How Mikhail Fridman became Boris Lyuboshits

The oligarch's attempt to attack Georgy Bedzhamov in England ended in failure

As the VChK-OGPU Telegram channel and Rucriminal.info learned, by the decision of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Boris Moiseevich Lyuboshits, the owner of the micro-enterprise "Cesar Consulting", was recognized as "bad faith" and "a liar" in the case of financing lawsuits by Vneshprombank and the bankruptcy trustee Kireeva against Georgy Bedzhamov. The court also recognized Rustem Nuretdinov, Lyuboshits' lawyer, who is not registered as a lawyer in the Russian Federation, as well as Kireeva herself, as dishonest liars. The English court has dismissed Kireeva's claim against an Italian villa owned by Bedzhamov's civil partner, which both the manager and the Russian court had laid claim to. An appeal against this decision could, in theory, allow the case to continue, but would not change the court's basic conclusion that Lyuboshits, Nuretdinov and Kireeva were dishonest.



The severity of this offence in the context of English judicial decisions is best conveyed by the word "liar", rather than the softer and more streamlined "dishonest". "Dishonest" in the English legal tradition is not simply "dishonest conduct", but a deliberate misrepresentation, lying or concealment of the truth in order to deceive the court or another party.

Charges of deceiving the court are considered to be among the most serious in the context of UK civil proceedings. In exceptional cases, the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, which hears commercial and property disputes, has the power to impose criminal penalties of up to 24 months' imprisonment for contempt of court, including wilful deception.

These hearings follow strict protocols that have remained unchanged for the past three centuries: participants are required to adhere to a formal dress code, and barristers appear in ceremonial silk robes and wigs. Trust in the participants in the process is considered the cornerstone of English justice, and an attempt to mislead the court is a grave breach of these principles.



In English legal proceedings, it is extremely rare and exceptional for a person to be found to be a liar and a dishonest participant without cross-examination. Judges, as a rule, exercise the utmost caution and do not draw such harsh conclusions without personally hearing the party and checking the credibility of their evidence. Therefore, the fact that the English court came to such conclusions without cross-examination demonstrates the flagrant and outrageous nature of the conduct. This means that the evidence presented was so strong and unambiguous that it left the court with no other choice. If the lie had been revealed during the in-person hearing, the court could have immediately issued an arrest warrant right in the courtroom and remanded the defendant in custody until sentencing. According to the source of Rucriminal.info, Lyuboshits got off lightly, given the nature of the conclusion made by the judges.



In 2024, Boris Lyuboshits bought the rights to prosecute Georgy Bedzhamov from A1, Alfa Group (Mikhail Fridman's structure) - at that time, these rights had already been sold to Alexander Fain. This deal raised suspicions of an attempt to circumvent the sanctions regime. The English court refused to trust either Fridman or Fain, and even more so Lyuboshits himself, who claimed through his lawyers that he was a wealthy investor willing to invest over $20 million in the prosecution of Bedzhamov. The court found this version unconvincing, in addition to the court rulings on deceiving the court.



Lyuboshits had previously figured in a corporate conflict around the inheritance of Andrey Trubnikov - the assets of the company Natura Siberica. For several months, he held the post of trustee of the business. At that time, representatives of the majority of the heirs of the company's founder accused him and his structure of attempting to seize control by force. Lyuboshits himself claimed that the management refused to provide documents necessary for the audit and due diligence. After his removal, his legal agency initiated a series of lawsuits against legal entities associated with Natura Siberica, but all of them were either rejected or left without consideration, which is confirmed by the data of the arbitration courts. Boris Luboshits also participated in organizing the sale of a Russian business to the German OBI GmbH for a symbolic sum of 1 euro.



After the deception of the English court was revealed, references to Boris Luboshits began to disappear from websites associated with him. The website of his micro-company Cesar Consulting (https://sezarconsult.ru/) became unavailable. The website of the company registered to his son, Audit Group (https://auditgr.ru/), remains accessible for now, but all references to Luboshits as the "founder" have been removed from it.



Archived versions of the websites are still available:



- Cesar Consulting: https://web.archive.org/web/20250125030222/https://sezarconsult.ru/#b2618



- Audit Group: https://web.archive.org/web/202405021

24541/https://www.auditgr.ru/



Lyuboshits' name is also no longer displayed on the SOLOMON.help website, an organization affiliated with the Federation of Jewish Communities of Russia and supported by Mikhail Fridman and Alfa Group structures through the Solomon Foundation for the Support of Jewish Traditions and Culture. The SOLOMON.help website opens today with a photo of Mikhail Fridman, a leading shareholder in Alfa Group: https://solomon.help/. Earlier on this same website, Boris Lyuboshits was listed as a "Mentor" along with representatives of Alfa Group, including, for example, Andrei Elinson, until recently the managing partner of A1 Alfa Group, and now claiming to be the founder of the "independent" investment firm Inweasta with billions of dollars under management in Dubai.

Lyuboshits can be seen in the archived version of the Solomon.help website:



Boris Moiseevich Lyuboshits - brief information



Auditor and entrepreneur Boris Moiseevich Lyuboshits positions himself as a motivational speaker, public figure and business guru. Lyuboshits, the owner of the micro-enterprise "Cesar Consulting", called himself the founder and chairman of the board of directors of the company "Audit Group", which he presents as one of the top 10 largest audit groups and companies in the field of tax consulting.



In his Facebook and Instagram accounts, Boris Lyuboshits actively creates the image of an involved participant in public and professional life, periodically mentioning his participation in various councils and committees - such as the "Expert Council" of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, the "Investment Policy Council" under the Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the "Public Council" of the Federal Treasury and other similar structures, membership in which he indicates.



Lyuboshits is also listed as the founder of the online school "ERA", which promises free lessons in mathematics, physics, computer science and economics for schoolchildren.



In interviews and at his seminars, Lyuboshits often talks about "perfectionism", "values" and overcoming "internal barriers". He regularly appears as a "lecturer" and organizer of "master classes", where he shares what he calls "experience and knowledge", actively promoting himself through social networks and participation in events, including meetings at the Maryina Roshcha synagogue near Moscow.



Boris Lyuboshits publishes information about his activities and motivational initiatives on social networks: Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/borisliuboshits/, Facebook company - https://www.facebook.com/AuditGr/.



Extracts from judgments



Key Findings on Dishonesty and Bad Faith

Key Findings on Lying, Mendacity and Abuse of Process



1. "The certificate was false in a very material, if not crucial, respect... Mr Lyuboshits and Mr Nurtdinov must have known that the certificate... could not be provided... I consider that this document was not honestly provided."



[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024), [para 56]



2. "It is inconceivable that the bank did not tell them [Lyuboshits and Nurtdinov] that from the end of August it was not going to be possible [to transfer funds]." "It is inconceivable that the bank did not tell them [Lyuborshchits and Nurtdinov] that from the end of August transfers of funds were no longer possible."

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024), [para 42]



3. "Knowing as they did that the certificate had to be provided, and knowing... that RB’s stance meant that moneys could not be paid directly... they must have known that the certificate could not be provided."

"Knowing as they did that the certificate had to be provided, and knowing... that RB’s stance meant that moneys could not be paid directly... they must have known that the certificate could not be provided." [2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024), [para 57]



4. "The certificate, and the reliance on it thereafter as preserving the proceedings, is in my view conduct falling within the broad description of Lord Diplock [abuse of process]."



[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024), [para 64]



5. "The funders, who were the part of the team most closely connected with the exercise, knew that it could not be provided, and yet it was. That in my view is a clear abuse."

"The funders who were closely involved in the process knew that the certificate could not be provided and yet it was provided anyway - this is in my view a patent lie and an abuse."

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024), [para 64]



6. "I therefore find that the certificate in this case was not a valid or effective certificate, or alternatively that its provision and reliance on it is an abuse of process."

"an effective or efficient document or that its submission and reliance on it resulted from falsehood or abuse of process."

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024), [para 67]



7. "Knowing as they did... they must either have told Mr Elliot of the difficulty (though I have not found that they actually did) or they deliberately withheld knowledge of the problem from Mr Elliot, making it impossible for him to certify truthfully."

"Knowing as they did... they must either have told Mr Elliot of the difficulty (though I have not found that they actually did) or they deliberately withheld knowledge of the problem from Mr Elliot, making it impossible for him to certify truthfully."

" [2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024), [para 57]



8. "Mr Nurtdinov himself has not apparently said anything about it. His silence is doubtless very significant."

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024), [para 42]



9. "I have found that it was a certificate that was dishonest... The costs for the period since 31st August are directly attributable to that act of dishonesty... that is well ‘beyond the norm’ in terms of the test which has to be fulfilled for indemnity costs to be justified." "I have found that the certificate was a lie... The expenditure after 31 August is directly attributable to that lie... which is significantly outside the normal range."

