четверг, 20 апреля 2023 г.

How Alisher Usmanov's top manager bought a judge

And at the same time he set Metalloinvest's security service on a woman with children



Rucriminal.info and the telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU talked about how the judge of the Simanovsky court Kuleshova V.A. sent a 13-year-old girl to a psychiatric hospital for no reason. As it turned out, the Qualification Board of Judges constantly receives complaints against this judge. At our disposal was such a complaint filed by Ekaterina Gosteva - at the time of the events, the wife of the top manager of Metalloinvest (owned by the Kremlin oligarch Alisher Usmanov) Sergey Gorin. The couple divorced and Gorin threw all his strength to leave Ekaterina without money. He enlisted Metalloinvest's security service to spy on her, and then turned to his friend Judge Kuleshov. What happened next can be found in Ekaterina's appeal to the qualification board.

“I am compelled to turn to you with this complaint against the actions of V. A. Kuleshov, judge of the Simonovsky District Court of Moscow, because I believe that he committed deliberate actions that grossly violate civil procedural legislation, which entailed a violation of my civil rights.



On August 19, 2015, Judge Kuleshov V.A. issued a decision on the claim of WEST PROVINCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED against Gorin S.A., Gosteva E.A. and Abdullaeva L.A. for the recovery of solidary debts under loan agreements (civil case No. 2- 5088/15). The claims were satisfied in part. From Gorin S.A. and Gosteva E.A., the court ruled to recover jointly and severally a sum of money in the amount of 2,333,029 (Two million three hundred thirty-three thousand twenty-nine) dollars 38 US cents in rubles at the exchange rate of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation on the day of execution of the court decision. I strongly disagree with this decision of the court.

I understand very well that the qualification board is not directly studying the legal aspects of the content of the case itself, but for the sake of clarity of the situation and the fact that the issuance of this unlawful decision by Kuleshov V.A. is natural, I must briefly state the circumstances of the case.



The circumstances of the case are as follows. I, E. A. Gosteva, was in a registered marriage with S. A. Gorin. The marriage was annulled between us. In July 2013, I applied to the Nikulinsky Court of Moscow with a lawsuit against Gorin S.A. on the division of jointly acquired property and the recognition of transactions for the alienation of immovable property acquired in marriage without the consent of the spouse, invalid. For my part, options for concluding a settlement agreement were repeatedly proposed, but the ex-husband did not want to finish resolving the dispute amicably. After some time, S.A. Gorin filed a counterclaim for the division of joint property and the recovery of funds from me under supposedly concluded agreements with the offshore company WEST PROVINCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED. Loan agreements between WEST PROVINCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED and S.A. Gorin were attached to the counterclaim. case materials. I note that to date, the dispute in the Nikulinsky Court of Moscow has not yet been considered. All this happens through the fault of S.A. Gorin, who files endless complaints to the Moscow City Court against each court ruling. Most of the time, the case on the division of property is actually in the Moscow City Court in the appellate instance. Gorin S.A. by any means delays the consideration of the case on the merits in the Nikulinsky Court of Moscow with the sole purpose of obtaining a decision in favor of the offshore company in the Simonovsky Court of Moscow. And he got it!

The fact that the Cypriot offshore company WEST PROVINCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED filed a lawsuit against me and Gorin S.A. in the Simonovsky Court of Moscow became known to me by a coincidence in May 2014. The fact that I learned about the discovery of such a lawsuit, filed with violation of jurisdiction, bypassing Nikulinsky to Simonovsky, was an unpleasant stun for the representative of the plaintiff and for the defendant Gorin SA.

I immediately had legitimate questions: why about the lawsuit, which, as it turned out, was filed with the Simonovsky court in February 2014, I was not notified by the court, and only in May 2014, when my representative appeared, was the court served a statement of claim with annexes to it (applications are copies of those documents that were attached to loan agreements in the Nikulinsky court by S.A. Gorin); why the court accepted the case for proceedings with violation of jurisdiction.

On June 24, 2014 Judge Kuleshov V.A. refuses to satisfy the request to transfer the case to the Nikulinsky Court of Moscow. Attention is also drawn to the fact that the representatives of the plaintiff and the defendant Gorin S.A. object to the transfer of the case by jurisdiction to the Nikulinsky Court of Moscow, despite the fact that these agreements are the subject of a dispute there.

My representative filed a private complaint against the ruling of the court (private complaint is attached). August 04, 2014 private complaint was satisfied voren by the Moscow City Court. The case was sent to the Nikulinsky Court of Moscow.

Further events develop as follows. Instead of collecting funds in the Nikulinsky Court of Moscow from the debtor under the agreement, as a normal creditor should, the offshore company continues to persistently apply to the Simonovsky Court. And in August 2014, in the Simonovsky Court of Moscow, Judge Kuleshov V.A. again raises a lawsuit with similar claims against Gorin S.A. and Gosteva E.A., repeating word for word the previous statement of claim with the only difference that as a defendant, the citizen Abdullaeva L.A., registered on the territory of the Simonovsky Court of Moscow, who is allegedly a cohabitant of Gorin S.A. at the present time, was also involved. The plaintiff asks to recover jointly and severally from three of the funds that Gorin S.A. must pay to WEST PROVINCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED under loan agreements. At the same time, all property acquired by Gorin and Gosteva in marriage is listed. From a similar claim, the goal of the plaintiff (and in fact an offshore company owned by Gorin S.A.) is clearly traced to receive funds from Gosteva, despite the fact that Gorin S.A. is the debtor under the loan agreement. as a defendant serves only as a basis for applying to the Simonovsky Court of Moscow on jurisdiction. There is no legal argumentation of her involvement in the lawsuit. There is a complete unwillingness on the part of the plaintiff and defendant Gorin S.A. to consider the case of debt obligations in the Nikulinsky court, where the case on the division of property of the spouses is located.

At the same time, the case under the claim of WEST PROVINCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED against Gorin S.A. and me, which returned in August 2014 from the Moscow City Court after satisfaction of a private complaint about the direction of the case under jurisdiction by the court apparatus, was not sent to the Nikulinsky Court of Moscow, and was sent only in November 2014.

I applied to the Simonovsky Court of Moscow with a motion to leave the newly filed claim of WEST PROVINCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED without consideration, since the Nikulinsky Court is in the process of a similar case sent there under jurisdiction on the basis of the appeal ruling of the Moscow City Court (the petition is attached).

On December 19, 2014, the Simonovsky Court of Moscow satisfies the petition and leaves the claims without consideration.

In May 2015, while browsing the website of the Moscow City Court with a view to returning to the Nikulinsky Court of Moscow the case on the division of property after another complaint by Gorin S.A. Moscow dated December 19, 2014, that is, 5 months after its issuance. And the case was returned to the Simonovsky court for consideration. Again, in my opinion, an absolutely incomprehensible situation is taking place in terms of finding this dispute precisely in the Simonovsky Court of Moscow. With the statutory period for appeal of 15 days after the issuance of the ruling, the ruling is not appealed within this period, but after 5 months it is canceled on appeal.

The case is returned to the Simonovsky Court of Moscow and scheduled for hearing on August 19, 2015. On August 17, 2015, I send a telegram to the court stating that I ask that the hearing of the case be postponed due to my illness and the impossibility of being present at the court session to state my position on the case. The fact that the telegram reached the court is confirmed by a notice of receipt with the signature of a court employee dated August 17, 2015 (a copy of the telegram and notice is attached).

On August 19, 2015, Judge Kuleshov V.A. makes a decision on the claim of WEST PROVINCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED against Gorin S.A., Gosteva E.A. and Abdullaeva L.A. for the recovery of debt under loan agreements, which decides to recover funds from Gorin S. A. and Gosteva E. A. For obvious reasons, in terms of collecting money from Mrs. Abdullaeva, it was refused, which was 100% predictable. After all, the purpose of this lawsuit is the decision to recover money from me.

It is noteworthy that the court considered the case on the merits in my absence, recovering from me a huge amount of money under loan agreements to which I was not a party, depriving me of the right to speak my position in court.

On September 18, 2015, without waiting for the case to be submitted to the court office, I file an appeal, indicating that I will file a reasoned complaint after reading the minutes of the court session and the court decision.

Literally a few days later, information appears on the website of the court that the case was handed over to the office as early as September 3! But on September 18, 2015, the case was not in the office, and I could not get a decision. September 25, 2015 I go to court and receive a court decision. When I got to know it, everything became clear to me. Kuleshov V.A., in the framework of this case, actually divided the debts between the spouses instead of considering the dispute under a general civil agreement concluded between the credit rum and the debtor, on the recovery of funds. Actually, that was the goal. The legal justification for disagreeing with such an innovative decision in terms of law and judicial practice will be indicated by me in the full appeal.

When reviewing the case file, I discovered that my telegram with a request for adjournment was missing from the case file. She simply does not exist, despite her admission to the court!

After reading the minutes of the court session, which fit on two pages, everything became obvious. The court, recovering a huge amount of money from me, did not even consider it necessary to study in detail my position on the case, set out earlier in a written petition, where I indicated that I was not the proper defendant in the case, to postpone the case to receive explanations from me, to ask questions the side of the plaintiff and the side of the defendant Gorin S.A.

Although everything is clear here, Gorin S.A. and his offshore company - the plaintiff (of which I have evidence) pursued the goal of obtaining a decision to recover funds for non-existent debts from me, and submit to the Nikulinsky Court of Moscow that entered into force decision of the Simonovskiy Court of Moscow. But by a coincidence, I became aware of the existence of a lawsuit in the Simonovsky court, which has nothing to do with the place of residence of either mine or Gorin SA, and the case was sent to the jurisdiction. But Gorin S.A. achieved his goal and got the solution he needed.

