Favorite Koreans Sergei Sobyanin: Gordeev, Muzychenko, Stepanova

The main developers of Moscow are fleeing to foreign jurisdictions



The VChK-OGPU Telegram channel learned that Pavel Te, co-owner of Capital Group, who applied for South Korean citizenship a few weeks after the outbreak of hostilities in Ukraine (in March 2022), received it already 3 months later through a simplified consideration procedure . Together with him, 29 more people applied for citizenship of this country, including all his closest relatives and nominees, as well as the CEO of Capital Group Valentina Stanovova and her family.



It is especially interesting that the list also includes the owner of PIK Group Sergey Gordeev and his wife. Almost all applicants (including Gordeev) acted under the simplified procedure for obtaining citizenship. Considering yesterday's deeply symbolic drone strike on Moscow City, which also damaged the Oko-2 tower, it can be said that Cho and Gordeev acted very presciently, attending to the creation of another alternate airfield.

Cho already has citizenship of Russia, Uzbekistan and a Spanish residence permit issued in the Balearic Islands. "Capital Group" is a company that is engaged in large-scale embezzlement of funds from the budget of Moscow and the federal budget under the auspices of a number of high-ranking officials. The account of funds withdrawn from state contracts and received as a result of overestimation of the cost of real estate sold to the state goes to many tens of billions of rubles. Capital Group employees are driven to rallies in support of the war. The owners themselves prefer to live in other countries.

Thus, the other two shareholders of Capital Group are Vladislav Doronin, a citizen of Sweden and a resident of Switzerland, and Eduard Berman, an Israeli citizen and a resident of Spain.

All these developers are favorites of Moscow Mayor Serey Sobyanin

As journalists found out, a business jet owned by Aman Resorts and its CEO Vladislav Doronin, who bought the Gorsuch Haus property on Mount Aspen last year for $76.5 million, has not been able to fly since November due to sanctions imposed on the operator of the aircraft by the Office US Treasury Department of Foreign Assets Control.

The Bombardier Global Express aircraft has been on the OFAC Nationals of Special Purpose list for nearly nine months. OFAC maintains a public sanctions database. The Aman aircraft is among eight aircraft operated and operated by Malta-based and Russian-based Emperor Aviation Ltd., which has also been sanctioned, according to OFAC.

OFAC said in November that it sanctioned Emperor Aviation because it coordinated luxury travel for relatives of Suleiman Kerimov. US sanctions have been imposed on Kerimov since 2018; following Russia's invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, the United States, the United Kingdom and the European Union identified Kerimov as an oligarch and ally of President Vladimir Putin.

In its November sanctions, OFAC added Kerimov's wife, son and two daughters to the list.

The tail number of the Aman aircraft, or N number, is 9H-AMN; the prefix "9H" indicates that the aircraft is registered in Malta, according to the Federal Aviation Administration. All eight aircraft operated by Emperor Aviation are based in Malta.

The documents found at Rucriminal.info indicate that Pavel Te was tried in his native Uzbekistan. On August 10, 1988, he was arrested and then sentenced to four years on charges of committing a crime under article 147 of the Soviet Criminal Code (Fraud committed on a large scale or by an organized group). The term of Pavel Cho was serving in ITK-29 of the city of Navoi, Uzbek SSR. And on February 16, 1990, the Navoi court decided to replace the remaining term (2 years 3 months 15 days) with a conditional one. Then he went to Bukhara, and then showed up in Russia and became a co-owner of Capital Group in 1993-1994. Remarkably, four years later, Pavel Te was registered with the IC as a convicted citizen. During the election as a deputy, the head of Capital Group forgot to indicate his criminal record.

One of the main defendants in the case of giving a bribe to employees of the TFR for the release of "authority" Andrei Kochuykov (Italian) was his friend, also an "authority" Oleg Sheykhametov (Oleg Sheikh). In recent years, the Sheikh has been engaged in business, primarily construction. And his partner in these projects was the co-owner of Capital group Pavel Te. In particular, Sheikh and Te had a joint project - the construction of the residential complex "Faces".





Roman Trushkin

To be continued

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Любимые корейцы Сергей Собянина: Гордеев, Музыченко, Степанова

Главные застройщики Москвы бегут в иностранные юрисдикции



Телеграм-каналу ВЧК-ОГПУ стало известно, что совладелец Капитал Груп Павел Тё, подавший прошение о получении гражданства Южной Кореи через несколько недель после начала боевых действий в Украине (в марте 2022 г.), получил его уже через 3 месяца посредством упрощенной процедуры рассмотрения. Вместе с ним прошения о получении гражданства этой страны подали еще 29 человек, включая всех его ближайших родственников и номиналов, а также генерального директора Капитал Груп Валентину Становову и ее семью.



Сергей Собянин




Особенно интересно, что в списке также значится владелец ГК ПИК Сергей Гордеев с супругой. Почти все заявители (включая Гордеева) действовали в рамках упрощенного порядка получения гражданства. Учитывая вчерашний глубоко символичный удар дрона по Москве Сити, нанесший повреждения и башне Око-2, можно сказать, что Тё и Гордеев поступили весьма прозорливо, озаботившись созданием еще одного запасного аэродрома.

