Who is in the service of the funeral mafia of the Leningrad region?

Service 112 and emergency communication of the Ministry of Emergencies



It is safe to say - there are no residents of Russia who have not heard about the funeral crime. Thousands of articles have been written about the most gloomy and perhaps the very shadow industry of the country's economy and hundreds of television ties were removed. However, it was in the Leningrad region that the fusion of cemetery crime with corrupt civil servants and security forces reached such a scale that it gives rise to truly surrealistic paintings. Judge for yourself-in the most prestigious Vsevolozhsk district, 47-registers, shadow funerals not only available all the information of the Emergency Service 112, but also an absolutely closed, secret relationship between the Ministry of Emergencies! Agree - in conditions close to a full -scale war, secret operational data on explosions, fires, terrorist attacks and other emergency in the hands of crime representatives are not the best guarantees for the population.

Rucriminal.info will begin in order. There is an expensive Toksovsky cemetery in the Vsevolozhsk district, the criminal everyday life of which the media wrote many times. And there is an experienced administrator in this cemetery - Vyacheslav Sadovnikov, tightly connected with both the municipal authorities and the Vsevolozhsk police. He is in the photo below.



And Vyacheslav has a daughter Catherine, who replaced the girl’s surname to Artemyev. Catherine followed in the footsteps of her father and is also actively engaged in the cemetery business - she personally sells ritual items in a family shop in the neighboring village of Sertolovo,



And even until recently, she went to the relatives of the deceased as a funeral agent, which can be seen from the samples of powers below:



What is bad in such a family contract, can the reader ask? To begin with, the junior sergeant Ekaterina Artemyeva (Sadovnikova) is the current employee of the Russian Emergencies Ministry, works as a radiotelephonist at a closed communication facility of the Ministry of Emergencies (6th detachment 32 part, is located in the resort district of St. Petersburg) and, in principle, does not have the right to engage in commercial activities without notifying his superiors and income declarations. After the brave officer-rescuer almost came across, a pair of friendly entrepreneurs replaced her by the deceased: IP Morozv and IP Makeev. At that time, the sanctions of Artemyeva relying under the law were avoided due to the patronage of the authorities. However, all these are just administrative trifles, because at a closed facility the Emergencies Ministry, Ekaterina does not work at all by chance. We will talk about this a little lower, and first we will tell about the connection of funeral criminals with Emergency Service operators 112.

As our colleagues have already written, a real shadow dispatch service is working in the Vsevolozhsk district of the Leningrad region, distributing fresh dead as funeral agents affiliated with the mafia. The organizers of the scheme, which, incidentally, has already been introduced into the territory of neighboring resort and Krasnogvardeisky regions of St. Petersburg, are gardeners and his daughter Ekaterina Artemyeva, the main task of the shadow funerals - to send his agent as soon as possible to the relatives of the deceased, preferably before the arrival of doctors and the police. The agent must force relatives by hook or by crook to sign the contract for ritual services and take the passport of the deceased. After that, the family actually falls into a trap - nothing can be done without a passport and you have to pay for ritual services at predatory prices, several times higher than the average in the region.

So efficiency is the key to the success of the shadowers. Previously, Tandem received information from police officers called to the apartment or from ambulance brigades. But real miracles of speed was achieved after the gardeners and his daughter met Ruslan Galantsev. The guy in the photo below is not remarkable, except for one - he has trusting business relations with telephone operators of an emergency service 112.



It is operators 112 that are the first to learn about the death of a person, and Ruslan is an intermediary for the sale of data on the place of death and contacts of relatives. For reference, information about one fresh corpse costs only 3 thousand rubles. The question is in the number of deaths, the complete information about which is 112.

By lightning speed, receiving information about the new deceased, the tandem of Sadovnikov-Artemyev manages to send his employee to the place no later than half an hour after the message. For the operational export of the body, Tandem even acquired a 15-year-old Gazelle, on which the designations “special” were glued. Ideally, after the contract is signed, and the passport of the deceased lies in the pocket of the agent, the body immediately goes towards the morgue at this same Gazelle.



Well, now we go to the most piquant. The monthly shadow income of Father Sadovnikov and daughter Artemyeva - millions of rubles. Why does Catherine continue to work in the Ministry of Emergencies and several times a week to go to a long watch of the telephone operator? Believe me - not only for the sake of an early state pension or a preferential mortgage. The fact is that it is according to the closed connection of the Ministry of Emergencies that information about large emergencies with human victims: from accidents on the tracks, to fires, explosions, plane crashes and others. There are operas Information about the number of victims, seriously wounded, then lists of the dead and injured. Often among them are residents of the districts in which the shadowers work. Further, their funeral agents work out the usual scheme, concluding contracts with the relatives of the dead and earning hundreds of thousands of black rubles to their owners.

This is it, the power of the funeral mafia in the signs for the country of the border Leningrad region. Of course, with the support of officials and security officials, all this remains completely unpunished. First of all, we are talking about the head of the administration of Sertolovo Yuri Khodko and responsible persons of 128 and 88 police departments. Here are the main, although not the main patrons of cemetery shadowers, regularly receiving their bribes from them.

To be continued

Timofey Zabiyakin

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Кто на службе у похоронной мафии Ленобласти?

Сервис 112 и экстренная связь МЧС



Можно с уверенностью утверждать – нет жителей России, которые не слышали о похоронном криминале. О самой мрачной и, пожалуй, самой теневой отрасли экономики страны написаны тысячи статей и сняты сотни телесюжетов. Однако именно в Ленинградской области, срастание кладбищенского криминала с коррумпированными госслужащими и силовиками достигло такого масштаба, что порождает поистине сюрреалистические картины. Судите сами – в самом престижном Всеволожском районе 47-региона теневым похоронщикам не только доступна вся информация экстренной службы 112, но и абсолютно закрытая, секретная связь МЧС! Согласитесь – в условиях, близких к полномасштабной войне, секретные оперативные данные о взрывах, пожарах, терактах и прочих ЧП в руках у представителей криминала не лучшие гарантии безопасности для населения.

Rucriminal.info начнет по порядку. Есть во Всеволожском районе дорогое Токсовское кладбище, о криминальных буднях которого СМИ писали многократно. И есть на этом кладбище опытный администратор – Вячеслав Садовников, крепко связанный как с муниципальными властями, так и со всеволожской полицией. Он на фото ниже.



А еще у Вячеслава есть дочь Екатерина, сменившая девичью фамилию на Артемьева. Екатерина пошла по стопам отца и тоже активно занимается кладбищенским бизнесом – лично продает ритуальные предметы в семейной лавке в соседнем поселке Сертолово,



и даже до недавнего времени выезжала к родственникам усопших как похоронный агент, что видно из образцов доверенностей ниже:



Что же плохого в таком семейном подряде, может спросить читатель? Начнем с того, что младший сержант Екатерина Артемьева (Садовникова) – действующий сотрудник МЧС России, работает радиотелефонистом на закрытом объекте связи МЧС (6й отряд 32 часть, расположена в Курортном районе СПб) и в принципе не имеет права заниматься коммерческой деятельностью без уведомления своего начальства и декларирования доходов. После того, как бравая сотрудница-спасатель едва не попалась, на выезды к покойным ее заменила пара дружественных предпринимателей: ИП Морозв и ИП Макеев. В тот раз полагающихся по закону санкций Артемьевой удалось избежать из-за покровительства начальства. Впрочем, все это просто административные мелочи, ведь на закрытом объекте МЧС Екатерина работает совсем не случайно. Об это мы расскажем чуть ниже, а для начала поведаем о связи похоронного криминалитета с операторами экстренной службы 112.