Kuleshov V.A. makes an unlawful decision. The judge initially accepts the case with violation of jurisdiction, refuses to satisfy the request to refer the case to jurisdiction. Does not exercise proper control over the case. After returning from the Moscow City Court, the case is not sent to the Nikulinsky Court of Moscow for several months. My telegram, sent to the court in advance, mysteriously disappears. I cannot say with full confidence that this telegram was deliberately not included in the case file, or that this was done due to the negligence of the court employees, but in any case, the result was that my failure to appear was not recognized as valid and the case was considered in my absence and I was charged a huge sum of money. For me, this situation is catastrophic. I alone am raising two small children, fighting off the endless attacks of Gorin S.A., now I have to have more troubles associated with a debt that did not really exist, but is only the fruit of the revenge of my ex-spouse, who, due to his position in business, is able to fabricate loan agreements with an offshore company that is subordinate to him.

My non-participation in the case, despite the fact that all measures were taken on my part to postpone the case, entailed a gross violation of my rights in the form of the impossibility of representing my interests personally in the court session - observing one of the most important principles of the civil process as oral and spontaneity, and as a result, an unlawful decision by the court.

The judge is obliged to control and take appropriate measures to comply with and fulfill the requirements of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation by employees of the court apparatus, in particular, the secretary of the court session and secretaries of the court.

According to the Code of Judicial Ethics, a judge is obliged to comply with the Constitution of the Russian Federation, its laws, other normative legal acts, must conscientiously fulfill his professional duties, take all necessary measures for the timely consideration of cases, and require conscientiousness and dedication from the court staff and his immediate subordinates.

On the basis of the foregoing, I ask the QUALIFICATION BOARD OF JUDGES OF THE CITY OF MOSCOW to look into this issue and bring Judge V. A. Kuleshov of the Simonovsky District Court of Moscow to disciplinary responsibility.”





To be continued

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Как топ-менеджер Алишера Усманова покупал судью

А заодно натравил на женщину с детьми службу безопасности «Металлоинвеста»



Rucriminal.info и телеграм-канал ВЧК-ОГПУ рассказали о том, как судья Симановского суда Кулешова В. А. без всяких причин отправил в психушку 13-летнюю девочку. Как оказалось, Квалификационная коллегия судей постоянно получает жалобы на этого судью. В нашем распоряжении оказалась такая жалоба, поданная Екатериной Гостевой – на момент событий жены топ-менеджера Металлоинвеста (принадлежит кремлевскому олигарху Алишеру Усманову) Сергею Горину. Супруги разводились и Горин бросил все силы, чтобы оставить Екатерину без денег. Он привлек для слежки за ней службу безопасности «Металлоинвеста», а потом обратился к своему приятелю судье Кулешову. Что произошло дальше можно узнать из обращения Екатерины в квалификационную коллегию.

«Я вынуждена обратиться к Вам с настоящей жалобой на действия судьи Симоновского районного суда г. Москвы Кулешова В. А., поскольку считаю, что им совершены умышленные действия, грубо нарушающие гражданско-процессуальное законодательство, что повлекло нарушение моих гражданских прав.



Сергей Горин




19 августа 2015 года судьей Кулешовым В. А. было вынесено решение по иску WEST PROVINCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED к Горину С. А. , Гостевой Е. А. и Абдуллаевой Л. А. о взыскании солидарных долгов по договорам займа (гражданское дело № 2-5088/15). Исковые требования были удовлетворены частично. С Горина С. А. и Гостевой Е. А. суд постановил взыскать солидарно денежную сумму в размере 2 333 029 (Два миллиона триста тридцать три тысячи двадцать девять) долларов 38 центов США в рублях по курсу ЦБ РФ на день исполнения решения суда. С данным решением суда я категорически не согласна.

Я хорошо понимаю, что непосредственно изучением правовых аспектов содержания самого дела квалификационная коллегия не занимается, но для ясности ситуации и то, что вынесение данного неправомерного решения Кулешовым В. А. является закономерным, я должна кратко изложить обстоятельства дела.



Обстоятельства дела следующие. Я, Гостева Е. А., находилась в зарегистрированном браке с Гориным С. А. Брак был между нами расторгнут. В июле 2013 года я обратилась в Никулинский суд г. Москвы с иском к Горину С. А. о разделе совместно нажитого имущества и признании сделок по отчуждению без согласия супруги недвижимого имущества, нажитого в браке, недействительными. С моей стороны были неоднократно предложены варианты для заключения мирового соглашения, но бывший супруг так и не захотел закончить урегулировать спор мирным путем. Через некоторое время Гориным С. А. был заявлен встречный иск о разделе совместного имущества и взыскании с меня денежных средств по якобы заключенным договорам с офшорной компанией WEST PROVINCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED. К встречному иску приобщены договоры займа между WEST PROVINCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED и Гориным С. А. Компания WEST PROVINCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED была поставлена в известность о том, что данное дело о разделе имущества находится в Никулинском суде г. Москвы, о чем имеется подтверждение от компании в материалах дела. Отмечу, что на сегодняшний день спор в Никулинском суде г. Москвы еще не рассмотрен. Все это происходит по вине Горина С. А. который подает бесконечные жалобы в Мосгорсуд на каждое определение суда. Большую часть времени дело о разделе имущества фактически находится в Мосгорсуде в апелляционной инстанции. Горин С. А. любыми путями затягивает рассмотрение дела по существу в Никулинском суде г. Москвы с одной только целью, чтобы получить решение в пользу офшорной компании в Симоновском суде г. Москвы. И он его получил!

О том, что кипрская офшорная компания WEST PROVINCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED обратилась с иском ко мне и к Горину С. А. в Симоновский суд г. Москвы мне стало известно по случайному стечению обстоятельств в мае 2014 года. О том, что я узнала о нахождении такого иска, поданного с нарушением подсудности, минуя Никулинский в Симоновский, для представителя истца и для ответчика Горина С. А. было неприятным ошеломлением.

Тут же у меня возникли закономерные вопросы : почему о иске, который как выяснилось был подан в Симоновский суд в феврале 2014 года, я не была уведомлена судом, и только лишь в мае 2014 года, когда явился мой представитель, судом было вручено исковое заявление с приложениями к нему ( приложения есть копии тех документов, которые были приобщены к договорам займа в Никулинском суде Гориным С. А.); почему суд принял дело к производству с нарушением подсудности.

24 июня 2014 года судья Кулешов В. А. отказывает в удовлетворении ходатайства о передаче дела по подсудности в Никулинский суд г. Москвы. Обращает на себя внимание и тот факт, что представители истца и ответчика Горина С. А. возражают против передачи дела по подсудности в Никулинский суд г. Москвы, несмотря на то, что данные договоры являются там предметом спора.

На определение суда моим представителем подана частная жалоба (частная жалоба прилагается). 04 августа 2014 года частная жалоба была удовлетворена Мосгорсудом. Дело направлено в Никулинский суд г. Москвы.

Далее события развиваются следующим образом. Вместо того, чтобы взыскивать денежные средства в Никулинском суде г. Москвы с должника по договору, как и полагается нормальному кредитору, офшорная компания продолжает настойчиво обращаться именно в Симоновский суд. И в августе 2014 года в Симоновском суде г. Москвы у судьи Кулешова В. А. вновь возникает иск с аналогичными исковыми требованиями к Горину С. А. и Гостевой Е. А., повторяя слово в слово предыдущее исковое заявление с той лишь разницей, что в качестве ответчика еще привлечена гр-ка Абдуллаева Л. А., зарегистрированная на территории Симоновского суда г. Москвы, которая якобы является сожительницей Горина С. А. в настоящее время. Истец просит взыскать солидарно с троих денежные средства, которые Горин С. А. должен выплатить WEST PROVINCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED по договорам займа. При этом перечисляется все имущество нажитое Гориным и Гостевой в браке. Из аналогичного иска четко прослеживается цель истца (а по факту офшорной компании, принадлежащей Горину С. А.) получить денежные средства именно с Гостевой, несмотря на то, что должником по договору займа является Горин С. А. Указание Абдуллаевой Л. А. в качестве ответчика служит только основанием для обращения в Симоновский суд г. Москвы по подсудности. Никакой правовой аргументации ее привлечения в иске не содержится. Налицо полное нежелание со стороны истца и ответчика Горина С. А. рассматривать дело о долговых обязательствах в Никулинском суде, где находится дело о разделе имущества супругов.

При этом дело по иску WEST PROVINCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED к Горину С. А. и ко мне, которое вернулось в августе 2014 года из Московского городского суда после удовлетворения частной жалобы о направлении дела по подсудности аппаратом суда в Никулинский суд г. Москвы не направлялось, и было направлено только лишь в ноябре 2014 года.

Я обратилась в Симоновский суд г. Москвы с ходатайством об оставлении вновь поданного иска WEST PROVINCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED без рассмотрения, поскольку в производстве Никулинского суда находится аналогичное дело, направленное туда по подсудности на основании апелляционного определения Мосгорсуда (ходатайство прилагается).

19 декабря 2014 года Симоновский суд г. Москвы удовлетворяет ходатайство и оставляет исковые требования без рассмотрения.

В мае 2015 года, просматривая сайт Мосгорсуда на предмет возвращения в Никулинский суд г. Москвы дела о разделе имущества после очередной жалобы Горина С. А., я вбивая в поисковую систему фамилии, обнаруживаю, что 12 мая 2015 года Мосгорсуд отменил определение Симоновского суда г. Москвы от 19 декабря 2014 года, то есть спустя 5 месяцев после его вынесения. И дело возвращено в Симоновский суд для рассмотрения. Опять же происходит на мой взгляд абсолютно непонятная ситуация в плане нахождения этого спора именно в Симоновском суде г. Москвы. При установленном законом сроке для обжалования в 15 дней после вынесения определения, определение не обжалуется в этот срок, но спустя 5 месяцев оно отменяется в апелляционном порядке.

Дело возвращается в в Симоновский суд г. Москвы и назначается к слушанию на 19 августа 2015 года. 17 августа 2015 года я направляю в суд телеграмму о том, что прошу слушания дела отложить в связи с моей болезнью и невозможностью присутствия в судебном заседании для изложения своей позиции по делу. То, что телеграмма дошла до суда подтверждается уведомлением о вручении с имеющейся подписью сотрудника суда от 17 августа 2015 года (копии телеграммы и уведомления прилагается).

