Gimadiev cleans the meadow

"The FSB officer Gimadiyev has a goal - to control all the "state" flows of St. Petersburg and LO."



There is no need to get in the way of the FSB officers, especially if the employee is the head of the department. It seems that they began to forget about this common truth in the structures of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region. As a result, a total of five generals who worked in the northern capital have recently been fired. Those who remained have lost all hope for at least some kind of career growth; at least they won’t lose their current chair. But recently, some of them were prophesied almost the position of the Minister of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. Details - at Rucriminal.info.

Of course, all dismissals are arranged accordingly, there is always a reason, often fashionable and strong now, corruption. But if you look a little deeper, it becomes clear who and why is behind all this leapfrog.

As Rucriminal.info wrote, the head of the "M" department of the St. Petersburg FSB, Alexander Gimadiyev, has a completely understandable and specific goal - to control all the "state" financial flows of St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region, both "white" and not so. And on the way to this goal, he is ready to sweep away any obstacles, without thinking too much about the methods.

The history of the confrontation between Gimadiyev and the Ministry of Internal Affairs is a long one. The beginning was laid back in 2016, when a scandal erupted with an underground tobacco production that had existed since at least 2010 in IK No. 7 on Latyshskih Strilkov Street, known as Yablonevka. The head of IK-7 at that time was Viktor Bochkov, one of the closest comrades of Alexander Gimadiyev, who was still starting his financial growth at that time (but already heading the "M" department). The department of economic security of the police chief Glavk tried to enter the colony unexpectedly, but Bochkov learned about this visit from Gimadiyev in three days, during which he managed to take out all the goods and related evidence. As a result, what we managed to find did not even pull on a high-profile case with landings.



And now employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, both former and current, prevent Gimadiyev from crushing the finances of the city and region.

So, one of the former candidates for the position of Minister Kolokoltsev, the former deputy chief of police of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, who incidentally started with the same economic police, and now the vice-governor of the 47th region for security, Major General Mikhail Ilyin is now in charge of the ritual sphere in the region, which has passed from municipal to regional authorities from 2021. Immediately after the appointment of Ilyin, the manager of the Vsevolozhsk district, Broiler, who is also a professor at the St. Petersburg State Economic University, Sergei Mikhailov, former Miskarev, a former officer of the internal troops of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs, a former "Malyshevsky", gave an interview to 47news.ru, in which he welcomed the appointment of Ilyin, highly appreciating his talents and experience. However, here he is honest - Ilyin, while still in uniform, lobbied for the "necessary" candidate for the post of head of the Leningrad Regional Bureau of Forensic Medical Examination.

Can Gimadiyev pass by such a tidbit as a "funeral", where the turnover of finances, if not in the first, then in the second place after the construction in the "shadow treasury" of any region? The question is rhetorical.

Considering that all operations in the power structures of St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region, Gimadiyev is doing by the hands of the Investigative Committee and the economic police, while remaining in the shadows himself, control over the commander in chief, or, at least, the absence of strong and independent figures in the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region is vital important for the successful implementation of the ambitious plans of Alexander Gimadiev. Therefore, squeezing out Umnov-Piotrovsky's people by any means, many of whom grew up "from the ground" in St. Petersburg and know too much and many people, both in the city and in the region, such as General Alexander Travnikov (former head of the University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs), ex-deputy minister of the Ministry of Internal Affairs , the former head of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for St. Petersburg, Mikhail Vanichkin, and Umnov himself, from the entire structure of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, where Gimadiyev can reach (for example, through initiating cases in his native St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region), will continue.

To be continued

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Гимадиев чистит поляну

"У сотрудника ФСБ Гимадиева есть цель - контролировать все "государственные" потоки Питера и ЛО."

Не нужно становиться на пути сотрудников ФСБ, особенно если сотрудник - руководитель отдела. Об этой прописной истине похоже стали забывать в структурах ГУ МВД по Санкт-Петербургу и Ленинградской области. Как результат - за последнее время уволено в общей сложности пять генералов, работавших в северной столице. Те, кто остались, потеряли всякие надежды на хоть какой-то карьерный рост, им хотя бы сегодняшнее кресло не потерять. А ведь недавно некоторым из них пророчили чуть ли не место министра внутренних дел РФ. Подробности – у Rucriminal.info.

Конечно, все увольнения обставлены соответствующим образом, всегда есть причина, зачастую модная и сильная сейчас коррупционная. Но если заглянуть чуть поглубже, то становится понятно, кто и зачем стоит за всей этой чехардой.

