How Real Estate and Business Are Being Taken Away in Crimea

"More than 350 people were included in the list of those "planning and committing terrorist attacks”



Rukriminal.info has already reported on stories of absolutely illegal seizures of property from residents of Crimea or non-Crimeans developing their businesses on the peninsula more than once. Expropriations are carried out according to a tried and tested scheme that is not stressful for the expropriators. First, a list of attractive property is compiled (based on the interests of "their own", local or capital customers who want to get something Crimean for free). Then a meeting of the regional anti-terrorist commission is appointed, which includes representatives of the regional government, deputies and security officials (headed, of course, by Aksyonov himself). The commission includes all owners of expropriated real estate in the number of people whose plans include, according to the convictions of this vigilant company, we quote, "planning to carry out terrorist attacks" (and other evil plans to undermine the foundations of the state). As a result: all the property in real life of completely law-abiding citizens is unanimously sentenced to confiscation. Initially in favor of the Republic of Crimea. With subsequent redistribution in favor of their "guys" or no less their status "ladies". Interested legal entities can also receive their share of the confiscated property. The number of "those plotting terrorist attacks" is growing. And today, in fact, no one who owns anything decent in Crimea is insured against getting on the lists of the republican anti-terrorist "get-together".

The speed of emergence of new property rights was not even dreamed of by the fairy-tale Vasilisa. She asked for at least a night for the facility being put into operation, that is, 8-10 hours. And here "palaces" and "crystal bridges" appear for new owners in 10-15 minutes - in the time it takes to put the necessary signatures of the commission members under the prepared papers.

For a long time, this practice worked quite effectively. Although the former owners tried to fight before. They appealed to common sense. It is still strange when a person is almost directly accused of preparing terrorist attacks, but then people in balaclavas do not come for him to arrest, investigate and then try him with a harsh sentence. But all these "accusatory formulations" are not for investigators of the Investigative Committee or the FSB - they are to justify the squeezing out of someone's "own" property that caught their eye. Attempts to appeal to regional courts predictably ended in nothing. The republican justice system has been protecting the interests of businessmen-officials for years. Citizens who lost their real estate or their business came to the sad conclusion: unfortunately, there is no "reception" against Aksyonov's "crowbar".

And almost all this time, the confiscation workers felt quite confident, believing that Aksyonov is like a Kremlin creature, and all such murky issues can be resolved with one call to his curators. Since we have described the details of these illegal seizures more than once, representatives of the Interregional Center for Forensic Expertise and Evaluation, who became interested in the trend, did not need to describe the situation in their requests to the Chairman of the Russian Government Mikhail Mishustin, the Minister of Finance Anton Siluanov, and the Chairman of the Central Bank Elvira Nabiullina. They simply provided a link to the texts of Rucriminal.info. "On July 10, 2024, a publication was posted on the Telegram social network in the public account "VChK-OGPU" (t.me/vckogpu), which contained a copy of the protocol of the Anti-Terrorist Commission in the Republic of Crimea dated October 20, 2023, in accordance with paragraph 2 of which the Commission agreed on the List of citizens of the Russian Federation, organizations, affiliated organizations and foreign persons, presumably belonging to foreign states, who are planning or committing unfriendly actions against the Russian Federation, its legal entities and individuals, including terrorist acts." The appeals stated that for the period from October 18, 2022 to August 15, 2024, more than 350 mainly Russian legal entities and individuals were added to the list of "planning and committing terrorist acts." The property included in this list has already been included in the list of property of the Republic of Crimea. And there are about a thousand such expropriated objects. The essence of the request: "Are the authorities of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation authorized to independently approve the Lists of legal entities and individuals to whom special economic measures are applied, listed in the Decree of the President No. 252 of 03.05.22? Do the special economic measures provided for by this Decree of the President provide for the emergence of the right of ownership of the Subject of the Russian Federation to movable and immovable property, shares in the authorized capital of Russian legal entities belonging to legal entities and individuals to whom special economic measures are applied? And can the list of special economic measures provided for by the Decree of the President No. 252 of 03.05.22 be expanded or supplemented by the authority of the Subject of the Russian Federation independently?" Forensic expert Epishko N.N., prepared The person who made these requests, of course, knows the laws of the Russian Federation well, and we have no doubt that she knew the answers to the questions posed in the appeals. But for Aksyonov and his accomplices-confiscators, "some" expert on Russian legislation is not an authority. Which, by the way, was proven during the recent elections of deputies of the republican parliament. The candidate - an employee of the Center for Forensic Expertise and Evaluation, even before the significant September election date, was crossed out from the list of candidates by the "correct" hand of the election commission. Why would any willful "unforeseen" deputy be needed in the Turkish delight parliamentary cohort of Crimea?

And just now a response was received from the Ministry of Finance to the lawyers' request.



There, Aksyonov was reminded that he and his anti-terrorist colleagues do not have the slightest authority over decisions that can only be made by the Government of the Russian Federation. And no such powers of state authorities or local government bodies are provided for by law.





After the Russian Government explained their place to the Crimean leadership, the traditional fuss began for officials and heads of services who have screwed up. Some members of the anti-terrorist commission now claim that they were not present at the meetings at all, and some hint that their signatures were forged. There is also some awkwardness in the courts of the peninsula, where they are not aware of Russian legislative norms. Well, how can we now explain the basis on which decisions were made recognizing the illegal actions of the anti-terrorist commission as legal? And how can we now enter into a squabble with the President of the Russian Federation and the Government of the country, proving that Aksyonov and his accomplices, greedy for other people's property, are wrong?