19 августа 2015 года судья Кулешов В. А. выносит решение по иску WEST PROVINCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED к Горину С. А. , Гостевой Е. А. и Абдуллаевой Л. А. о взыскании долга по договорам займа, которым постановляет взыскать денежные средства с Горина С. А. и Гостевой Е. А. По очевидным причинам в части взыскания денежных средств с гр-ки Абдуллаевой – отказано, что было на 100% предсказуемо. Ведь цель данного иска, это решение о взыскании денежных средств именно с меня.

Обращает на себя внимание, что суд рассмотрел дело по существу в мое отсутствие, взыскав с меня огромнейшую денежную сумму по договорам займа стороной в которых я не являлась, лишив меня права выступить со своей позицией в суде.

18 сентября 2015 года, так и не дождавшись сдачи дела в канцелярию суда, я подаю апелляционную жалобу с указанием, что аргументированная жалоба будет подана мной после ознакомления с протоколом судебного заседания и решением суда.

Буквально через несколько дней на сайте суда появляется информация, что дело сдано в канцелярию аж 3 сентября! Но 18 сентября 2015 года дело в канцелярии не было, и я не смогла получить решение. 25 сентября 2015 года я еду в суд получаю решение суда. Ознакомившись с которым, мне стало все очевидно. Кулешов В. А. в рамках данного дела фактически произвел раздел долгов между супругами вместо того, чтобы рассматривать спор по общегражданскому договору, заключенному между кредитором и должником, о взыскании денежных средств. Собственно это и было целью. Правовое обоснование несогласия со столь новационным решением в плане закона и судебной практики будет мной указано в полной апелляционной жалобе.

При ознакомлении с материалами дела мной было обнаружено, что в материалах дела отсутствует моя телеграмма с просьбой об отложении. Ее просто нет, несмотря на ее поступление в суд!

Прочитав протокол судебного заседания, который уместился на двух страницах, все стало очевидным. Суд, взыскивая с меня огромную сумму денег, даже не счел нужным подробно изучить мою позицию по делу, изложенную ранее в письменном ходатайстве, где я указывала на то, что не являюсь надлежащим ответчиком по делу, отложить дело для получения от меня объяснений, задать вопросы стороне истца и стороне ответчика Горина С. А.

Хотя здесь все понятно, Горин С. А. и его офшорная компания – истец (о чем у меня имеются доказательства) преследовали цель получить решение о взыскании денежных средств по несуществующим долгам с меня, и представить в Никулинский суд г. Москвы вступившее в законную силу решение Симоновского суда г. Москвы. Но по случайному стечению обстоятельств мне стало известно о наличии иска в Симоновском суде, который не имеет отношения к месту жительства ни моему, ни Горина С. А., и дело было отправлено по подсудности. Но Горин С. А. добился своей цели и получил решение, которое ему было нужно.

Кулешов В. А. при этом выносит незаконное решение. Судья первоначально принимает дело с нарушением подсудности, отказывает в удовлетворении ходатайства о направлении дела по подсудности. Не осуществляет должный контроль за делом. После возвращение из Мосгорсуда дело не направляется в Никулинский суд г. Москвы в течение нескольких месяцев. Загадочным образом исчезает моя телеграмма, заранее направленная в суд. Я не могу с полной уверенностью утверждать, что данная телеграмма намеренно не приобщена к материалам дела, или же это было сделано по халатности сотрудников суда, но в любом случае итогом явилось то, что моя неявка не была признана уважительной и дело было рассмотрено в мое отсутствие, и с меня взыскана огромная денежная сумма. Для меня такая ситуация катастрофична. Я одна воспитываю двух маленьких детей, отбиваясь от бесконечных нападок Горина С. А., вынуждена теперь иметь еще неприятности, связанные с долгом, который на самом деле не существовал, а лишь является плодом мести бывшего супруга, способного в силу своего положения в бизнесе сфабриковать договоры займа с офшорной фирмой, которая ему же и подчиняется.

Мое неучастие в деле, несмотря на то, что с моей стороны были приняты все меры, чтобы дело было отложено, повлекло за собой грубейшее нарушение моих прав в виде невозможности представления своих интересов лично в судебном заседании - соблюдении одного из важнейших принципов гражданского процесса как устность и непосредственность, и как результат вынесение судом неправомерного решения.

Судья обязан контролировать и принимать соответствующие меры по соблюдению и выполнению требований ГПК РФ работниками аппарата суда, в частности, секретаря судебного заседания и секретарей суда.

Согласно Кодексу судейской этики, судья обязан соблюдать Конституцию РФ, ее законы, другие нормативно-правовые акты, должен добросовестно исполнять свои профессиональные обязанности, принимать все необходимые меры для своевременного рассмотрения дел, требовать от работников аппарата суда и своих непосредственных подчиненных добросовестности и преданности делу.

На основании изложенного прошу КВАЛИФИКАЦИОННУЮ КОЛЛЕГИЮ СУДЕЙ г. МОСКВЫ разобраться в данном вопросе и привлечь судью Симоновского районного суда г. Москвы Кулешова В. А. к дисциплинарной ответственности».





Продолжение следует

Тимофей Гришин

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

среда, 19 апреля 2023 г.

Metropolitan judge sent a 13-year-old child to a psychiatric hospital

Doctors admit that the girl is absolutely healthy, but they can’t do anything.



The Telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU and Rucriminal.info became aware of the forced placement of a 13-year-old in a psychiatric hospital against the wishes of the girl and her parents. And all then, that the schoolgirl accidentally drank the wrong medicine. Doctors admit that this is not necessary, but refer to the instructions of the Ministry of Health. And the judge who made the decision stupidly stamped and did not even understand what had happened.

Minor Shakira K, while at home with her family, drank sedative medicine St. John's wort. However, noticing that she mixed up the medicines and took paracetamol, she turned to her parents to call a doctor just in case. So the family did. The ambulance team did not investigate on the spot, offering to drive through GBUZ “DGKB them. N.F. Filatov, where the underage Shakira was washed out of the stomach and two hours later she actually had to go home, but then all the fun began.



The doctors of the Filatov hospital forcibly (despite the requests of the parents to let the child go home) transferred Shakira to the State Budgetary Healthcare Institution of Moscow “Scientific and Practical Center for Mental Health of Children and Adolescents. G. E. Sukhareva of the Department of Health of Moscow”, having groundlessly diagnosed her with “short-term depression”, and the doctors of the psychiatric hospital filed a lawsuit with a lawsuit for the forced hospitalization of the child.

A couple of days later, a man dressed in jeans and a sweater arrived at the hospital, accompanied by two more men and a woman, who later turned out to be V.A. Kuleshov, judge of the Simonovsky Court of Moscow. In the same form, without any symbols of judicial authority, Judge Kuleshov forced the minor to participate in the consideration of the case in violation of the law without the participation of a teacher, without listening to any arguments from the defender of the minor, the minor herself, her parents, without understanding the essence of the issue, forcibly placed an absolutely healthy child to a psychiatric hospital, effectively depriving Shakira of her freedom, her right to study, her right to participate in sports competitions, for which the girl was preparing in her life, in which there were no doctors, judges and all this nightmare.

Hospital staff in behind-the-scenes conversations admit to parents that there is no reason to keep a healthy child Shakira in a psychiatric hospital, but they cannot let her go, as there is an order from above. Who are these influential people from above, who decided to trample on the life of a child, subjecting her to humiliation by means of passing through a psychiatric hospital, knowing that she does not have any psychiatric disease?

In general, this is the situation. Doctors at the Filatov hospital determined mild poisoning, but refused to give the child to the parents, explaining verbally that there was an unspoken order from the Ministry of Health to send all children with poisoning to a psychiatric hospital. In the psychiatric hospital Sukhareva, where the child was transferred without parental consent on March 30, 2023, confirmed that there is such an unspoken order, and that even if the child does not have a mental illness, she will still be kept there, and after 30 days they will be released because she is not sick. In fact, the child spent 3 weeks in the reception room, where no one worked with her, no one treated her for any reason (either psychologically or with medication), and there was no reason to treat her, everyone understands this. The established diagnosis is depression, that is, what a psychologist does, who is not even a doctor. Psychiatric Hospital. Sukhareva filed an administrative lawsuit with the Simonovsky Court to place the child forcibly with a diagnosis of depression in a psychiatric hospital, since neither the child nor the parents agreed to this. Before considering the case, the doctors and the lawyer of the hospital apologized for the situation, explaining that they did not support the placement of the child in the hospital, but they could not do anything, as there was an order from the Ministry of Health. The court (Judge Kuleshov) did not even open the documents, arrived at the hospital and quickly spoke the decision already made in advance, without thinking about what happened to the child, why she was in the hospital, for what reason, was it a mistake, and ran away.



A girl from an ordinary family, she has never been on any records, is healthy, goes to school, studies well, the class teacher came to court with a very good reference for the child.

The parents of the minor are the father of a worker, the mother is an employee of the rehabilitation center for the disabled. All live in the Troitsky district of Moscow.

The legislator settled issues in the field of psychiatry, judicial practice (Overview of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation) also explained that in order to protect the rights of individuals from abuse of power and arbitrariness, it is established that the use of involuntary hospitalization is applied only to the mentally seriously ill and only in exceptional cases.

But what about the judge of the Simonovsky Court of Moscow Kuleshov V.A. before the law and clarifications of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, he is his own law, which means it is for him the life of this little girl Shakira, but nothing!

Whether such an attitude of state bodies will lead to total fear of parents about seeking medical help for their underage children, whom I can take away at any time by placing them in a psychiatric hospital, is still unknown. However, it is clear that such punitive actions lead to distrust of the Russian society in the state represented by its representatives - doctors, judges, prosecutors, which is intensified against the backdrop of the international agenda on Russia's cruel treatment of minor children.

The decision of the Simonovskiy Court of Moscow has been appealed to the Moscow City Court, where a hearing will be held next Friday.



Roman Trushkin

To be continued

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Столичный судья отправила 13-летнего ребенка в психушку

Врачи признают, что девочка абсолютно здорова, но сделать ничего не могут





Телеграм-каналу ВЧК-ОГПУ и Rucriminal.info стало известно о насильственном помещении 13-летнего в психиатрическую больницу вопреки желанию девочки и ее родителей. А все потом, что школьница случайно выпила не правильное лекарство. Врачи признают, что в этом нет необходимости, но ссылаются на предписания Минздрава. А судья, вынесшая решения, тупо проштамповала и даже не стало разбираться в произошедшем.