Как писал Rucriminal.info , у начальника отдела "М" питерского УФСБ Александра Гимадиева есть вполне понятная и конкретная цель - контролировать все "государственные" финансовые потоки Санкт-Петербурга и Ленинградской области, как "белые", так и не очень. И на пути к этой цели он готов сметать любые препятствия, не задумываясь особо о методах.

История противостояния Гимадиева и МВД давняя. Начало было положено в далеком 2016 году, когда разразился скандал с подпольным табачным производством, существовавшим как минимум с 2010 года, в ИК №7 на улице Латышских Стрелков, известной как "Яблоневка". Начальником ИК-7 тогда был Виктор Бочков, один из ближайших товарищей еще начинающего тогда свой финансовый рост (но уже руководившего отделом "М") Александра Гимадиева. Управление экономической безопасности полицейского Главка пыталось зайти в колонию неожиданно, но об этом визите Бочков узнал от Гимадиева за три дня, за которые успел вывезти весь товар и сопутствующие улики. В итоге то, что удалось найти, не потянуло даже на громкое дело с посадками.



И сейчас сотрудники МВД, как бывшие так и действующие, мешают Гимадиеву подминать под себя финансы города и области.



Михаил Ильин




Так, один из бывших кандидатов на место министра Колокольцева, бывший заместитель начальника полиции ГУ МВД, начинавший кстати с той самой экономической полиции, а ныне - вице-губернатор 47 региона по безопасности, генерал майор Михаил Ильин курирует сейчас в области ритуальную сферу, которая перешла от муниципальной власти к областной с 2021 года. Сразу после назначения Ильина хозяйничающий во Всеволожском районе Бройлер, он же профессор Санкт-Петербургского государственного экономического университета Сергей Михайлов, бывший Мискарев, бывший офицер внутренних войск МВД СССР, бывший "малышевский", дал интервью 47news.ru, в котором приветствовал назначение Ильина, высоко оценив его таланты и опыт. Впрочем, тут он честен - Ильин, будучи еще в погонах, лоббировал «нужную» кандидатуру на пост руководителя Ленинградского областного бюро судебно-медицинской экспертизы.

Может ли Гимадиев пройти мимо такого лакомого куска как "похоронка", где оборот финансов, если не на первом, то на втором после стройки месте в "теневом казначействе" любого региона? Вопрос риторический.

Учитывая то, что все операции во властных структурах Петербурга и Ленобласти Гимадиев делает руками СК и экономической полиции, сам оставаясь в тени - контроль за главком, или, как минимум, отсутствие сильных и независимых фигур в ГУ МВД по Санкт-Петербургу и Ленинградской области жизненно важно для успешной реализации амбициозных планов Александра Гимадиева. Поэтому выдавливание любыми способами людей Умнова-Пиотровского, многие из которых выросли "с земли" в Петербурге и слишко многое и многих знают, и в городе, и в области, таких как генерал Александр Травников (бывший руководитель Университета МВД), экс-замминистра МВД, бывший начальник ГУ МВД по Санкт-Петербургу Михаил Ваничкин, да и сам Умнов, из всей структуры МВД, куда сможет дотянуться Гимадиев (например, через возбуждение дел в родном Петербурге и Ленинградской области), будет продолжаться.

Продолжение следует

Тимофей Гришин

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

GSU of Moscow bears its own death in court

"I'm sitting at the table of my cell, sipping tea and smiling"

The Telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU and Rucriminal.info continue to publish letters from the defenders of the Police Ombudsman and the authors of the film about the grossest violations and falsifications committed by operatives and investigators in the case of Vladimir Vorontsov. As a result, it was because of this film that the defenders themselves were sent to prison on a perfect invented case. Earlier Evgeny Moiseev spoke on our pages, and now the letter was sent by Vasily Fedorov.