У Тё уже имеется гражданства России, Узбекистана и испанский вид на жительство, выданный на Балеарских островах. "Капитал Групп" - это компания, которая занимается масштабными хищениями денежных средств из бюджета Москвы и федерального бюджета при покровительстве ряда высокопоставленных чиновников. Счет средствам, выведенным из государственных подрядов и полученных вследствие завышения стоимости проданных государству объектов недвижимости, идет на многие десятки миллиардов рублей. Сотрудников «Капитал Групп» сгоняют на митинги в поддержку войны. Сами же владельцы предпочитают жить в других странах.

Так, другие два акционера "Капитал Груп" - гражданин Швеции и резидент Швейцарии Владислав Доронин и гражданин Израиля и резидент Испании Эдуард Берман.

Все эти застройщики- любимчики мэра Москвы Серея Собянина

Как выяснили журналисты, бизнес-джет, принадлежащий Aman Resorts и ее генеральному директору Владиславу Доронину, купившему в прошлом году недвижимость Gorsuch Haus на горе Аспен за 76,5 млн долларов, не может летать с ноября из-за санкций, наложенных на оператора самолета Управлением по контролю за иностранными активами казначейства США.

Самолет Bombardier Global Express находится в списке «Граждан особого назначения» OFAC уже почти девять месяцев. OFAC имеет общедоступную базу данных санкций. Самолет Aman входит в число восьми самолетов, которые эксплуатировались и управлялись базирующейся на Мальте и в России компанией Emperor Aviation Ltd., которая также попала под санкции, согласно OFAC.

OFAC заявило в ноябре, что оно наложило санкции на Emperor Aviation, потому что оно координировало роскошные поездки для родственников Сулеймана Керимова. Санкции США были введены против Керимова с 2018 года; после вторжения России в Украину 24 февраля 2022 года Соединенные Штаты, Великобритания и Европейский союз идентифицировали Керимова как олигарха и союзника президента Владимира Путина.

В своих ноябрьских санкциях OFAC добавило в список жену, сына и двух дочерей Керимова.

Бортовой номер самолета Aman, или номер N, — 9H-AMN; префикс «9H» указывает на то, что самолет зарегистрирован на Мальте, по данным Федерального управления гражданской авиации. Все восемь самолетов, которыми эксплуатировалась компания Emperor Aviation, базируются на Мальте.

Оказавшиеся у Rucriminal.info документы, свидетельствуют о том, что Павел Те был судим в родном Узбекистане. 10 августа 1988 года он был арестован, а потом осужден на четыре года по обвинению, в совершении преступления, предусмотренного статьей 147 советского УК (Мошенничество, совершенное в крупных размерах, или организованной группой). Срок Павла Тё отбывал в ИТК-29 города Навой Узбекской ССР. А 16 февраля 1990 года суд Навой принял решение заменить Те оставшийся срок ( 2 года 3 месяца 15 дней) на условный. Дальше он уехал в Бухару, а потом объявился в России и стал совладельцем Capital Group в 1993-1994 годах. Что примечательно, спустя четыре года после этого, Павла Те поставили на учет в ИЦ, как судимого гражданина. При выборах депутатом, глава Capital Group забыл указать свою судимость.

Одним из главных фигурантов дела о даче взятки сотрудникам СКР за освобождение «авторитета» Андрея Кочуйкова (Итальянец) стал его друг, тоже «авторитет» Олег Шейхаметов (Олег Шейх). В последнии годы Шейх занимается бизнесом, в первую очередь строительным. А его партнером по данным проектам являлся совладелец Capital group Павел Те. В частности, у Шейха и Те был совместный проект - возведение ЖК «Лица».





Роман Трушкин

Продолжение следует

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

TFR took on the pet of the head of RD Melikov

How many suitcases of money did the head of Izberbash prepare?



Izberbasha Isakov plundered the lands of the city under the nose of Melikov

As it became known to Rucriminal.info, the TFR found signs of a crime in the actions of the head of Izberbash Magomed Isakov. An inspection has been launched, all relevant procedural documents for the consideration of several dozen appeals and applications from citizens have been seized.

All of them relate to the illegal actions of the head of Izberbash Isakov and his subordinates, and were transferred on 14.07. 2023 in the Investigative Committee of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the RD on the instructions of the Chairman of the Investigative Committee of Russia Bastrykin for a new consideration of these appeals and procedural documents.

Earlier, having considered one of the statements against the head of Izberbash Isakov, the deputy head of the Izberbash Interdistrict Investigation Department of the Investigative Committee of the RF Investigative Committee for the Republic of Dagestan, Lieutenant Colonel of Justice Chamsudin Gamzatov compiled a report on the discovery of signs of a crime under Articles 285 (abuse of official powers) and 286 (abuse of official powers) of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and sent it to the head of the Izberbash inter-district investigative department of the Investigative Committee of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for Dagestan, Islam Mogushkov.

According to information from a Rucriminal.info source, Lieutenant Colonel Mogushkov, in agreement with the prosecutor of Izberbash Muslim Eminov, and at the request of Isakov, in February 2022 decided, under any pretext, to refuse to initiate a criminal case and delay the consideration of the application, the verification and the adoption of a decision.

Mogushkov sent Gamzatov's report to the investigator of the Khunzakh MRSO of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for Dagestan Lieutenant Colonel of Justice Sahratula Khaibulaev, seconded to the Izberbash MRSO.