Несовершеннолетняя Шакира К, находясь дома совместно с семьей, выпила успокоительные лекарство зверобой. Однако, заметив, что перепутала лекарства и приняла парацетамол, обратилась к родителям, чтобы те взвали врача на всякий случай. Так семья и поступила. Бригада скорой помощи не стала разбираться на месте, предложив, проехать ГБУЗ «ДГКБ им. Н.Ф. Филатова», где несовершеннолетней Шакире промыли желудок и через два часа она фактически должна была отправиться домой, но тут началось все самое интересное.



Врачи Филатовской больницы принудительно (вопреки просьбам родителей отпустить ребенка домой) перевели Шакиру в ГБУ здравоохранения г. Москвы «Научно-практический центр психического здоровья детей и подростков им. Г. Е. Сухаревой Департамента здравоохранения г. Москвы», установив ей безосновательно диагноз - «краткосрочная депрессия», а врачи психиатрической больницы обратились в суд с иском о принудительной госпитализации ребенка.

Через пару дней в больницу приехал мужчина, одетый в джинсы и свитер в сопровождении еще двух мужчин и женщины, который в последствии оказался судьей Симоновского суда г. Москвы Кулешовым В.А. В том же виде без каких-либо символов судебной власти судья Кулешов принудил участвовать при рассмотрении дела несовершеннолетнюю в нарушении закона без участия педагога, не слушая никаких аргументов стороны защитника несовершеннолетней, самой несовершеннолетней, ее родителей, не разбираясь в сути вопроса, принудительно поместил абсолютно здорового ребенка в психиатрический стационар, фактически лишив свободы Шакиру, ее права учиться, право на участие ее в спортивных соревнованиях, к которым девочка готовилась в той своей жизни, в которой не было врачей, судей и всего этого кошмара.

Сотрудники больницы в кулуарных беседах признаются родителям, что не за чем держать здорового ребенка Шакиру в психиатрической больнице, однако отпустить ее не могут, так как есть указание сверху. Кто эти влиятельные люди сверху, кто решил растоптать жизнь ребенка, подвергая ее унижению по средствам прохождения через стационар психиатрической больницы, зная об отсутствии у нее какого-либо психиатрического заболевания?

В целом вышла такая ситуация. Врачи Филатовской больницы установили отравление легкой степени, но отказались отдать ребенка родителям, на словах пояснив, что из Минздрава есть негласное​ распоряжение​ всех детей с отравлением направлять в психиатрическую больницу. В психиатрической больнице им. Сухаревой, куда был переведен ребенок без согласия родителей 30 марта 2023 года, подтвердили, что такое негласное распоряжение есть, и что даже при отсутствие у ребенка психического заболевания ее все равно будут удерживать там, а после 30 дней отпустят, поскольку она не больна.​ По факту​ ребенок 3 недели пробыл в приемнике, где​ с ней никто не занимался, никто ее не отчего не лечил (ни психологически, ни медикаментозно), да лечить не отчего, все это понимают. Установленный диагноз —​ депрессия, то есть то, чем занимается психолог, который даже не является врачом. Психиатрическая больница им. Сухаревой вышла с административным иском в Симоновский суд, чтобы поместить ребенка принудительно с диагнозом депрессия в психиатрическую больницу, поскольку ни ребенок, ни родители согласия на это не давали. Перед рассмотрением дела, врачи и юрист больницы извинялись за сложившуюся ситуацию, объясняя, что не поддерживают помещение ребенка в больницу, но сделать ничего не могут, так как есть указание Минздрава.​ Суд (судья Кулешов)​ даже не открывал документы, приехал в больницу и по-быстрому проговорил уже заранее вынесенное решение, не вдумываясь, что с ребенком, зачем она в больнице, по какой причине, не ошибка ли это, и убежал.



Девочка из обычной семьи, никогда не состояла ни на каких учетах, здорова, ходит в школу, учится хорошо, классный руководитель приходил на суд с очень хорошей характеристикой на ребенка.

Родители несовершеннолетней — отец рабочий, мать работник центра реабилитации инвалидов. Все проживают в Троицком округе Москвы.

Законодатель, урегулировал вопросы в области психиатрии, судебная практика (Обзор ВС РФ) также разъяснила, что в целях защиты прав лиц от злоупотреблений властью и произвола устанавливают, что применение недобровольной госпитализации применяется только в отношении психически тяжело болящих и только в исключительных случаях.

Но что судье Симоновского суда г. Москвы Кулешову В.А. до закона и разъяснений Верховного суда РФ, он сам себе закон, что значит для него жизнь этой маленькой девочки Шакиры, да ничего!

Приведет ли такое отношение государственных органов к тотальному страху родителей по обращению за медицинской помощью для своих несовершеннолетних детей, которых в любой момент могу отобрать, поместив в психиатрическую больницу, пока неизвестно. Однако точно понятно, что подобные карательные действия ведут к недоверию Российского общества государству в лице ее представителей – врачей, судей, прокуроров, что усиливается на фоне международной повестки по жестокому обращению России с несовершеннолетними детьми.

Решение Симоновского суда г. Москвы обжаловано в Московский городской суд, где в ближайшую пятницу состоится слушание.



Роман Трушкин

Продолжение следует

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

вторник, 18 апреля 2023 г.

“In agreement with the top management of PJSC Gazprom.

How 100 billion budget funds are being cut



Information that has recently appeared about a possible change of leadership in Gazprom Mezhregiongaz Makhachkala could well turn out to be true. As it became known to Rucriminal.info, the head of the republic, Sergei Melikov, is actively lobbying for the position of the head of Gazprom MRG Makhachkala, former Minister of Energy Rizvan Muradov. The latter not so long ago voluntarily left the ministerial chair. Muradov's strange decision to leave the post of minister surprised all the inhabitants of the republic. Especially, after his statement about 100% corruption in the energy sector and in particular, in the representative office of PJSC Rosseti in Dagestan. Everyone understood that after such an exposure, Muradov was unlikely to remain in his post and it was logical that he decided to leave himself before he was kicked out. But, there are still a lot of questions for Muradov:

- It took you two years to figure it out and understand that the level of corruption in the ministry you head is going through the roof?

- why, instead of fighting with her, they chose to leave their post, is it really so bad?

- and the main question - how can you lead a ministry and not sign a single document?

At the same time, the leader praised Muradov's "work" and noted that he had improved the work of the ministry, but did not name how specifically. During the period of Muradov's rule, the level of debt for electricity increased by 2.3 billion rubles, and for housing and communal services - by 3.2 billion.

So why lobby Muradov in Gazprom? Especially at the level of the leadership of the republic?

And the answer is the newly created JSC "Unified Operator RD". The company, which was intensively created by the deputy chairman of the government of the Republic of Dagestan, the former minister of energy and housing and communal services, Muradov's predecessor, the well-known Mazhonts Manvel.



Mazhonts created the "Single Operator" system for the purpose of consolidating payments, controlling incoming payments, etc. The goals and objectives of the joint-stock company were more than noble, but in real life, what was created was created .... How can you create something working on the basis of bankrupt enterprises with millions of debts? Over time, realizing that the system does not work, they decided to drag in another possible payer and the choice falls on Gazprom MRG Makhachkala. But there is a chance that the new leader Mansurov may not support their "correct decision" and will not support the idea of ​​merging with the "Unified Operator" and then the system will die without working. The solution to this problem is only the removal of Mansurov from his post and replacing him with his man, the fighter against corruption Muradov. With this proposal, the head of the republic turned to Gazprom MRG, personally to the head Gustov S.V., backing up his proposals with a promise to increase the collection of payments for gas. But here another question arises, but this time for the leadership of the republic, and who will pay for the services of an intermediary ("Single Operator"), again at the expense of the consumer, again increasing the already prohibitive price for gas.

And Rucriminal.info also has a question. How will the management of Gazprom PJSC react to the appointment of Muradov to the position of the head of their subsidiary, a man who, during his work as Minister of Energy of the Republic of Dagestan, for 2 years tried to sue Gazprom Mezhregiongaz Makhachkala for 12 billion rubles, on unreasonable grounds . He sued for two years, tried to sue, but could not, and following the proverb "you can't win, lead and collapse", I decided to go this way.

There is another option, such an incomprehensible lobbying for the appointment of Muradov to Gazprom Mezhregiongaz Makhachkala, this is a situation related to the creation of a new subsidiary of Gazprom PJSC - DAGGAZ OJSC, which is being created on the basis of a company of the same name owned by the former head of Dagestanregiongaz LLC » Nasrudinov Magomedgusen Nasrudinovich.