Как уже писали наши коллеги, во Всеволожском районе Ленобласти работает настоящая теневая диспетчерская служба, распределяющая свежих покойников по аффилированным с мафией похоронным агентам. Организаторами схемы, которая, кстати, уже внедрена и на территорию соседних Курортного и Красногвардейского районов Петербурга, выступают Садовников и его дочь Екатерина Артемьева Главная задача у теневых похоронщиков – как можно быстрее прислать своего агента к родственникам покойного, желательно еще до приезда врачей и полиции. Агент должен всеми правдами и неправдами вынудить родственников подписать договор на ритуальные услуги и забрать паспорт умершего. После этого семья фактически попадает в ловушку – без паспорта сделать уже ничего нельзя и приходится оплачивать ритуальные услуги по грабительским ценам, в разы превышающим средние по региону.

Так что оперативность – залог успеха теневиков. Ранее тандем получал информацию от вызванных в квартиру полицейских или от бригад скорой помощи. Но настоящие чудеса скорости удалось достичь после того, как Садовников и его дочь познакомились с Русланом Галанцевым. Парень на фото ниже ничем не примечателен, кроме одного – он имеет доверительные деловые связи с телефонными операторами экстренной службы 112.





Именно операторы 112 самыми первыми узнают о смерти человека, а Руслан является посредником для продажи данных о месте смерти и контактах родственников. Для справки, информация об одном свежем трупе стоит всего 3 тысячи рублей. Вопрос в количестве смертей, полную информацию о которых имеет служба 112.

Молниеносно получая информацию о новом покойном, тандем Садовников-Артемьева успевает прислать своего сотрудника на место не позднее чем через полчаса после сообщения. Для оперативного вывоза тела тандем даже приобрел 15-летнюю «Газель», на которую наклеили обозначения «Специальная». В идеале, после того, как договор подписан, а паспорт покойного лежит в кармане у агента, тело сразу же отправляется в сторону морга на этой самой «Газели».



Ну а теперь переходим к самому пикантному. Ежемесячные теневые доходы отца Садовникова и дочери Артемьевой – миллионы рублей. Зачем же Екатерина продолжает работать в МЧС и несколько раз в неделю выходить на долгие дежурства телефонистки? Уж поверьте – не только ради ранней государственной пенсии или льготной ипотеки. Дело в том, что именно по закрытой связи МЧС проходит информация о крупных ЧП с человеческими жертвами: от аварий на трассах, до пожаров, взрывов, авиакатастроф и прочих. Там же оперативно появляются сведения о числе жертв, тяжелораненых, затем списки погибших и пострадавших. Зачастую среди них находятся жители районов, в которых работают теневики. Далее их похоронные агенты отрабатывают привычную схему, заключая договоры с родственниками погибших и зарабатывая своим хозяевам сотни тысяч черных рублей.

Вот такое оно, могущество похоронной мафии в знаковой для страны приграничной Ленинградской области. Разумеется, при поддержке чиновников и силовиков, все это остается совершенно безнаказанным. В первую очередь мы говорим о главе администрации Сертолово Юрии Ходько и ответственных лицах 128 и 88 отделов полиции. Вот основные, хотя и не главные покровители кладбищенских теневиков, исправно получающие с них свою мзду.

Продолжение следует

Тимофей Забиякин

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

The evolution of executions in PMC Wagner

“Prigozhin has a video on his phone where the “raider” was skinned alive”

Correspondents of Rucriminal.info talked with sources, in front of whom the ideology and types of executions were changing in Wagner PMC. We present this story with small cuts:

“PMC “Wagner” went through a number of military conflicts, completely different in nature, so the changes within “Wagner” were constant.

In order to come to an understanding of the topic of torture and executions of Wagner, first you need to understand the key difference between this PMC and other PMCs in the world. If all armies and PMCs try to avoid frontal attacks involving large assault groups, then for Wagner this is just about the main feature.



Start: Syria

The first large-scale campaign of the Musicians was Syria.

The main enemy in Syria was initially "foreign": Dmitry Utkin laid down his primary, understandable majority of the first fighters, a nationalist philosophy: "we are Slavs, Russians, whites." It wasn't exactly racist, but there were racial overtones, of course. And in Syria itself, the local population was generally not perceived very well: the Assad soldiers were distinguished by cowardice and far from the best training, they could betray for many reasons, the opposition also did not suffer from humanism, but ISIS completely turned executions into a form of "torture art" with beautiful shots and non-trivial plots.

At that time, Wagner was still taking shape and looking for himself: even the 500th in Syria were treated rather mildly - they were simply thrown into unloading and loading operations, using them as loaders. Efficiency was at the forefront even then, but even in heavy assaults, they usually lost somewhere around 10% of people.

And then there were a lot of Cossacks among the Musicians - specific people in the war, more ostentatious. Since there was enough free time in Syria, and the hostilities were not of the total nature of artillery and other hunting for each other, somehow imperceptibly for everyone, a habit appeared to bring the severed heads of "ISIS" - at first they even paid for them. Not much, just a few dollars, now it's hard to even remember. The practice of paying had to be stopped, because they began to carry a lot of heads: no one would understand by the bearded head whether the ISIS fighter was really finished off, or it was just someone who got under the arm. The locals still didn't like it.

But the sledgehammer first began to be used even then, but it was used against Assad deserters. They were conditionally "Assad": they had their own groups, which had their own commanders and themselves were more like PMCs (only of the Syrian spill, that is, more of an orgband).

Wagner, nevertheless, was a mercenary structure, which means that in addition to the army's simplicity and effectiveness, the emphasis is on rituals and other demonstration methods. And with sledgehammers they often beat the deserters of Assad.

With the ISIS, everything was much tougher, because they tortured the prisoners harshly and always. Accordingly, they, too (as well as sympathizers, those involved and suspects) were mocked as they wanted - creativity was allowed and at least not punished. In addition, the availability of free time contributed, which is already there.



Donbass

The atmosphere in the Donbass was like this: complete chaos, chaos and looting, disguised as a war. Even then it was obvious that it was looting and their own systems of "judicial trials" that corrupted even good and intelligent fighters. As for the cruelty itself, the Donbass could give odds even to Syria: cruelty here often took the form of manic sadism, which everyone was engaged in.

At the same time, torture remained the simplest and most effective way to obtain information. On the whole, in Wagner, such entertainment of individual fighters was looked through with fingers, although they were never encouraged. The more hostilities there were, the more efficiency was manifested - to finish off or shoot faster, but not to waste time and energy. Those who cycled on violence and torture, as a rule, either did not differ in zeal in battle, or died quickly enough themselves.

A new phenomenon that has taken on a large scale is the real-life torture video market. There was a black market, there was a movement. Video buyers were different - from consumer goods to those who bought "exclusives": sometimes they even ordered a form of execution and torture. As soon as the authorities realized that the morale was not getting better from this, the activities of the Musicians were quietly stopped.

Systematically, torture and executions were brought under the jurisdiction of the Musicians' security guards. And with a sledgehammer they began to “tap” on their deserters.