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024) (Costs Judgment), [para 5]



10. "The evidence overall now demonstrates that [Lyuboshits] was never likely to be [the true funder]... including some misleading statements about his interest in certain companies. I consider that this reflects a desire to hide something."

"The evidence overall now demonstrates that [Lyuboshits] was never likely to be [the true funder]... including some misleading statements about his interest in certain companies. I consider that this reflects a desire to hide something." [2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024) (Costs Judgment), [para 7]



11. "Since Mr Lyuboshits came on the scene this litigation has been presented on a false basis of the wealth of Mr Lyuboshits."



[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024) (Costs Judgment), [para 8]



12. "Various statements have been made on the claimant’s behalf by her solicitors from time to time about the source of the security monies which turn out to be either untrue or half-truths." "Various statements were made on behalf of the claimant by her solicitors about the origin of the security funds which turned out to be either false or half-true."

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024) (Costs Judgment), [para 7]



13. "As I observed in my striking-out judgement, the falsity originated from someone who is closely associated with this litigation, someone who is said to be funding it and someone who benefits from the litigation, so it is appropriate that those acts, for these purposes, should be attributed to the claimant. She cannot distance herself from the costs certificate."



"As I observed in my striking-out judgment, the falsity originated from someone who is closely associated with this litigation, someone who is said to be funding it and someone who benefits from the litigation, so it is appropriate that those acts, for these purposes, should be attributed to the claimant. She cannot distance herself from the costs certificate."



"As I noted in my striking-out judgment, the falsity originated from someone who is closely associated with this litigation, someone who is said to be funding it and someone who benefits from the litigation, so it is appropriate that those acts, for these purposes, should be attributed to the claimant. She cannot distance herself from the false expenses certificate."

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024) (Costs Judgment), [para 5]



Arseniy Dronov



To be continued....

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Как Михаил Фридман стал Борисом Любошицем

Попытка олигарха атаковать Георгия Беджамова в Англии обернулась провалом

Как стало известно телеграм-каналу ВЧК-ОГПУ и Rucriminal.info, решением Высокого Суда Правосудия Англии и Уэльса Борис Моисеевич Любошиц, владелец микропредприятия "Сезар Консалтинг", был признан "недобросовестным" (“bad faith”), "лжецом" (“dishonest”) в рамках дела о финансировании судебных исков Внешпромбанка и конкурсной управляющей Киреевой против Георгия Беджамова. Также недобросовестными лжецами суд признал Рустема Нуретдинова, юриста Любошица, не зарегистрированного в качестве адвоката в РФ, а также саму Кирееву.



Английский суд отказал Киреевой в иске в отношении итальянской виллы, находящейся в собственности гражданского партнёра Беджамова, на которую претендовали как сама управляющая, так и российский суд. Апелляция на данное решение, теоретически, может позволить продолжение процесса, однако не изменит основного вывода суда о бесчестности Любошица, Нуретдинова и Киреевой.

Тяжесть данного проступка в контексте английских судебных определений наиболее точно передаётся именно словом «лжец», а не более мягким и обтекаемым «нечестный». "Dishonest" — в английской правовой традиции — это не просто "нечестное поведение", а намеренное введение в заблуждение, ложь или сокрытие правды с целью обмана суда или другой стороны.

Обвинения в обмане суда считаются одними из самых тяжёлых в рамках гражданского судопроизводства Великобритании. В исключительных случаях Высокий суд правосудия Англии и Уэльса, рассматривающий коммерческие и имущественные споры, обладает полномочиями назначать уголовное наказание — вплоть до 24 месяцев тюремного заключения за неуважение к суду, включая намеренный обман.

Такие слушания проходят по строгим протоколам, неизменным на протяжении последних трёх столетий: участники обязаны соблюдать формальный дресс-код, а барристеры выступают в церемониальных шёлковых мантиях и париках. Доверие к участникам процесса считается краеугольным камнем английской юстиции, а попытка ввести суд в заблуждение — тяжелейшим нарушением этих принципов.

В английском судопроизводстве признание лица лжецом и недобросовестным участником без проведения перекрёстного допроса — крайне редкое и исключительное явление. Судьи, как правило, проявляют максимальную осторожность и не делают столь жёстких выводов без личного заслушивания стороны и проверки достоверности её показаний. Поэтому тот факт, что английский суд пришёл к таким выводам в отсутствие перекрёстного допроса, свидетельствует о вопиющем и возмутительном характере поведения. Это означает, что представленные доказательства были столь вескими и однозначными, что не оставили суду иного выбора. В случае, если бы ложь была выявлена в ходе очного слушания, суд мог бы незамедлительно выдать ордер на арест прямо в зале суда и заключить ответчика под стражу до вынесения приговора. По мнению источника Rucriminal.info, Любошиц отделался лёгким испугом, учитывая характер заключения, сделанный судьями.

В 2024 году Борис Любошиц выкупил у А1, Альфа-Групп (структура Михаила Фридмана) права на преследование Георгия Беджамова — на тот момент эти права уже были проданы Александру Фаину. Данная сделка вызвала подозрения в попытке обхода санкционного режима. Английский суд отказался доверять как Фридману, так и Фаину, и тем более — самому Любошицу, который через своих адвокатов утверждал, что является состоятельным инвестором, готовым вложить свыше $20 млн в судебное преследование Беджамова. Суд признал такую версию неубедительной, вдобавок к судебным определениям об обмане суда.

Любошиц ранее уже фигурировал в корпоративном конфликте вокруг наследства Андрея Трубникова — активов компании Natura Siberica. В течение нескольких месяцев он занимал пост доверительного управляющего бизнесом. Тогда представители большинства наследников основателя компании обвиняли его и его структуру в попытке силового захвата управления. Сам Любошиц утверждал, что менеджмент отказывался предоставлять документы, необходимые для проведения аудита и due diligence. После его отстранения его юридическое агентство инициировало серию исков к юридическим лицам, связанным с Natura Siberica, однако все они были либо отклонены, либо оставлены без рассмотрения, что подтверждается данными арбитражных судов. Борис Любошиц также участвовал в организации продажи российского бизнеса немецкой OBI GmbH за символическую сумму в 1 евро.

После раскрытия обмана английского суда упоминания о Борисе Любошице начали исчезать со связанных с ним веб-сайтов. Веб-сайт его микрокомпании Сезар Консалтинг (https://sezarconsult.ru/) стал недоступен. Сайт компании, записанной на его сына — Аудит Групп (https://auditgr.ru/), пока остаётся доступным, но с него были удалены все упоминания о Любошице как об "основателе".



Архивные версии сайтов по-прежнему доступны:



- Сезар Консалтинг: https://web.archive.org/web/20250125030222/https://sezarconsult.ru/#b2618



- Аудит Групп: https://web.archive.org/web/20240502124541/https://www.auditgr.ru/



Также имя Любошица больше не отображается на сайте SOLOMON.help — организации, связанной с Федерацией еврейских общин России и поддерживаемой Михаилом Фридманом и структурами Альфа-Групп через благотворительный фонд поддержки еврейских традиций и культуры БФ «Соломон». Сайт SOLOMON.help сегодня открывается с фотографией Михаила Фридмана, ведущего акционера Альфа-Групп: https://solomon.help/. Ранее на этом же веб-сайте Борис Любошиц был указан как "Ментор" наряду с представителями Альфа-Групп, включая, например, Андрея Елинсона — до недавнего времени управляющего партнёра компании А1 Альфа-Групп, а ныне заявляющего себя как основателя "независимой" инвестиционной фирмы Inweasta с миллиардами долларов под управлением в Дубае.

Любошица можно увидеть в архивной версии сайта Solomon.help:



Борис Моисеевич Любошиц– краткая справка



Аудитор и предприниматель Борис Моисеевич Любошиц позиционирует себя как мотивационного спикера, общественного деятеля и гуру бизнеса. Любошиц, владелец микропредприятия "Сезар Консалтинг", называл себя основателем и председателем совета директоров компании "Аудит Груп", которую он представляет как одну из топ-10 крупнейших аудиторских групп и компаний в области налогового консалтинга.

В своих аккаунтах на Facebook и Instagram Борис Любошиц активно создает образ вовлеченного участника общественной и профессиональной жизни, периодически упоминая о своем участии в различных советах и комитетах — таких как "Экспертный Совет" Минфина РФ, "Совет по Инвестиционной Политике" при Торгово-промышленной палате, "Общественный Совет" Федерального казначейства и другие подобные структуры, членство в которых он указывает.

Любошиц также числится основателем онлайн-школы "ЭРА", где обещаются бесплатные уроки по математике, физике, информатике и экономике для школьников.