Nasrudinov M.G. a well-known “gas worker” in Dagestan, was convicted under part 4 of article 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation for organizing a fraudulent deal to “grab” gas networks in the Republic of Dagestan. As a result of this transaction, Mr. Nasrudinov M.N. received the property of 9 municipalities, this is 1 million linear meters of gas pipes. Having served his sentence for the crime, Nasrudinov nevertheless managed to keep the seized property in the ownership of DAGGAZ OJSC. And after his release, Nasrudinov could not calm down and repeatedly made attempts to buy out or seize the gas networks of RD. All his attempts did not bring any result, except for the initiation of new criminal cases. As soon as the leadership of the RD changed, Nasrudinov launched a new attempt to seize the networks. And only under Melikov he managed to create "an ideal scheme for the consolidation (capture) of the gas networks of Dagestan." And interestingly, he is supported by the government of the Republic of Dagestan and he also has to earn money. The Deputy Chairman of the Government of the Republic of Dagestan Mazhonts M.L. personally helps him to implement this scheme. and a certain Konstantin Averkin, a very well-known businessman in the northern capital, in his own words, “a personal friend and confidant of Mr. Gustov S.V., head of Gazprom Mezhregiongaz St. Petersburg. Averkin K., Mazhonts M.L., Nasrudinov M.N., create a new consonant company "DAGGAZ", which includes the main shareholders Averkin, Nasrudinov and representatives of PJSC "Gazprom", who in the future must buy out the gas networks of Dagestan, for the money of "Gazprom" and consolidate them in a new company. For this procedure, Gazprom had to allocate up to 100 billion rubles. At the same time, Gazprom Mezhregiongaz Makhachkala, at that time the head of Davydov A.V., also a protege of Averkin K., had to pay the debt of Mezhregiongaz to DAGGAZ OJSC, in the amount of 1.7 billion rubles. Everything was fine and discussed, until Davydov A.V. left with a scandal. , from the position of the head of the IWG, a new appointee Mansurov L.N. came, who, according to rumors, was appointed in agreement with the top echelon of the management of PJSC Gazprom. Averkin K. could not find an approach to Mansurov, especially since the first person to be removed from the post of head of the GRO IWG was Oleg Chiglintsev, Averkin's brother. The appointment of Mansurov broke the "ideal scheme" for the capture of the gas networks of the RD by the company Mazhonts, Averkin, Nasrudinov. But they could no longer retreat, beautiful obligations were given to the Management of PJSC "Gazprom" not only by them, but personally by Gustav S.V., who personally promised the Chairman of "Gazprom" Miller A.B. solve the problem of gas supply and additional gasification in the Republic of Dagestan. And they find a way out - to remove Mansurov and appoint their own person as the head of the IWG, who will sign all the necessary papers for the transfer of gas networks to DAGGAZ, Rizvan Muradov became this person. Muradov is an ideal candidate, he headed the relevant ministry, he did not get involved in any scandals (he personally did not sign a single document for two years), he left his post as an ardent fighter against corruption, which was noted by the Government of the Republic of Dagestan, from a well-known and respected Dagestan family. In short, in all positions a passing candidate and, most importantly, will sign everything that is needed.

Alexey Ermakov

To be continued

Source: www.rucriminal.info

«По согласованию с высшим руководства ПАО «Газпром».

Как пилят 100 млрд бюджетных средств



Появившиеся в последнее время сведения о возможной смене руководства в "Газпром межрегионгазе Махачкала" вполне мог оказаться правдой. Как стало известно Rucriminal.info, руководитель республики Сергей Меликов активно лоббирует на должность руководителя " Газпром МРГ Махачкала", бывшего министра энергетики Ризвана Мурадова. Последний не так давно добровольно, оставил министерское кресло. Странное решение Мурадова покинуть пост министра удивило всех жителей республики. Особенно, после его заявления о 100% коррумпированности в сфере энергетики и в частности, в представительстве ПАО "Россети" в Дагестане. Все понимали, что после такого разоблачения, Мурадов вряд ли останется на своем посту и логично, что он решил сам уйти, пока не выгнали. Но, осталось куча вопросов к Мурадову:

- Вам понадобилось два года, чтобы разобраться и понять, что в возглавляемом министерстве уровень коррупции зашкаливает?

- почему вместо того, чтобы бороться с ней, предпочли покинуть свой пост, неужели так все плохо?

- и главный вопрос - как можно руководить министерством и не подписать ни одного документа?

При этом руководитель похвалил "работу" Мурадова и отметил, что он улучшил работу министерства, но при этом не назвал как конкретно. За период правления Мурадова уровень задолженности за электроэнергию вырос на 2,3 млрд рублей, а по линии ЖКХ - на 3,2 млрд.

Так зачем лоббировать Мурадова в Газпром? Тем более на уровне руководства республики?

А ответ - это новосозданное АО "Единый оператор РД" . Компания, которую усиленно создавал заместитель председатель правительства РД, бывший министр энергетики и ЖКХ, предшественник Мурадова, всем известный Мажонц Манвел.



Сергей Густов


Мажонц создал систему "Единого оператора" с целью консолидации платежей, контроля за поступаемыми платежами и т.д. Цели и задачи АО были более чем благородные, но в реале, создалось что создалось.... Как можно создать, что то рабочее, на базе банкротных предприятий с миллионными долгами? Со временем поняв, что система не работает, решили затащить еще одного возможного плательщика и выбор падает на "Газпром МРГ Махачкала". Но есть шанс, что новый руководитель Мансуров может не поддержать их "правильное решение" и не станет поддерживать идею слияния с "Единым оператором" и тогда система помрет, так и не заработав. Решение этой проблемы - только смещение Мансурова с должности и замена его на своего человека, борца с коррупцией Мурадова. С этим предложением и обратился глава республики в "Газпром МРГ", лично к руководителю Густову с.в., подкрепляя свое предложениями обещанием увеличить собираемость платежей за газ. Но тут еще возникает еще один вопрос, но уже к руководству республики, а кто будет оплачивать услуги посредника ("Единого оператора"), опять за счет потребителя, опять повышение и так запредельной, цены за газ.

И еще у Rucriminal.info есть вопрос. Как руководство ПАО "Газпром" отреагирует на назначение Мурадова на должность руководителя их дочернего предприятия, человека, который, за время своей работы в должности министра энергетики РД, в течении 2 лет пытался отсудить у "Газпром межрегионгаз Махачкала" 12 млрд рублей, по необоснованным основаниям. Два года судился, пытался отсудить, но не смог и следуя пословице "не можешь победить -возглавь и развали", решил идти этим путем.

Есть еще один вариант, такого непонятного лоббирования назначения Мурадова в «Газпром Межрегионгаз Махачкала» это ситуация, связанная с созданием новой «дочки» ПАО «Газпром» — ОАО «ДАГГАЗ», которое создается на базе одноименной компании, принадлежащей, бывшему руководителю ООО «Дагестанрегионгаз» Насрудинову Магомедгусену Насрудиновичу.


Насрудинов М.Г. известный в Дагестане «газовик», был осужден по ч.4 ст.159 УК РФ, за организацию мошеннической сделки по «прихватизации» газовых сетей в РД. В результате этой сделки, г-н Насрудинов М.Н. получил, в собственность имущество 9 муниципальных образований, это 1 млн. погонных метров газовых труб. Отбыв наказание за совершенное преступление, Насрудинов тем не менее смог удержать захваченное имущество в собственности ОАО «ДАГГАЗ». И после своего освобождения, Насрудинов не мог успокоиться и неоднократно предпринимал попытки по выкупу или захвату газовых сетей РД. Все его попытки не принесли никакого результата, кроме возбуждения новых уголовных дел. Как только менялось руководство РД, Насрудинов запускал новую попытку по захвату сетей. И только при Меликове он сумел создать «идеальную схему по консолидации (захвату) газовых сетей Дагестана». И что занимательно, ему оказывает поддержку в правительстве РД и он еще и денег должен заработать. Реализовать ему эту схему помогает лично заместитель Председателя правительства РД Мажонц М.Л. и некто Аверкин Константин, очень известный в северной столице бизнесмен, по его собственным словам «личный друг и доверенное лицо г-на Густова С.В., руководителя «Газпром межрегионгаз Санкт-Петербург. Аверкин К. , Мажонц М.Л., Насрудинов М.Н., создают новую созвучную компанию «ДАГГАЗ», в которую входят основными акционерами Аверкин, Насрудинов и представители ПАО «Газпром», которые в дальнейшем, должны выкупить газовые сети Дагестана, за деньги «Газпрома» и консолидировать их в новой компании. На данную процедуру, «Газпром» должен был выделить до 100 млрд рублей. При этом «Газпром межрегионгаз Махачкала», в то время руководитель Давыдов А.В., тоже протеже Аверкина К., должен был оплатить долг «Межрегионгаза» перед ОАО «ДАГГАЗ», в размере 1,7 млрд рублей. Все было хорошо и обговорено, до тех пор пока не ушел со скандалом Давыдов А.В. , с должности руководителя МРГ и пришел новый назначенец Мансуров Л.Н., которого, по слухам, назначили по согласованию с высшим эшелоном руководства ПАО «Газпром». Аверкин К. не смог найти подхода к Мансурову, тем более первый кого снял с должности руководителя ГРО МРГ был Чиглинцев Олег, брат Аверкина. Назначение Мансурова сломало «идеальную схему» по захвату газовых сетей РД компанией Мажонц, Аверкин, Насрудинов. Но отступать они уже не могли, были даны красивые обязательства Руководству ПАО «Газпром» не только ими, ни и лично Густавом С.В., который лично обещал Председателю «Газпрома» Миллеру А.Б. решить проблему по газоснабжению и догазификации в Республике Дагестан. И они находят выход-убрать Мансурова и назначить своего человека руководителем МРГ, который подпишет все необходимые бумаги по передаче газовых сетей в «ДАГГАЗ», этим человеком стал Ризван Мурадов. Мурадов идеальная кандидатура, возглавлял профильное министерство, не замазался ни в каких скандалах (за два года лично не подписал ни одного документа), ушел с должности как ярый борец с коррупцией, что было отмечено Правительством РД, из известного и уважаемого дагестанского рода. Короче, по всем позициям проходная кандидатура и что самое главное, подпишет все что нужно.

Алексей Ермаков

Продолжение следует

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

понедельник, 17 апреля 2023 г.

How the wife of the "King of the Kuban Themis" was smeared from the case

The perpetrators did not answer for taking dozens of old people from their last houses and apartments



Under the personal control of the head of the Russian investigative committee, Alexander Bastrykin, a high-profile case of “black realtors” is successfully falling apart in Krasnodar, who during the pandemic managed to fraudulently transfer more than two dozen apartments of lonely old people to themselves. In this high-profile case, immediately after the start of the investigation, the names of representatives of the family of the former chief judge of the region Alexander Chernov, the judicial and notarial family of the Lameikins, flashed by. And now, not without their active "attention", the criminal case against this organized criminal community ends with powerful ... nothing. And it seemed, at first, that after the completion of the investigation to the employees of the Kuban Investigative Committee, the authorities could throw additional stars on shoulder straps with a shovel. It would seem that such a unique opportunity for the employees of the Investigative Committee is to flare up brightly in the dim Kuban law enforcement firmament .. But ... Details - at Rucriminal.info.