Donbass also brought a culture of the criminal world and banditry. By the way, the military and security officers turned out to be quite weak in the face of this challenge: the criminal culture (despised, it seems, as they do) weakened them from the inside, transferring goals from really combative to mercantile ones.

Ukraine - big war

The beginning of the war was chaotic and very similar to what was already in the Donbass, but very quickly this war became completely different.

Russia lost the ideological battle before February 24, because the local population in the cities it occupied did not feel much sympathy for the Russians and directed art at everything that it could lead to.

In Syria, there was no partisanship on such a scale: the Russians did not like the locals, they did not like the Russians, but they were afraid and acted mainly at night. A few even collective farm. On the territory of Ukraine it was different.

The military began to solve the problem simply: they shot the locals on the slightest suspicion, interrogated them fully, harshly. And they miscalculated: these are not Arabs, here instead of fear you get frenzy and anger in response.

When a mass recruitment of criminals began in Wagner, discipline was generally screwed up to a level that had never been born in an ordinary army.

At the peak of recruitment from the zones in Wagner, they shot their five hundredths, refuseniks and daring ones in much larger numbers than they shot prisoners. Looting and rape are taboo, because where a marauder or a rapist is born. fighter dies.

Inside the Musicians, various executions are already a full-fledged kind of folklore. Prigozhin has a video on his phone where the hijacker was skinned alive and put under a drip to suffer longer. He showed this video many times - to show what will happen if you kill the commander. It was for criminals, but in general - a working thing.

There were sophisticated executions and torture, but as soon as they received evidence in the form of videos, etc., each time it turned into problems. Yes, and Isis, with its cinematic approach to executions, laid its foundation - perhaps it was after them that for some time there was a fashion for "originality".

“Veterans” of Muzykants say that the level of cruelty in torture also depended on the tightness of the intersection with other units - this is like an option to “measure pussy” in a military environment, who is cooler and tougher in implementing the execution. Now the Wagners operate mostly on their own, which also does not contribute to the "spirit of competition" in sophistication.

Stories about original executions are circulating, but where is the truth and where is folklore - you can’t figure it out. From the "classics" of the early Donbass - cutting the stomachs and pouring salt into it, tying hands to the exhaust of a tank, cutting off teeth with a file, chopping off hands and feet and leaving them to die, "roasting on a spit", castration, and, of course, cutting off heads. Of the especially perverted methods - the accurate passage of bath shadows through the body and switching on for heating, partial burning (they bind, pour gasoline on the brush or feet, set fire to it).

Each new stage of the war made its own adjustments, but on the whole, Wagner clearly followed the path of discipline. The main type of execution inside the structure is execution, a sledgehammer is exotic, a symbol. Well, what exactly is used by the security guards during the inquiry - only they know about it. Because those who came to them for a tough interrogation will not tell anything, and in such cases the bodies are usually burned.

To be continued

Arseny Dronov

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Эволюция казней в ЧВК Вагнер

«У Пригожина на телефоне есть видео, где с «залетчика» сняли кожу живьем»



Корреспонденты Rucriminal.info побеседовали с источниками, на глазах которых в ЧВК Вагнер менялась идеология и виды казней. Мы приводим этот рассказ с небольшими купюрами:



«ЧВК "Вагнер" прошел через целый ряд военных конфликтов, совершенно разных по своей природе, поэтому перемены внутри "Вагнера" были постоянными.

Для того же, чтобы прийти к пониманию темы пыток и казней "Вагнера", для начала нужно понять ключевое отличие этой ЧВК от других ЧВК мира. Если все армии и ЧВК стараются избегать лобовых атак с задействованием больших штурмовых групп, то для Вагнера это как раз чуть ли не главная фишка.

Начало: Сирия

Первой масштабной кампанией Музыкантов была Сирия.

Главный противник в Сирии был изначально "чужим": Дмитрий Уткин заложил свою первичную, понятную большинство первых бойцов философию националистического толка: «мы - славяне, русские, белые». Это не был совсем расизм, но расовые нотки, конечно, были. И в самой Сирии местное население воспринималось в целом не очень хорошо: асадовские солдаты отличались трусостью и далеко не самой лучшей подготовкой, предать они могли по множеству причин, оппозиция тоже не страдала гуманизмом, ну а ИГИЛ и вовсе превратил казни в вид "пыточного искусства" с красивыми съемками и нетривиальными сюжетами.

На тот момент Вагнер еще формировался и искал себя: даже к пятисотым в Сирии относились достаточно мягко - их просто закидывали на разгрузочно-погрузочные работы, используя в качестве грузчиков. Эффективность и тогда стояла во главе угла, но даже в тяжелых штурмах обычно теряли где-то 10% людей.

И было тогда среди Музыкантов немало казаков - людей на войне специфических, больше показушных. Так как времени свободного в Сирии хватало, а боевые действия не носили тотальный характер артиллерийской и прочей охоты друг на друга, то как-то незаметно для всех появилась привычка приносить отрезанные головы "игиловцев" - поначалу за них даже платили. Немного, там какие-то несколько долларов, сейчас даже вспомнить трудно. Практику с оплатой пришлось прекратить, потому что голов таскать стали много: по бородатой башке никто не поймет, действительно ли игиловца прикончили, или это просто кто-то под руку попался. Местные все равно недолюбливали.

А вот кувалда впервые начала применяться уже тогда, но применяли ее против асадовских дезертиров. "Асадовскими" они были условно: там были свои группировки, которые имели своих командиров и сами были больше похожи на ЧВК (только сирийского разлива, т.е. больше оргбанды).

Вагнер, все же, был структурой наемников, а это значит, что помимо армейской простоты и эффективности ставка делается на ритуалы и иные демонстрационные методы. И вот кувалдами частенько били дезертировавших асадовцев.

С игиловцами все было куда жестче, поскольку они пленных пытали жестко и всегда. Соответственно, над ними тоже (а также над сочувствующими, причастными и подозреваемыми) издевались, как хотели - творчество допускалось и как минимум не наказывалось. К тому же наличие свободного времени способствовало, чего уж там.



Донбасс

Атмосфера в Донбассе была такая: полный хаос, бардак и мародерство, маскируемое под войну. Уже тогда было очевидно, что именно мародерства и собственные системы "судилищ" разлагали даже хороших и толковых бойцов. Что же касается непосредственно жестокости, то Донбасс мог дать фору даже Сирии: жестокость здесь часто носила форму маниакального садизма, которым занимались все.

В то же время пытки оставались самым простым и эффективным способом добывать информацию. В целом в "Вагнере" на такие развлечения отдельных бойцов смотрели сквозь пальцы, хотя никогда и не поощряли. Чем больше было боевых действий, тем больше проявлялась именно эффективность - быстрее добить или расстрелять, но не тратить сил и времени. Те, кто циклился на насилии и пытках, как правило или не отличались рвением в бою, или достаточно быстро погибали сами.

Новое явление, которое приняло неслабый масштаб - это рынок видео реальных пыток. Появился свой черный рынок, появилось и движение. Покупатели видео были разные - от ширпотребных, до тех, кто покупал "эксклюзивы": иногда даже заказывали вид казни и пытки. Как только начальство просекло, что боевой дух от этого лучше не становится, деятельности у Музыкантов без лишнего шума пресекли.