В интервью и на своих семинарах Любошиц часто рассуждает о "перфекционизме", "ценностях" и преодолении "внутренних барьеров". Он регулярно выступает как "лектор" и организатор "мастер-классов", где делится тем, что называет "опытом и знаниями", активно продвигая себя через социальные сети и участие в мероприятиях, в том числе в формате встреч в подмосковной синагоге Марьина Роща.

Информацию о своей деятельности и мотивационных инициативах Борис Любошиц публикует в социальных сетях: Instagram — https://www.instagram.com/borisliuboshits/, Facebook компании — https://www.facebook.com/AuditGr/.



Выдержки из решений суда



Key Findings on Dishonesty and Bad Faith

Ключевые выводы о лжи, лживости и злоупотреблении процессом



1. "The certificate was false in a very material, if not crucial, respect... Mr Lyuboshits and Mr Nurtdinov must have known that the certificate... could not be provided... I consider that this document was not honestly provided."

«Сертификат был ложным в очень существенном, если не критически важном аспекте... Господа Люборщиц и Нуртдинов должны были знать, что сертификат... не мог быть предоставлен... Я считаю, что этот документ был предоставлен с ложью.»

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024), [para 56]



2. "It is inconceivable that the bank did not tell them [Lyuboshits and Nurtdinov] that from the end of August it was not going to be possible [to transfer funds]."

«Немыслимо предположить, что банк не сообщил им [Люборщицу и Нуртдинову], что с конца августа переводы средств стали невозможны.»

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024), [para 42]



3. "Knowing as they did that the certificate had to be provided, and knowing... that RB’s stance meant that moneys could not be paid directly... they must have known that the certificate could not be provided."

«Зная, что сертификат необходимо предоставить, и зная, что позиция банка RB означала невозможность прямых переводов средств, они должны были понимать, что сертификат не может быть предоставлен без лжи.»

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024), [para 57]



4. "The certificate, and reliance on it thereafter as preserving the proceedings, is in my view conduct falling within the wide description of Lord Diplock [abuse of process]."

«Сертификат и дальнейшее полагание на него для сохранения производства, по моему мнению, подпадают под широкое определение злоупотребления процессом, основанного на лжи.»

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024), [para 64]



5. "The funders, who were the part of the team most closely connected with the exercise, knew that it could not be provided, and yet it was. That in my view is a clear abuse."

«Финансирующие лица, которые были тесно связаны с процессом, знали, что сертификат не может быть предоставлен, и тем не менее он был представлен — это, по моему мнению, явная ложь и злоупотребление.»

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024), [para 64]



6. "I therefore find that the certificate in this case was not a valid or effective certificate, or alternatively that its provision and reliance on it is an abuse of process."

«Я считаю, что сертификат в данном случае не был действительным или эффективным документом либо что его подача и полагание на него являются результатом лжи и злоупотребления процессом.»

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024), [para 67]



7. "Knowing as they did... they must either have told Mr Elliot of the difficulty (though I have not found that they actually did) or they deliberately withheld knowledge of the problem from Mr Elliot, making it impossible for him to certify truthfully."

«Зная все обстоятельства... они либо сообщили господину Эллиоту о проблеме (хотя я не установил, что это произошло), либо намеренно скрыли информацию, таким образом заставив его подписать ложный сертификат.»

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024), [para 57]



8. "Mr Nurtdinov himself has not apparently said anything about it. His silence is doubtless very significant."

«Господин Нуртдинов, по-видимому, ничего по этому поводу не сказал. Его молчание, безусловно, имеет большое значение.»

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024), [para 42]



9. "I have found that it was a certificate that was dishonest... The costs for the period since 31st August are directly attributable to that act of dishonesty... that is well ‘beyond the norm’ in terms of the test which has to be fulfilled for indemnity costs to be justified."

«Я установил, что сертификат был лживым... Расходы после 31 августа напрямую связаны с этим актом лжи... что значительно выходит за пределы нормы.»

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024) (Costs Judgment), [para 5]



10. "The evidence overall now demonstrates that that [Lyuboshits] was never likely to be [the true funder]... including some misleading statements about his interest in certain companies. I consider that this reflects a desire to hide something."

«Доказательства в целом показывают, что [Люборщиц] вряд ли был истинным спонсором... включая некоторые вводящие в заблуждение (лживые) заявления о его долях в некоторых компаниях. Я считаю, что это отражает стремление что-то скрыть.»

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024) (Costs Judgment), [para 7]



11. "Since Mr Lyuboshits came on the scene this litigation has been presented on a false basis of the wealth of Mr Lyuboshits."

«С момента появления господина Люборщица данное разбирательство строилось на ложной основе его якобы богатства.»

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024) (Costs Judgment), [para 8]



12. "Various statements have been made on the claimant’s behalf by her solicitors from time to time about the source of the security monies which turn out to be either untrue or half-truths."

«От имени истца её солиситорами делались различные заявления о происхождении обеспечительных средств, которые оказались либо ложными, либо полуправдой.»

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024) (Costs Judgment), [para 7]



13. "As I observed in my striking-out judgement, the falsity originated from someone who is closely associated with this litigation, someone who is said to be funding it and someone who benefits from the litigation, so it is appropriate that those acts, for these purposes, should be attributed to the claimant. She cannot distance herself from the costs certificate."





«Как я отметил в своём решении о прекращении дела, ложь исходила от лица, тесно связанного с этим процессом, которое, как утверждается, финансировало его и получало от него выгоду; поэтому правильно отнести эти действия к истцу. Она не может дистанцироваться от лживого сертификата о расходах.»

[2024] EWHC 2705 (Ch) (Mann J, 21 October 2024) (Costs Judgment), [para 5]









Арсений Дронов

Продолжение следует....

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

A man writing cheques he can’t cash

The ever-growing isolation of Shukhrat Ibragimov

Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev has proven himself a skilled diplomat – carefully balancing relations with Russia in the wake of its invasion of Ukraine, strengthening ties with China and maintaining a cooperative stance with the West. Yet this finely tuned diplomacy now risks being derailed by a single figure: Shukhrat Ibragimov.



Appointed CEO of Eurasian Resources Group in October with the Kazakh government’s backing, Ibragimov junior has quickly become a towering liability. His disastrous leadership and explosive allegations linking him to a Russian sanctions evasion scheme have severely damaged his credibility. His shocking professional track record has been just as damaging: from a flailing noodle business to a faltering e-sports company marred by allegations of corruption, Ibragimov has proven himself a serial failure.

The fallout is now casting a shadow over Tokayev’s government, raising serious questions about elevating such an untested and controversial figure. Within the four walls of the Akorda, the recriminations have already begun: Mukhamed and Kanysh Izbastin, nephews of President Tokayev and longstanding cheerleaders of Ibragimov, are at risk of exposure because of their links to Shukhrat. Timur Tokayev, the president’s son, has also raised eyebrows in government circles for championing Ibragimov as the man to take the helm at ERG.

Ibragimov now stands at a critical crossroads, confronting perhaps his toughest challenge yet. At the heart of this battle is a high-stakes push to gain full control of ERG by buying out his partners. According to government sources, a draft term sheet is in circulation to acquire the 40% stake held equally by the Chodiev and Mashkevitch families, with the group valued at over USD 5 billion. And what of the offer by James Cameron, former chairman of Petropavlosk, to snap up the whole company (including the government’s stake) for USD 5 billion? Are the sharks beginning to circle?

The initial whispers of disquiet about the Kazakh government’s handling of ERG and Ibragimov have risen to full screams inside the government and are understood to be driving a wedge between Tokayev and Ibragimov Junior – whose late father would no doubt be shuddering at his son’s naivety and ineptitude. Even a clumsy attempt to curry favour with the President’s son, Timur Tokayev – convincing him to pour millions into Ibragimov’s passion project, Alif Bank – has done little to salvage his credibility.

In a frantic effort to raise the funds needed to buy out his partners, Ibragimov has begging to major trading houses including Glencore, Trafigura and Mercuria. All have rebuffed him, however – as well as tycoons Lars Windhorst and Nat Rothschild – over his sanctions exposure. Even Shukhrat’s own family has withheld support. His mother, who holds the keys to the family fortune, refused to back him after he betrayed his older brother Dastan in a dramatic and unprecedented move to seize control of ERG. Now frozen out on all fronts, it seems Abel has taken his revenge on Cain.

Having been rebuffed by his own family, Ibragimov is now pursuing more dubious avenue. Sources say he’s turned to Khofiz Shakhidi, a longtime associate with deep ties to offshore finance and opaque, high-risk networks.

A longstanding fixer and associate, Shakhidi has built a reputation as a frontman controlling a network of companies registered in secretive offshore jurisdictions. His operations have come under scrutiny in various investigations, notably by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ).