Mogushkov, who has long-standing personal proven relationships and contacts with Khaibulaev, brought him with him to a new place of service in Izberbash to jointly carry out criminal acts with Khaibulaev in order to falsify criminal cases and materials, the results of inspections, to order and financially motivated concealment of crimes .

Having received from the head of Izberbash Isakov guarantees of their further financial and material rewards, Eminov, Mogushkov and Khaibulaev block attempts to initiate a criminal case against the head of Izberbash Isakov.

For 18 months from the day the report was sent, Gamzatova, Mogushkov and Khaibulaev were refused several times to initiate a criminal case, and the prosecutor Eminov, creating the appearance of a prosecutor's response, several times made a decision to cancel Khaibulaev's decision to refuse and returned the materials for a new consideration back to the Izberbash MRSO SU The Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the RD, for its part, is making efforts to drag out time.

According to the source, prosecutor Eminov, investigators Mogushkov and Khaibulaev received large amounts of money from the head of Izberbash for the above illegal actions, and Khaibulaev also received a land plot on the seashore on which he is building a hotel.

The illegally allocated land plots, indicated in the report of Lieutenant Colonel Gamzatov, were provided to the favorite and favorite of the prosecutor Eminov, Shamil Mamiev, the eternal contractor-hauler of all municipal construction, one of Isakov's "purses", Abdul Kubaev and a number of other persons from the Izberbash OPS, whose head, head Isakov M.K., under the auspices of the prosecutor, investigators and judges of Izberbash, sold more than 1000 land plots for bribes.

On July 14, 2023, the procedural documents (applications, resolutions, decisions) seized in the Izberbash MRSO of the Investigative Committee of the RF Investigative Committee for the Republic of Dagestan underwent incoming registration with the Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Republic of Dagestan and are closely studied by the investigators of the Office.

There is a long and painstaking work ahead to return to the city of Izberbash the stolen municipal land plots illegally sold to foreigners, residents of other regions of the Russian Federation and regions of the republic.



P.S.....According to information, the head of Izberbash, Isakov, sent one lieutenant colonel to the Investigative Committee of the Russian Investigative Committee for RD to "solve the issue" with a new suitcase of Isakov's money.

Alexey Ermakov

To be continued

Source: www.rucriminal.info

СКР взялся за любимчика главы РД Меликова

Сколько чемоданов денег приготовил глава Избербаша?




Избербаша Исаков разграбил земли города под носом у Меликова

Как стало известно Rucriminal.info, СКР нашел признаки преступления в действиях главы Избербаша Магомеда Исакова. Начата проверка, изъяты все соответствующие процессуальные документы по рассмотрению нескольких десятков обращений и заявлений граждан.

Все они касаются противоправных действий главы Избербаша Исакова и его подчиненных, и переданы 14.07. 2023 г. в СУ СК РФ по РД по указанию Председателя СК России Бастрыкина для нового рассмотрения этих обращений и процессуальных документов.

Ранее, рассмотрев одно из заявлений в отношении главы Избербаша Исакова, заместитель руководителя Избербашского межрайонного следственного отдела СУ СК РФ по РД, подполковник юстиции Чамсудин Гамзатов составил рапорт об обнаружении признаков преступления, предусмотренного статьями 285 ( злоупотребление должностными полномочиями) и 286 ( превышение должностных полномочий) УК РФ, и направил его на имя руководителя Избербашского межрайонного следственного отдела СУ СК РФ по РД, Ислама Могушкова.

По информации от источника Rucriminal.info, подполковник Могушков, по согласованию с прокурором Избербаша Муслимом Эминовым, и по просьбе Исакова, в феврале 2022 года принял решение под любыми предлогами отказывать в возбуждении уголовного дела и затягивать рассмотрение заявление, проведение проверки и принятие решения.

Могушков направил рапорт Гамзатова следователю Хунзахского МРСО СУ СК РФ по РД подполковнику юстиции Сахратуле Хайбулаеву, прикомандированному в Избербашский МРСО.

Могушков, которого с Хайбулаевым связывают давние личные проверенные отношения и контакты по службе, привел его за собой на новое место службы в Избербаш для совместного осуществления с Хайбулаевым уголовно наказуемых деяний по заказной фальсификации уголовных дел и материалов, результатов проверок, заказного и финансово мотивированного укрывательства преступлений.

Получив от главы Избербаша Исакова гарантии своего дальнейшего финансового и материального вознаграждения, Эминов, Могушков и Хайбулаев блокируют попытки возбуждения уголовного дела в отношении главы Избербаша Исакова.

За 18 месяцев от дня направления рапорта Гамзатова, Могушков и Хайбулаев несколько раз отказали в возбуждении уголовного дела, а прокурор Эминов, создавая видимость прокурорского реагирования, несколько раз выносил решение об отмене постановления Хайбулаева об отказе и возвращал материалы на новое рассмотрение обратно в Избербашский МРСО СУ СК РФ по РД, со своей стороны прилагая усилия по затягиванию времени.

По информации от источника, за совершение вышеуказанных незаконных действий прокурор Эминов, следователи Могушков и Хайбулаев получили от главы Избербаша денежные средства в крупном размере, а Хайбулаев также и земельный участок на берегу моря, на котором строит гостиницу.