Планомерно пытки и казни были выведены в ведение безопасников Музыкантов. И кувалдой стали «постукивать» уже по своим дезертирам.

А еще Донбасс привнес культуру уголовного мира и бандитизма. Кстати, военные и чекисты оказались достаточно слабы перед этим вызовом: криминальная культура (презираемая вроде бы как ими) их ослабляла изнутри, переводя цели с реально боевых на меркантильные.

Украина - большая война

Начало войны было хаотическим и сильно похожим на то, что уже было в Донбассе, но очень быстро эта война стала совершенно другой.

Россия проиграла идеологическую битву до 24 февраля, потому что местное население в занимаемых городах большой симпатии к россиянам не испытывало и наводило арту на все, на что могло навести.

В Сирии партизанщины в таких масштабах не было: россияне не любили местных, они не любили россиян, но они боялись и действовали в основном ночью. Несколько даже по-колхозному. На территории Украины было иначе.

Когда в Вагнере пошел массовый набор уголовников, дисциплину завинтили вообще до уровня, которого в обычной армии отродясь не было.

На пике набора с зон в Вагнере расстреливали своих пятисотых, отказников и дерзящих в куда больших количествах, чем расстреливали пленных. Мародерства и изнасилования - табу, потому что там, где рождается мародер или насильник. умирает боец.

Внутри Музыкантов разные казни являются уже полноценным видом фольклора. У Пригожина на телефоне есть видео, где с залетчика сняли кожу живьем и положили под капельницу, чтобы дольше мучился. Он это видео показывал многократно - чтобы показать, что будет, если убьешь командира. Это для уголовников было, но в целом - рабочая вещь.

Изощренные казни и пытки были, но как только они получали доказательство в виде видео и т.д., каждый раз это оборачивалось проблемами. Да и Игил с его киношным подходом к казням заложил свою основу - возможно, это после них какое-то время была мода на "оригинальность".

«Ветераны» Музыкантов говорят, что уровень жестокости в пытках еще и зависел от тесности пересечения с другими подразделениями - это как вариант "мериться письками" в военной среде, кто круче и жестче реализует казнь. Сейчас Вагнер действуют в основном самостоятельно, что тоже не способствует "духу соревнования" в изощрениях.

Рассказы про оригинальные казни гуляют, но где здесь правда, а где фольклор - не разберешься. Из "классики" раннего Донбасса - разрезание животов и насыпание туда соли, привязывать руки к выхлопной танка, спиливание напильником зубов, отрубание рук и ног с оставлением умирать, "поджарка на вертеле", кастрация, ну и естественно отрезание голов. Из особо извращенных способов - аккуратный пропуск банных тенов сквозь тело и включение на подогрев, частичное сжигание (связывают, поливают бензином кисть или ступни, поджигают).

Каждый новый этап войны вносил свои корректировки, но в целом Вагнер четко пошел по пути дисциплины. Основной вид казни внутри структуры - расстрел, кувалда - это экзотика, символ. Ну а что именно применяют безопасники при дознании - об этом знают только они. Потому что те, кто к ним на жесткое дознание попал, уже ничего не расскажет, а тела в таких случаях обычно сжигают».

Продолжение следует

Арсений Дронов

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

The head of Dagestan and the broken deal in La Bottega Siciliana

How a schemer became a deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation

In Dagestan, the focus of attention was the scandal with Yan Ivanov, a member of the local Public Chamber who resigned, and Biysultan Khamzaev, a State Duma deputy from Dagestan, who is being patronized. A 26-year-old guest performer from Moscow became a public figure under false documents. The fact of forgery was indicated in a request to the Prosecutor's Office of Dagestan from the coordinating council of the NPO of the republic, after which, without waiting for the prosecutor's order, Khamzaev recommended Ivanov to merge ahead of schedule so that the deputy himself would not become the object of a negative agenda. Details - at Rucriminal.info.

Biysultan Khamzaev is a very controversial person. His active propaganda against the distribution of alcoholic products is very discordant with the beginning of his working career at a distillery in the Moscow region. Khamzaev ended up at the alcoholic shop in Lyubertsy, owned by the ex-senator of Dagestan Atay Aliyev, only because he was afraid of blood feud by the relatives of a native of the Khasavyurt district killed by his own mother. The Khamzaev family was saved from mortal danger by the late former head of the Khasavyurt district, Alik Alkhamatov, who not only hushed up the initiation of a criminal case, but also asked Atai Aliyev to attach the Khamzaev family to his distillery in Lyubertsy. After some time, the father and son of the Khamzaevs lost their employer's trust in connection with embezzlement in the financial unit of the enterprise - the money had to be taken by force to the son and nephew of Atay Aliyev. The Khamzaevs were saved from physical punishment by Moscow fixers from Dagestan.



After the fiasco with the wine and vodka business, Khamzaev, together with his father, goes to the Lytkarinsky fuel and lubricants plant, where he also manages to pull off a fraud in the financial activities of the enterprise. Then there were frauds with medical equipment and kidnapping of buyers of medical equipment, who paid Khamzaev 4 million rubles in advance.

Biysultan Khamzaev earned his first capital in the elections to the State Duma in the Pskov region, where he happened to play the role of a “satellite” for a passing candidate, creating the appearance of an opposition candidate. The money received was then transformed into a house near the Pirogovsky reservoir in Mytishchi.

In the current deputy convocation of the State Duma from Dagestan, Khamzaev appeared at the very last moment. And only for the reason that Mamed Abasov, who was going to the deputy, did not fulfill his obligations to the head of Dagestan, Sergey Melikov, - earlier they agreed on certain conditions in the La Bottega Siciliana restaurant, the fulfillment of which would promise Abasov a deputy mandate. But, in the end, the latter refrained from the deal and Sultan Khamzaev took the burning place.

According to the source of Rucriminal.info, Sultan Khamzaev's style of behavior in the status of a deputy is maximally adapted to the phalanx of populism.

And, the most ridiculous thing is that Yan Ivanov, who had been showing off for several months in Dagestan, was awarded "for many years of fruitful work" by Sergey Melikov, who was firmly entrenched in the last places in the governor's ratings. For this, the head of Dagestan should also be grateful to Biysultan Khamzaev, who positions his activities as work in tandem with the head of Dagestan.

Alexey Ermakov

To be continued

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Глава Дагестана и сорванная сделка в La Bottega Siciliana

Как депутатом ГД РФ стал махинатор



В Дагестане в фокус внимания попал скандал с подавшим в отставку членом местной Общественной палаты Яном Ивановым, протежируемым депутатом ГосДумы от Дагестана Бийсултаном Хамзаевым. 26-летний гастролер из Москвы заделался общественником по подложным документам. Факт подлога был обозначен в запросе в Прокуратуру Дагестана от координационного совета НКО республики, после чего, не дожидаясь прокурорского предписания, Хамзаев рекомендовал Иванову сливаться на опережение, чтоб сам депутат не стал объектом негативной повестки. Подробности – у Rucriminal.info.