“Sometimes I sit at the table of my cell, sip tea and smile, thinking about what the investigator Yegor Fedorov will do with his superiors and the Security Guards if the case is suddenly stopped due to lack of composition or if we are acquitted. Well, if we were closed on a bunch of some articles and this 306 part 3 was thrown to us purely in the appendage, like Vova those nine episodes of any game, which the prosecutor eventually refused. But after all, this hastily cobbled together article is the only thing they sew for us, and the prospects for condemnation are very thin there. After all, even if the district court of Tverskoy, with its eyes closed, soldered a sentence to us (do not care - according to the time spent or something else), and the Moscow City Court will leave it in force, despite the fact that he himself acquitted the dude with the wording "you can't judge of a person under part 3 of article 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, if the accused artificially created evidence of a crime, after submitting a deliberately false report of a crime (i.e., you must first create evidence, then sign for a warning about liability under article 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, then file statement), then the Supreme Court certainly will not go against its own decision, the plenum of 06/28/2022 No. 20, in paragraph 20 of which it ruled that a person under 306 of the Criminal Code can be attracted only if it:

1) wrote an application;

2) was warned under Article 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

But that's not all. After almost a month of our imprisonment, the Supreme Court acquitted citizen Nikitina, who wrote a statement and was warned of liability under Article 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, only they first took a statement from her, and then took a receipt of responsibility, which violated the chronology of events, because. the receipt comes after the application (ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 73-UD22-7-K8 dated 08.24.2022 in the case of Nikitina). On behalf of Zhenya and me, there is neither a statement nor a receipt, and these are two obligatory conditions for holding liable, as I described above. At least they forged statements from us with receipts, forcing us to prove that these were not our handwriting and signatures. And a pocket examination, of course, would recognize that this is all ours, but the moment is lost and the case in court is based on the pure conclusions of the investigator Yegor. And I’m still silent about artificially created evidence, which we are charged with interrogation protocols signed by Ira, which are simply not the definition of a whole bunch of regulations (including clause 22 of the decision of the plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. such, because they are created not by the one who signs. The one who signs does not create evidence, but gives deliberately false testimony, according to which the statute of limitations has expired, and were also declared by Ira as false, during the trial of Vova, which frees her from liability immediately (see the note of Article 307 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation ). In general, if they start throwing new episodes of crimes at us, then this in no way and in no way saves them from the fact that now we are sitting "for nothing." And if the court establishes this, then this is automatically Article 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation for the investigator Yegor and his superiors, plus a deafening resonance and rearrangements.



In general, our entire criminal case simply whines that it was initiated not in order to punish us, but in order to dissuade the USBeks from inciting Ira to write a statement. Every interrogation by the USBs, whining that Ira voluntarily filed an application. Through each word "voluntarily", "she voluntarily", "which voluntarily", "Andina voluntarily", "voluntarily and without putting any pressure on her" ... That's just for what merits Ira was bought clothes in an Italian boutique for the account of the USBs and why she was paid for a hotel in the Peter I hotel, and not in the hostel of the Ministry of Internal Affairs - the question remained open and the Uzbeks were not asked during interrogations. But there will be many surprises on this score when the meetings begin. There will be a lot of uncomfortable questions for the USBs, we will watch our movie and, most importantly, we will listen to the original eight-hour recording from which I edited the film. I didn’t include a lot in the movie, since it would be three hours long, and even with a very exciting plot, one could get tired of it, but I was worried about it and cut it as best I could. In general, we are waiting for an interesting stage of our conclusion. I look forward to seeing the face of the prosecutor, who will look at the three of us as terrorists and convince the judge that we should be in prison and everything that happened to us is fair and legal. And all these rulings and rulings of the Supreme Court are a mistake, they are not about us, and in general they didn’t mean that, and we misunderstand everything. I feel bolder msya from the heart.



THANK YOU TO EVERYONE WHO REMEMBERS US AND SPREADS INFORMATION ABOUT US. A HUGE THANK YOU TO THE GUYS FROM THE VChK-OGPU.”

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

ГСУ Москвы несет в суд собственную погибель

«Сижу за столом своей камеры, потягиваю чай и улыбаюсь»



Телеграм-канал ВЧК-ОГПУ и Rucriminal.info продолжают публиковать письма защитников Омбудсмена полиции и авторов фильма о том, какие грубейшие нарушения и фальсификации допустили оперативники и следователи по делу Владимира Воронцова. В результате защитников именно из-за этого фильма самих отправили в тюрьму по совершенному придуманному делу. Ранее на наших страницах выступал Евгений Моисеев, а теперь письмо прислал Василий Федоров.