Незаконно выделенные земельные участки, указанные в рапорте подполковника Гамзатова, предоставлены фавориту и любимчику прокурора Эминова, Шамилю Мамиеву, вечному подрядчику-откатчику всех муниципальных строительств, одному из "кошельков" Исакова, Кубаеву Абдуле и ряду других лиц из избербашского ОПС, руководитель которого, глава Исаков М.К, при покровительстве прокурора, следователей и судей Избербаша продал за взятки более 1000 земельных участков.

14 июля 2023 года изьятые в Избербашском МРСО СУ СК РФ по РД процессуальные документы (заявления, постановления, решения) прошли входящую регистрацию в СУ СК РФ по РД и пристально изучаются следователями Управления.

Предстоит долгая и кропотливая работа по возвращению городу Избербашу похищенных муниципальных земельных участков, незаконно распроданных иностранцам, жителям других регионов РФ и районов республики.



P.S.....По информации, глава Избербаша Исаков отрядил в СУ СК России по РД одного подполковника " решить вопрос" с новым чемоданом исаковских денег.

Алексей Ермаков

Продолжение следует

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

The GSU of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Moscow and the prosecutor’s office “plugged them into a socket”

The trial of the defenders of the Police Ombudsman began



Defender of the Police Ombudsman Vasily Fedorov especially for the Cheka-OGPU

“You all know that the three of us are in prison for solving the crime, the details of which were outlined in the video “Save the Police Ombudsman.”

Sitting in a pre-trial detention center and periodically seeing the proud and confident face of our investigator Yegor, who came for interrogations, portraying the investigation of the case of the century. I still could not believe that he was so narrow-minded that he believes in the success of his falsification only on the basis that his superiors promised full support. I could not believe that Yegor did not understand that the powers of his superiors would end at the stage of the court, where their hands simply could not reach, and if not the district court, then the Moscow Court, Cassation or the Supreme would definitely turn this nonsense in the opposite direction. There must have been something else that instilled confidence in Egor and allowed him to wear a complex expression, and now, after almost a year in the pre-trial detention center, my accomplice Yevgeny Moiseev seems to have found the answer: in 2022, before a criminal case was opened against us, Khoroshevsky the district court of Moscow, gave a year of probation for part 3 of article 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (the same as ours) to citizen Khamitova, who wrote a statement to the police that someone stole her car. According to her statement, the duty officer sent an investigative task force (SOG). They arrived, took a picture of the place where the car was supposedly stolen from, drew up a protocol for the inspection of the scene (OMP), asked Khamitova to sign it, later it turned out that Khamitova wrote a deliberately false statement, but in fact no one stole the car and she knew. The goal of Khamitova was most likely a classic - getting insurance, but what does part 3 have to do with it ???

After all, this part involves the artificial creation of evidence of a crime, that is, its staging. If Khamitova had painted on the spot where her car was allegedly stolen from, traces of men's boots; I would have thrown a screwdriver / ruler into place, with which they allegedly opened the car; I would have planted instructions for stealing a car. Which the hijackers allegedly could have dropped, and after that would have filed an application for theft, then it would be the purest part 3 of article 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and without all of the above, her application only draws on part 1 of article 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. But apparently the Khoroshevsky police department needed a stick specifically for a serious crime, and the investigation, as an artificially created evidence of car theft, sewed on Khamitova that she signed the WMD protocol! That is, the structure of the accusation is exactly the same as ours: Ira allegedly voluntarily wrote a statement about the crime to the police from the CSS of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, who, for some reason, ended up at her house 500 kilometers from the service area, although she did not call them, and after initiating a criminal case, according to her statement, signed the protocols of interrogations and confrontations, which, according to investigator Yegor, artificially created evidence of Vova's accusation of extortion.

It is obvious that the senior investigator for especially important cases of the 12th department of the SC of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Moscow, Yegor Fedorov, when we were put in a pre-trial detention center, was inspired by the Khamitova case, because, according to Evgeny Moiseev, some speech turns and phrases were simply copied from her sentence and inserted into our accusation. And everything is “herringbone” with Yegor and the authorities pat on the head, but there was a surprise that Yegor may not be aware of until now: Khamitova, disagreeing with the decision of the Khoroshevsky court that, with her signature in the WMD protocol, she artificially created evidence for the prosecution, filed an appeal with the Moscow City Court, which on December 8, 2022 determined (No. 10-23014/2022) that Khamitova did not create any evidence by signing in the WMD protocol. In addition, this action of hers was already carried out during the verification of a false report (statement) by Khamitova, and according to the meaning of the law, the crime under 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is completed from the moment the addressee perceives knowingly false information. On the basis of all this, the Moscow City Court canceled Khamitova's condition, reclassified her, 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation from part 3 to part 1 (with a serious one to a slight one), soldered 50 thousand rubles a fine and released her with God.

On July 28, 2023, the judge of the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow, Belyakov, began consideration of our case, which is identical in structure to the Khamitova case. True, the methods of investigation are radically different, as are its circumstances:

1) No one mocked Khamitova. During the investigation, she was under house arrest, while all three of us, including a widow with two children and a mortgage, have been sitting in a pre-trial detention center for a year without the slightest specific and factual grounds for which Art. 108 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation obliges the judge to refer when making a decision on the length of service.