Бийсултан Хамзаев является весьма противоречивой персоной. Его активная пропаганда против распространения алкогольной продукции сильно диссонирует с началом трудовой карьеры на ликеро-водочном заводе в Московской области. На принадлежащем экс-сенатору Дагестана Атаю Алиеву алкогольном цехе в Люберцах Хамзаев оказался лишь потому, что опасался кровной мести родственников убитого его же матерью уроженца Хасавюртовского района. От смертельной опасности семью Хамзаевых спас ныне покойный бывший глава Хасавюртовского района Алик Алхаматов, замявший не только возбуждение уголовного дела, но и попросивший тогда Атая Алиева пристроить семью Хамзаевых на его ликеро-водочный цех в Люберцах. Спустя какое-то время, отец и сын Хамзаевы вышли из доверия у своего работодателя в связи с хищениями в финансовом блоке предприятия, - деньги пришлось забирать силой сыну и племяннику Атая Алиева. От физической расправы Хамзаевых спасли московские решальщики из Дагестана.



После фиаско с вино-водочным делом, Хамзаев вместе с отцом подаётся на Лыткаринский завод ГСМ, где также умудряется провернуть махинацию в финансовой деятельности предприятия. Затем махинации с медицинским оборудованием и кидок покупателей лечебной техники, заранее выплативших Хамзаеву 4 млн рублей.

Бийсултан Хамзаев свой первый капитал заработал на выборах в ГосДуму по Псковской области, где ему довелось исполнить роль «сателлита» у проходного кандидата, создавая видимость оппозиционного соискателя. Полученные денежные средства тогда преобразовались в дом у Пироговского водохранилища в Мытищах.

В нынешнем депутатском созыве ГД от Дагестана Хамзаев оказался в самый последний момент. И только лишь по той причине, что свои обязательства перед главой Дагестана Сергеем Меликовым не выполнил идущий на депутата Мамед Абасов, - ранее они в ресторане La Bottega Siciliana договорились на определенные условия, выполнение которых сулило бы Абасову депутатский мандат. Но, последний в итоге воздержался от сделки и горящее место занял Султан Хамзаев.

По мнению источника Rucriminal.info, стиль поведения Султана Хамзаева в статусе депутата максимально адаптирован под фалангу популизма.

И, самое нелепое, что покуражившегося несколько месяцев в Дагестане Яна Иванова наградил «за многолетнюю плодотворную работу» Сергей Меликов, прочно закрепившийся на последних местах в губернаторских рейтингах . За это глава Дагестана должен быть благодарен в том числе и Бийсултану Хамзаеву, позиционирующего свою деятельность как работу в тандеме с главой Дагестана.

Алексей Ермаков

Продолжение следует

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

General and the "golden passport" of Cyprus

“Positions himself as a lawyer for the President and Patriarch Kirill”




Judge Tverskoy District Court. Moscow Stekliev A.The. in July 2022, he deprived the former daughter-in-law of the retired general of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Pronin V.V. This was done in favor of the interests of the general, who urgently wants to transfer again to himself the property previously recorded on the son of Pronin A.V., who died in Cyprus. The granddaughter became an obstacle for the general in his desire to urgently seize the hereditary property of the deceased son, since she has primary rights to the property of the deceased father under Cypriot law. Details are in the material of the telegram-kahal of the Cheka-OGPU and Rucriminal.info.

General of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Pronin V.V. I decided first to get rid of the mother of a minor granddaughter - the only legal person who can officially intercede for his child.



Failing to reach an agreement in the Family Court of Limassol of the Republic of Cyprus, where the court actually denied custody of the minor granddaughter to the general, since only her mother, Gyandzhayeva E.E., General Pronin V.V., has such rights, went to the bank.

Having found loopholes from old memory in the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow, where he had previously “twisted” his cases when he was the head of the Moscow Court Egorova O.A., with whom he had friendly relations, Pronin The.The. made the right decision.

The judge "closed his eyes" to the opinion of the guardianship and guardianship of the Basmanny district of Moscow, where the mother of many children Gyandzhaeva E.E. legal grounds. Without a single evidence, Judge Stekliev A.The. he was in such a hurry to “please” General Pronin V.V. that, even while being sentenced in the resonant “Landromat case”, one of the largest money laundering channels, defendants in which Korkin A.G., Sobolev A. S., Pakhomov L.V., Yusupov R.Kh., Sharipova V.R., accused under Part 1 of Art. 210, p.p. "a", "b" part 3 of Art. 193.1, p.p. "a", "b" part 3 of Art. 193.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, part 3 of Art. 210, p.p. "a", "b" part 3 of Art. 193.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, - on June 28, 2022, decided not to interrupt the civil process to deprive Gyandzhayeva E.E. of parental rights.

On January 18, 2023, after prolonged torment, the Themis of the Moscow City Court also “turned a blind eye” to the illegal decision of the Tverskoy Court to deprive Gyandzheva E.E. ), attributing even violations of the secrecy of the deliberation room by Judge Stekliev A.The. in a criminal case, to insignificant.

Ahead is the Second Cassation Court of General Jurisdiction, which will check the legality of judgments of the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow and the Court of Appeal, which will be announced later.

One should think about how long Russian citizens will tolerate such former generals of the Ministry of Internal Affairs as Pronin V.V., who have citizenship of Cyprus, hiding large sums of money there, for the possession of which they are then ready for any action.

At the disposal of Rucriminal.info was the appeal of Ekaterina Ganjaeva, where she describes in detail both all the events and Pronin's gigantic assets.

“I am the mother of three minor children, one of whom is my daughter, Pronina Stefania Alexandrovna, I have a higher legal education, I work as an assistant to a deputy of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly.

Previously, I was married to Pronin A.V., who died on April 13, 2021 in Cyprus, who was the son of Pronin V.V. - who held the position of head of the Moscow Department of Internal Affairs from 2001 to 2009.

This Pronin family, having deceitfully separated me from my daughter Stephanie, for a long time deprives me of the opportunity to fully communicate with my daughter, including by means of threats of physical violence, and now they have reached the point that, using their financial and administrative resources, they are trying to deprive me parental rights in relation to my daughter.

Since 2014, I have been fighting for the return of my child, who, bypassing my consent, Father Pronin A.V. issued citizenship of the Republic of Cyprus, and simply speaking, bought such citizenship (golden passport), and put a ban on her leaving the island.

In relation to me, civil cases were fabricated for the recovery of non-existent debts to Pronin A.V. - former spouse - and bailiffs, respectively, a ban on leaving the Russian Federation. Using for that period of time friendship with the chairman of the Moscow City Court Egorova O.A., General Pronin V.V. resolved all the issues of interest to him, including the determination of my place of residence with my father, and not with me for unmotivated reasons, and when terminating the agreement on the residence of the child with me after the dissolution of the marriage, under section on property and so on.

For almost 8 years, I have been fighting every day with the Pronin family to return my child.

Pronin A.V. - Stephanie's father - died on April 13, 2021 in a house in Cyprus.

Pronin V.V. - the general of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, who lives either in Cyprus, or in Germany, or in other European countries, on the so-called general's pension, decided by any means to resolve his material issue regarding the inheritance after the death of his son Alexander, whose heir is his daughter Stephanie - my minor daughter. The General of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Pronin V.V., acting with his barbaric methods, decided to “solve everything” in the Family Court of Limassol of the Republic of Cyprus, secretly from me to the court with an application to establish him as the sole guardian of my child.

The court preliminary considered this application, established temporary guardianship, but after a challenge from my side on January 22, 2022, it completely ruled out the participation of General of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Pronin V.V. and his wife Pronina V.V. from guardianship of my daughter without my consent, explaining that Pronin had misled the court by pointing out his sole guardianship.