«Я иногда сижу за столом своей камеры, потягивая чай и улыбаюсь, думая о том, что будет делать следак Егор Федоров со своими начальниками и УСБеками, если вдруг дело прекратят по отсутствию состава или если нас оправдают. Ладно если бы мы были закрыты по куче каких-нибудь статей и эту 306 ч.3 нам докинули чисто в довесок, как Вове те девять эпизодов всякой дичи, от которых в итоге отказался прокурор. Но ведь эта, наспех слепленная статья- единственное что нам шьют, и перспективы осуждения там очень жидкие. Ведь даже если районный Тверской суд, с закрытыми глазами, впаяет нам приговор (пофиг- по отсиженному или ещё что-нибудь сверху накинет), а Мосгорсуд оставит его в силе, не смотря на то, что он сам оправдал чувака с формулировкой "нельзя судить человека по ч.3 ст.306 УК РФ, если обвиняемый искусственно создал доказательства преступления, после подачи заведомо ложного сообщения о преступлении (т.е. нужно сначала создать доказуху, потом подписаться за предупреждение об ответственности по ст.306 УК РФ, потом подать заявление) то Верховный суд уж точно не пойдет против своего же собственного постановления, пленума от 28.06.2022 №20, в пункте 20 которого он постановил, что лицо по 306 УК может быть привлечено только если оно:

1) написало заявление;

2) было предупреждено по ст.306 УК РФ.

Но и это ещё не всё. Спустя почти месяц нашего заключения, Верховный суд оправдал гражданку Никитину, которая и заявление написала и была предупреждена об ответственности по 306 УК РФ, вот только с нее сначала взяли заявление, а потом взяли расписку об ответственности, чем нарушили хронологию событий, т.к. расписка идёт после заявления (определение Верховного суда РФ №73-УД22-7-К8 от 24.08.2022 дело Никитиной). От нашего с Женькой имени, нет ни заявления, ни расписки, а это обязательные два условие для привлечения к ответственности, как я описал выше. Они хотя бы подделали от нас заявления с расписками, вынудив нас доказывать, что это не наши почерки и подписи. И карманная экспертиза конечно же признала бы что, это все наше, но момент упущен и дело в суде на чистых умозаключениях следователя Егора. И это я ещё молчу об искусственно созданных доказательствах , в качестве которых нам вменяют подписанные Ирой протоколы допросов, которые определением целой кучи нормативных актов ( включая п.22 постановления пленума верховного суда РФ №20 от 26.08.2022) и отмененных приговоров, просто не являются таковыми, т.к. их создаёт не тот кто подписывает. Тот кто подписывает не создаёт доказательства, а даёт заведомо ложные показания, по которым вышли сроки давности, так ещё и были заявлены Ирой как ложные, в ходе суда по Вове, что освобождает ее от ответственности сразу же ( см. примечание ст.307 УК РФ ). В общем если нам начнут накидывать новые эпизоды преступлений, то это уже никак и не при каком раскладе не спасает их от того, что сейчас мы сидим "за просто так". А если это установит и суд то это автоматически ст.286 УК РФ для следователя Егора и его начальства плюс оглушительный резонанс и перестановки.



Вообще все наше уголовное дело просто скулит о том, что оно возбуждено не для того, чтобы наказать нас, а для того чтобы отмазать УСБеков от склонения Иры к написанию заявления. Каждый допрос УСБеков, скулеж о том, что Ира добровольно подала заявление. Через каждое слово "добровольно", "она добровольно", " которая добровольно", " Андина добровольно", " добровольно и без оказания на нее какого-либо давления"... Вот только за какие заслуги Ире были куплены шмотки в итальянском бутике за счёт УСБеков и почему ей оплатили гостиницу в отеле "Петр I", а не в общежитии МВД - вопрос остался открытым и в допросах узбекам не задавался. Но на этот счёт будет много сюрпризов, когда начнутся заседания. Будет куча неудобных вопросов УСБекам, будем смотреть наше кино и самое главное будем слушать оригинал восьмичасовой записи, из которой я монтировал фильм. Я очень много не включил в кино, так как он был бы длиной часа в три и даже при очень захватывающем сюжете от него можно было бы устать, а я за это переживал и сократил как мог. Вообще нас ждет интересный этап нашего заключения. С нетерпением жду чтобы увидеть лицо прокурора, который будет смотреть на нас троих, как на террористов и убеждать судью, что место нам в тюрьме и все что с нами произошло - справедливо и законно. А все эти постановления и определения Верховного суда - ошибка, не про нас и вообще там не то имелось ввиду и мы неправильно все понимаем. Чую посмеемся от души.



СПАСИБО ВСЕМ КТО НАС ПОМНИТ И РАСПРОСТРАНЯЕТ ИНФОРМАЦИЮ О НАС. ОГРОМНОЕ СПАСИБО РЕБЯТАМ ИЗ ВЧК – ОГПУ».