As Ibragimov looks to solidify his control over ERG, it appears that Shakhidi may be called upon to reciprocate the financial backing. Shakhidi’s list of clients resembles a roll call of high-profile oligarchs, each more controversial than the last. Topping the list is Tamaz Somkishvili, a figure with alleged connections to the Russian criminal underworld. Known by the nickname Tamaz Tobolsky, he has a history of corporate and real estate dealings facilitated by Shakhidi. Somkhishvili is a founder of TS Holding, a company with interests in various sectors, including aviation. He also established TAM Management LLC, which operates within the premises of Tbilisi Aircraft Manufacturing (Tbilaviamsheni). Investigations have alleged that TAM Management and Tbilaviamsheni were involved in repairing Russian military aircrafts used in conflicts, including the invasion of Ukraine. Reports suggest that Tbilaviamsheni holds a 20% stake in the Russian company Sukhoi Sturmoviks, which specializes in the maintenance of Russian combat aircrafts.

Another potentially lucrative source of funds for Ibragimov is Vagit Alekperov, the former head of Lukoil, who is currently sanctioned due to war in Ukraine and his tight links to Putin. Pavel Novoselov and Pavel Sukharuchkin are Shakhidi’s business partners in his asset management company, Jefferson Trust in Hong Kong. Novoselov’s brother, Edouard, served as director in numerous companies owned by Shakhidi. The two Pavels have longstanding ties to Alekperov, having served as his representatives and proxies in various capacities.

The network further extends to Leonid Fedun, a co-founder of Lukoil and right-hand man of Alekperov. Shakhidi is a director of Fedun’s and his wife Marina’s company La Patula, which holds their family assets.

Kazakh sources indicate that Ibrqgimov Junior has turned to Mukhamedjan Turdakhunov for assistance, who for many years had been head of a major ENRC subsidiary - miner SSGPO JSC. In 2014, Kazakh mining holding company Sokolovka JSC was acquired by Shakhidi’s KS Holding Group and later sold to ENRC but before that, Shakhidi helped Turdakhunov carve out a coal asset, Priozyorniy Coal LLP and keep it all for himself in a Luxembourg entity Access Ventures S.A. It was later transferred to Access Resources Sarl, another Luxembourg company under Shakhidi’s control. Shukhrat’s brother is married to Turdakhunov’s daughter, so these financial matters can conveniently be discussed at a family dinner.

Turdakhunov is also a majority shareholder of a UK entity called Taborwood Holdings Limited which owns 62.5% of Kazakh company Rudny Cement Plant LLP. The other shareholder is Zaure Zaurbekova, ex CFO of ENRC who was implicated in a major scandal at SSGPO, which involved $100 million in inflated contracts awarded to companies secretly linked to her family. These contracts, associated with industrial “stripping” services, were allegedly overvalued, with work often done by SSGPO itself rather than the contractors. An investigative report revealed that these companies were originally owned by Zaurbekova’s son and brother and quickly transferred to nominees when scrutiny arose. The report also cited collusion between the SSGPO president and major ENRC shareholder…Alijan Ibragimov, indicating deeper conflicts of interest and lack of disclosure to regulators. It would be timely for Zaurbekova to return some favours.

All of this has disrupted the financial networks of Ibragimov and Shakhidi—particularly Swiss bank CBH, which has a controversial track record. CBH previously supported Shakhidi in various ventures, including by holding a stake in Alif Bank, reportedly on behalf of Timur Tokayev.

Ibragimov’s options are few and none of them good. But with Tokayev’s patience wearing thin, he now faces the very real risk of losing not just the president’s support, but his position at ERG entirely…

Source: www.rucriminal.info

The path of the main fixer

How "Aunt Galya and Uncle Valera" got the first deputy director of the FSB of the Russian Federation 

The VChK-OGPU Telegram channel and Rucriminal.info are starting to talk about the number one fixer at the FSB, Valery Bitayev, who is actually openly trading the highest-ranking security officials, including the first deputy director of the FSB of the Russian Federation.

Few can afford his services, for example, his main client, the oligarch Alisher Usmanov. The former military man (a graduate of the Frunze Academy, a participant in the war in Angola, was a fixer back under Serdyukov), official (headed the Volgograd Region representative office in Moscow) and businessman (holder of shares in the security forces) is preparing his replacement in the person of his son. And, despite the revelations, he remains at the center of corruption flows between people with money and people with power. Much has been said about Valery Bitayev's connections with the first deputy head of the FSB and at the same time the main contender for the post of director of the special service, Sergei Korolev. Including in the early posts of the VChK-OGPU. The "take-off" of the fixer coincided with the general's career growth: after they met (different sources say the period of Korolev's service in the Ministry of Defense), Bitayev got a mansion on the 2nd line of Serebryany Bor, where the neighborhood is only billionaires, security officials and their relatives at the level of heads of federal departments. A source of the VChK-OGPU said that the friendship between Bitayev and Korolev has long and deep "roots". Valery's wife Galina was the head of public catering in the Transcaucasian Military District back in the days of the USSR, where Sergei Korolev's father Boris served at the same time. Father and son often communicated with Galina, and warm, friendly relations developed. It was Galina who began inviting Sergei Korolev, who was rapidly climbing the career ladder, to family celebrations. At first, Korolev could not refuse "Aunt Galya", and then he developed a business relationship with her husband Valery. For example, one of Korolev's first visits to a closed event of Valery Bitaev was noteworthy. Valery celebrated a luxurious birthday at the Safisa banquet hall, where some of his clientele of that time were present. The most notable client was Telman Ismailov, who did not leave Korolev's side for almost the entire evening at Safisa...

 

Globally, large "arrivals" of funds and assets are synchronized with additions to the family of Sergei Korolev. Earlier, the VChK-OGPU published an investigation into the official wealth of the Chekist's family.

 

Thus, the eldest son of the FSB general Boris Korolev in 2014 became the owner of an apartment in the famous St. Petersburg residential complex "Smolny Park" (1st stage), located in the historical center of St. Petersburg. We are talking about house number 1 on Orlovskaya, the windows of which look out onto the Neva, and on the first floor between the entrances to the front doors there is a restaurant "Kontora". The cadastral value of elite housing with an area of ​​more than 140 square meters is more than 35 million rubles.

 

Literally the next day, Sergei Korolev's wife Marina became the owner of a non-residential premises of 140 square meters in house 51 on Tchaikovsky Street. The cadastral value of the property is more than 20 million rubles.

 

Around 2014, when Sergei Korolev had already settled into the FSB and headed the internal security service, Valery Bitaev was dismissed from the post of representative of the Volgograd region in Moscow. But despite this, his fortune continued to grow. Like mushrooms after rain, the Bitayev family began to acquire expensive cars, real estate, and later assets disproportionate to their status fell into his hands - shares in various companies.

 

We are not just talking about foreign cars, but about a whole fleet of Mercedes and Bentleys, which came with "gold" state registration plates of identical numbers and letters, as well as the EKX, AMR, MMM series, which have a value comparable to the prices of cars on the black market.

 

As the VChK-OGPU found out, after leaving the civil service, Valery Bitayev and his family members received salaries not only in the structures of oligarch Alisher Usmanov (USM and Metalloinvest paid tens of millions of rubles, according to leaks), but also in the companies of the son-in-law of Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov - Alexander Vinokurov. In particular, Valery Bitaev had official income from working at the Marathon Group company and from the pharmaceutical company Fort (since 2020, it has belonged to Rostec through the Natsimbio holding).

 

The real heyday of the Bitaev and Co empire was in 2017-2018. Bitaev personally became one of the founders of the Citadel holding, where he was a partner with the now deceased IT entrepreneur Anton Cherepennikov. The latter also worked with Alisher Usmanov, the holding was essentially assembled by him from SORM-Companies (operational search and investigation systems) and “earned” tens of billions from 2018 to 2021 against the backdrop of the entry into force of the “Yarovaya law”.

 

In the same 2018, Boris Korolev became the owner of a "dacha" in the Lesnaya Bukhta cottage village worth tens of millions of rubles, and his sister Anastasia Koroleva became the owner of a land plot of 35 "hundred square meters" in the elite cottage village near St. Petersburg on Zarechnaya Road. The dachas are hidden from the eyes of strangers by a 4-meter fence. This place was historically inhabited by FSB chief Alexander Bortnikov and his family.

 

At one time, property here belonged to Vladimir Putin's former colleague Sergei Smirnov, former Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov, former senator from the Leningrad Region Andrei Molchanov and others. The cadastral value of the plot is more than 27 million rubles. A house with an area of ​​757 square meters was built on the territory, which is clearly visible in the satellite photo. It also belongs to Sergei Korolev's daughter and has a cadastral value of more than 22 million rubles.