2) Khamitova's article, although it was reclassified as less serious, but hot. She nevertheless received some kind of sentence, which means that the investigation and the prosecutor's office worked at least somewhat effectively, even though the stick would be under part 1 (small severity), and not under part 3 (severe). In our case, retraining in part 1 neither the prosecutor, nor even Egor with his leader no matter how it suits, because the statute of limitations under part 1 of article 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation expired even before the initiation of a criminal case against us, and this is a rehabilitating ground, unlike the situation, if during an investigation or trial. Those. requalification in part 1 in our case automatically means that the case against us was initiated illegally, which in turn makes it illegal to pick at relatives' underpants with the seizure of their phones and laptops and, in general, all procedural and investigative actions, which in in turn gives them the status of abuse of power. Well, our detention, in an illegally initiated case, is the cherry on the cake of all this lawlessness.

Judge Anatoly Anatolyevich Belyakov is now facing a very interesting choice:

1) Pass a guilty verdict, knowing that it will be canceled by Mos. Gor. The court, based on its own practice, and get a ticket to the disciplinary commission;

2) To justify, than to undermine warm relations with the Main Investigative Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Prosecutor's Office, frankly "plugging them into the socket";

3) Return the case to Yegor through the prosecutor, with the resolution “here one hundred percent justification is writhing and either you yourself stop this rotten thing as you like, or if you stick it in me again, you won’t like my decision”;

4) Convince the prosecutor to drop support for the prosecution.

In the meantime, we are waiting for everyone to attend court hearings in room 355 of the Tverskoy District Court.





THANK YOU TO ALL LAWYERS WHO RESPONDED TO DEFEND US, YOU WILL BE DEDICATED TO A SEPARATE POST.

SPECIAL THANKS TO THE GUYS FROM THE VChK-OGPU TELEGRAM CHANNEL WHO ARE FOLLOWING OUR SITUATION.

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

ГСУ ГУ МВД Москвы и прокуратуру «воткнули их в розетку»

Начался суд над защитниками Омбудсмена полиции



Защитник Омбудсмена полиции Василий Федоров специально для ВЧК-ОГПУ

«Все вы знаете, что мы втроем сидим за то, что раскрыли преступление, подробности которого изложили в видео «Спасти Омбудсмена полиции».

Сидя в СИЗО и периодически видя гордое и уверенное лицом нашего следака Егор, который приезжал на допросы, изображая расследование дела века. Я все никак не мог поверить, что он настолько недалекий, что верит в успех своего фальсификата только лишь на основании того, что его начальники пообещали всестороннюю поддержку. Я не мог поверить, что Егор не понимает, что полномочия его начальников окончатся на стадии суда, куда их руки просто не дотянутся и если не районный суд, то Мосгодсуд, Кассационный или Верховный точно развернут этот бред в обратную сторону. Должно было быть что-то еще, что вселяло в Егорку уверенность и позволяло носить сложное выражение лица и вот спустя почти год пребывания в СИЗО, мой подельник Евгений Моисеев, похоже нашел ответ: в 2022 году, до возбуждения в отношении нас уголовного дела, Хорошевский районный суд г. Москвы, дал год условно за ч.3 ст.306 УК РФ (та же что и у нас) гражданке Хамитовой, которая написала заявление в полицию о том, что кто-то угнал ее машину. По ее заявлению дежурный выслал следственно оперативную группу (СОГ). Те приехали, сфоткали место, откуда якобы была угнана машина, составили протокол осмотра места происшествия (ОМП), попросили Хамитову расписаться в нем, позже выяснилось, что Хамитова написала заведомо ложное заявление, а на самом деле машину ни кто не угонял и она об этом знала. Цель Хамитовой была скорее всего классической- получение страховки, но при чем тут ч.3 ???

Ведь эта часть предполагает искусственное создание доказательств преступления, т. е. его инсценировка. Если бы Хамитова нарисовала на месте, откуда якобы угнали ее машину, следы мужских сапог; подкинула бы на место отвертку/линейку, которой якобы вскрыли машину; подбросила бы инструкцию по угону машины. Которую якобы могли выронить угонщики, а после этого подала бы заявление об угоне, то это была бы чистейшая ч.3 ст.306 УК РФ, а без всего вышеперечисленного ее заява тянет лишь на ч.1 ст.306 УК РФ. Но видимо Хорошевскому отделу полиции нужна была палка именно по тяжкому преступлению и следствие, в качестве искусственно созданного доказательства угона машины, пришило Хамитовой то, что она расписалась в протоколе ОМП! То есть структура обвинения точь в точь как у нас: Ира якобы добровольно написала заявление о преступлении полицейским из УСБ МВД России, которые, почему-то оказались у нее дома в 500 километров от территории обслуживания, хотя она их не вызывала, а после возбуждения уголовного дела по ее заявлению, подписала протоколы допросов и очных ставок чем, по мнению следака Егора, искусственно создала доказательства обвинения Вовы в вымогательстве.