Realizing that General V.V. Pronin had his own question in the Cypriot court. will not decide on the basis of the principle “who pays, he orders the music”, he, together with his lawyer E.Yu. I have parental rights in relation to my daughter in the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow, where judge Merkulov A.A. works, whose father Merkulov is friends with the former chairman of the Moscow City Court Egorova O.A. and General of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Pronin V.V., and judge Merkulov A.A. in turn, has a friendship with Judge Stekliev A.The. (a close-minded professional, but very ambitious in every sense!).

On September 20, 2021, a claim was allegedly filed with the court from my minor daughter to deprive me of parental rights, and, bypassing the distribution of the claim by an electronic database, on September 20, 2001, it was accepted by judge A.V. Stekliev. to your production.

The number of criminal violations committed by judge Stekliev A.The. when considering the case, do not count: he considered the claim for the recovery of alimony for the second time, with the decision that came into force by law, and considered the claim, despite the fact that the Family Court of Limassol of the Republic of Cyprus began to hear this case six months before ( two civil disputes at the same time), and admitted to the case persons who were not involved in the case and did not have authority, closed the court session without thoroughly questioning General V.V. the minutes of the court sessions, including the part where the prosecutor supported the position of my side, altered the case, pinned up and tore out documents, cooked what he could according to the terms of reference of the customer Pronin V.V., and still it turned out badly. But this will be dealt with by the appellate board for civil cases of the Moscow City Court on December 14, 2022.

What did I face while protecting my rights and the rights of my minor daughter.

During the proceedings, it was established that my daughter permanently resides in the Republic of Cyprus, as she studies there.

However, the Department of Custody and Guardianship for the Odintsovo city district and the city of the Krasnoznamensk district entered the case.

In accordance with Art. 70, 78 of the IC of the Russian Federation, when considering disputes related to the upbringing of children, regardless of who filed a claim in defense of the child, the body of guardianship and guardianship must be involved in the case. The guardianship and guardianship body is obliged to conduct an examination of the living conditions of the child and the person (persons) applying for his upbringing, and submit to the court an examination report and a conclusion based on it on the merits of the dispute

According to the clarifications contained in paragraph 3 of the Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 44 dated November 14, 2017 “On the practice of applying legislation by courts in resolving disputes related to the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a child in the event of a direct threat to his life or health, as well as in limiting or deprivation of parental rights” participation of the guardianship and guardianship body in cases of deprivation of parental rights is carried out at the place of residence of the plaintiff and defendant in the case.

In accordance with the requirements of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, the Department of Guardianship and Guardianship for the Odintsovo city district and the city of Krasnoznamensk district was also not involved in the case.

As stated above, Gyandzhaeva Ekaterina Evgenievna permanently resides at the address: Moscow, Elokhovsky pr., 1, apt. 16. This address is assigned to the guardianship and guardianship of the Basmanny district of Moscow.

Stefania Aleksandrovna Pronina, a minor, permanently resides in the Republic of Cyprus, Pyrgos Tourist Zone, Limassol, 171B Amathuntos Ave.

Consequently, none of the parties to the case lives in the territorial jurisdiction of the Office of Custody and Custody for the Odintsovo urban district and the city of Krasnoznamensk district. At the same time, this guardianship authority actively began to take part in the case precisely after questioning an outsider in a closed court session - Vladimir Vasilyevich Pronin, and even provided a second opinion on the case of April 27, 2022, which, in its essence and content, directly contradicts the conclusion given earlier by the same guardianship on November 11, 2021 without any justification, containing factually false information.

At the same time, from the very act of the survey of living conditions of April 27, 2022 (volume 4 pp. 2-5), conducted on April 21, 2022, it is seen that the representative of the Guardianship and Guardianship Department for the Odintsovo city district and the city of Krasnoznamensk district Drizhak G.V. conducted an inspection of the house, located at the address: Moscow region, Odintsovo, der. Podushkino, section GP-30.

Not only that, according to the data of the public cadastral map of the Russian Federation, there are no residential facilities at the address: Moscow Region, Odintsovo, der. Podushkino, plot GP-30, does not exist, but at the address: Moscow region, Odintsovo, der. Podushkino, GP-1, account. 30, does not belong to Pronina S.A. and her relatives, but to third parties, as evidenced by the extract attached to the case file at the court session on July 28, 2022, also during the inspection, the representative of the guardianship spoke with a certain citizen Sosnovsky, whose identity was not established, who, from his own words, knew deceased Pronin A.V. and considers himself a proper person who can talk about the life of a minor Pronina SA.

From the words of this particular citizen, an act of housing and living conditions of April 27, 2022 was drawn up.

At the same time, in the act itself, the representative of the Department of guardianship and guardianship for the Odintsovo urban district and the city of Krasnoznamensk district Drizhak G.V. indicated that the house itself, in which it is located, does not have a title owner.

A legitimate question arises, on what basis the representative of the Department of guardianship and guardianship in the Odintsovo urban district and the city of Krasnoznamensk district Drizhak G.V. was located in the above house, in which the minor Pronina S.A., who has no legal connection with the said property, has never been. Moreover, when conducting an inspection by a representative of the Department of guardianship and guardianship in the Odintsovo urban district and the city of Krasnoznamensk district, Drizhak G.V. in principle, there was no owner or his representative in the house, since, by virtue of the law, there is currently none.

However, all these circumstances did not prevent G.V. conduct an inspection of living conditions in some house, apparently chosen on their own initiative on the basis of the principle “I like it better here”.

Well, quite egregious is the indication in this act by the representative of the Department of guardianship and guardianship in the Odintsovo urban district and the city of Krasnoznamensk district, Drizhak G.V. false information about the presence of some kind of debt from Gyandzhaeva E.E. in the amount of 171,089 rubles. 92 kop.