 

During this period, a large share in the family business of the odious former drug police officer Mikhail Kiiko was received by Valery Bitaev's wife Galina. As Vazhnye Istorii wrote, this event occurred against the background of a redistribution of the market and pressure from the FSB on the Morpia company, closely associated with the Krasnodar Marine Cargo Terminal Kavkaz, which was used for grain transshipment. After the fixer's wife joined the founders, the security forces ran out of questions for Kiiko, and Galina Bitaeva remained in business until 2020. After she ceased to be the owner of the share, the company changed its name and was liquidated in February 2025.

 

In 2019, Valery Bitayev was awarded the Order of Alexander Nevsky for his "services". The following were also honored that year: Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic, Inter RAO Chairman Boris Kovalchuk, businessman Boris Rotenberg and others. According to leaks, in March 2019, YUESEM Management LLC sent information to the tax authorities about Valery Bitayev's receipt of income in the amount of more than 24 million rubles. It is not known whether this was a one-time payment or income for a certain period.

 

The Queens did not lag behind in 2019. The daughter of a high-ranking security officer became the owner of an apartment in the Smolny Park residential complex (like her brother, only the 2nd stage) on Smolny Street. The apartment with an area of ​​135 square meters was registered to Anastasia Koroleva in 2019 and has a cadastral value of more than 36 million rubles.

 

In 2022, Valery Bitayev founded the Letona Jet company, organizing private flights two months after the start of the war. As sources of the VChK-OGPU said, the decision-maker himself told potential clients that the FSB leadership, politicians and businessmen use the services of his new company.

 

Another enterprise that has not yet been mentioned is ABI LLC. The Algorithm Business Invest company was founded in 2024 and owns NPO Akhtuba. The metallurgical production is based in the Volgograd Region, which Valery Bitayev previously represented in Moscow. With his arrival, the company showed revenue growth of more than 70% in 2024, amounting to more than 1.5 billion rubles.

Timofey Grishin

To be continued

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Путь главного решалы

Как «тетя Галя и дядя Валера» заполучили первого замдиректора ФСБ РФ

Телеграм-канал ВЧК-ОГПУ и Rucriminal.info начинают рассказывать о решале номер один при ФСБ Валерии Битаеве, который фактически в открытую ведет торговлю самыми высокопоставленными силовиками, включая первого замдиректора ФСБ РФ. Его услуги мало кому по карману, например, главный его клиент олигарх Алишер Усманов. Бывший военный (выпускник Академии Фрунзе, участник войны в Анголе, был решалой еще при Сердюкове), чиновник (возглавлял представительство Волгоградской области в Москве) и бизнесмен (держатель долей силовиков) готовит себе смену в лице сына. И, несмотря на разоблачения, остаётся в центре коррупционных потоков между людьми с деньгами и людьми с властью.



О связях Валерия Битаева с первым замглавы ФСБ и одновременно главным претендентом в кресло директора спецслужбы Сергеем Королевым, было сказано немало. В том числе в ранних постах ВЧК-ОГПУ. «Взлёт» решалы совпал с ростом по службе генерала: после их знакомства (разные источники называют период службы Королева в Минобороны) у Битаева появился особняк на 2-й линии Серебряного Бора, где по соседству только миллиардеры, силовики и их родственники уровня глав федеральных ведомств.

Источник ВЧК-ОГПУ, рассказал, что у дружбы Битаева и Королева давние и глубокие «корни». Жена Валерия Галина еще во времена СССР была заведующим общепитом в Закавказском военном округе, где одновременно служил отец Сергея Королева Борис. Отец и сын часто общались с Галиной, сложились теплые, дружеские отношения. Именно Галина в свое время стала приглашать на семейные торжества Сергея Королева, стремительно поднимавшегося по карьерной лестнице. Королев сначала не мог отказать «тете Гале», а потом у него сложились уже деловые отношения и с ее мужем Валерием. Примечателен был, например, один из первых визитов Королева на закрытое мероприятие Валерия Битаева. Валерий отмечал шикарное день рождение в доме торжеств «Сафиса», где присутствовала и часть его клиентуры того времени. Самым заметным клиентом был Тельман Исмаилов, который почти весь вечер в «Сафисе» не отходил от Королева….



Глобально, крупные «приходы» денежных средств и активов синхронизируются с пополнениями в семье Сергея Королева. Ранее ВЧК-ОГПУ публиковал расследование об официальных богатствах семьи чекиста.

Так, старший сын генерала ФСБ Борис Королев в 2014 году стал владельцем квартиры в известном питерском ЖК «Смольный парк» (1-я очередь), расположенном в историческом центре Санкт-Петербурга. Речь о доме номер 1 на Орловской, окна которого смотрят на Неву, а на первом этаже между входами в парадные находится ресторан «Контора». Кадастровая стоимость элитного жилья площадью более 140 квадратных метров составляет более 35 миллионов рублей.

Буквально на следующий день жена Сергея Королева Марина стала обладательницей нежилого помещения площадью 140 квадратных метров в доме 51 на улице Чайковского. Кадастровая стоимость объекта составляет более 20 миллионов рублей.

Примерно с 2014 года, когда Сергей Королев уже обжился в ФСБ и возглавил службу собственной безопасности, Валерий Битаев был сокращён с должности представителя Волгоградской области в Москве. Но несмотря на это, и его состояние продолжало расти. Как грибы после дождя, у семьи Битаевых стали появляться дорогие автомобили, недвижимость, а позднее в его руки попали несоизмеримые со статусом активы — доли в различных обществах.

Речь идёт не просто об иномарках, а о целом автопарке из «Мерседесов» и «Бентли», которые шли в комплекте с «золотыми» госномерами из одинаковых цифр и букв, а также серий ЕКХ, АМР, МММ, которые на чёрном рынке имеют стоимость сопоставимую с ценами на автомобили.

Как выяснил ВЧК-ОГПУ, Валерий Битаев и члены его семьи после увольнения с госслужбы получали зарплату не только в структурах олигарха Алишера Усманова (USM и Металлоинвест платили десятки миллионов рублей, согласно утечкам), но и в фирмах зятя министра иностранных дел Сергея Лаврова — Александра Винокурова. В частности, Валерий Битаев имел официальные доходы от работы в компании «Марафон Групп» и от фармацевтической компании «Форт» (с 2020 года принадлежит «Ростеху» через холдинг «Нацимбио»).

Настоящий расцвет империи Битаева и КО приходится на 2017-2018 годы. Битаев лично вошёл в учредители холдинга «Цитадель», где был партнёром с ныне покойным IT-предпринимателем Антоном Черепенниковым. Последний также работал с Алишером Усмановым, холдинг по сути был собран им из СОРМ-Компаний (систем оперативно-розыскных мероприятий) и «заработал» с 2018 по 2021 год десятки миллиардов на фоне вступления в силу «закона Яровой».

В том же 2018 году Борис Королев стал собственником «дачи» в КП Лесная Бухта стоимостью в десятки миллионов рублей, а его сестра Анастасия Королева стада владелицей земли площадью 35 «соток» в элитнейшем дачном посёлке под Питером на Заречной дороге. Дачи скрыты от глаз посторонних 4-х метровым забором. Это место исторически было заселено шефом ФСБ Александром Бортниковым и его семьей.

Когда-то тут владели имуществом бывший сослуживец Владимира Путина Сергей Смирнов, экс-министр обороны Анатолий Сердюков, бывший сенатор от Ленинградской области Андрей Молчанов и другие. Кадастровая стоимость участка составляет более 27 миллионов рублей. На территории возведён дом площадью 757 квадратных метров, который хорошо видно на фото со спутника. Он также принадлежит дочери Сергея Королева и имеет кадастровую стоимость более 22 миллионов рублей.

В этот период крупную долю в семейном бизнесе одиозного экс-наркополицейского Михаила Кийко получила жена Валерия Битаева Галина. Как писали «Важные истории», данное событие произошло на фоне передела рынка и прессинга со стороны ФСБ компании «Морпиа», тесно связанной с краснодарским «Морским грузовым терминалом «Кавказ», который использовался для перевалки зерна. После того, как в состав учредителей вошла супруга решалы, у силовиков закончились вопросы к Кийко, а Галина Битаева была в бизнесе вплоть до 2020 года. После того, как она перестала быть владелицей доли, фирма изменила название и в феврале 2025 года была ликвидирована.

В 2019 году Валерий Битаев за свои «заслуги» был удостоен стать кавалером ордена Александра Невского. В этом же году чести удостоились: президент Сербии Александр Вучич, председатель «Интер РАО» Борис Ковальчук, бизнесмен Борис Ротенбергом и другие. Согласно утечкам, в марте 2019 года ООО «ЮЭСЭМ Менеджмент» направило в налоговую информацию о получении Валерием Битаевым дохода в размере более 24 миллионов рублей. Была ли эта разовая выплата или это доход за какой-то определённый период не известно.