Василий Федоров




Очевидно, что старший следователь по особо важным делам 12 отдела СЧ ГСУ МВД Москвы Егор Федоров, при посадке нас в СИЗО , вдохновлялся именно делом Хамитовой, т. к. со слов Евгения Моисеева некоторые речевые обороты и фразы просто скопированы из ее приговора и вставлены в наше обвинение. И все у Егора «в ёлочку» и начальство гладит по головке, но случился нежданчик, о котором Егор , возможно, не в курсе до сих пор: Хамитова, не согласившись с решением Хорошевского суда в том что, своей подписью в протоколе ОМП она искусственно создала доказательства обвинения, подала апелляционную жалобу в Мосгорсуд, который 08.12.2022 года определил (№10-23014/2022), что Хамитова не создала никаких доказательств подписью в протоколе ОМП. Кроме того, это ее действие было осуществлено уже в ходе проверки ложного сообщения (заявления) Хамитовой, а по смыслу закона, преступление по 306 УК РФ является оконченным с момента восприятия адресатом заведомо ложных сведений. На основании этого всего Мосгорсуд, отменил условку Хамитовой, переквалифицировал, ее 306 УК РФ из ч.3 в ч.1 (с тяжкой на небольшой тяжести), впаял 50 тыс. рублей штрафа и отпустил с Богом.

28.07.2023 года судьей Тверского районного суда Москвы Беляковым началось рассмотрение нашего дела, которое по своей структуре идентично делу Хамитовой. Правда методы расследования кардинально различаются, как и его обстоятельства:

1) Над Хамитовой никто не издевался. Она во время следствия находилась под подпиской о невыезде , в то время как мы все втроем, включая вдову с двумя детьми и ипотекой уже год сидим в СИЗО без малейших на то конкретных и фактических оснований, на которые ст. 108 УПК РФ обязывает ссылаться судью при вынесении решения о стаже.

2) Статья Хамитовойхоть и была переквалифицирована на менее тяжкую, но хот. Какой-то приговор она все же получила, а значит следствие и прокуратура сработали хоть сколько-нибудь эффективно, хоть палка и будет по ч.1 (небольшая тяжесть), а не по ч. 3 (тяжкое). В нашем случае переквалификация в ч.1 ни прокурора, ни тем более Егорку с его руководителями, ни как не устроит, т. к. сроки давности по ч.1 ст.306 УК РФ вышли еще до возбуждения в отношении нас уголовного дела, а это реабилитирующее основание в отличии от ситуации, если бы во время расследования или суда. Т.е. переквалификация в ч. 1 в нашем случае автоматически означает, что дело в отношении нас было возбуждено незаконно, что в свою очередь делает незаконным все ковыряния в трусах у родственников с изъятием у них телефонов и ноутбуков и вообще, все процессуальные и следственные действия, что в свою очередь придает им статус злоупотребления должностными полномочиями. Ну а наше содержание под стражей, по незаконно возбужденному делу -вишенка на торте всего этого беспредела.

Судья Анатолий Анатольевич Беляков сейчас перед очень интересным выбором:

1) Вынести обвинительный приговор, зная что его отменит Мос. Гор. Суд, основываясь на своей же практике и получить путевку на дисциплинарную комиссию;

2) Оправдать, чем подорвать теплые отношения с ГСУ МВД и Прокуратурой, откровенно «воткнув их в розетку»;

3) Вернуть дело Егору через прокурора, с резолюцией «тут сто процентный оправдос корячится и либо вы сами как хотите прекращаете этот тухляк, либо если опять мне его просунете, мое решение вам не понравится»;

4) Убедить прокурора отказаться от поддержки обвинения .

Ну а пока мы ждем всех желающих на судебные заседания в кабинет 355, Тверского районного суда.





СПАСИБО ВСЕМ АДВОКАТАМ, КТО ОТОЗВАЛСЯ НАС ЗАЩИЩАТЬ, ВАМ БУДЕТ ПОСВЯЩЕН ОТДЕЛЬНЫЙ ПОСТ.

ОСОБОЕ СПАСИБО РЕБЯТАМ ИЗ ТЕЛЕГРАММ-КАНАЛА ВЧК-ОГПУ ,КОТОРЫЕ СЛЕДЯТ ЗА НАШЕЙ СИТУАЦИЕЙ.

Тимофей Гришин

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

Putin's relatives are taken to the office

Russian president's relative arrested



The wife of one of Vladimir Putin's distant relatives, businesswoman Tatyana Putina, has been arrested. According to the telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU, she is accused of fraud and, allegedly, illegal possession of the Syneil trademark. However, according to Tatyana's lawyers and relatives, this criminal case was actually "invented" and is supervised by the Investigative Committee for the Western District of the city of Krasnodar, since the initiator of this criminal case and the main competitor of Putin-Borisov simply did not have any legal ways to take possession of the trademark " Syneil" and related business and activities of LEGRAND PLUS LLC and LBP GROUP LLC. Earlier, he lost to T.S. Putina. a number of courts of first, cassation and appeal instances.

Rucriminal.info found out the details of this story.

So much material has been written about the specific work of law enforcement officers in the Kuban that would be enough for a small library, but this story, although not new in terms of plot, clearly illustrates how in Russia it is possible to ignore the decisions of courts of various instances, and thanks to the “necessary and respected people, criminal cases are born with incredible ease, which grind the fate of people, and the business created over the years, under pressure, passes to the initiators of criminal prosecution.

A feature of the criminal case No. 1220203000033, initiated on 04/27/2022 by the Senior Detective for the Western Department of the Investigative Committee for the city of Krasnodar, was not even that it reeks of a custom-made character and a corruption component from a mile away, but also the fact that it concerns the relatives of Vladimir Putin in such a way as a defendant in this case, entrepreneur Tatyana Putina Sergeevna, who had previously married a distant relative of the President of the Russian Federation.