In accordance with paragraphs 6,7,8 of the Procedure for conducting a survey of the living conditions of underage citizens and their families, approved by order of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation dated January 10, 2019 No. 4 (Appendix No. 2), the survey reveals: 6.1. The level of provision of the basic needs of the child: 6.1.1. Health status: general visual assessment of the level of physical development and its correspondence to the age of the child, the presence of diseases, special needs for medical care, drug provision; the presence of signs of physical and (or) mental abuse of the child; an explanation from parents and / or persons living with the child, signs of violence in the child; having a history of child abuse. 6.1.2. Appearance: observance of the norms of personal hygiene of the child, the availability, quality and condition of clothes and shoes, their compliance with the season, as well as the age and gender of the child, and more. 6.1.3. Basic care: meeting the basic needs of the child - food, shelter, hygiene, provision of clothing, provision of medical care; daily routine of the child, sleep schedule, their compliance with age and individual characteristics. 6.1.4. Social adaptation: the presence of communication skills with others, self-service skills in accordance with the age and individual characteristics of the child's development, the adequacy of the child's behavior in different situations, and more. 6.1.5. Upbringing and education: name(s) of the organization(s) carrying out educational activities, including institutions of additional education for children, which the child attends, the form and success of mastering educational programs in accordance with the age and individual characteristics of the child's development ; organization of free time and rest of the child; the presence of a developing and learning environment. 6.1.6. Meeting the emotional needs of the child. 6.2. family okra child's condition: 6.2.1. Composition of the family who actually provides care and supervision for the child; the presence and place of residence of close relatives of the child, the degree of participation of parents and other persons living together, relatives in the upbringing and maintenance of the child; the degree of attachment and relationship of the child with parents and family members. 6.2.2. Relationships between family members, their nature; features of relations between family members, the impact of these relations on the child, changes in the composition of the family in the present and past, the distribution of responsibilities in the family. 6.3. Housing and property conditions: 6.3.1. Living conditions in which the child lives: the presence and ownership of the dwelling, its total and living area, the number of rooms, landscaping and sanitary and hygienic condition; the child has a separate equipped place (room, corner) for sleeping, games, activities; the presence of personal items (toys, books, etc.) in accordance with the age of the child and more. 6.3.2. Ensuring the safety of the child in accordance with his age (lack of access to dangerous household items, medicines, electrical appliances, gas, and the like, the risk of harm to the child both at home and outside the home). 6.3.3. Family income structure: main sources of income (income of parents and other family members, alimony, pensions, allowances, other social payments); average monthly and per capita family income; information about the property and property rights of the child; information about providing for the basic needs of the child. 6.4. The presence of circumstances that endanger the life and health of the child, his physical and moral development or violate his rights and legally protected interests; facts of neglect, cruel, rude, degrading treatment, insult or exploitation of a child, physical or mental abuse of a child, encroachment on his sexual inviolability. 7. During the survey, such forms of obtaining information as a conversation with the child, his parents and other family members are used. During the survey, the confidentiality of personal data of citizens is ensured. 8. Based on the results of the examination, an act of examination of the living conditions of a minor citizen and his family (hereinafter referred to as the act of examination) is drawn up in the form in accordance with Appendix No. 3 to this order, containing: an assessment of the circumstances identified during the examination, specified in paragraph 6 of this Procedure; conclusions about the presence of conditions that pose a threat to the life or health of the child or impede his normal upbringing and development; conclusions about the presence of circumstances indicating the absence of parental care over the child; recommendations on the form of protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the child.

None of the above points was observed by the representative of the Guardianship and Guardianship Department for the Odintsovo city district and the city of Krasnoznamensk district, Drizhak G.V., when drawing up the act of examining housing and living conditions of April 27, 2022.

Representatives of this Department of guardianship and guardianship in the Odintsovo city district and the city of Krasnoznamensk district have never seen or talked to either the minor Pronina SA or the defendant Gyandzhaeva E.E.

The question is, what is the reason for such an ardent participation of the Guardianship and Guardianship Authority, which has nothing to do with either the mother or the child. And here everything is simple again. The daughter of a lawyer from the side of the plaintiff Zabralova E.Yew. - Zabralova O.S. previously headed the Department of Education of the Moscow Region, which included the Guardianship and Guardianship Authority, and is currently a Senator.

And what a coincidence.

I turned to the Deputy of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation Khinshtein A.E., who, in turn, turned to the Governor of the Moscow Region Vorobyov A.Yu. with a request to conduct an inspection at the Ministry of Social Development of the Moscow Region for violations of the legislation of the Russian Federation by the Department of Guardianship and Guardianship for the Odintsovo city district and the city of Krasnoznamensk district

However, both me and Deputy Khinshtein A.E. letters came from the vice-governors of the Moscow region (girlfriends of Zabralova O.S.), in which information is indicated that does not correspond to reality, but is simply false.

At the same time, before the Governor of the Moscow Region Vorobyov A.Yu. These appeals also did not reach.

There was also an appeal to the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation Krasnov I.V. from Deputy Khinshtein A.E. on the issue of ensuring the appearance in a civil case of the Tver prosecutor, as well as conducting an audit and taking prosecutorial response measures in relation to the guardianship and guardianship department of the Guardianship and Guardianship Department for the Odintsovo city district and the city of Krasnoznamensk district, which is clearly acting in violation of the requirements of the law outside its territory, however, these appeals were sent to the prosecutor's office of the Moscow region, and there they gave replies on a different subject, not related to the text of the appeals.

The only one who responded to this message In connection with this, on July 28, 2022, after 12 court hearings missed by the Tver District Prosecutor, an assistant prosecutor appeared in court, who in conclusion asked the court to make a decision in the interests of the child, without giving its conclusion on the merits.

But, the disgrace on the part of guardians did not end there.

By order of the Acting Head of the Department of Social Protection of the Population of the Tverskoy District of the Department of Social Protection of the Population of the Central Administrative District of Moscow No. 271-r dated August 10, 2022, provisional guardianship was established for the minor Pronina Stefania Alexandrovna, born on August 13, 2005, and a temporary guardian was appointed for a period of up to six months child Pronin Vladimir Vasilyevich, born on September 21, 1948, the place of residence of the minor Pronina SA was determined. for the period of stay on the territory of the Russian Federation together with the trustee at the address: Moscow, st. Zoological, 26, building 2, apt. 73, taking into account that the minor actually resides at the address: Republic of Cyprus, Pigos Tourist Zone, Limassol, 171B Amathunthos Ave.

In the Ordinance, Guardianship refers to the illegal decision of the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow dated July 28, 2022 on the claim of the minor Pronina S.A. to Gyandzhaeva E.E. on deprivation of parental rights, recovery of alimony, determination of the place of residence with the Pronins, which has not entered into force, if there is an appeal against the said court decision, which will be considered by the court of second instance, and also taking into account the fact that the court decision that has not entered into force by virtue of the current legislation, it does not bear legal consequences for the parties to the case, as well as for other persons, including state bodies (Article 3, 210 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation), and at all testifies to the illegality of the grounds for issuing the above Order.

In addition, the complex lawlessness is aggravated by a letter - a petition from the Department of Social Protection of the Population of the Tverskoy District of the Central Administrative District of Moscow, filed with the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow, in which this body asks to be released from participation in the case of deprivation of parental rights by Gyandzhaeva E.E., in Due to the fact that neither the minor plaintiff Pronina SA, nor the defendant Gyandzhayeva E.E. do not live in the territory of action of these bodies, that is, in the apartment ..., located at the address: Moscow, Veskovsky per., d. ...

That is, having full information, possessing material in relation to the minor Pronina S.A., refusing to even inspect the living quarters and draw up an act of living conditions in the framework of the case of deprivation of parental rights (2021-2022), August 10, 2022 Department social protection of the population of the Tverskoy district of the Central Administrative District of Moscow suddenly discovered a minor Pronina S.A. on the territory of his jurisdiction. and even considered it possible to "take part in her fate" at the administrative level in favor of persons who have a clear interest in the hereditary property of the latter.

Among other things, neither Pronin V.V., nor the minor Pronina S.A., do not live in Moscow, as indicated in the contested Order, which in itself testifies to the nature of this document.

I would especially like to cancel the fact that when the representative of Gyandzhaeva E.E. department of social protection of the population of the Tverskoy district of the Department of social protection of the population of the Central Administrative District of Moscow, in particular the head of the department of guardianship, guardianship and patronage Posnikova E.V. October 04, 2022, the last to the legal requirement to provide a copy of the above-mentioned order No. 271-r dated August 10, 2022, as well as on familiarization with the personal file of the minor Pronina S.A. - refused.