Тимофей Гришин

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

After a call from Nazarbayev and from the FSB of the Russian Federation

How Kazakh oligarch Kenes Rakishev solves the problems of his Russian friends

The editors of Rucriminal.info continue to publish the most interesting materials from the case of the shootout on Rochdelskaya Street.



The shootout on Rochdelskaya occurred due to a conflict between the owner of the Elements restaurant, Zhanna Kim, and designer Fatima Misikova: the latter believed that Kim did not pay her 8 million rubles extra. for the repair. Henchmen of the thief in law Zakhary Kalashov (Shakro Molodoy), Andrey Kochuykov, nicknamed Italian, Eduard Romanov and several other people came to demand money from Kim. Kim called her lover Kenes Rakishev, an oligarch from Kazakhstan, to solve the problem. And he has already attracted to dismantling a lawyer-fixer associated with the FSB of the Russian Federation, Eduard Budantsev, whom the oligarch Iskander Makhmudov had previously recommended to Rakishev. Together with Budantsev, Vladimir Kostrichenko arrived at Rochdelskaya. As a result, Budantsev opened fire with a Beretta 92 FS pistol. As a result, 2 people died and 3 were injured. However, thanks to the connections of Budantsev in the FSB, the case was turned in such a way that it was from Buantsev that they made a victim.

In December 2017, the lawyer Eduard Budantsev was re-interrogated in the Presnensky District Court. Judge Tatyana Vasyuchenko agreed to this because of the large number of disagreements and inconsistencies in his testimony. During the hearing, the court compared Budantsev's words with audio and video recordings of the events of that evening, as well as with details of phone calls.

So, for example, at the very beginning of the process, the lawyer announced his arrival at the Elements restaurant after a call from the owner of the restaurant Zhanna Kim. According to him, the girl allegedly asked for help in negotiations with unknown people demanding that she return the debt.

It was revealed in court that there was no such call on the record, and that Kim's conversation was not on the audio recording. The girl recorded the meeting on a dictaphone.

When Budantsev's lie became obvious, he stated that everything seemed to him. It also seemed to him that Kim reported that the amount that extortionists allegedly demanded from her had increased.

In general, one gets the impression that Vasyuchenko wanted to deal with this case according to the law, and tried to find the truth. Maybe that's why instead of the post of chairman of the Kuntsevsky court, for which she was preparing, she was dismissed.

Now it is already obvious that the criminal case, which became the reason for the fourth military war, was fabricated for a specific purpose - to get Budantsev out of harm's way. His patrons are still afraid of publicity, because after the shootout and subsequent power manipulations, Nursultan Nazarbayev called the presidential administration and asked to deal with this story. After that, the country's leadership was given an answer that the situation had been settled. No one reported on the real state of affairs. Nazarbayev's call was caused by the fact that the cover for Zhanna Kim was a businessman from Kazakhstan, Kenes Rakishev, who is also called the wallet of the ex-president of Kazakhstan.

Lies of a lawyer in court are a strong reason to reconsider the events of those days and hold the lawyer-declarer liable for giving false testimony. And in general, if the court made decisions according to the law, it would recognize that there were no grounds for the use of weapons by him, and then Budantsev should have been in the dock on charges of murder.

But the criminal does not tolerate the subjunctive mood. The lie of Budantsev was revealed at the stage of the investigation, but at the direction of the senior investigator under the chairman of the ICR, Konstantin Krivorotov, the case was put on the brakes and stopped. Budantsev remained at large, and Krivorotov received the Order of Courage for "courage and selflessness in the line of duty."





To be continued

Alexey Ermakov

Source: www.rucriminal.info

После звонка Назарбаева и из ФСБ РФ

Как казахский олигарх Кенес Ракишев решает проблемы своих российских друзей



Редакция Rucriminal.info продолжает публиковать наиболее интересные материалы дела о перестрелке на Рочдельской улице.



Перестрелка на Рочдельской произошла из-за конфликта между хозяйкой ресторана Elements Жанной Ким и дизайнером Фатимой Мисиковой: последняя считала, что Ким не доплатила ей 8 млн руб. за ремонт. Требовать у Ким деньги приехали подручные вора в законе Захария Калашова (Шакро Молодого) Андрей Кочуйков по прозвищу Итальянец, Эдуард Романов и еще несколько человек. Ким позвонила для решения проблемы своему любовнику олигарху из Казахстана Кенесу Ракишеву. А тот уже привлек на разборку адвоката-решальщика, связанного с ФСБ РФ, Эдуарда Буданцева, которого Ракишеву ранее рекомендовал олигарх Искандер Махмудов. Вместе с Буданцевым на Рочдельскую прибыл Владимир Костриченко. В итоге Буданцев открыл стрельбу из пистолета Beretta 92 FS. В результате 2 человека погибли, 3 получили ранения. Однако, благодаря связям Буданцева в ФСБ, дело повернули так, что именно из Буанцева сделали жертву.