Не отстали в 2019 году и Королевы. Дочь высокопоставленного чекиста стала обладательницей квартиры в ЖК «Смольный парк» (как у брата, только 2-я очередь) на улице Смольного. Апартаменты площадью 135 «квадратов» были зарегистрированы на Анастасию Королёву в 2019 году и имеют кадастровую стоимость более 36 миллионов рублей.

В 2022 году Валерий Битаев учредил фирму «Летона Джет», организовав спустя два месяца после начала войны частные рейсы. Как рассказывали источники ВЧК-ОГПУ, сам решала рассказывал потенциальным клиентам, что услугами его новой фирмы пользуется руководство ФСБ, политики и бизнесмены.

Другое предприятие, о котором ещё не упоминалось — это ООО «АБИ». Компания «Алгоритм бизнес инвест» была учреждена в 2024 году и владеет НПО «Ахтуба». Металлургическое производство базируется в Волгоградской области, которую Валерий Битаев ранее представлял в Москве. С его приходом предприятие в 2024 году показало рост выручки более чем на 70%, на сумму более 1,5 миллиардов рублей.

Тимофей Гришин

Продолжение следует

Источник: www.rucriminal.info

How one governor fed Sobchak and Simonyan

And Vorobyov was not allowed to punish the Agalarovs

As it turned out, initially the militants who attacked Crocus chose as their target the places between Crocus City Hall, Mega Belaya Dacha, the Moscow trade and fair complex in Lyublino, Red Square, and the synagogue on Chistye Prudy.

The choice was made on the first option based on the results of the reconnaissance. In particular, due to the fact that there were almost no security measures there. According to a source from the VChK-OGPU Telegram channel and Rucriminal.info, the head of the Moscow region Andrei Vorobyov wanted to "set all the dogs loose" on the owners of Crocus, Araz and Emin Agalarov. By that time, everything was literally falling apart for Vorobyov in the Moscow region, he was threatened with resignation, and then such a blow - Crocus was located on the territory of the Moscow region. And in many ways, what happened happened because the Agalarovs did not organize even minimal security for Crocus. However, Vorobyov unexpectedly received the command to "stop" from the Kremlin. They say that the attack on Crocus was a federal terrorist act and it was the federal authorities who would determine the culprits. The Agalarovs were not among the latter.



As for Vorobyov, he launched a stormy PR campaign as a "lifeline", praising himself and non-existent achievements in the Moscow region. For this, the right contractors were chosen - Alisa Simonyan - Margarita Simonyan's sister and Ksenia Sobchak, for whom the Presidential Administration was in love at that time and gave the go-ahead to conclude contracts with Ksenia that were beneficial to her.

As reported by the VChK-OGPU, Vorobyov's team conducts financial relations with Sobchak through the State Autonomous Institution "Content Center" - this structure manages all purchases of the Moscow Region in terms of PR. Pr0438em, everything is being processed without the required competitions.



As a result, a contract for 20 million rubles was signed with Sobchak through the State Autonomous Institution "Content Center" in 2024. This is how this very project "about the history of park culture" appeared, which tells only about the parks of the Moscow region (of course, they are the best in the world). This direction is supervised by the Deputy Chairman of the Government of the Moscow Region Vyacheslav Dukhin (former CEO of TV channel 360), he also personally communicates with Sobchak.



Since Vorobyov was not removed, the path to buying Sobchak seemed right to the authorities of the Moscow region. Sobchak was then to shoot the film "They Teach at School" about the fact that the Moscow region has the best schools, which are not inferior to the most expensive fee-based and British ones. New contracts and cooperation with Sobchak continued in 2025. And it is not only the Moscow region that provides her with such a cash flow. Here it is enough to pay the salaries of the journalists of "Beware, Media", and to buy more expensive Italian marble for an apartment worth 1 billion rubles. According to the post of the Cheka-OGPU, Andrei Vorobyov and the budget of the Moscow region act as "cash cows" not only for Ksenia Sobchak and her "Beware, Media", but also for the family of Margarita Simonyan. As the Cheka-OGPU found out, Margarita's sister Alisa is the main contractor of Vorobyov and the Moscow region government for PR work in Telegram. In general, Alisa Simonyan's modest individual entrepreneur ("the best PR person in the country" according to Margarita) has contracts worth about 100 million rubles per year. The contract amounts also include complete loyalty on the part of Margarita Simonyan and the resources she manages. And in the case of Vorobyov, everything is resolved in a neighborly manner. The main channel of the Moscow region "360" is located in the building of MIA "Russia Today", next to RT and radio "Sputnik" (owned by RT). And the former general director of "360" Vyacheslav Dukhin is now the deputy chairman of the government of the Moscow region, who oversees all the work on the positive image of Vorobyov and the Moscow region.

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucrimianl.info

Как один губернатор Собчак и Симоньян прокормил

А наказать Агаларовых Воробьеву не дали



Как выяснилось, изначально боевики, напавшие на Крокус, выбирали в качестве объекта атаки места между «Крокус Сити Холл», «Мега Белая Дача», торгово-ярмарочный комплексом «Москва» в Люблино, Красной площадью, синагогой на Чистых прудах.

Выбор остановили на первом варианте по итогам проведенной разведки. В частности, из-за того, что там почти не было никаких мер безопасности. По словам источника телеграм-канала ВЧК-ОГПУ и Rucriminal.info глава Подмосковья Андрей Воробьев хотел «спустить всех собак» на владельцев «Крокуса» Араза и Эмина Агаларовых. К тому момент у Воробьева в Подмосковье буквально все сыпалось, грозила отставка, а тут такой удар- «Крокус» находился на территории Подмосковья. И во много случившиеся произошло из-за того, что Агаларовы не организовали даже минимальную безопасность «Крокуса». Однако, неожиданно Воробьев получил команду «стоп» из Кремля. Мол, нападение на Крокус федеральный теракт и именно федеральные власти определят виноватых. Среди последних Агаларовых не оказалось.



Что касается Воробьева, то он в качестве «спасательного круга» развернул бурную PR-кампанию, восхваляющую его самого и несуществующие достижения в Подмосковья. Для этого были выбраны правильные подрядчики- Алиса Симоньян- родная сестра Маргариты Симоньян и Ксения Собчак, к который тот момент воспылала любовью Администрация президента и дала отмашку заключать с Ксений выгодные ей контракты.


Как сообщал ВЧК-ОГПУ, команда Воробьева ведет финансовые взаимоотношения с Собчак через ГАУ «контент-центр» - эта структура , которая управляет всеми закупками Мособласти в части пиара. Пр0438ем, все оформляется без положенных конкурсов.



В результате через ГАУ «Контент-Центр» с Собчак в 2024 году был заключен договор на 20 млн рублей. Так и появился этот самый проект «об истории парковой культуры», который рассказывает только о парках Подмосковья (конечно же, они самые лучшие в мире). Курирует это направление заместитель председателя правительства Московской области Вячеслав Духин (бывший гендиректор телеканала 360), он же лично общается с Собчак.

Поскольку Воробьева не сняли, то путь по покупке Собчак показался властям Подмосковья правильным. Следом Собчак был снять фильм «Учат в школе» о том, что в Подмосковье лучшие школы, которые не уступаю самым дорогим платным и британским. Новые договора и сотрудничество с Собчак продолжилось и в 2025 году. И таким денежным потоком ее обеспечивает не только Подмосковье. Тут и на зарплаты журналистам «Осторожно, медиа» хватит, и чтобы итальянский мрамор подороже взять для квартиры за 1 млрд рублей



Согласно посту ВЧК-ОГПУ, Андрей Воробьев и бюджет Подмосковья выступают «дойными коровами» не только для Ксении Собчак и ее «Осторожно Медиа», но и для семейства Маргариты Симоньян. Как выяснил ВЧК-ОГПУ, сестре Маргариты Алиса является главным подрядчиком Воробьева и правительства МО по PR-работе в Телеграм. Вообще, скромный ИП Алисы Симоньян («лучший пиарщик страны» по версии Маргариты) в год имеет контрактов на сумму около 100 млн рублей. В суммы контрактов входит и полная лояльность со стороны Маргариты Симоньян и руководимой ей ресурсов. А в случае с Воробьевым все решается по-соседски. Главный канал Подмосковья «360» находится в здании МИА «Россия Сегодня№, рядом с RT и радио «Спутник» (принадлежит RT). А бывший гендиректор «360» Вячеслав Духин сейчас заместитель председателя правительства Московской области, который и курирует всю работу по позитивному облику Воробьева и Подмосковья.