These circumstances significantly once again violated the rights of the sole legal representative of the minor Pronina SA. - her mother Gyandzhaeva E.E., and similar behavior of guardianship, guardianship and patronage employees of the Tverskoy district of Moscow, led by the head Posnikova E.V. once again approved Gyandzhaeva E.E. in thoughts about the obvious and direct interest of the selfish nature of these officials in decision-making.

I would also like to mention the senior bailiff of the department of bailiffs for the Balashikha district and the city of Zheleznodorozhny of the Federal Bailiff Service for the Moscow Region, Gasanov R.A., who distinguished himself in the indicated lawlessness, and his bailiffs.

Having no evidence to deprive Gyandzhayeva E.E. parental rights, lawyer Zabralova E.Yu. decided to interest the bailiffs-executors to commit illegal actions, carrying out the protection of the interests of Pronin The.The.

June 09, 2022 and June 14, 2022 to the representative of Gyandzhaeva E.E. a certificate was issued stating that the materials of enforcement proceedings No. 154753/00/50001-IP dated July 29, 2019 on the recovery of alimony from Pronina (married - Gyandzhaeva) E.E. in favor of Pronin A.V. alimony for the maintenance of a minor child - Pronina Stefania Alexandrovna, Born on August 13, 2005, completed, are in the archive and no enforcement actions have been taken within the framework of this enforcement proceedings.

At the same time, on June 14, 2022, the senior bailiff of the department of bailiffs of executors in the Balashikha district and the city of Zheleznodorozhniy Department of the Federal Bailiff Service for the Moscow Region Gasanov R. A. canceled the decision to end the enforcement proceedings of March 26, 2020.

When considering an administrative claim Gyandzhayeva E.E. The Balashikha City Court of the Makovskaya Region found that this decision of March 26, 2020 on the completion of enforcement proceedings was canceled, since the deceased Pronin A.V. The department received a certificate of his own death. At the same time, the bailiffs were not embarrassed that the allegedly deceased sent this death certificate. On the contrary, the bailiffs continued to send correspondence to the deceased. At the same time, during the proceedings in the case, the representative of the senior bailiff explained that the deceased had his representative by proxy, and he carried out all the instructions of the deceased Pronin A.V., which, in her opinion, does not contradict the law.

No one was embarrassed that the only legal representative at the moment of her minor child Pronina S.A., who exercises her parental responsibilities in relation to her daughter, is her mother - Gyandzhaeva E.E., which is objectively confirmed by the birth certificate of a minor.

The above follows from the systematic interpretation of the family legislation of the Russian Federation, in particular, paragraph 1 of Art. 64 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation, according to which parents are the legal representatives of their children and act in defense of their rights and interests in relations with any individuals and legal entities, including in courts, without special powers.

Consequently, the violation of the rights of a minor by a single parent does not occur, since by virtue of the law the child is in the care of the mother.

In such a situation, it is not clear in connection with which the interest of the senior bailiff of the department of bailiffs for the Balashikha district and the city of the Zheleznodorozhny Office of the Federal Bailiff Service for the Moscow Region, Roman Avazovich Gasanov, was shown interest in the materials of this enforcement proceeding, or he considered the application from deceased creditor, to whom he sends a copy of the decision.

Further, through the website of the public service, Gyandzhayeva E.E. an accompanying letter was sent under the number 487808143/5001, from which it is seen that the SPI Aleshina E.V. sends a copy of the resolution on the calculation of the determination of the debt for alimony, while the resolution itself was not sent to the debtor.

At the same time, Gyandzhaeva E.E. there is no arrears in the payment of alimony payments to Pronin A.The. and even more so in front of her daughter.

By the decision of the Balashiikha City Court of the Moscow Region of September 16, 2022, the actions of the bailiffs of the bailiff of the department of bailiffs for the Balashikha district and the city of Zheleznodorozhniy of the Federal Bailiff Service for the Moscow Region were declared illegal, the decision on the calculation of the debt of June 14, 2022 was declared illegal.

However, when considering the case, it turned out that the bailiff-executor of the department of bailiffs of executors in the Balashikha district and the city of Zheleznodorozhny Department of the Federal Bailiff Service in the Moscow Region Aleshina E.A., issued some other decisions dated April 7, 2022 and August 31 2022 on the calculation of debt.

At the same time, at the hearing on August 31 - September 16, 2022 SPI Aleshina E.A. explained that she issued all the decisions due to inexperience, these decisions are illegal, and the enforcement proceedings were completely terminated on July 22, 2022. To the questions of the representative of Gyandzhaeva E.E., who advised and forced the SPI Aleshina E.A. to commit such actions, the latter replied that she received all orders from the senior bailiff Gasanov R.A.

After the appeal of Deputy Khinshtein A.E. to the director of the FSSP of Russia Arestov D.V. according to the statement of Gyandzhaeva E.E., at a personal reception, the senior bailiff Gasanov R.A. to the questions of the representative Ganjaeva E.E. about that, in connection with which interest was shown in the above-mentioned enforcement proceedings, which have been in the archive for many years, he referred to the head of the GUFSSP of Russia in the Moscow Region Nikishin I.A. and Pronina V.V.



And of course, one cannot ignore the actions of the First Secretary of the Embassy in the Republic of Cyprus Baikin A.Yu., who holds the position of head of the consular department, who, together with a group of people (Second Secretary Artamonov I.A., Secretary-Referent Shalak E.A.) drew up an inspection report housing conditions dated October 18, 2021, which he conducted by phone, without leaving his office in Nicosia, in a house located in Limassol, and also allegedly interviewed Prinina S.A. Not only that, this official violated the provision of the Federal Law of July 05, 2010 No. 154-FZ (as amended on June 11, 2021) “Consular Charter of the Russian Federation”, and a number of provisions of Russian legislation, including the Family Code of the Russian Federation, based on analysis of which no consul - First Secretary of the Embassy in the Republic of Cyprus Baikin A.Yu. together with the employees of his department (consular), no other person is endowed with such powers in accordance with the law, and cannot replace the Guardianship and Guardianship Authority, and also submitted these illegal documents to the court.



On the basis of the above,

I BEG:



In order to protect the rights and legitimate interests of the mother of many children Gyandzhaeva Ekaterina Evgenievna and her minor child Pronina Stefania Alexandrovna, born on August 13, 2005, I ask you to take control of the following issues that are not resolved by state bodies in the execution order:

1. The issue of checking the illegal actions of the Guardianship and Guardianship Department for the Odintsovo city district and the city of Krasnoznamensk district on the participation in the case of the minor Pronina Stefania Aleksandrovna, born on August 13, 2005, supervised by the Government of the Moscow Region represented by Governor A.Yu. Vorobyov.

2. The issue of checking illegal actions of the Department of Social Protection of the Population of the Tverskoy District of the Department of Social Protection of the Population of the Central Administrative District of Moscow and the Department of Labor and Social Protection of the Population of the City of Moscow, which are supervised by the Government of Moscow represented by the Mayor of Moscow Sobyanin S.S.

3. The issue of checking the actions of the prosecutor of the Moscow region Zabaturin S.V. on inaction in the framework of consideration of complaints by Gyandzhaeva E.E. and Deputy of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly Khinshtein A.E., supervised by the Prosecutor General Krasnov I.V.

4. The issue of verification of illegal actions of the First Secretary of the Embassy in the Republic of Cyprus Baikin A.Yu.





To be continued

Timofey Zabiyakin

Source: www.rucriminal.info