​

Yaroslav Mukhtarov

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Police chief shot in the stomach

TFR decided to "smear" the perpetrators

We return to the topic of the death of the head of the police department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Alexander Aksenov. The investigation regarded the incident as a hunting accident. They say that former policeman Yevgeny Piklovsky accidentally got into Aksenov. However, all the facts and circumstances indicate that a planned murder took place. How the employees of the ICR turned a blind eye to the obvious things in the new Rucriminal.info material.

On August 10, 2022, Alexander Aksenov, head of the police department of the Kyrinsky district of the Trans-Baikal Territory, was mortally wounded while hunting. The wound was inflicted while hunting (the exact location of the investigation has not been established) by a former police officer, and now the head of the security service of one of the local mines, Evgeny Piklovsky. An eyewitness or an accomplice in the crime was Piklovsky's friend Alexander Simonov.

Aksyonov was shot in the abdomen and died in the hospital. It was established by expert examination that the shot came from a weapon belonging to Piklovsky.

However, Piklovsky, as well as his accomplice, immediately informed the investigation that Aksenov had wounded himself by negligence with his own weapon. They told the same in the district hospital, where Aksenov was taken.

Piklovsky and Simonov adhered to this version until the results of a ballistic examination became known that the shot came from Piklovsky's weapon, and the nature of the wound precludes its independent infliction to the victims.

It is also noteworthy that Piklovsky got rid of the spent cartridge case, that is, from the most important evidence. And before the investigators examined the car, they completely washed it from all traces, in their opinion.



The following is also important: Piklovsky, having reached the place where there is a connection, did not call the police or the hospital, but his acquaintance, the chief doctor of the district hospital, Ivan Loginov. An eyewitness to the conversation told the investigation that Piklovsky asked not to tell anyone about the incident.

The head physician Loginov, knowing perfectly well how to act in such cases, did not register the call and did not report to the police. Both Loginov and Piklovsky knew that a helicopter had to be called in to rescue the wounded. Instead, Piklovsky and his comrade drove the wounded man along a broken road for about six hours. An ambulance moved towards them, secretly sent by the head physician Loginov. Moreover, it is not clear for what purpose Loginov replaced the ambulance driver on duty Ustyuzhin with another - with Zhuravlev. Apparently absolutely loyal. Since he never left the village of Kyra, the driver Zhuravlev never left.

It wasn't until about six hours later that a helicopter was called.

Thus, the behavior of Piklovsky, Simonov, as well as the head physician Loginov, indicates that, most likely, they did not need Aksenov to survive. In order to then put forward and defend the version of the accident.

A criminal case was initiated by the investigative department of the Investigative Committee for the Kyrinsky district of the Trans-Baikal Territory under article 109 of the Criminal Code - causing death by negligence.

However, then the case was withdrawn to the third department for especially important cases of the regional Investigative Committee, which qualified Piklovsky's actions under Article 111 of the Criminal Code - intentional infliction of grievous bodily harm, resulting in the death of the victim. The investigation established that Piklovsky deliberately fired a shot at Aksyonov from a personal firearm in the presence of Simonov. As a result, Aksyonov was inflicted with a penetrating gunshot wound through the abdomen, from which he died. Piklovsky was taken into custody.

And Simonov's actions were qualified under Article 316 of the Criminal Code - harboring a serious crime.

Piklovsky during the investigation, under pressure from evidence, changed his version of events - the alleged gunshot wound occurred when Piklovsky was transferring his weapon from the back seat of the car to the luggage compartment. Allegedly, the trigger of the weapon caught on some object, which is why the shot occurred. By negligence.

The totality of the facts indicated that, most likely, a planned murder had taken place. Otherwise, why change versions, destroy evidence, hide the incident from registration and create conditions for the death of the victim?

But then strange things began to happen with the criminal case.

The case was withdrawn to the second department for especially important cases of the IC of the region, where, for unknown reasons, the investigation considered Piklovsky's second version plausible. His actions again began to qualify as causing death by negligence. Moreover, the investigators of the third department did not make a reasoned decision to stop the prosecution under Article 111 Part 4 of the Criminal Code. Apparently there was nothing to motivate.

In order to give Piklovsky's version a plausible appearance, the investigators conducted an investigative experiment, during which Piklovsky, in an environment allegedly close to that which took place, showed how the wound occurred when the weapon was transferred from the back seat of the car to the trunk.

Any sane person understands that to carry out such an action was busy I eat meaningless. After all, the person involved, knowing for a long time all the conclusions of ballistic examinations, including the approximate distance from which the shot occurred, easily coordinates his version with the conclusions of the examinations.

And then the investigators took a completely ridiculous step - repeated examinations were appointed, the experts were asked whether Piklovsky's testimony during the investigative experiment was plausible. And the experts, realizing that it was not their competence to determine the question of whether a shot was fired intentionally or arbitrarily, answered in the manner necessary for the investigation and Piklovsky.

As a result, the criminal case went to court under Article 109 of the Criminal Code (Causing death by negligence), and against Simonov, the criminal prosecution was generally terminated.



The prosecutor of the region, despite all the odiousness of reclassification from a serious crime to a crime committed through negligence, approved the indictment.

The actions of the head physician of the district hospital Ivan Loginov did not receive any assessment at all. But in the normal course of the investigation, many questions should have arisen to him.

The victims filed statements addressed to the Prosecutor General Krasnov and the Chairman of the Investigative Committee Bastrykin demanding the need for an additional investigation by the federal center.





Roman Trushkin

To be continued

Source: www.rucriminal.info