The initiator of the initiation of a criminal case - Borisov L.V. is the CEO and founder of Legrand Plus LLC (TIN: 2311287342), as well as the founder of LBP Group LLC (TIN: 7726466997), and since 08/16/2021 is also the CEO. And according to an unspoken rating, he is one of the richest, and therefore influential people in the Krasnodar Territory.

Conflict with Putin T.S. with Borisov L.V. originates in 2020, since since May 24, 2020, it was Putina who was the copyright holder of the following domain names:

syneil.net, syneil.ru, syneil.info, syneil.su, syneil.com, syneil.tech, syneil.rus

And since June 16, 2020, it is also the owner of the intellectual property object "SYNEIL"

And Sofya Dmitrievna Putina, the adopted daughter of Tatyana Sergeevna, as an Individual Entrepreneur, is the owner of the SYNEIL trademarks on the basis of certificates No. 826354 and No. 826355.

Brief history of the conflict with Borisov L.V. was as follows: on June 01, 2020, Tatyana Sergeevna Putina (Customer) concluded with a citizen of the Republic of Kazakhstan Mamisashvili Yuri (Author) an Agreement on the creation of an intellectual property object "SYNEIL". On June 16, 2020, the parties to the Agreement signed Act No. 1 on the fulfillment of obligations and on the alienation of exclusive rights under the Agreement. Since June 16, 2020, Tatyana Sergeevna Putina has become the copyright holder of the developed intellectual property object - "SYNEIL".

At the beginning of July 2020, Borisov Leonid Vadimovich, who already had experience in the lighting products market under the simple-story brand (the brand was never brought to the federal level, the project was unprofitable, the sale of the leftovers was entrusted to Tatyana Sergeevna Putina), agreed with Putina Tatyana Sergeevna conditions for cooperation and opening of a new company called "LBP GROUP" for the sale of lighting products under the brand name "SYNEIL". Borisov Leonid Vadimovich provided financial resources for starting and running a business, and Putina Tatyana Sergeevna, provided the right to use exclusive rights to the brand and domain name "SYNEIL" and "customer base".

On July 22, 2020, documents were submitted for the creation of LBP GROUP LLC, according to which Putina T.S. was the participant. and Borisov L.V., and the general director of Putin T.S., however, on July 27, 2020, a refusal was received (Decision 339744A dated July 27, 2020 on the refusal of state registration) due to the fact that the participant and general director of LLC " LBP GROUP" Tatyana Sergeevna Putina was disqualified for 3 (three) years and does not have the right to be a member and / or a permanent executive body of the Company for 3 years from the date of disqualification. The disqualification of Tatyana Sergeyevna by Putin ends in April 2022.

As a result of the negotiations, it was decided to create LBP GROUP LLC with the sole participant Leonid Vadimovich Borisov and Marina Vladimirovna Filimonova, an external general director involved. On August 12, 2020 LBP GROUP LLC (OGRN 1207700287574) was registered. Tatyana Sergeevna Putina was registered with LBP GROUP LLC as an executive director.

Due to the impossibility, under the indicated restrictions, of creating an individual entrepreneur or legal th person on Putin T.S. a decision was made to register the trademark "SYNEIL" before the removal of restrictions on T.S. Putina. start registration of the intellectual property object "SYNEIL" owned by Putina T.S. at LBP GROUP LLC. For this, applications No. 2020747522 and No. 2020747520 were filed for the registration of the trademark "SYNEIL".

As a result of conflicts of interest between Borisov Leonid Vadimovich and Putnaya Tatyana Sergeevna, the basis for which was the desire of Leonid Vadimovich to single-handedly manage the business, and receive real profits and dividends from the enterprise and trademark actually created and organized by Tatyana Sergeevna Putin with involved specialists. As a result of Borisov’s actions, Tatyana Sergeevna Putina was forced to change the applicant (on the basis of the Agreement on the transfer of rights in relation to applications for registration of trademarks dated January 20, 2021) on application No. 2020747522 and No. 2020747520 for the registration of the trademark “SYNEIL” to Individual Entrepreneur Putin Sofia Dmitrievna.

On March 26, 2021, information on applications was changed to IP Putin S.D.

On August 26, 2021, Sofya Dmitrievna, Sofya Dmitrievna, Sofya Dmitrievna, Sofya Dmitrievna, Sophia Dmitrievna, became the owner of the SYNEIL trademark.

In turn, on 06/04/2021 LBP GROUP LLC represented by Borisov L.V. was filed with the Arbitration Court of Moscow (case A40-118850/21-34-652 Judge O.A. Kravchik) statement of claim to Filimonova M.The. and IP Putina S.D. with requirements:

- invalidate the agreement on the transfer of rights in relation to applications for registration of trademarks dated January 20, 2021, concluded between LBP GROUP LLC represented by Filimonova M.V. and IP Putin S.D. and apply the consequences of the invalidity of the transaction in the form of the return of the parties to their original position.

- to recover from Filimonova Marina Vladimirovna the losses caused by LBP GROUP LLC in the amount of 166,500 rubles.

The claims were completely denied in the first instance - 10/20/2021, then in the appellate instance - 01/10/2022, and finally in the cassation instance - 04/13/2022. It would seem that justice has triumphed, the decision has come into legal force, and now the Agreement on the transfer of rights in relation to applications for registration of trademarks dated 01/20/2021 has been recognized as valid.