Тимофей Гришин

Источник: www.rucrimianl.info

"Lawmakers" - Popov and Govyadin

"We earned 2 billion rubles with the Pokrovsky OPS alone”



Finally, a period has been put in the case of the Pokrovsky Concern OPS and their raider stories. More precisely, not even a period, but an ellipsis. After all, the case on the conversion of property illegally obtained by an organized criminal group to state revenue has been hanging in the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation since November 2024, and despite all the deadlines, it will most likely not be considered in May, and all this is not without reason, "the Pokrovskys" and friends are working.

Despite the fact that on October 8, 2024, the Preobrazhensky District Court of Moscow sentenced five active members of the "Pokrovskies", the faces are quite interesting, but their sentence is more interesting, having analyzed it, it becomes clear that not everyone is in the dock, and now we are talking not only about the leaders of the criminal group "Pokrovskies" Korovaika and Chebanov, but also other interesting people, including employees of investigative and judicial bodies, who should also have been held accountable for participating in an organized criminal group.

More about this, all the information from the sentence, which for some reason was "classified", but at least all free "Pokrovskies" are already familiar with it, and even take measures, destroy evidence, hide, generally prepare to obstruct justice. The sentence is also at the disposal of the VChK-OGPU tedegram channel and Rucriminal.info.

Now about the sentence that convicted Khachaturov G.A. (fully admitted guilt), Brazhnikov V.G., Voynalovich A.V., Glazyrin A.S. (after the verdict, he began to cooperate in another criminal case), Rodionov G.A. (fully admitted guilt).

The investigative bodies and the court established that each of them committed extortion, under the threat of violence by an organized group in order to obtain property on an especially large scale.

Further, according to the verdict, “Identified person No. 1”, “Identified person No. 2” and “Identified person No. 3” are often indicated. Let us risk assuming, and most likely this is so, that person No. 1 is Korovaika Andrey, person No. 2 is Chebanov Arkady (they are the leaders of the OPS “Pokrovsky” and are wanted), person No. 3 is Sergey Echkalov. The last retired FSB colonel, an active member of the group, the trial against him is currently taking place in the same Preobrazhensky District Court.



All the above-mentioned persons, and those who will be listed below, entered into a criminal conspiracy among themselves, developing plans for hostile takeovers of other enterprises. The members of the group gathered in the business center "League of Nations" (Rostov-on-Don), owned by "Pokrovsky".



Structural unit No. 1 included Echkalov S.N., Glazyrin A.S., Rodionov G.A., including law enforcement officers, structural unit No. 2 included lawyers Khachaturov G.A., who pleaded guilty, Voynalovich A.V., and Brazhnikov V.G., and other unidentified persons.

The leaders of the organized crime group, Khachaturov, Echkalov, as the heads of their structural divisions, for the vital activity of the criminal group, ensured interaction with unidentified members of the group - law enforcement officers.

At the same time, the activities of these "unidentified" persons are described in sufficient detail in the verdict, and they remain unidentified for the average person, and the persons investigating this criminal case, well, and these persons themselves, are aware that they have been known about them since last year, and they were given time to prepare, cover their tracks, or hide. They were not brought to justice, despite the sincere testimony of active members of the gang, they were not allocated to separate proceedings, the persons were "not identified", which suggests that either in this part the verdict is pure fiction, or it was necessary, for someone.

Meanwhile, it has been established that these members of the group from among the law enforcement officers took part in the proceedings based on the materials of the inspections and criminal cases initiated by the members of the criminal group, that is, the "Pokrovskys", at the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings, performed actions or gave, by virtue of their official position, instructions on their production to other employees, who may not have assumed that they were nominally being used by members of the criminal group in the implementation of their criminal intent, but today, they probably already realize this, and it would be reasonable for them to contact the relevant authorities.

The verdict describes several episodes of the criminal activity of the "Pokrovskys", fortunately for some, the criminal actions of the group were not brought to a logical conclusion, so far, that is, people are safe, the business was somehow preserved. For those who are interested, we are talking about ZAO MAYAK, AK Kushchevsky, SZAO SKVO, OOO OPKh Slava-Kubani, Kasyanenko A.V., Kasyanenko E.V.



Despite the verdict of the Preobrazhensky District Court, despite the fact that the law enforcement system knew everything in advance, since Khachaturov, Rodionov, and a number of witnesses informed the employees and the court in advance of the entire raiding scheme that was implemented.

Raidersk seizure of property valued at 4-5 billion rubles, according to a scheme and scenario that was developed and 90% implemented by the organized crime group "Concern Pokrovsky", and their project was completed by fixers Oleg Popov and Sergey Govyadina, who have earned more than 2 billion rubles on this so far.

Thus, based on a knowingly false statement, controlled by the criminal group, Isyuk A.G., a criminal case was opened in the police department No. 2 of the investigative department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for Rostov-on-Don. Based on his statement, a number of people were brought to criminal responsibility, including the then general director of OOO OPKh "Slava Kubani" Strishnaya N.I., the footage of her detention and how she was carried out of the house was seen by the whole country, by the way, these footage were personally filmed by Echkalov, who knew that on that day, early in the morning, there would be such an event. Strishnyaya was then detained, and within the walls of the pretrial detention center, through persons controlled by the group, she was persuaded to give up the property in favor of the "Pokrovskys".

Fortunately for Strishnyaya, everything then ended well, the criminal case on the statement of Isyuk was dismissed, he himself was convicted of knowingly false denunciation, falsification. Not a single employee of the law enforcement or judicial system was punished. Neither those who accepted such a false statement and initiated the case, nor the judge who took Strishnyaya into custody.

Despite the fact that the leaders of the organized crime group "Concern Pokrovsky" Korovaika and Chebanov are wanted, many of the group were detained, some were convicted, the raider seizure of the assets of the Slava Kubani LLC OPKh was carried out strictly according to the plan developed by the group members, which attracted our attention, which they outlined in their interrogations and is reflected in the verdict. The Kushchevsky District Court, Judge Korobkov, initiated the "Pokrovsky" group.

Below we will present excerpts from the verdict, so as not to be unfounded.

At the court hearing, the defendant Khachaturov G.A. admitted his guilt in the act, repented, and specified that the head of structural unit No. 2 of the organized group was Stolyarov V.G. (who was also given the opportunity to move to the EU, is wanted).

Khachaturov explained the scheme of corporate raids established by the Pokrovsky Concern, according to which the Pokrovskys eliminated the owners and managers of agricultural enterprises by initiating falsified criminal cases, in which the applicants were controlled by the Pokrovskys, in particular Averkov G.V., Isyuk A.G., Kasyanenko A.V., Doroshenko S.B., Zakharov (Gordik) N.M., Kholmovoy S.B. In relation to persons who owned assets that they tried to seize, the Pokrovskys were presented in the media in a negative light, which created conditions for acquiring assets at a reduced cost. After the implementation of this stage, the concern acquired the rights of claim, initiated bankruptcy, appointed a bankruptcy trustee under its control and received the property. Khachaturov specified that the organized group, led by Korovaiko A.V. and Chebanov A.O., included four structural divisions:

The security unit (as well as the applicants), headed by Echkalov S.N., included: Rodionov G.A., Glazyrin A.S., as well as other persons (including Averkov G.V., Bobritsky I.V., Bliznyuk F., Otvagin, Karpenko A.M., Platov, Cherednichenko, Isyuk A.G. Doroshenko S.B., Zakharov (Gordik) N.M., Kholmovoy S.B. (from whom they filed claims and applications, on the basis of which falsified criminal cases were initiated and they were not brought to justice).

The legal unit, headed by Stolyarov A.G., included: he (Khachaturov G.A.), Voynalovich A.V., Brazhnikov V.G., and also other persons (Lapach L.V., Tolstorebrova E.G., Golokhvostov A., Kuyumzhi K.I. -Laptev S.N., Kvasov R.V., (wanted) Tolstokonev A.N., Smirnov P., Arakelyan S.A., Salmin A.G., Kichiyan A.D., Kochergin P.V., Said R.H. and others.

Lawyer Voynalovich A.V. was part of the legal block, representing the interests of Isyuk A.G., the interests of Echkalov S.N. in the Investigative Committee. (And also represented the interests of Zakharov-Gordik N.M., in the Kushchevsky District Court, during the first stages of the raider takeover, Judge Korobkov).