The Pervomaisky District Court of Krasnodar put an amusing final end to the first part of the iconic law enforcement-Marlezon show, which has been under the vigilant personal control of the head of the Russian Investigative Committee, Alexander Ivanovich Bastrykin, for two years now. Two years ago, a number of central and regional media described the first details of apartment scams committed by an organized criminal community of black realtors. During the pandemic, scammers transferred a considerable number of apartments and houses of single residents of the Krasnodar Territory and the Republic of Adygea to themselves and their accomplices. From the very first days of the investigation, this, as it now turns out, very strange work, was taken over by the regional investigatory committee.

And already at the start, the first question arose: why, in a separate proceeding, was the criminal case of the acting notary Chernova G.T.? After all, Chernov's assistant, Tamara Tsikunib, was perhaps the most important criminal link in the implementation of all these murky schemes. It was she who issued all the powers of attorney to the mountain, where, as if on behalf of the old people, the right to dispose of their real estate and savings was received by crooks. And it was on the basis of this “leftist” that the houses and apartments of grandfathers corresponded with scammers. But for some reason, the investigation, having opened a case under Part 4 on the other members of the organized criminal group. Art. 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - "Fraud", according to Tsikunib led the investigation to article 202 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. And this is just something "Abuse of authority by private notaries and auditors." What served as the basis for such a wise division remained a mystery. Which just now turned out to be easily solvable. One of the victims handed over to us the "Resolution of the Pervomaisky District Court of Krasnodar dated January 25, 2023." And reading this voluminous text, the answer to this question immediately becomes obvious.

Grandmother said that she managed to get this highly secret document far from immediately. But, since the right to know what the court decided there was guaranteed to her by law, she nevertheless turned out to have the document.



Immediately about the summarizing part of the "verdict". Court sentenced:

“Stop the criminal case against Tsikunib Tamara Mussovna ... in connection with the expiration of the statute of limitations for criminal prosecution. The preventive measure chosen in relation to Tsikunib T.M. – a written undertaking not to leave and proper behavior – to be left unchanged until the entry into force of the decision, and then canceled”…

After reading the 25-page resolution itself, I wanted to look at its first page again. Judging by the content, it should also have read “Bazhov… Afanasiev… Andersen… The Brothers Grimm… Charles Perrault”… or who else is there among the famous storytellers? What relation these 25 pages of the court document have to the truth is impossible to understand in principle.

Of course, the young judge Syatkin N.N., who literally just tried on a judicial robe and was urgently and unconsciously appointed to the trial at the very last moment (instead of Judge E.A. Lameykin, who had previously held two dozen stably postponed meetings) could only focus on materials cases prepared by the investigator of the Investigative Committee S. Kobzev. But the young judge, for some reason, did not have any obvious questions. Although they are already even on the first page of the case.

“Tsikunib T.M. committed seven episodes of deliberate crimes against the interests of service in other organizations, namely, abuse of power by private notaries”…

Why seven? Two years ago, both the media and a number of Internet resources published a complete list of victims. There are twenty one! Once again, - in letters: "d-in-a-d-c-a-t-o-d-i-n" !!! Where did the other 14 episodes go? Due to what insurmountable circumstances did they find themselves outside the field of view of the IC? The case file mentions injured pensioners A.M. Sundukov, D.A. Veprikov, V.G. Mozalevsky, Yu.V. Zakharov. Zenkova E.T., Bondarenko A.A., Kovalev I.V. Q: What about the rest of the episodes? What about the episodes on the real estate of pensioners Fomina, Kiseleva, Nadyarnaya, Sergina, Breus, and other victims? Yes, today many the issues that caused the panic of the elderly seem to have been settled. Housing owned by grandfathers. Although not all. The apartments of those victims who have passed away during this time have also been robbed. But nevertheless, what about these 14 episodes that have fallen out of the investigation's field of vision? Have they launched another investigation? Indeed, according to Article 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation “Fraud”, no pre-trial decision is provided for by mutual agreement of the parties. And, therefore, the investigation should have considered them. Moreover, the same grandmother Fomina, who was the first to turn to law enforcement officers, seeing an unfamiliar surname in her payment for housing and communal services, the new “owner” of her apartment, even wrote a personal appeal to the “personally supervising” this case, the main Russian investigative officer A. Bastrykin. This means that even those who received their housing back did not stop demanding just retribution for the criminals. The struggle for justice cost them a loss of time and health ... But they did not bother to give an answer either to her appeal, or to the appeal of Zenkova Alexander Ivanovich, or other employees of the RF Investigative Committee. Not in the prescribed month, not at all.



Reading the fantasies mentioned in the court ruling as irrefutable facts, the first question that arises is: why did the phrase “abuse of authority” suddenly appear in the materials of the investigation submitted to the court, when right there, in the materials, it says “deliberate crimes”?

However, it may be a matter of legal subtleties that are misunderstood by ordinary people without special legal education.

But even from the further reasoning of the investigators of the Investigative Committee, reflected in the case, the same question is rather intensified. Because the given references to laws and norms also inspire great doubts that we are talking only about “abuses”. It strongly looks like the fact that many in the case are far-fetched. And, for the ears of an elephant.

First, a little legal educational program:

In accordance with Articles 42, 43, 44 of the Fundamentals of the Legislation of the Russian Federation on Notaries

“When performing notarial acts, the notary establishes the identity of the citizen who applied for the notarial act, his representative ... Identification should be carried out on the basis of a passport or other documents that exclude any doubts about the identity of the citizen ... When certifying transactions, the legal capacity of citizens is checked ...

According to Art. 48 Fundamentals, the notary refuses to perform notarial acts if the performance of such an action is contrary to the law. documents submitted for the performance of a notarial act are not confirmed are not confirmed in the manner prescribed by the legislation of the Russian Federation "...

To finish with this, meaning nothing for our investigation, legislative lyrics, one more quote. From the "Professional Code of Notaries of the Russian Federation".

Clause 2.2. “Perform a notarial act, if you are sure that you are acting within the law, resolve doubts before making a deal, refrain from acting even with the slightest doubt about its legality and correctness” ... How beautiful it is! Although the Krasnodar Territory, as it turns out, this is in no way applicable.

Based on all these legislative scarecrows, how to explain, for example, the ease of consequences for Tsikunib of the very first crime that came to the attention of the investigation?

“Realizing his CRIMINAL intent, on September 13, 2019 ... acting notary Chernova G.T. Tsikuniya T.M., .. in order to derive benefits and advantages for himself and Zhestovskaya G., as a person acquiring the right to dispose of other people's property, REALIZING the social danger of their actions , FOREIGHTING the inevitability of the onset of socially dangerous consequences and WANTING their onset, realizing and assuming that ... the victim (No. 1) ... is not aware of the legal consequences, and that as a result of the unfair performance of her duties, significant harm may be caused to the legitimate interests of citizens ..., did not check the legal capacity of a citizen (No. 1), in the presence of obvious signs of a mental illness, which he has been suffering from since May 2001, is registered with a psychiatrist with a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia, continuous type of treatment, stably expressed emotional-volitional effect, hallucinatory - paranoid syndrome ... and in the absence of grounds, notarized his will at the disposal of Zhestovskaya G.I. with all property and money (No. 1), with the right of substitution, by printing out a power of attorney on the form 23 AA 9498674, according to which, (No. 1) authorized Zhestovskaya G.I. dispose of all his property, in particular an apartment at the address: Sochi, st. Apricot…. By making an entry in the register for registration of notarial acts under No. 23/241-n/23-2019-4-290 of 09/13/2019.

Let's leave aside the strangeness associated with the delivery of the old man from Sochi to Krasnodar (are there not notaries in Sochi?).

But when even the investigator writes down in his observations that (No. 1) has clear signs of mental illness, what was a secret for Tsikunib? Just look at (No. 1), and the child will understand that the old man, unfortunately, has huge mental health problems. And any notarial actions with such a category of citizens are prohibited by law (see above the articles of those same “Fundamentals”). Doesn't even this case show that there simply can't be any "excesses of authority", but a conscious intent is absolutely clearly seen ... But the investigator of the regional Investigative Committee S. Kobzev draws completely different conclusions.

“07/11/2020 by the Office of the Federal Service for State Registration, Cadastre and Cartography in the Krasnodar Territory, on the basis of a certified acting notary Chernova G.T. – Tsikunib T.M. notarized power of attorney ... state registration of ownership of the STOPPED was made (it means that we are still talking about an organized, well-thought-out and planned abduction, and not about some kind of abuse of power?), at (No. 1) residential premises at the address ..., in the name of Salnikova O .G., registration record 23:49:0205014:1162-23/050/2020-5.”

An interesting detail: when the Pervomaisky Court needed ... the absence of (No. 1) or his legal representatives at court hearings on the case, the assistants of Judge Lameikin contacted the representatives of (No. 1) and persuaded them to write that, they say, there were no objections to the court deciding everything without them.



That is, the judge immediately discovered the representatives of the old man with schizophrenia, but did Tsikunib, who even according to the deepest conviction of the investigator Koboev, saw that her grandfather was clearly not in her right mind, had no doubts?

As Rucriminal.info found out, now the criminal case of the head of the OPS, Galina Zhestovskaya, is also not shaky, with numerous postponements of meetings, the Leninsky District Court of Krasnodar is considering. We will return to this most interesting criminal frame later. The gypsy realtor, the owner of a private almshouse, through which many old people “persuaded to good care” passed, now, thanks to such “care”, is the owner of over fifty real estate objects. She started back in her time by selling orphans to the USA and Europe. Although, all this was officially called “adoption of orphans abroad”. But it soon became clear that pushing orphans to rich Americans and the Bundes was still troublesome. In addition, they, their fate in the county at that time, were tracked by Russian social services. And soon the shop was completely covered up - it was forbidden to adopt abroad ... It turned out to be much easier with the old people. Moreover, no one was interested in their fate when they got into the old house ... As soon as the lonely got into her almshouse, the regional social services removed them from their register. And who would then begin to bother with dozens of strange transfers of the property of Zhestovskaya's "wards" into her hands. With the subsequent rapid disappearance of grandfathers from life.