After the registration of the trademark "SYNEIL" and due to the filing by Borisov L.V. statement of claim to the Arbitration Court of the city of Moscow, from 09/29/2021 IP Putin S.D. banned the use of the SYNEIL trademark in commercial activities for the sale of goods to third parties, including by filing a claim with LEGRAND PLUS LLC and LBP GROUP LLC about the prohibition of the sale of goods under the SYNEIL brand and the disposal of counterfeit goods. This claim was ignored and on November 22, 2021, IP Putin S.D. filed a claim with the Arbitration Court of the Krasnodar Territory (case No. A32-53867/2021 Judge: Yurchenko E.S.) with a claim in the amount of 122,078,068 rubles:

- Collect from IP Tyufyakova O.Ya. (exclusive partner Borisova L.V.) compensation for the illegal use of the SYNEIL trademark in the amount of 5,000,000 rubles.

- Collect from IP Tyufyakov E.S. (exclusive partner Borisova L.V.) compensation for the illegal use of the SYNEIL trademark in the amount of 5,000,000 rubles.

- Collect compensation from LBP GROUP LLC for the illegal use of the SYNEIL trademark in the amount of 5,000,000 rubles.

- To recover compensation from LEGRAND PLUS LLC in the amount of 107,078,068 rubles in the amount of two times the cost of goods on which the SYNEIL trademark is illegally placed.

- Dispose of all counterfeit goods under the SYNEIL brand, owned by LEGRAND PLUS LLC.



In order to obtain the SYNEIL trademark and on the basis of documents (an agreement on the creation of SYNEIL intellectual property, the SYNEIL brand book, an application for the SYNEIL trademark, certificates for the SYNEIL trademark), which were provided by Putina T. WITH. within the framework of the above cases No. A32-53867 / 2021 and A40-118850 / 21-34-652), Borisov L.V. case No. 2-5389/21 was fabricated with his authorized representative Kuzmenko Darya Alexandrovna in the Oktyabrsky District Court of the city of Krasnodar on the recognition of an agreement on the creation of an intellectual property object dated 06/01/2020 as invalid and on the recognition of Kuzmenko D.A. the copyright holder of the Syneil logo on the basis of the Copyright Order Agreement dated February 8, 2020, concluded between Kuzmenko D.A. and Borisov L.V.

Despite the statement by Putin T.S. about the falsification of evidence and the lack of evidence of the fact of the creation of the work “Syneil” precisely by Kuzmenko D.A., the court satisfied the claims of Kuzmenko D.A.

And on April 14, 2022, an appeal was filed with the Krasnodar Regional Court against the decision of the court of first instance and a complaint / application to the Prosecutor's Office of the Krasnodar Territory about falsification of evidence, perjury and fraud.

According to the application, the investigative committee refused to conduct an audit.

On December 27, 2022, the Krasnodar Regional Court issued an appeal ruling (case No. 33-36662/2022), in which silt decision Oktyabrsky District Court cancel and claims Kuzmenko D.A. refuse.

Thus, after Borisov L.V. lost to T.S. Putina all the courts, and the legal ways to get what you want ended, the lawyer Antoni Srgeevich Yanovsky, a former high-ranking employee of the Krasnodar Territory, came to his aid. As a result of his entry into the case, using previously obtained connections and acquaintances, a certain criminal case appears in the prosecutor's office against Putin T.S., her adopted daughter, an accountant and a lawyer of their company, in which they are accused of attempted fraud. And their fraud, according to the investigating authorities and the prosecutor's office, lies in the fact that they filed an application with the court and resolved the disputes that arose exclusively in accordance with the letter of the Law.

But filing a criminal case is only part of the task. It is necessary to make sure that a woman who is trying to protect her intellectual property and the results of many years of work not only does not get in the way, but really cannot do anything. That is why 47-year-old Putin T.S., who lives and is located at the place of permanent registration, did not hide from the investigation, did not go abroad, but, despite all the arguments, a preventive measure in the form of detention is chosen against her. And also, they deprive her of the possibility of defending her lawyer, who by this moment had studied the case thoroughly and clearly interfered with the investigation - Olga Nikolaevna Kovaleva, providing her with the “Duty” lawyer, who appeared in court drunk, about which Putin T. WITH. repeatedly stated to the judge, but all her efforts were in vain.

All complaints of Tatyana Sergeyevna about the initiation of such an absurd criminal case, filed with the Presidential Administration, as well as with the Anti-Corruption Committee of the State Duma, invariably descended to the Investigative Committee for the Western District of Krasnodar. The paradox lies in the fact that the same investigator who initiated the ill-fated criminal case gave replies - replies to these statements (copies of complaints, decisions of the Arbitration and other courts are at the disposal of the editorial office).

On June 13, 2023, President Putin signed Law No. 217 “On Limiting the Arrest of Entrepreneurs”, but, apparently, for the judicial machine of the Krasnodar Territory, the issues of acquaintances, connections, and possibly finances are of higher importance, and that is why a 47-year-old woman who is diagnosed with a whole a number of chronic diseases, which is not hiding either from the court or from the investigation, has a permanent place of residence - is in custody. And most likely, it is in this place that she will have to expect justice in Krasnodar.





Alexey Ermakov

To be continued

Source: www.rucriminal.info