В декабре 2017 года в Пресненском районном суде повторно был допрошен адвокат-решальщик Эдуард Буданцев. Судья Татьяна Васюченко пошла на это из-за большого количества разногласий и нестыковок в его показаниях. Во время заседания суд сравнивал слова Буданцева с аудио и видеозаписями событий того вечера, а также с детализацией телефонных звонков.

Так, например, в самом начале процесса адвокат заявлял о своем приезде к ресторану Elements после звонка хозяйки ресторана Жанна Ким. По его словам, девушка якобы просила помощи в переговорах с неизвестными людьми, требующими от нее вернуть долг.

В суде открылось, что такого звонка не было на детализации, а также разговор Ким отсутствовал на аудиозаписи. Встречу девушка записывала на диктофон.

Когда ложь Буданцева стала очевидной, он заявил, что ему все показалось. Также ему показалось, что Ким сообщила, что сумма, которую с нее якобы требовали вымогатели, увеличилась.

Вообще складывается впечатление, что Васюченко хотела разобраться с этим кейсом по закону, и пыталась найти правду. Может быть поэтому вместо должности председателя Кунцевского суда, к которой она готовилась, ее отправили в отставку.

Теперь уже очевидно, что уголовное дело, ставшее поводом для четвертой силовой войны, было сфабриковано под конкретную цель – вывести Буданцева из-под удара. Его покровители до сих пор боятся огласки, так как после перестрелки и последующих силовых манипуляций в администрацию президента звонил Нурсултан Назарбаев и просил разобраться с этой историей. После чего руководству страны был дан ответ, что ситуация улажена. О реальном положении дел никто не докладывал. Звонок Назарбаева был вызван тем, что прикрытием для Жанны Ким был бизнесмен из Казахстана Кенес Ракишев, которого еще называют кошельком экс-президента Казахстана.

Ложь адвоката в суде – крепкий повод пересмотреть события тех дней и привлечь адвоката-решалу к ответственности за дачу ложных показаний. Да и в целом, если бы суд принимал решения по закону, то он бы признал, что оснований для применения им оружия не было, и тогда на скамье подсудимых по обвинению в убийстве должен был бы находиться Буданцев.

Но уголовка не терпит сослагательного наклонения. Ложь Буданцева, была вскрыта еще на стадии следствия, но по указанию старшего следователя при председателе СКР Константина Криворотова дело спустили на тормозах и прекратили. Буданцев остался на свободе, а Криворотов получил Орден Мужества за «отвагу и самоотверженность при исполнении служебного долга».





Продолжение следует

Алексей Ермаков

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

Politkovskaya's killer spoke

Rustam Makhmudov spoke about the murders that the TFR does not want to investigate

The Telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU and Rucriminal.info continue to talk about the uniquely phantasmagoric events related to the investigation of crimes committed by the gang of Mikhail Mikhailov, as well as a number of mystical "coincidences" in the investigation of the criminal case of the Makarenko D.S. gang.

At our disposal was a lawyer's questioning of Makhmudov Rustam Ruslanovich (perpetrator of the murder of journalist Anna Politkovskaya, sentenced to life). Makhmudov R.R. for a long time he was kept in the same cell with D.S. Makarenko. Makhmudov R.R. told the lawyer in detail about how Makarenko D.S. he spoke in detail about the murders he had committed, incl. about the commission by him (Makarenko D.S.) of the murder of Vakulin D.S. Makarenko D.S. he assured his cellmate that everything had already been decided and he (Makarenko D.S.) would not receive a life sentence for committing 5 (five) murders.