According to the real estate agent Zhestovskaya, the consideration of the case in the Leninsky District Court of Krasnodar continues. Well, it goes on... Endlessly enduring... And, it seems that all this is happening because Zhestovskaya or her "unidentified accomplices" are now conducting "separate negotiations" with those high-ranking officials who are up to their necks in all these scams. Zhestovskaya has something to present to her "roof" and sympathizers to alleviate her plight. So, it is not at all excluded that everything will end for her with some kind of ridiculous sentence. With the release of the swindler right in the courtroom on parole. But information on her "high-ranking" associates will not be announced.

Although according to the sane Zhestovskaya 159th Art. Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the statute of limitations is not two years, but ten years. So there is hope that the verdict, albeit in softness comparable to cotton candy, will eventually come.

It only seems strange at first glance that, for example, the one to whom the apartment of a patient with schizophrenia (No. 1) was immediately recorded at a commercial price far over 10 million turned out to be outside the field of investigation - Salnikova O.G. If only the eskashniks had interrogated the lucky woman, even if only for the sake of appearances. But to do this, if we proceed from the interests of the crooks themselves, was in no way possible. After all, it is clear that the "first buyers" are either the members of the OPS themselves, or the figures "needed" by the gang, who were thus attracted as a "contributing roof". And, having interviewed all the "first buyers" who got the property for a penny, you never know what high-ranking Kuban hornet's nest could be stirred up.

By the way, in the case file on these seven episodes out of two dozen that came to court, they speak of serious psychiatric illnesses, with clearly expressed signs of several more victims (in 4 out of 7). But, according to the investigator of the Investigative Committee and the Pervomaisky District Court, the fact that it was to Chernova’s office that such disabled old grandfathers were taken from distances of tens and hundreds of kilometers, so that they would give their only housing to crooks, according to powers of attorney bungled by Tsikunib, this just something "abuse of authority"?

Okay, even we can admit, with a very big stretch, that Tsikunib, at the time of the execution of these powers of attorney, found some eclipse. And twenty times she did not understand the situation to the end. And so spitting on the law.

But we are looking at the continuation of the myth-making tale, which, following the results of his free investigative work, was filled up by the investigator of the Kuban Investigative Committee.

We quote the decision of the Pervomaisky Court, created on the basis of the materials of the investigation.

“10/29/2019 Zhestovskaya G.I., acting in accordance with the criminal role assigned to her, jointly and in concert as part of an organized group with Rozhikhin G.G., Nikolaeva T.A., Miroshnichenko G.M., Zaichenko T.I. the absence of Zenkova E.T., arrived with an official document received by them for temporary use by deception from the latter, misled by them about their intentions for her lifelong maintenance - a passport of a citizen of the Russian Federation to the notary's office of a notary of the Krasnodar notary district Chernova G.T. Address: Krasnodar, st. Levanevsky, 174, in which the duties of a notary were temporarily performed by Tsikunib T.M., to certify a notarized power of attorney to dispose of ... all the property and funds of Zenkova E.T, with the right of substitution, for the purpose of illegally acquiring the right to property ...

Realizing the social danger of her actions, foreseeing the inevitability of the onset of socially dangerous consequences and wishing their onset, realizing and admitting that Zenkova E.T. using its powers, contrary to the tasks of the notary, in the absence of Zenkova E.T., did not check her state of health, did not explain to her the meaning and significance of the provided draft transaction, did not check whether its content corresponded to the actual intentions of Zenkova E.T. did not leave for her place of residence, did not make sure that she owns another habitable dwelling, did not verify the truth of her intentions, did not receive from her the appropriate expression of will and in the absence of grounds, notarized her will to dispose of all the property and funds of Zenkova E.T., with the right of disposal through the appellant Nikolaeva T.A. by printing a power of attorney on the form 23 AA 9498970 ... "



On January 16, 2020, on the basis of this power of attorney, state registration of a mortgage was carried out in Rosreestr by virtue of an agreement on property stolen from Zenkova in the name of Barabash S.S.

Some time later, Zenkova's house turned out to be registered with Rozhikhin G.G.

Rozhikhin is now on more than a strange run. He, like that elusive Joe from the joke, looks like no one from the investigation needs it. Through our channels, we found out that Rozhikhin first hung out in the Kuban village of Poltava, then in the village of Kuzhorskaya in Adygea. They passed this information through the regional colleagues... If only they knew to what extent this turned out to be of no interest to the investigation. Now Rozhikhin has completely disappeared somewhere in the steppe southern expanses.

But here, at the same time, I would like to know: where, in principle, could this fairy tale come from with the participation of Zenkova E.T.? In all this nonsense, which for some reason is called "the result of the work of the investigation," is there even a word of truth?

There is not the slightest doubt about how Ekaterina Tikhonovna herself described this criminal offense that had fallen on her. In detail, she told how things were in reality (and not in the myth composed by the investigator Kobzev, convenient for the Pervomaisky court).



Zenkova's private house is an extremely attractive place. On Red Partisan Street in Krasnodar. Directly opposite the Second Regional Hospital, Eye Microsurgery. Her neighbor, who built a building on her plot, which is now rented by Pyaterochka, repeatedly asked Zenkova to sell her her house with a plot - commerce required expansion. To which she received a resounding refusal. Ekaterina Tikhonovna, a man of strong Soviet hardening, with excellent health for her age, was not going to hand over the house that her father had built back in the 50s to anyone.

The fact that her house is no longer hers, Ekaterina Tikhonovna learned from a neighbor. She came with a question: “Bab Katya, why did you sell the house to another, did I ask you to give it to me?” Together with her other neighbor, Olga Maslova, who helps Baba Katya with the housework, in the midst of a pandemic, when you could only walk on the streets with your dog, and the old people were generally ordered to sit in their huts and not show their nose into the street, Ekaterina Tikhonovna still managed to get her hands on strange documents regarding the “new owners” of the house.

The part of the materials of the investigation and the decision of the Pervomaisky Court, where it is said that the members of the criminal group (named and, we hope, for some disinterested reason, unidentified by the investigation) showed up at Chernova’s office with ... the passport of Zenkova E.T. It's just a lie. No passport to anyone Ekaterina Tikhonovna did not give to the family. He is always with her.

But the fact of the matter is that if there is a record in the materials of the criminal case that the swindlers appeared in order for their accomplice-notary to draw up all this “leftist” without a passport at all, and the power of attorney was issued, you won’t understand by what data, here even a law enforcement officer could not change Article 159, a fraudulent article, into light Article 202 on abuse of authority. In addition, the question, which is generally unnecessary for the Kuban social elites, who maintains a database of all regional pensioners, would come up: where did the crooks get the data on single grandfathers? Where did the passport data come from, if the grandmothers never gave their passports to anyone? If the investigation were really interested in these issues, then the dock would have to be expanded to the scale of a stadium tribune. And even very iconic personalities of the Southern Federal District would sit on it.

What kind of “excess of notarial powers” is this if the owner of the property does not come to the notary’s office, if the crooks do not have his passport in their hands, but only passport data leaked by Kuban social officials? The situation for any, even a completely illiterate notary, would more than transparently say that we are talking about a fraudulent kidnapping of a house. But if the investigation had come to such a suggestive conclusion, Tsikunib T.M., acting notary, would have gone. on fraud and would threaten her, according to the articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, up to "tens". But with such a threat, God knows what “details” Tsikunib could already begin to share with the investigation.

The investigation, for some "mysterious", although, by and large, more than obvious reasons, needed to fit the Tsikunib case under the light article 202 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. And already after the first sessions of the Pervomaisky court, there was no doubt: the case was set in such a way that everything would end precisely with the “expiration of the statute of limitations”. And more than 20 reschedulings of the court session, they say, this is not just a guess. Although, everything, of course, was done in accordance with the law. Either the plaintiffs, due to decrepitude, did not appear at the hearings, then the lawyers were ill, then the defendant, for some very good reasons, could not drive into the courtroom from house arrest.

As you know, the devil is in the details. And in order to understand why, this threatened to become the most grandiose, most successful case of the entire Russian investigatory committee in terms of exposing the domestic black real estate business, ended in complete trash, let's just talk about the details. Those that the attention of the investigation, in the current situation of the Kuban "elite", could never attract.

In the scams of the real estate OPS, a significant, if not the main, role was played by the acting notary Chernova Tsikunib T.M. Without it, the implementation of the plans of scammers would be impossible in principle. And probably at the very beginning, when information about the actions of fraudsters only began to seep into the then “just something” in independent regional media, one could still assume that perhaps Galina Timofeevna Chernova herself, the wife of the former chief judge of the region, who, in addition to that the current notary herself, also the President of the Notary Chamber of the Krasnodar Territory, is not aware of the affairs of her acting. So, then, one could expect a thorough analysis of the criminal actions of a subordinate, Tsikunib's summons to the ethics commission (or whatever the notaries have for suppressing illegal actions and deciding the future fate of unscrupulous bodies). But instead of this, the media, which, according to the lady who was accustomed to commanding, “become pissed off”, almost received a “response” in the form of Chernova’s statement ... to the police ... To the daring journalists. That is, instead of analyzing the scams of a subordinate, it was supposed to execute those who encroached. And such a choice of a line of conduct indicated that Chernova herself was well aware of the criminal results of the work of her office. However, we cannot say with certainty. It is possible that something from Galina Timofeevna's old days leapt up, When her husband, Alexander Dmitrievich, was the all-powerful chief judge of the regional court, and no one dared even look askance at the Chernivtsi clan.

To confirm her insult, Chernova also organized an information attack on journalists who dared to say something there.

In one of those media that we jokingly consider independent, such a denunciation appeared.

“On February 10, 2021, the editors of the Krasnodar Territory online publication committed an intentional crime against the President of the Notary Chamber of the Krasnodar Territory and her assistant. They posted a publication on the network resource, taking as its basis the events of a real resonant crime revealed in the Kuban, about the theft of real estate by drawing up sales contracts drawn up in a simple written form, where no one's presence is required, especially a notary, "- informs the lawyer of the Chamber of Advocates of the Krasnodar Territory Angelina Konstantinova.

Levanevsky Street, 174 is the address of the MFC building. Both ordinary people and realtors come here for documents. They bring already signed contracts for registration. It is impossible to understand that this is a "lime on paper" .

