance. All in the same confidential video conversation that was filmed on video by one of the parties. Sadovsky M.A. claims: that Gumnikov A.S. had nothing to do with the “case”, and received a share of $ 25,000 because he was a friend. And there is also an audio recording on which Marchuk N.A. claims that she personally shared the money for the sold apartment of Danilin V.M. and handed them out to the participants. And one of these participants was Sadovsky M.A. In his "sincere" testimony, about receiving money for the sold apartment Danilina V.M. Gray-haired naturally did not report. Lucky fellow, do not say anything. Under the noise of this wave, the investigators lost interest in the information obtained during the ORM that the murder of Danilin V.M. involved c. Kryuchkov A.A. Probably the investigation came to the conclusion that if the "witness" Sadovsky M.A. about Kryuchkov A.A. did not report anything, so the results of the ORM do not correspond to reality.
But on the episode of the murder of Vakulin D.S. our "hero" did not bother with a detailed narrative about the terrible crimes that "accidentally" became known to him. He simply answered the question of the investigator what he knew about the murder of Vakulin D.S., he answered: during a telephone conversation with Mikhailov M.V. from the latter, it became known to me that Vakulina D.S. shot from a machine gun. Everything! No comment.
Recall: previously repeatedly convicted of grave and especially grave crimes, with a conviction that has not been expunged and not extinguished, for committing a murder for hire by a group of people, participating in a gang, robbery with a weapon, using violence dangerous to life and health, illegal possession of weapons, received 5 (five) years in prison.
One of the operatives leading the operational support of the criminal case of the Mikhailov gang was Semenikhin A.V. When conducting a search in the apartment of Sadovsky M.A. one of the o / s was Semenikhin A.V. Who had a lightning-fast romance with the already ex-wife of Sadovsky M.A., Oksana. Relations Semenikhina A.V. and Sadovskaya Oksana developed rapidly, which resulted in the registration of marriage between Semenikhin A.V. and Oksana (already Semenikhina). But the very savor of this happy marriage is that, after the release of Sadovsky M.A. from the colony (in 2014), the newlyweds urged the latter to confirm all the “true” testimony given at the preliminary investigation, but already in court. And in return for him (Sadovsky M.A.), the Semenikhins promised a life sentence for Mikhailov M.V. and receiving half of the property of Mikhailov M.V. to Sedym, to which Sedy agreed. Having come to court with his own feet, as a witness for the prosecution, Sedoy simply refused to answer any questions. Referring to the provisions of Art. 51 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. But here's the problem again. The right to use the norm of Art. 51 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, witnesses in criminal proceedings are not endowed. Moreover, art. 308 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation provides for the responsibility of a witness for refusing to testify. However, neither the prosecutor Karapetyan D.Oh., nor the presiding judge Vyunov A.The. did not respond in any way to the fundamental violation of the Law, witness Sadovsky M.A. As soon as the Semenikhins found out that Sedoy had not retracted his earlier testimony, he was sent away for a long time. With a brief reminder that in case of bad behavior, he (Sedoy) will be promptly returned to places of detention. Since everyone knows how “honestly” he fulfilled the conditions of the pre-trial cooperation agreement concluded with him.
This is how the testimony of one “sincere” person becomes an iron-concrete basis for a sentence with 2 life terms.
But these are all things of the past. And there is what is called at the top. As we wrote earlier, Mikhailov M.V. is currently in jail, in connection with the investigation of a criminal case. In this criminal case Mikhailov M.The. is the accused. The latter fully admits his guilt, cooperates with the investigation, he has written a confession. Also with Mikhailov M.V. on-site verification was carried out. In the course of investigative actions, from the beginning of August 2022, Mikhailov M.V. informed the investigation about the persons involved in the commission of this crime and their role in the commission of this crime. However, to date, none of those indicated by Mikhailov M.V. persons were not detained and not interrogated. In the decision to attract as the accused, only one surname of the accomplice, now deceased, appears. The rest are unidentified persons. Although Mikhailov M.V. given clear, consistent evidence that is logical and consistent with other materials of the case. Or maybe it is again beneficial for the preliminary investigation bodies not to notice something?
To be continued
Arseny Dronov
Source: www.rucriminal.info