As Rucriminal.info wrote earlier, our editors have at their disposal a video of D.Kh. Zaripov’s confessions. Zaripov D.Kh. was a direct witness to the murder of Vakulin D.S. Zaripov D.Kh. was interrogated as a witness. within the framework of the UD of the gang Mikhailova M.V., Zaripov D.Kh. claims that the face of the man who shot Vakulin D.S. remembered very well. Zaripov D.Kh. tells in detail how the “identification” of A.S. Gumnikov took place. in the conditions of the pre-trial detention center, as well as how he (Zaripov D.Kh.) “identified” Gumnikov A.S. in the Moscow Regional Court. During the "identification" of Gumnikov A.S. 06/11/2009 in SIZO - 7 (Yegoryevsk), Zaripov D.Kh. first, they showed the identifiable person through the door slot, and then the “identification” procedure took place directly. Zaripov D.Kh. says that, at the time of the identification, he was directly in the same office with the person he identified. This is despite the fact that from the materials of UD No. 79191 (the gang of Mikhailov M.V.) it follows that the identification of Gumnikov A.S. was carried out under conditions precluding visual observation by the identifiable person. It follows from the response to the request in PKU SIZO-7 that there was no room for conducting identification under conditions that excluded visual contact between the identifying person and the person being identified on June 11, 2009 in PKU SIZO-7.

Witness Zaripov D.Kh. told that he (Zaripov D.Kh.) was threatened with a knife by a man who introduced himself as an employee of the FSB of the Russian Federation. Zaripov D.Kh. said that he had repeatedly informed the investigator Pavel Igorevich Filipchuk about the threats from a man who introduced himself as an employee of the FSB of the Russian Federation (the case of the gang of Mikhailov M.V. was in his proceedings). However, no checks were made on this fact. Zaripov D.Kh. He said that he saw a man who introduced himself as an employee of the FSB of the Russian Federation on the dock in the Moscow Regional Court, where on December 1, 2014 he was summoned for questioning as a witness, in the case of Mikhailov's gang M.V.

By the way, investigator Filipchuk P.I. A lot of things became known during the investigation of this UD. However, this much is still lurking in the depths of UD No. 79191. In the following publications, Rucriminal.info will talk about this in detail.

Zaripov D.Kh. said that in the Moscow Regional Court, before the “identification”, he was taken to the office for secret witnesses, where investigator Filipchuk P.I. and one more person. In this office, Zaripov D.Kh. investigator Filipchuk P.I. photographs of a person who needed to be "identified" were shown. Zaripov D.Kh. clearly says that the person whom he “identified” under pressure in the Moscow Regional Court, i.e. Gumnikova A.S. and the man who shot Vakulin D.S. these are different people.

And even that's not all!

At the scene of the murder of Vakulin D.S. A Kalashnikov assault rifle was discovered. Experts found biological traces (DNA of a man) on this machine. Within the framework of UD No. 79191 (Mikhailov's gang), a molecular genetic examination was carried out on the biological traces found on the machine. From the conclusion of this examination, it follows that, found on weapons from the scene of the murder of Vakulin D.S. biological traces definitely DO NOT BELONG to Gumnikov A.S. and Mikhailov M.V. According to the current legislation (clause 2, part 1, article 7 of the Federal Law No. 242 of December 3, 2008), biological material of unidentified persons, which was seized during the course of investigative actions, is subject to mandatory genomic registration in the FBDGI (federal database of genomic information) . Information about the registration and, as a result, the verification of the genomic passport of an “unknown” man, whose DNA was found on the AK-74 machine No. It didn't happen by accident!

In the case of a check by FBDGI, a match of the genomic passport of D.S. Makarenko would have been revealed. with DNA traces of an "unknown" man left at the scene of the murder of Vakulin D.S.

Accordingly, this was clear to the best investigator (according to the results of 2013) Vasilovsky Sergey Vladimirovich, in whose production was UD No. 376610 (Gang Makarenko D.S.). Knew, understood and was silent about this and the investigator for the Department of Internal Affairs Filipchuk Pavel Igorevich, who investigated the case of Mikhailov's gang M.V. I wonder what the synchronous "forgetfulness" of two officers of the investigative department is connected with?!....

Ancient Latin wisdom says: if you want to understand who did it, understand who benefits from it.

In the materials of the criminal cases of the gang of Mikhailov M.V. (Don't wake) and Makarenko D.S. repeatedly there are 2 (two) names - Mullashaekhov M.A. and Grishchenko Artur Alexandrovich (nicknamed Uzbek). In early publications, we said that Mullashaekhov M.A. was killed by members of the gang Don't wake up. As established by the investigation and the court Mullashaekhov M.A. was killed by order of Vakulin D.S. But Grishchenko A.A. in both UD appears as a close person and chief Mullashaehova M.A., as well as an extremely wealthy person with connections in law enforcement agencies. From the materials of the UD gang Makarenko D.S. it is seen that Grishchenko A.A. with impunity he beat Kuksenko Yury Arkadyevich, who on 12/21/2005 was killed by members of the Makarenko D.S. gang, incl. for hire. An interesting coincidence, Kuksenko Yu.A. and Grishchenko A.A. there was a joint business - LLC "Grand Pri Stroy". 26% of the authorized capital belonged to Kuksenko Yu.A., and 76% belonged respectively to Grishchenko A.A. After the death of Kuksenko Yu.A. the share of the latter promptly passed to Grishchenko A.A. A number of witnesses in the case of the Makarenko D.S. gang point to the direct involvement of A.A. Grishchenko. to the death of Kuksenko Yu.A.