“There is no information that these transactions went through a notary's office. These transactions took place in a simple written form. This became possible only because the law does not oblige to conduct real estate transactions in a notarial order. These transactions were carried out at the MFC without the participation of a notary, so it is impossible to say that there was some kind of notarization here. The activity of a notary is insured. It bears both criminal and civil liability. By law, he is obliged to compensate for the damage caused by his actions, within the amount specified in the contract of sale. As you can see, the notary is responsible for everything, and he is responsible with his personal freedom and property, ”says Elena Lagodina, notary, chairman of the commission for advanced training of notaries in the Krasnodar Territory.

If you take the fact that the decoration took place in the same building and add tragedy to it, then the result is fake news. Thus, the neighborhood for rent is not a crime, but the placement of slander is quite.

What is the difference between custom notes and objective notes is not worth telling anyone. Objective - this is when both sides are heard. Custom - this is when one is rushing with a drill. And there is a zakuzukha in cases where either one of the “almighty” asked, or paid a lot, or the task of covering a “hot topic” was entrusted to an enthusiastic stupid young lady, convinced that she was a genius of journalism, based on the fact that at school, according to the essays she always had a "five".

There is only one truth in this “refutation” - Chernova’s notary office is really in the same knowledge with the MFC, in the Galaktika shopping center, on the street. Levanevsky in Krasnodar. And what? What did the MFC have to do with all those two dozen left-wing notarized powers of attorney, under which Chernova's seal stood?

But the fact that journalists have already been called slanderers, criminals, and authors of fakes, said that “the situation for the Chernivtsi clan clearly ceased to be languid.

Attacks on those who dared to talk about these notarial scams subsided after the leadership of the Kuban notary realized that to get away, as it had always been until recently (for example, on the facts of bribes during competitions for filling vacant positions, - we will also talk about this a little later - there is a rich texture here), it will not work. Although Chernova defended Tsikunib to the last. But, feeling that it would still not be possible to defend “her own”, and besides, such a struggle could cast suspicion on the defender herself, Chernova initiated a strange order, as if claiming the triumph of justice.

“The powers of the assistant notary Tsikunib T.M. to replace a temporarily absent notary engaged in private practice in the Krasnodar notary district Chernova G.T. terminated from 05/12/2021 (order of the head of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation for the Krasnodar Territory No. 106 dated 05/12/2021).

From this very strict order, however, it is still not clear, Tsikunib just cannot temporarily perform the duties of a notary Chernova? What about other notaries? In case of transfer from one office to another? What about her notary license? Are they deprived of it? Or not, which means that over time, when the scandal subsides, it will pop up somewhere else with its services? And what did she do in Chernova's office at her workplace, after signing all this order of the regional representative office of the Ministry of Justice? In general, they extinguished the fire with an enema ...

Chernova herself, in order to completely protect herself, provided the investigation with simply unique orders.

It turned out that in accordance with the orders to replace the temporarily absent notary No. 1 dated December 29, 2017, No. 1 dated December 28, 2018 and No. 1 dated December 30, 2019, notary Chernova delegated the authority to carry out notarial activities to the assistant notary Tsikunib T.M. . “In connection with the absence for a good reason - the performance of the duties of the president of the notary chamber of the Krasnodar Territory, namely ... (here it is very touching ...)“ from 09 h. 00 min. 01/09/2018 at 18:00 00 min. 31 12.2018… from 09:00 min. 01/09/2019, at 18:00 00 min. 12/21/2019… from 09:00 00 min. 01/09/2020 at 18:00 00 min. 12/31/2020”…

Apparently, this order-making was being prepared the other day in such a hurry that there was even no time to look at the old calendars. In 2018, the New Year's holidays were postponed to December 30 and 31 - these are Sunday and Monday. The country did not work - it cut salads. Only Tsikunib sweated in the field, according to this ordered "leftist". But the point is not even in such small “inconsistencies”, indicating that orders No. 1 were signed strongly retroactively, but in the periods indicated in the orders, when the powers of a notary Chernova were performed by Tsikunib. Does that mean exactly three years? Well, do not consider the New Year holidays that fell out of these orders as “work”. Then, excuse me, why did Chernova receive a salary as a notary all these three years of a stable absence from the workplace? Well, yes, it turns out that she was not in charge of everything in the office. The message is clear: like, I was not at work, and I could not be aware of what my acting was doing. But after all, the same notarial Russian norms clearly prescribe the responsibility of the notary, for the consequences of the work of all employees of the office. At least sometimes it was necessary to look at what subordinates had accumulated there - this is the sacred duty of the owner of the office. And why was it completely ignored by Chernova? Which is also the President of the Notary Chamber of the Territory, which, it seems, should not only monitor the work of its office and show an exceptional example of service, but also stop any possible shortcoming in the Kuban notarial economy entrusted to it. According to some, sitting on the street. Yankovsky, 41 (the Notary Chamber of the Krasnodar Territory is located in this building, which is headed by Chernova, and which is also “a good reason for her three-year absence from work as a notary), Chernova appeared here, far from every day. That is, and in general it turns out, not particularly bothered. Not as a notary (according to orders issued by her), nor as president of the chamber.



After the investigation reduced the number of criminal episodes to seven (we can only express our version of why this happened - it would be even more difficult to drag the rest for Tsikunib by the ears to the 202nd article of the Criminal Code than the episode with Zenkova transformed into a myth), incomprehensible events continued in the form of the appointment of a judge for the trial ... The hearings began to be held by the judge of the Pervomaisky Court, Eduard Lameikin. The brother of the State Duma deputy from ER, Dmitry Lameykin, the husband of the notary Ekaterina Vitalievna Lameikina and the father of her daughter, Anna Eduardovna Lameikina, who, just in the midst of the scandal, received a notary license without any problems ... Namely, on October 19, 2021. A good, kind, invaluable service from Chernova, who cares about young notarial talents.

We, like all citizens of the country, believe in the infallibility of the courts and the absolute impartiality of judges. And in order to preserve this faith, any doubts should, in theory (and according to the law, in the first place) be immediately excluded. Right there, there were doubts. Lameikin's assistants immediately began to attack the old men with demands to write “petitions” to the judge saying that the trial could take place without them, and that they fully trust the decision that would be made in their absence.

The prosecutor's office, which usually reacts instantly to such "conflicts of interest", then froze in its blindness. And it took "acceleration" in the form of an appeal by the deputy of the State Duma V.P. Isakov, in which the same arguments were repeated that had been well known to both the Investigative Committee and the prosecutor's office for almost two years. At least from the media.

Regional prosecutor Tabelsky, who repeatedly thanked journalists, including for their help in investigating this case (which in itself sounded monstrous, because journalists are not obliged to investigate the case themselves, or to help the investigation - their lot is to colorfully describe the victories achieved by law enforcement officers) suddenly woke up from hibernation, like the Icelandic volcano Eyjafjallajoyudl and gave a very lyrical answer: to the State Duma deputy.



Well, at least with the recognition of the obvious red tape, the prosecutor seemed to agree. But that's why, quite an obvious conflict of interest remained out of the prosecutor's attention for almost two years? There is a great mystery in that.

The result of justice in the concept of the Kuban system was that Judge Lameikin was nevertheless replaced (but if for two years they did not see a reason to change a judge, why was it necessary to change at the last moment? So, did they see the prosecutor’s reason in the form of a wife, daughter - notaries? How once before the last meeting ... Having entrusted this high-profile case to, sorry, the young judge of the Pervomaisky Court.

Which, as best he could, figured out the fairy tale that was slipped to him from the investigatory committee.

Moreover, in fact, he also acted with the prosecutor's blessing. Although even here the regional prosecutor Tabelsky issued something absurd to the mountain:



So, that is, according to the conviction of the regional prosecutor, Tsikunib is outside the criminal group. So she's not a scammer?



That is, Chernova all this time was in the stage of “ignorance” regarding “the deeds of Tsikunib. And what the hell was she supposed to be aware of, if Tsikunib didn’t do anything, according to the assurances of the same Tabelsky, nothing? Although in this case it is quite possible that the employees of the Investigative Committee, with their, let's say, not entirely correct investigation, misled the gullible regional prosecutor.

But what could such mysterious illogical messages signal to the young judge? Since Tabelsky himself orders the deputy to consider Tsikunib and Chernov “not involved” in his answer, then why should the young judge be clever.

Yes, regional Tabelsky, in his conclusions, he may have been guided by the data composed by the investigation.

But, that's why the investigator brought Tsikunib out of the criminal community? Yes, and in general the question is: why are these scams, tragic for grandfathers, only about the 202nd (for Tsikunib) and 159th (for other participants in the OPS) articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation? Because if the investigators managed to prove the obvious: what is on terri For years, a well-organized, carefully echeloned criminal community has been operating in the Krasnodar Territory and the Republic of Adygea, this would be a completely different article of the Criminal Code. Article 210 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. "Organization of a criminal community (criminal organization) or participation in it (her)". Here from 12 to 20 years in prison. And then no way, it would not be possible to smear Tsikunib. Because her participation is more than obvious.

But the main thing is this article, attracts the attention of high management. And, therefore, you never know what ... Suddenly, someone from the capital would be sent to "strengthen". Of those that are not familiar with our Kuban law enforcement and judicial specifics. And here such heads could roll in a row ... After all, they would begin to find out not only from these seven episodes that came to court. And then uncomfortable questions would have climbed ... Where did this OPS get data on lonely old people? Who leaked them from what databases? Where did the same Bandera Zhestovskaya, who is now being led along the very sparing 159th (and not the harsh 210th article of the Criminal Code) even before these two dozen pandemic episodes, had about fifty real estate objects? What are the first buyers who received bonuses in the form of criminal square meters from this OPS - a simple finding out who was among these first ones would give no small reason for surprise. But the investigation did not bother to clarify all these circumstances.

The swindler-notary, in the end, was not even convicted. The case was closed "after the statute of limitations". The main goal of this stage was achieved: no "unnecessary" information was leaked anywhere.

Roman Trushkin

To be continued

Source: www.rucriminal.info