Regarding the raider takeover of Slava Kubani LLC, he indicated that the idea of ​​taking over Slava Kubani LLC and initiating a criminal case came from Echkalov, who was the generator of all the ideas. Thus, Echkalov collected information, prepared a takeover project, then Stolyarov and Kashuba considered this project in their part, and then the idea of ​​​​the takeover was brought to Korovaiko A.V. and Chebanov A.O. Criminal cases were initiated by giving a bribe to an official. (Who is also not in the dock). Echkalov also had corrupt connections in the Kushchevsky Court, in which he personally supervised the consideration of claims and the issuance of positive decisions for the payment of a certain amount to certain persons. (These people are also not in the dock). Initiation of additional criminal cases against Strishney (later, they were also initiated against Tsepovyaz, as the owner of the assets) based on the statement of Zakharov/Gordik, Doroshenko, Kholmovoy, under Articles 159 and 163 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. (data criminal cases were initiated by investigator of the Investigative Committee of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation Novopashin A., these criminal cases are still in proceedings, more than 5 years. ) Korovaiko, Chebanov, Echkalov, Stolyarov, Kashuba decided to send lawyer Kvasov R., to the colony where Alekseev V.V., a member of the Tsapki gang, is serving his sentence, so that he could convince Alekseev to sign a confession in which Alekseev confessed to extortion and murder by the Tsapki gang, which allegedly included Strishnaya, Streltsov F.E. Alekseev agreed and demanded in exchange to transfer 10 million rubles, for his relatives to purchase apartments in Krasnodar to put from 20 to 50 thousand rubles into his account in the colony. The confession was prepared by Echkalov, the funds were gradually transferred to Alekseev's relatives. They also tried to contact other members of the Tsapkov gang through lawyers so that they would confirm Alekseev's appearance, but they refused to do so.

Khachaturov also noted that he never participated in civil suits of ZAO SKVO and OOO OPKh Slava Kubani; Stolyarov supervised civil and arbitration cases directly with his lawyers - Lapach, Tolstorebrova, Grishin. They prepared these suits on behalf of Doroshenko, Kholmovoy, Gordik - (now Zakharov), and on behalf of Kasyanenko Denis, Kasyanenko Lidiya.

All of the above is an excerpt from the testimony of one of the most active members of the organized group "Pokrovskie" Khachaturov Genrikh, which is also confirmed by the testimony of other witnesses and other members of the criminal group.



In particular, Rodionov Gennady admitted his guilt in the deed, repented, and explained that Korovaiko A.V. and Chebanov A.O., wanted to seize the lands of agricultural enterprises, including the land assets of JSC Mayak, OOO OPKh Slava Kubani, AK Kushchevsky, ZAO SKVO and others.

The services of journalists who covered and discredited negative information regarding Strishney N.I., Tsepovyaz V.A. and OOO OPKh Slava Kubani, after which video stories were released on NTV, OTR, on the Internet and other media, the scripts for which were written by Echkalov, and Echkalov also wrote false testimony for Isyuk, Doroshenko, who predicted Strishney N.I., Tsepovyaz V.A. All this was done in order to paralyze the production activities of OOO OPKh Slava Kubani, then seize the harvest, property, and then lead it to bankruptcy.

Korovaiko and Chebanov failed to agree on the purchase and sale of assets of the enterprise OOO OPKh Slava Kubani, and then they decided to implement the bankruptcy procedure against OOO OPKh Slava Kubani through law enforcement agencies and court proceedings. Lawyers and attorneys of the Pokrovsky concern Kvasov, Lapach, Tolstokonev, Tolstorebrova, Kondybka and other persons, under the personal supervision of Stolyarov, prepared false statements from victims Gordik (Zakharov), Doroshenko, Kholmovoy and others, and submitted them to law enforcement agencies, also on behalf of the victims Gordik, Doroshenko, Kholmovoy, claims were filed in the Kushchevsky District Court and the Arbitration Court to seize the property of OOO OPKh Slava Kubani, as well as to collect money, material and moral damages. In 2019, lawyer Kvasov, on behalf of the Pokrovskys, was sent on a business trip to V. A. Tsepovyaz (to the colony).



A secret witness nicknamed "Alexey Pravdin", whose identity is kept secret, from which it follows that he worked in one of the organizations that was related to the security of the Pokrovsky Concern. The heads of the Pokrovsky Concern are A. V. Korovaiko and A. O. Chebanov, as well as the ex-wife of A. V. Korovaiko - I. V. Rukovishnikova - (until recently a member of the Federation Council of the Russian Federation). Chebanov O. A. (son of A. O. Chebanov) is also related to the management. He explained in detail about the number of structures, their composition and content.

This witness explained that the Pokrovskys often involved media lawyer Sergei Zhorin to participate in their projects.



The verdict also reflects the testimony of Laurier O.A., who conducted his journalistic investigation after he became interested in the topic regarding Judge Elena Khakhaleva, during which he established that this was lawyer Zhorin S.Zh., and also found out that this lawyer "defended" the interests of "grandmother Danko", who took away the lands of the Tsapki. At the same time, the journalist found out that there is an interest in this case of the "Pokrovskys", that Chebanov's wife held the position of a judge of the arbitration court and conducted cases in the interests of the "Pokrovskys".



Witness Karpenko A.M., a lawyer, explained that, from Echkalov's words, he knows that his interests in the Kushchevsky court will be represented by Zhorin S.V., who also represented the interests of Kasyanenko D.V.



The verdict also reflects the wiretapping of telephone conversations of the group members.

10/21/2020 Echkalov S.N. receives a call from Korobkov I.S. (judge of the Kushchevsky District Court of the Krasnodar Territory), says that he is waiting for people with a parcel from Yekalov, Yechkalov replies that they can bring it now. This judge made a number of fateful and partly illegal decisions ordered by the "Pokrovskies"

06.02.2020 Kholmovoy S.B. calls a man, ptells about the meeting at which Stolyarov was present, there was a conversation about money that is owed to Kholmovoy, without money he will not participate in their events, including filming reports. Kholmovoy is one of the controlled applicants.

The mobile phones of Chebanov O.A. were also examined, in the WhatsApp and Signal applications, there are correspondences indicating the activities under the projects "Slava" (as established - OOO "OPH. "Slava Kubani"), "Heirs" (as established - SZAO "SKVO") and others, expenses incurred with these projects, the approval of expenses by the Concern's management. There is also correspondence regarding the financing (of events aimed at the raider takeover of OOO OPKh Slava Kubani, while taking conspiracy measures, making transfers of funds through third parties (Davydov, Cherednichenko).

Also examined was the correspondence of Stolyarov A. with Chebanov O.A., indicating the involvement of the Concern's representatives in the raider takeover of OOO OPKh Slava Kubani, about active work with Alekseev V.V. - ("Vova Bespredel", member of the Tsapkov gang) held in a penal colony in the Republic of Mordovia with the aim of giving them testimony in the interests of the "Pokrovskys", about the involvement of the Pokrovsky Group of Companies in the raider takeover of OOO Agrokompleks Kushchevsky. Claim of Kholmovoy S.B. against the defendants in criminal case No. 11901600090000657, which is an element of the raider takeover of OOO OPKh Slava Kuban", on the financial support of the Pokrovsky concern for the lawyer of the witness Alekseev V.V., on the financial support of the Pokrovsky concern for Isyuk A.G.

During the search of the car used by the lawyer Voynalovich A.V., a large number of folders were seized, including a folder with documents related to the civil case (raiding) of Zakharov/Gordik N.M.

During the inspection of the details of telephone connections, the contacts of the defendants and witnesses were established: Echkalov S.N., with - Averkov G.V., Gordik N.M., Isyuk A.G., Karpenko, Kholmovogo, etc. Isyuk A.G., with - Voynalovich A.V., Galitsky A.Yu., Glazyrin A.S., Gordik N.M., Doroshenko V.I., Echkalov S.N., Isyuk N.V.

There is also an interrogation of witness Alekseev V.V. (sentenced to life imprisonment, member of the "tsapok" gang) from which it follows that Strishnaya N.I. was never a member of the gang and did not participate in committing crimes. During previous interrogations, he gave other testimony in the criminal case. Lawyer Kvasov R.V. convinced him to give testimony in exchange for help.

The verdict of the Preobrazhensky District Court is interesting for its abundance of information about a number of criminal schemes and plans that were allowed to come true, and are allowed to continue, and the proceeds are estimated in billions, will definitely benefit the "Pokrovskys" and their assistants, corruption. It is described in detail in the verdict on the fabrication of criminal cases, in which not a single employee was brought to justice. There are a huge number of interesting people in this sentence, the fixers Popov Oleg, Sergey Govyadina, ex-senator Rukavishnikova Irina who played an important role and there is reason to believe that they continue to help the "Pokrovskys" having serious resources in the security and judicial structures, in the highest offices. The law enforcement system, knowing about the criminal plans, about the criminals who remain at large and continue to faithfully serve the "Pokrovskys" give them the opportunity to obstruct justice, to continue raider takeovers.



Roman Trushkin

To be continued

Source: www.rucriminal.info