My friend's enemy is my enemy.

Grishchenko A.A. there was a firm - LLC PRESS-MOTIV (TIN 5027066262). And the general director in this company was ...... voila - Mullashaekhov M.A. And before Mullashaekhov M.A. Vakulin D.S. was the general director. From the testimonies of a number of witnesses and materials of UD No. 79191 (Ne wake up the gang), it follows that Vakulin D.S. ceased to be the CEO of the illegal, as a result of forgery of title documents. On this fact, the Department of Internal Affairs of the city of Lyubertsy initiated a criminal case under Part 4 of Article 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. After that, a month later Mullashaekhov M.A. was killed, and after 2 (two) months Vakulin D.S. was killed.

It is worth noting that despite the testimony of a number of witnesses (more than 10 people), in the cases of both gangs, about the involvement of Grishchenko A.A. to the commission of especially serious crimes, no measures against Grishchenko A.A. was not carried out.

Maybe the witnesses (on the cases of both gangs) told the truth that Grishchenko A.A. a very rich man and has huge connections in law enforcement?!

Here is such a "non-intersecting" parallel in the affairs of two independent gangs.

In recent years, official representatives of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation regularly receive statements that one of the most important activities of the department is the disclosure of crimes of past years. The forensic investigators of the IC have at their disposal a huge amount of forensic technology and modern methods of expert research, the possibilities of which, a simple layman cannot even imagine. One of the key innovations in forensic science is olfactory examination - the examination of odor traces. According to highly qualified employees of the Central Administration of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, it is possible even 30 years after the crime was committed.

By the way, on the basis of this examination, a number of guilty verdicts have recently been issued. Incl. and criminal cases from the distant past.

But I wonder if it will be possible to conduct an olfactory study on the fact of the murder of Vakulin D.S.?! And to conduct the named examination on the facts of the violent death of Senichkin V.V., Ostrovsky V.Yu., Akinshina S.V. it would be just great. We talked about the named victims in detail earlier.

Yes, by the way, on January 11, 2023, to Mikhailov M.V. and Gumnikov A.S. operatives came to talk. They were very interested in the circumstances of the murders of Senichkin V.V. And for some reason they said that Sergey Anatolyevich Savelyev (nicknamed Bald), who was an intermediary in ordering the murder of Senichkin V.V., died. And he lives and rejoices. Maybe this is a tactical move, the purpose of which is the lack of evidence against Savelyev S.A. about his direct involvement in the murder of Senichkin V.V.?! And on the other hand Savelyev S.A. can give detailed testimony about the murder of VV Senichkin, about all the persons involved in its commission and the specific role of everyone who took part in the murder. Does the investigation really need this??!



It should be noted that until now - 16.02.2023 in respect of Mikhailov M.V. and Gumnikova A.S. no measure of restraint has been chosen. They are kept in a pre-trial detention center for more than 3 months on the basis of an investigator's decision issued in accordance with Art. 77.1 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation. This is in view of the fact that they were charged with murder! With their participation, a number of investigative and procedural actions were carried out. But it cannot be ruled out that the investigation intends to “bury” UD No. 9941 on the fact of the murder of Senichkin V.V. And by sending materials for choosing a preventive measure to the court, additional traces will remain. Probably the investigation leaves itself room for maneuver. Insured so to speak ....

Well, our old acquaintance, "witness" Misha Sadovsky, was duly notified that his no one will ever stop. He smokes a plan every day, threatens with physical harm to citizens of the Russian Federation, regularly receives money from renting the premises for which Valery Ostrovsky was killed. In general, a person enjoys life. He has a lifetime warranty card from the Investigative Committee and the Ministry of Internal Affairs, guaranteeing a free and carefree life.



In the near future we will publish a whole series of audio and video recordings. From the content of which, dear readers, it will become clear to you how “correctly” the investigation of a whole series of interrelated especially serious crimes was carried out.











To be continued

Arseny Dronov

Source: www.rucriminal.info